Energetic Forum  
Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Delicious Digg Reddit WordPress StumbleUpon Tumblr Translate Addthis Aaron Murakami YouTube REGISTER NOW*** 2018 ENERGY CONFERENCE ***


Monero XMR


Go Back   Energetic Forum > >
   

Renewable Energy Discussion on various alternative energy, renewable energy, & free energy technologies. Also any discussion about the environment, global warming, and other related topics are welcome here.

* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 05-22-2012, 06:57 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 4,633
Symmetric versus Asymmetric Electromagnetic Systems

Symmetric versus Asymmetric Electromagnetic Systems

I wanted to start this thread before I move on to disclose the type of motors and generators that took me to the paths of Radiant Energy in another Thread.
As they are based on Asymmetric Technology, I certainly believe it will help understand the concept better, avoiding future comparisons-conflicts between this two completely different systems.
It took me a while to put all this material together, it is back up by several tests with many different types of sizes and configuration Models that I have built over more than two decades. Plus all the research and developed work that goes back in our history to more than a Century ago...
I will keep this document as simple as possible, in order to be understood easier.
The main body of this document is written by me, and please forgive any misspellings or not to well redacted text, whenever I copy-paste paragraphs, I will insert a reference to a link at the bottom of this thread. I will try to maintain it as brief as possible.

The History

The Father of Magnetism, James Clerk Maxwell , gave Us an Incredible and great Dynamic Theory of Electromagnetism, his analysis extends to the deepest interactions basically from space , the Vortex Theory of Molecules. The Scientists of his time found his Theory very hard to accept not only because of its complexity, but the way he refers to as an Electromagnetic Field, something intangible and not simple to analyze ..."Maxwell's Theory becomes simple and intelligible only when you give up thinking in terms of mechanical models. Instead of thinking of mechanical objects as primary and electromagnetic stresses as secondary consequences, You must think of the Electromagnetic field as primary and mechanical forces as secondary..." (2)

At his final developments He derived into two main fields to calculate-study his Electromagnetic Theory:

1- The Symmetric Systems

2- The Asymmetric Systems

The Symmetrical Systems were the ones adopted by All EE (Electrical Engineering) Universities in the World since the fall of the 19th Century (1880-to late 1890's), right after the death of Maxwell in 1879, the Heaviside Vectorial Equations started to suffer a "Process of Symmetrization" by Nobel Prize Scientist Hendrik Lorentz , financed by J.P Morgan and Thomas A. Edison...
Asymmetrical Systems were completely disregarded from further teachings in any Technological Center or Universities of the related fields in the World.

Lt. Colonel Thomas Bearden writes:

"H. A. Lorentz was the man who was elicited to do the necessary "symmetrization" with ease, thereby accomplishing exactly what Morgan decreed to his own advisors that must be done: Get rid of those Tesla systems capable of taking and freely using EM energy from the active medium. H. A. Lorentz (with the "t") simply lifted and used what L. V. Lorenz (without the "t") had already done.

For the deliberate "fixing" of the already sharply curtailed Heaviside equations, see H. A. Lorentz, "La Théorie électromagnétique de Maxwell et son application aux corps mouvants," [The Electromagnetic Theory of Maxwell and its application to moving bodies], Arch. Néerl. Sci., Vol. 25, 1892, p. 363-552. [Also in H. A. Lorentz, Collected Papers, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, vol. 2, pp. 168-238, esp. p. 168.] This is the work that Lorentz cites later (in 1895) for his proof of the symmetrical regauging theorems (the two equations of symmetrical regauging).

This is the "symmetrization" (at the direction of J. P. Morgan) of the Heaviside equations that arbitrarily discarded all remaining asymmetrical Maxwellian systems – thus discarding all systems that receive excess EM energy freely from the "active medium" (active vacuum) and could use this free energy to power loads and themselves. With this "fix", Morgan was assured that Tesla’s discovery of the active medium – and that EM energy could be extracted from it – would never be taught.
(1)


All the Motors that we have access up to now are symmetrical.
Symmetrical Systems are Closed Systems that equals Zero in a "Balanced Equation" of Energy Conservation.
They balance by canceling and constant reverse electromagnetic interactions.(Motors Related)

The Main Concept

The Symmetry or Asymmetry does not necessarily relate to the Geometrical and Structural Disposition of any given Electromagnetic System Components, but to the way they Interact Internally or Externally with each others. Example: We could have a Three Pole Armature Motor, (very asymmetrical) and two stators, but still falling within the Symmetrical Systems Category.


The Asymmetric Systems are Open Systems, when applying them to Motor Structure Coils configured in a fashion as not to interconnect them as a whole "pack" in a serial or parallel circuit, but disposed Independently Connected by pairs or by Groups of Sequenced Pairs.
Asymmetric Systems expands to all Electric-Electromagnetic Systems that includes Transformers and Capacitors. A typical Asymmetrical transformer is the Tesla Core less Coil, and all derivations from different Inventors through decades, like Don Smith or Tariel Kapanadze models.

The Typical Symmetrical Motors we are familiar with and mostly used up to now in daily applications, is the Lap or Overlapped Winding, it applies to all PM Brushed Motors and also to Universal Motors, the only difference in the last one is that it uses a Stator as a winded coil or Field versus a PM, Permanent Magnet Stator. This type of winding connected in series all coils in the armature, overlapping between coils, it is also known as a "Short Circuit Motor"...

Depending on the design, two or four brushes-stators, the 360 degrees turn will be divided in Two or Four Sections, where sequences of coils change voltage and magnetic polarity as soon as it leaves a section. This cancels all external magnetic resonance or feedback of every coil, electron and flux collision galore generates undesired heat, therefore must of this machines require a fixed fan to the end of shaft. This is the "Symmetrical Obsolete Systems" we use everyday, from an Automobile window, windshield wiper, seats adjustments, Starter, Fan Blowers, etc,etc...all the way to Drills, handheld or AC, hair blowers, Air Conditioning Fans, Vacuum Cleaners, etc,etc...the list is endless.

An exception to the brushed motor ,also Symmetrical, would be the lately used BLDC Motor, (Brush Less Direct Current) which uses a DC Three Phase Square Wave, generated by Three Channels of Heavy Duty MOSFET's, since their windings could be only two types: Star (Y) or Delta. Both connect in series with each others.
However, this type of motors does not have yet the powerful starting torque like a Brushed motor. It could be achieved, but by heavy duty and expensive controlling-management circuitry, and not applicable in limited small space like a brushed motor could be installed. Lately is being used in EV and small Utility Recreational transport vehicles, like Golf Carts, Bikes, Scooters, etc.

It is understood that all AC Motors, by the nature of its type of sine wave that fluctuates between Negative-Positive every 50-60 Hertz/Second plus the type of windings they utilize, will be also included in the Symmetrical Closed Systems.

Symmetrical Systems explained by Tom Bearden...

"...It is that Lorentz symmetrical regauging of the equations -- and the ubiquitous use of the well-grounded closed current loop circuit containing both the external (transmission) circuit and load, and the basic source of potential (i.e., the generator) in it -- that is the problem. The closed current loop circuit physically enforces Lorentz symmetrical regauging, which in turn guarantees back emf (or mmf) is equal to forward emf in our EM circuits and systems. Hence it forces half of the free regauging energy (from the vacuum) appearing in the external circuit to be used for nothing but destroying the main source of potential (the main source of dipolarizing the circuitry). The other half of the energy is used to power the loads and losses in the external circuit. So less than half is used to power the load, while a full half is used to destroy the source dipolarity. To RESTORE the dipolarity requires that we then input at least as much as was used to destroy it. Hence we are forced always to input and pay more energy to restore the source dipolarity (that actually extracts the energy from the vacuum) than we get out there as power in the load. I.e., we always have COP<1.0 power systems, unless we ring in some normal natural observable energy from the environment as from a flowing river, blowing wind, solar radiation, etc.

"Such a closed current loop circuit and resulting EM system can never produce COP>1.0 from the vacuum, even though all the fields and potentials and energy appearing in the external circuit are extracted directly from the local vacuum by their associated source charges in that circuit, a priori. Simply look into the known polarization of the vacuum that occurs from the presence of any charge, and then examine what "asymmetry of opposite charges -- i.e., asymmetry of that dipolarization -- means. It means that the beast directly absorbs virtual energy from the seething vacuum, coherently integrates it into observable photon energy size, and re-emits the energy as real, observable EM energy emitted in all directions. We have previously shown the solution to that "source charge problem", taken directly from particle physics. We also showed the fundamental coherent integration mechanism that is able to consume positive entropy of the virtual state and produce negative entropy in the observable state..."
(3)


Must of Nikola Tesla original Patents of Motors Generators are based on Independent Pairs of Coils, creating "Dipoles", or Groups thereof (Several Dipoles), Independently Connected, open, not connected in series through all the circuit as a huge short...Then We have all other suppressed Motor-Generators technology not easily available and most of times not containing all the spec's to be reproduced...except that We build it ourselves.

The Asymmetrical Systems since they are open, they allow to create a series of exchange of Energy Reaction to our Inputs, based on Electromagnetic Resonance or Electromagnetic Feedback in every spin (on a Motor),or in every pulse of input in a Static Coil.
One of the first Asymmetrical Motor was Faraday's Unipolar Motor, later modified by Nikola Tesla.

Asymmetrical Systems does not violates the Energy Conservation Laws, since they are not part of them.

The Asymmetric Electromagnetic Systems expands all the way to Transformers, Capacitors, Inductors, however, my main purpose in this Thread is to focus in Electrodynamic Machines.

If someone is interested in reviewing a great article dedicated to Asymmetrical Coils, Transformers and Capacitors, I recommend Vladimir Utkin FREE ENERGY Article pdf that I found posted at the Don Smith Thread.


Thanks for reading it, and I hope it defines properly the two Systems differences.


My Regards to All

Ufopolitics







(1)Site:LRP:The Deliberate Curtailment of Nikola Tesla's Primary Energy Source - PESWiki
(2)http://www.clerkmaxwellfoundation.or...manArticle.pdf
(3)The Tom Bearden Website
__________________
 

Last edited by Ufopolitics; 05-22-2012 at 07:06 PM. Reason: correction
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Download SOLAR SECRETS by Peter Lindemann
Free - Get it now: Solar Secrets

  #2  
Old 05-22-2012, 10:02 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 4,633
Nikola Tesla Patent 390414

"It is obviously only necessary to utilize them in Pairs or Sets to operate one of my converters by extending the segments of the commutators belonging to each Pair of Coils and causing a collecting brush to bear on the continuous portion of each segment. In this way two or more circuits could be taken off from the generator, each including one or more Pairs or Sets of Coils, as may be desired..."

Nikola Tesla, October 2nd 1888, Patent# 390414, "A Dynamo Electric Machine"
Attached Images
File Type: jpg CROP_TESLA_PATENT_390414.jpg (355.2 KB, 219 views)
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-22-2012, 10:14 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 4,633
Nikola Tesla Patent 390414 Image

The Asymmetrical Electromagnetic Systems, disregarded -so far- by Science and EE, offer the advantages of exchanging components , (meaning using 'common' Coils for both) from Generator to Motor and viceversa...Like Tesla patented in this case, which is not the only one...
Physics states that a Motor is also a Generator, and a Generator is a Motor, however they can NOT perform "Both Duties" at the same time...of course not...IF We are referring to Symmetrical Electromagnetic Systems...but simply, that statement does NOT "Apply" to Asymmetrical Systems...

Below is an Image from same Patent 390414, where it is demonstrated the possible fusion between both machines...Motor (Exciter called by Tesla here) and Generator...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg TESLA_PATENT_FIG_2.jpg (514.8 KB, 387 views)
__________________
 

Last edited by Ufopolitics; 05-23-2012 at 12:30 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-22-2012, 11:41 PM
torpex's Avatar
torpex torpex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Spain
Posts: 117
Hello Ufo,

I'm glad this thread is already running.
We'll be here to reading and learning.

Thanks for sharing

__________________
Regards
http://Cacharreo.com.es/foro
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-23-2012, 12:56 AM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 4,633
Prior Art...

It should be obvious to anyone that a 1888 Tesla Patent constitutes a very solid "Prior Art", they are all Public Domain.
Prior Art is a Legal term, used as definitive Grounds for Denial of any similar or obviously modified to original prior art, Application to any Patent Office in the World of such content would be denied.
__________________
 

Last edited by Ufopolitics; 05-23-2012 at 11:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-23-2012, 02:02 AM
Bob Smith Bob Smith is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 773
Thanks UFO

UFO,
Thank you for freely sharing the fruits of your study and work. Very much appreciated by me and I'm sure, many others.
Qu’estés bien
Bob
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-23-2012, 11:42 AM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 4,633
A pleasure Bob

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Smith View Post
UFO,
Thank you for freely sharing the fruits of your study and work. Very much appreciated by me and I'm sure, many others.
Qu’estés bien
Bob
Hello Bob!

Thanks!

A pleasure to see you around here...and it is also my pleasure to get to the bottom of the truth...of why we do not have OU up to now...
In this thread is the basic and simple truth to answer that...

I have to really thank Tom Bearden for his great research that dates back thirty years when He was active and younger...now He is pretty old...and can barely walk...it is a shame, but we all have to go through the same biological process...one day or the other.

Warm regards my friend!


Ufopolitics
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-23-2012, 02:45 PM
madhatter's Avatar
madhatter madhatter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 457
very good information. Thank you for taking the time to post this.

symmetry keeps things in the box, wrapped up nicely and no room for questions. the balanced push-pull system = 0.

I was doing some more research and going over my notes last night on the transformer core that's comprised of capacitor plates. The unbalanced or asymetrical surface area and number of plates between polarities is most likely why I'm getting such a gain and why it also pulls so heavily from ground. It's trying to balance it-self but since the ground is at the load side it has to balance and match the load as well.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-23-2012, 03:28 PM
aaron5120 aaron5120 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 105
This thread certainly sets the basis for many of us to understand the theory about radiant energy. Thanks to UFOpolitics for posting the info in an organized manner.
Like many others here, I am learning......
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-23-2012, 04:29 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 4,633
Hello Madhatter

Quote:
Originally Posted by madhatter View Post
very good information. Thank you for taking the time to post this.

symmetry keeps things in the box, wrapped up nicely and no room for questions. the balanced push-pull system = 0.

I was doing some more research and going over my notes last night on the transformer core that's comprised of capacitor plates. The unbalanced or asymetrical surface area and number of plates between polarities is most likely why I'm getting such a gain and why it also pulls so heavily from ground. It's trying to balance it-self but since the ground is at the load side it has to balance and match the load as well.

Hello Madhatter,

Thanks, my pleasure.

Yes, the System incredibly tries to "Naturally Balance Itself"...incredible isn't it?

Bob French realized that when charging batteries with my set-up...
I have also noticed when adding higher loads...

Well after all it is a Natural Response from Nature...trying to Balance out our "Bait" sent out through our magnetic field.


Regards


Ufopolitics
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-23-2012, 04:32 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 4,633
Thanks Aaron

Quote:
Originally Posted by aaron5120 View Post
This thread certainly sets the basis for many of us to understand the theory about radiant energy. Thanks to UFOpolitics for posting the info in an organized manner.
Like many others here, I am learning......

Hello Aaron,

Yes, exactly, that was the reason I have created this thread...clear doubts to those who do not really understand RE..and also to keep a nice debate by comparing differences between both systems.

Regards and my pleasure


Ufopolitics
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #12  
Old 05-23-2012, 08:14 PM
MonsieurM's Avatar
MonsieurM MonsieurM is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 10,078
Send a message via MSN to MonsieurM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ufopolitics View Post
Hello Madhatter,

Thanks, my pleasure.

Yes, the System incredibly tries to "Naturally Balance Itself"...incredible isn't it?

Bob French realized that when charging batteries with my set-up...
I have also noticed when adding higher loads...

Well after all it is a Natural Response from Nature...trying to Balance out our "Bait" sent out through our magnetic field.


Regards


Ufopolitics
Thank you for this great thread and info Ufopolitics
__________________
Signs and symbols rule the world, not words nor laws.” -Confucius.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-23-2012, 10:44 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 4,633
Mercy Monsieur M.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MonsieurM View Post
Thank you for this great thread and info Ufopolitics
Hello Monsieur,

Come ces't vá, trés bien?
Ces't un plaisir Monsieur...

Mercy


Au revoir


Ufopolitics

PD: This is just the "beginning"...get ready
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-23-2012, 11:23 PM
MonsieurM's Avatar
MonsieurM MonsieurM is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 10,078
Send a message via MSN to MonsieurM
can't wait to see it roll

Bien ....Merci

Rodrigo y Gabriela - Diablo Rojo (HQ) - YouTube

__________________
Signs and symbols rule the world, not words nor laws.” -Confucius.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-24-2012, 02:17 PM
ZeropointEnergy's Avatar
ZeropointEnergy ZeropointEnergy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 176
New thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ufopolitics View Post
Hello Aaron,

Yes, exactly, that was the reason I have created this thread...clear doubts to those who do not really understand RE..and also to keep a nice debate by comparing differences between both systems.

Regards and my pleasure


Ufopolitics
Hey UFO,

Thanks for starting this post and sharing more of your knowledge and experience with us. Now on Asymmetrical systems (motors) and I can see this thead getting into electrogravitics and the charge seperation principles of an asymmetrical capacitor

I did ask a few questions I hope relates to the material here and did not recieve answers in the "My motors got me to tap into Radiant energy" thread. Will go read the earlier argument pages in the first thread in case I missed the answer already posted.

Well back to experimenting

Regards
Zero
__________________
 

Last edited by ZeropointEnergy; 05-25-2012 at 09:05 AM. Reason: error
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-26-2012, 01:47 PM
Bob Smith Bob Smith is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 773
Bearden Interview - Addresses Asymmetry

Here's a helpful interview with Bearden which addresses asymmetry, among other things:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wypYFe3JXdE
Have a good weekend everybody!
Bob
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-26-2012, 04:41 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 4,633
Great Video Bob Smith!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Smith View Post
Here's a helpful interview with Bearden which addresses asymmetry, among other things:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wypYFe3JXdE
Have a good weekend everybody!
Bob
Thanks for the video Bob!

I like Tom Bearden, He has defined and expressed so clearly about all the crippled sciences ...well, after all, it took Him over Thirty Years of his life to find out...

This part of this video I love...

Time>5:22 to 5:38

"WHERE YOU TURN SCIENCE INTO DOGMA IS WHEN YOU 'LOCK IN' ON A GIVEN MODEL, AND YOU "ASSUME" YOUR MODEL IS PERFECT...AND THEREFORE, ANYTHING THAT DOESN'T AGREE WITH THAT MODEL CAN NOT POSSIBLE EXIST IN NATURE...SEE, THAT'S WHEN SCIENCE BECOMES DOGMA..."

Tom Bearden


We have been ruled by a Dogmatic Science for One Hundred and Thirty Two Years...when they started the process of "SYMMETRIZATION OF OUR DESTRUCTION"...

The red lines are mine...

Warm Regards Bob

Ufopolitics
__________________
 

Last edited by Ufopolitics; 05-26-2012 at 04:49 PM. Reason: add
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-26-2012, 05:42 PM
vrand vrand is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 465
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ufopolitics View Post
Symmetric versus Asymmetric Electromagnetic Systems

I wanted to start this thread before I move on to disclose the type of motors and generators that took me to the paths of Radiant Energy in another Thread. [/url]
Hi UFO,
Looking forward to learning more on the motors and generators you used in your OU experiments.

Keep up the good work!

Cheers Mike
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-26-2012, 07:03 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 4,633
Hello Vrand

Quote:
Originally Posted by vrand View Post
Hi UFO,
Looking forward to learning more on the motors and generators you used in your OU experiments.

Keep up the good work!

Cheers Mike
Hey Mike,

Let's ALL first get to learn about the crippled Sciences THEY have thought ALL of Us across all Engineering Schools along the whole Planet for more than a HUNDRED YEARS...(132 Years to be more precise)...before We enter in a completely different World of new concepts...
I want ALL to get to the BOTTOM of where, when and How did it ever Happened...
I want to accuse, bring out, broadcast every where they "Applied" this crappy technology...this machines that all they do is Generate vasts amounts of Fire and Heat...and consume, devour every volt from every single battery or source you attach them to...Fire Burners...

I am spending hundreds of hours making the Animated videos about this Obsolete Technology we've been bound to...
From Toys we buy to our kids, that keep wearing batteries up after five minutes run...all the way to heavy machinery and tooling...passing through ALL Household and Industry Appliances-Equipment, that utilizes a Motor...no matter if it is BLDC, Brushed, Universal or whatever...still, their armatures rotate based on crashing electron flow, are shorted out...burning energy galore that never returns back, but to smoke and heat...

"The Conservation of Energy Self Destruction Laws"...Is the name they should have given to it...

Keeping the Thermodynamics at very high temperatures Laws, closed systems, crashing circuitry...inefficiency galore.

Now, before I release my work in full here....I want to open that Thread...but first, am gonna start a series of videos...showing my prototypes doing things this Crippled Sciences would never accept...and tease the Skeptics, the non-believers, the Pessimists, all the ones who use their "creative minds" but to criticize, to theorize and to minimize...Asking them to "Go ahead, debunk this!..it will be a great pleasure to do that...after all, I am rendering all my work for free here, right?...You and many here, know perfectly well I could have sold my soul to them, to Evil himself...and then We all will keep going with the old fire burners...the Stove Motors and Oven Generators of heat...

So, it would be Ok, if I "entertain myself" a bit ...Don't you think?


Regards and Cheers...


Life is only one, live it at full rate...


Ufopolitics
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-26-2012, 08:41 PM
Bob Smith Bob Smith is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 773
Bearden Asymmetry Quote

Hi UFO
Hope you don't mind me posting another quote from Bearden - something I posted elsewhere on this site a few years back, copied and pasted. I think it does further justice to what you're saying, and hopefully helps the conversation along --
Bob


Posted at this link: Non-grounded wire effect, New or Old Known?
I'm wondering if this thread points to the assymetry that is required to run EM systems without destroying the dipole. Here is a quote from Bearden that I posted in another forum, which illustrates what I'm saying:
RS


Maxwell's equations (Heaviside version) do indeed allow open EM systems freely receiving excess energy from their environment, and producing overunity. Such systems can (1) self-oscillate, (2) self-organize, and (3) power themselves while simultaneously powering a load.

There is no problem at all in extracting all the EM energy you wish from the
vacuum. Everything does that anyway! Our normal circuits only capture and
use about 10exp(-13) of the actual energy flow extracted from the vacuum by the source dipole. Heaviside pointed out that most of the energy was just
wasted in nondivergent form. Lorentz impatiently formulated a procedure that
just discards all that 10exp13 component, leaving only the 10exp(-13)
component. That tiny little remaining "diverged" (collected) fraction is what
drives our circuits. Lorentz also taught us the completely stupid (from a
power system viewpoint) procedure of symmetrically regauging Maxwell-Heaviside equations before we use them. In other words, he taught us to discard far more systems -- all those that asymmetrically self-regauge so as to retain a net force and be able to use that excess free energy in a load -- than he retained. Since then, all our engineers have dutifully -- like good little parrots -- applied those equations AFTER the Lorentz procedure has been invoked.

Free energy experimenters always expected a conspiracy somewhere. It actually was an innocent conspiracy originally. The old guys did it to ease the solution of the equations mathematically. It appears that one or two later realized what I speak of in this writeup. However, their controllers (the
financial end) in secret has had this kind of thing suppressed for decades.
Now you know the exact nature of the real conspiracy. It is innocent on the
part of the scientists for 99.9999% of the cases. It is not innocent at all
on the part of a very few powerful industrialists who know this and pass it
along.

Both the Russians (Moscow University) and the U.S. (Gabriel Kron for a
contractor in a Navy contract at Stanford University) made free energy devices
in the 1930s. The Russian work is fully documented in the hard Russian
physics literature and the French physics literature. The KGB/Communists
suppressed the Russian work at the beginning of WW II. I do not know what
happened in France to cause its abandonment. In the U.S., Kron's work was
never openly released on what he called his "negative resistor" which, when
connected to the Network Analyzer at Stanford, allowed the NA to be
disconnected from the generator because the negative resistor would power it.

See: http://users.navi.net/~rsc/physics/beard24.txt
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 05-26-2012, 10:20 PM
Bob Smith Bob Smith is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 773
Bearden Spells out How Equations were Changed, Why

Here, Bearden spells out what UFO stated and supported with Bearden's quotes, regarding the re-gauging of Maxwell's equations. Great stuff:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v...ture=endscreen
B
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #22  
Old 05-29-2012, 05:35 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 4,633
Hello to All,

Hello Bob Smith,

Thanks for all your great posts, and please keep bringing all Tom Bearden videos and text explanations, as they will help understand where the "crippling" applies...and how this Symmetry works.

The "scenario" is not simple, it took me years to finally join all data together and apply it to Electrodynamic Machines...even after I had my motors running perfect.
It has been a long study of all "Free Energy" and OU Motors-Generators that have been seized, including Tesla's Patents...to make "Final Conclusions"
The Symmetry is a "Methodology" that applies to all electromagnetic systems in general, Static and Dynamics...and if we do not understand the Basic Fundamentals, we will never understand their applications in the fields of Dynamics...
My Motors are also based on a "Methodology", they do not "Limit" to an specific model-platform, I have done from three poles armatures, two stators to Twenty Eight Poles and four stators...and more...so the thing is to "Get the Way" to build them in order to beat the Symmetry that we are all used to...

So, it will not do any good, that I just post here an specific model that I'd built, even a simple one...without understanding first Symmetry versus Asymmetry...I know it will bring confusion, like I had before...where I could not "see" the difference, but just a different model...and that will limit yourselves to keep developing further "Conversions" of different structure-architecture types...
I am putting together great videos with 3D Animations-CAD Graphics, that will make a much better understanding of the big differences between the Two Worlds.

Regards


Ufopolitics
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-29-2012, 06:51 PM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 4,633
Re-Gauging Equations...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Smith View Post
Here, Bearden spells out what UFO stated and supported with Bearden's quotes, regarding the re-gauging of Maxwell's equations. Great stuff:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v...ture=endscreen
B
Hello Bob, great post!!

Exactly that video resumes the "Mathematical Standpoint of Both Systems"...

A Symmetrical System is a Closed System, calculations occurs in an enclosed and easier environment that could be calculated using a couple of 2D Planes to calculate a 3D Volume, but NOT perfectly accurate. Lorentz benefit and accepted the Rigid Vectors and Tensors for calculations of the Symmetrical Model. Everyone accepted this as "making it much more simple" to calculate...

The Asymmetrical Model, including the Giant Electromagnetic Curve from Heaviside, is much more complicated since it is an Open System, it deals with a Real Three Dimensional Volume of Irregular area (and like T. Bearden says...also in a Four Dimensional Space) that expands into Space and it "adjusts" according to Resonance and Pulses Applied...and the ONLY WAY to calculate their volume is through High Level Algebra's, Integers with infinite ranges are the only way to calculate irregular 3D Areas...(That is where Bearden goes back in time and explain in those times it was a clever deal...but now, with all the Software-Hardware Tech, it could be done by a young Engineer Apprentice-Student...


Regards


Ufopolitics
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-30-2012, 12:41 AM
Bob Smith Bob Smith is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 773
Another Quote from Bearden to Explain Asymmetrical Issue

The following is from the correspondence of Colonel Tom Bearden, posted on his Cheniere.org website at:
http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/030110.htm

I'll post as much as I can of it below
Bob

In 1892, there were no electrical engineers at all, because it (electrical engineering) had not been born yet -- but technical engineers were now needed to design, build, work on, and maintain the new AC power systems etc. given us by Nikola Tesla. Maxwell was already dead (he died in 1879), and everyone hated quaternions. There were only about three dozen PHYSICISTS on earth who understood something of electrodynamics, and that was it. To provide the new Tesla AC power technology, which was to be taught in our universities and called "electrical engineering", Lorentz was preparing the equations for the mathematical model to be used. He was using Heaviside's original vector equations, which were still ASYMMETRIC and thus included asymmetric Maxwellian systems.

Tesla had discovered in the late 1880s and early 1890s how to build ASYMMETRIC systems which could take and use all the EM energy one wished, from the "active medium" (Tesla's term) and without consuming fuel. And Tesla was briefing technical societies to that effect. (See rigorous proof that Tesla could have given us free EM energy from the seething active medium: See T. W. Barrett, "Tesla's Nonlinear Oscillator-Shuttle-Circuit (OSC) Theory," Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, 16(1), 1991, p. 23-41. Barrett rigorously shows that EM expressed in quaternions allows shuttling and storage of potentials in circuits, and dissipation of the energy in those regions desired. The quaternion electrodynamics also allows additional EM functioning of a circuit that a conventional EM analysis using the symmetrized Heaviside-Lorentz vector equations cannot reveal. Barrett shows that Tesla's patented circuits did exactly this]

We also strongly note that Barrett is a very noted (though quiet) electrodynamicist and one of the cofounders of ultrawideband radar, along with Harmuth.

All this was known to the ruthless financier J. P. Morgan, still angry and smarting at his own backing of Edison and DC power systems being soundly defeated by Tesla's much more practical AC power systems. So he was already setting up the total suppression of Tesla, by first breaking his backer Westinghouse (which he did) and then deliberately breaking Tesla (which he did also).

Morgan had already had his technical advisors check the work of Tesla, and they found that Tesla's confounded "energy freely from the active medium" systems (asymmetric systems) were for real.

As a result, Morgan's tech advisors did a group analysis on the Heaviside equations and showed that the Heaviside equations were still ASYMMETRICAL -- and thus they still contained some of those confounded Tesla "free excess energy from the active medium" (i.e., asymmetric) systems. At Morgan's bidding, Lorentz was then elicited to eliminate those "free energy from the active medium" systems from this new-fangled electrical engineering that was being formed.

Lorentz was a great scientist, but he was also noted for stealing and publishing other scientists' work and taking credit for it. [For an expose, see J. D. Jackson and L. B. Okun, "Historical roots of gauge invariance," Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 73, July 2001, p. 663-680. Jackson and Okun discuss roots and history of gauge invariance, verify that Ludwig Lorenz (without the 't') first symmetrically regauged Maxwell's equations, although it has been misattributed to H. A. Lorentz (with the 't') as being first. This is an excellent coverage of the history of who did what and when, and who got credit for it. Lorentz stole work by Lorenz (without the "t") and published it as his own, and thereby ARBITRARILY SYMMETRIZED the resulting EE model and theory using the "Heaviside-Lorentz" modified SYMMETRICAL equations.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-30-2012, 12:44 AM
Bob Smith Bob Smith is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 773
Bearden Cont'd Bolded for Emphasis

Hence before the very birth of EE, the model and subject were already deliberately mutilated and crippled to prevent free energy from the vacuum systems -- i.e., such systems as now have been rigorously developed and demonstrated by Klimov et al. and validated by both the Los Alamos National Laboratory and the National Recoverable Energy Laboratory. The work of Klimov et al. is rigorously published in leading physics and nanocrystalline journals, and it is now accepted in both fields -- and INDEPENDENTLY verified by those two great national labs.

Therefore we never have to "prove" it again, as it has been scientifically and experimentally proven for all time.

But from its very birth, the severely crippled electrical engineering model has allowed only SELF-SYMMETRIZING EM systems to be conceived, built, deployed, and used by our electrical engineers.

This odd fact (this deliberate mutilation of energy "science and technology" in our standard electrical engineering, from its very birth) is totally responsible for the present world energy crisis! The very first requirement for total, quick, clean, cheap solving of the world energy crisis is the direct and intentional violation of standard electrical engineering!

Meanwhile, there are already very good and much better systems of electrodynamics available in physics, such as quaternion electrodynamics etc. -- and these allow conceiving, building, deploying and using ASYMMETRIC electrical power systems. In short, these FAR BETTER electromagnetic models do indeed allow "free energy from the seething virtual state vacuum", speaking in modern quantum terms. And rigorous proof has been shown by (1) Barrett, (2) Klimov et al., and (3) Nobelists Lee and Yang in their epochal discovery and proof of broken symmetry and its requirement that "something previously virtual becomes observable".

Any dipole -- the common dipole! -- is a proven broken symmetry, and hence it continually converts something previously virtual into something observable (which is part of the nature of a broken symmetry). Any dipole continually absorbs virtual photons from the vacuum, additively exciting above the quantum threshold, and then decaying its excitation by re-emitting real observable photons at a steady rate. Indeed, the so-called "static EM field" in electrical engineering -- and associated with every charge and dipole -- is actually a proven steady FREE emission of real, usable EM energy-from-the-vacuum, which continually creates and sustains the so-called "static" EM field. The field is not "static" at all, but is rather like a steady-state waterfall, seemingly fixed in form and intensity at each "point", but comprised of internal components in steady and continual motion.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-30-2012, 12:47 AM
Bob Smith Bob Smith is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 773
Bearden Cont'd 3

In addition to the beautiful work of Klimov et al., it is simple to "power an electrical load" without "furnishing the power" by the source dipole (in the generator or battery). All one need furnish is the ENERGY, and then the interaction between energy and moving charge provides the "power".

Here's how to do it (power loads and systems by "static voltage" only). Simply let the source dipolarity momentarily provide "STATIC" VOLTAGE and no current at all, to the external circuit attached to its terminals. Do this while temporarily "pinning" the free electrons in the conductors of the external circuit, so that (momentarily) they cannot flow as current. The "static" voltage, however, will flow down the external circuit at nearly light speed, and will "potentialize" the temporarily pinned free electrons. (There are known ways to do this pinning for up to a millisecond; switching in a microsecond is easily done). The product of the voltage potentializing the external circuit, multiplied by the number of coulombs of interacting "potentialized pinned electrons", gives the number of joules of EM energy now FREELY collected in the external circuit, without "drawing power" from the dipolar voltage source.

Then, with the external pinned circuit now potentialized, switch away the dipolar source furnishing the potentializing "static" voltage (electrostatic scalar potential). Note that NO POWER HAS BEEN DRAWN FROM THE ORIGINAL DIPOLAR VOLTAGE SOURCE, BUT LOTS OF EM ENERGY HAS BEEN RATHER FREELY DRAWN FROM IT. So the dipolar source itself is not depleted at all. All that is required so far is a tiny bit of "switching power" to operate the efficient switching.

Then with the external potentialized circuit still pinned, one "switches in" a resistor load in series with a diode, connecting across the "gap" in the ends of the external circuit, so that a NEW and COMPLETELY SEPARATE symmetrical system -- ALREADY POTENTIALIZED ALMOST TOTALLY FREELY -- results.

And then let the pinning expire in this now-completed potentialized system, so that the NEW symmetrical system THEN splits its freely collected potential energy in half, using half in the FORWARD EMF region to dissipate in the loads and losses when current moves, and thus powering the loads. The other half of the stored potential energy is dissipated in the BACK EMF region (across the series load resistor and diode) to destroy the system's dipolarization.

Then switch back to original configuration with external circuit again pinned. Re-potentialize again while pinning still exists, switch away the potentializing source dipole again, switch back in the resistive load and the dipole, and repeat the cycle again and again and again.

In short, potentialize the load circuit "statically", and "dissipate" the potential energy dynamically to power the loads, without the original dipolar source being in the "discharging/depotentializing" circuit during its "powering" operation.

In this way one can easily "power" a large load with a "voltage source" only, while obeying all the laws of physics and of nature and requiring the operator furnish only a tiny bit of "switching" energy. Even this can be made "free" by making the "switching unit" part of the overall load system in the original external circuit.

So we have used a deliberately ASYMMETRICAL system to freely potentialize the pinned electrons in the external circuit, in total violation to standard electrical engineering SYMMETRIC-ONLY usage. And then we have switched away the very small VOLTAGE source dipole, by reconstituting the open external circuit into a closed-circuit system that then DISSIPATES the collected energy to (1) power the loads and losses, and (2) kill its own dipolarity.

Any competent EE department or physics department can readily build and demonstrate this system, if they but put their minds to it.

And it means that, by MERELY CHANGING AND UPGRADING THE HORRIBLY MUTILATED AND ANTIQUE OLD SELF-SYMMETRIZING HEAVISIDE-LORENTZ SYMMETRIZED MODEL, TO A MUCH MORE MODERN DELIBERATELY-ASYMMETRIC OVERALL SYSTEM USAGE, one can solve the world energy crisis easily and forever. One easily cleans up the biosphere now, because there need be no coal burning, diesel fuel burning, etc. Our cars can be electric and powered by very small VOLTAGE sources ("batteries"), that need hardly furnish any CURRENT at all.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-30-2012, 12:49 AM
Bob Smith Bob Smith is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 773
Bearden - Last of 4

Incredibly, the "world energy crisis" is due totally to the continued usage of a horribly crippled and deliberately mutilated archaic old electrical engineering technology and model. It is readily solved by first adopting a much better (higher group symmetry) EE model, and upgrading for over a century of scientific ignorance on a scale that boggles the human imagination. And by deliberately building and operating "ASYMMETRIC" Maxwellian power systems.

Klimov et al. have already rigorously proven that real physical systems can be built that receive extra energy from the seething virtual state interaction, and output it as real, observable EM energy used to help power our circuits and systems and loads, with COP>1.0. No "second law of equilibrium thermodynamics" is violated, because the described systems are NONEQUILIBRIUM systems with respect to their ongoing interaction with the virtual state vacuum. Maxwell, you see, was also a thermodynamicist of some note at his time, and he already knew that the hoary old second law of EQUILIBRIUM thermodynamics was readily violated.

E.g., quoting Maxwell: "The truth of the second law is ' a statistical, not a mathematical, truth, for it depends on the fact that the bodies we deal with consist of millions of molecules' Hence the second law of thermodynamics is continually being violated, and that to a considerable extent, in any sufficiently small group of molecules belonging to a real body." [J. C. Maxwell, 'Tait's Thermodynamics II,' Nature 17, 278'280 (7 February 1878)].

These "free energy from the vacuum" systems do not violate the situation re "perpetual motion" because NEWTON'S FIRST LAW OF MOTION IS ACTUALLY THE LAW OF UNIVERSAL PERPETUAL MOTION! Simply read it and think. If I place an object into a state of motion or at rest, it will remain (perpetually and continually) in that state of motion indefinitely (forever), unless and until an external force comes along and interacts on the state of motion or rest, changing it.

Sadly, we have not even "understood" Newton's law of perpetual motion (his first law of motion) all these years since he advanced it!

So I would strongly challenge and urge New Scientist that what is urgently needed is the following:

(1) Realization that the world energy crisis is directly due to the terrible deficiencies in the standard EE model.
(2) Therefore, the SOLUTION is a PHYSICS problem, requiring the use of much better and more complete electrodynamics (such as quaternion electrodynamics, very close to Maxwell's original theory), and requiring the development and usage of ASYMMETRIC Maxwellian/Tesla power systems.
(3) If we wish to be honest and scientific, then we MUST CHANGE that horribly mutilated and crippled old Heaviside-Lorentz EE model, and recover those Tesla ASYMMETRIC systems that were casually eliminated by eliciting Lorentz to do the dirty work.
(4) Revise all electrical engineering texts, labs, and practices to incorporate the new higher group symmetry EM model to be used.
(5) Get some bright new youngsters and grad students trained and graduated with Doctorates in a NEW and MODERN electrical engineering that incorporates both (1) SYMMETRIC old standard self-destructive electrical power systems and (2) ASYMMETRIC new Maxwellian power systems that then can and will rapidly be built.

Very best wishes,

Thomas E. Bearden, U.S. Army (Retired)
MS, Nuclear Engineering
BS Mathematics with minor in electronic engineering
Graduate of the U.S. Army's MOS 1181 Staff Officer's Missile Engineering course (equivalent to MS in missile science).

In addendum:
And if you REALLY wish to jump physics forward a thousand years into the future, see the subject I call "precursor engineering" (on my website www.cheniere.org). This subject was discovered and known to P.A.M. Dirac by 1930, and results from the use of Dirac Sea vacuum tickling of any physical object or objects, or any physical process. In short, physics also was deliberately mutilated by arbitrarily tearing negative energy out of Dirac's theory in 1934, only a year after Dirac and Schrodinger were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize. Their astounding work made possible modern quantum physics.

By proper understanding of Dirac sea tickling of the vacuum processes creating and sustaining any physical object or process, one can very simply and easily (once the science is developed) directly change physical reality as one wishes. We explain the DIRAC PHYSICS mechanism that the little jellyfish Turritopsis nutricula started using circa 1990 to become immortal against death by ageing, as proven in leading world biology labs by direct observation. The adaptation started in the Caribbean, and the little immortal-against-death-by-ageing jellyfish has now spread through all the oceans of the world. Professor Kanzius (now deceased) also developed a brilliant watergas technology that also could fuel the world with H2 and O2 gas mix generated in a small container of Dirac-sea-vacuum-tickled water, then piping the mix out of the "tickled vacuum" area into the combustion chamber of an combustion engine, to cleanly burn and power the engine and its load. The only exhaust is pure water vapor, and this can be done for all our autos, trains, ships, aircraft, etc. if we but do it. Kanzius, however, did not know the actual PHYSICS mechanism he was using, but merely found how to apply it so that statistically the OH bond in the "tickled water" started "unhappening", freeing H and O to form H2 and O2 gas bubbles. The mix is not very explosive in the tickled water container, since there the OH bond can be achieved now only with great difficulty!

The same Kanzius tickling process, applied to cancer, is being used to cure cancer. It is being developed by a known and recognized cancer research institute. Phase One animal tests were spectacular! With terminal tumors implanted in the lab animals, all were cured by just "unhappening" the cancer by adding negative energy judiciously in that tickled cancer area. Again, biologists are desperately seeking some kind of cellular mechanism in cellular biology, but it is actually a PHYSICS process torn out of physics by the tearing out of negative energy from Dirac's theory in 1934, and changing all the textbooks accordingly.

Today, a strong team of physicists lead by Dan Solomon and his colleagues is moving rigorously to get negative energy added back into physics. Dan Solomon is Engineering Manager at Rauland-Borg Corporation. He and his colleagues have published very rigorous papers in leading physics journals showing that the arbitrary removal of negative energy from Dirac's theory was not by the use of the scientific method at all, but by the total violation of it.

So there are some remarkable physics, medical, and energy scientific works out there that greatly need your attention and discussion and investigation, in the name of science and to make it honest again.

And incidentally, to solve the present world energy crisis by rapid development of ASYMMETRIC electrodynamics electrical engineering systems, and also solve the world medical crisis by direct usage of Dirac sea vacuum pulsing/tickling to "unhappen" any disease or back physical condition, including old age itself. The Russians have long worked out lots of precursor engineering, but kept it rigidly confined to their deep black operations of their superweapon systems. However, some years ago they released the Scenar, a little automated handheld electrical gadget that actually uses Dirac Sea Vacuum Tickling to alleviate pain etc. and do a small amount of healing. Then about a year ago, they released the Scenar-Cosmodic, which also contains a SECOND Dirac sea vacuum tickling system that automatically detects and cures disease conditions as well.

These have now been released into standard medical practice by Soviet doctors, who are treating their patients with it and having very good curative results. A few European doctors have also obtained Scenar-Cosmodic units and are successfully treating medical patients with it.

Very best wishes,
Tom Bearden

Source: http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/030110.htm
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-31-2012, 02:44 AM
Bob Smith Bob Smith is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 773
Another Bearden Piece on Assymetry and Dipole Destruction

The quote below is taken from:
The Deliberate Discard of Asymmetric Maxwellian Systems, Thus Preventing COP>1.0
and Self-Powering Energy-from-the-Vacuum Systems
© T. E. Bearden and Leslie R. Pastor
21 June 2007
Article re-states much of what's above, and a little extra. Source:
http://www.cheniere.org/articles/Del...%20Discard.htm

“This has led to one of the greatest ironies in history: All the hydrocarbons ever burned, all the steam turbines that ever turned the shaft of a generator, all the rivers ever dammed, all the nuclear fuel rods ever consumed, all the windmills and waterwheels, all the solar cells, and all the chemistry in all the batteries ever produced, have not directly delivered a single watt into the external circuit’s load. All that incredible fuel consumption and energy extracted from the environment has only been used to continually restore the source dipole that our own closed current loop circuits are deliberately designed to destroy faster than the load is powered.” [Thomas E. Bearden, “Extracting and Using Electromagnetic Energy from the Active Vacuum,” Modern Nonlinear Optics, Part 2. Second Edition, Advances in Chemical Physics, Volume 119, Edited by Myron W. Evans. Series Editors I. Prigogine and Stuart A. Rice, John Wiley and Sons, 2001, p. 691-192].
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05-31-2012, 05:02 AM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 4,633
Great Bob!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Smith View Post
The quote below is taken from:
The Deliberate Discard of Asymmetric Maxwellian Systems, Thus Preventing COP>1.0
and Self-Powering Energy-from-the-Vacuum Systems
© T. E. Bearden and Leslie R. Pastor
21 June 2007
Article re-states much of what's above, and a little extra. Source:
http://www.cheniere.org/articles/Del...%20Discard.htm

“This has led to one of the greatest ironies in history: All the hydrocarbons ever burned, all the steam turbines that ever turned the shaft of a generator, all the rivers ever dammed, all the nuclear fuel rods ever consumed, all the windmills and waterwheels, all the solar cells, and all the chemistry in all the batteries ever produced, have not directly delivered a single watt into the external circuit’s load. All that incredible fuel consumption and energy extracted from the environment has only been used to continually restore the source dipole that our own closed current loop circuits are deliberately designed to destroy faster than the load is powered.” [Thomas E. Bearden, “Extracting and Using Electromagnetic Energy from the Active Vacuum,” Modern Nonlinear Optics, Part 2. Second Edition, Advances in Chemical Physics, Volume 119, Edited by Myron W. Evans. Series Editors I. Prigogine and Stuart A. Rice, John Wiley and Sons, 2001, p. 691-192].

Thanks Bob Smith!

All this great posts corroborates all my writings above...
Tom Bearden refers often to the "Dipole", some people do not understand that term...However the Dipole means the Open two wire or two terminals open-at least- in a minimum lapse of time...it could be from a Battery, from a Capacitor, from an Inductor...etc,etc.
In Electrodynamics is referred to any coil that configures the "Machine"...whether a Motor or a Generator, whether the Stator Fields or the Armature Coils...
In Symmetric Models there is absolutely Zero Time of the dipole to be open...and that is what they ever pursued ...a machine that do not leave any Open Coils or Dipoles at any time during rotation, but reverses instead of being open...just because in that particular Lapse of Time "Off", is when an Electromagnetic Resonance with the Vacuum takes place...an Electromagnetic Feedback that invokes Radiant Energy In...


Regards


Ufopolitics
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 06-03-2012, 01:55 AM
Ufopolitics's Avatar
Ufopolitics Ufopolitics is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: US, Florida
Posts: 4,633
The Symmetry Of Darkness

THE SYMMETRY OF DARKNESS - YouTube

Thanks for watching it!


Regards


Ufopolitics
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Please consider supporting Energetic Forum with a voluntary monthly subscription.

For One-Time Donations, use admin@ this domain > energeticforum.com

Choose your voluntary subscription

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v1.4.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
2007-2015 Copyright - Energetic Forum - All Rights Reserved

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

Tesla Chargers