Energetic Forum  
Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Delicious Digg Reddit WordPress StumbleUpon Tumblr Translate Addthis Aaron Murakami YouTube 2020 ENERGY CONFERENCE - PRE-REGISTER NOW!!!!

2020 Energy Science & Technology Conference
PRE-REGISTER NOW!!!
http://energyscienceconference.com


Go Back   Energetic Forum > >
   

Renewable Energy Discussion on various alternative energy, renewable energy, & free energy technologies. Also any discussion about the environment, global warming, and other related topics are welcome here.

* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #3871  
Old 07-07-2018, 07:17 PM
wantomake's Avatar
wantomake wantomake is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 905
Hello to All,
Today and tomorrow will be good cool weather and chance for me to get some generator building time.

I'm using 3/4" plywood as stators holding the coils in place. The plan is 5 coils on north side of the rotor (with 6 x 2" x 1/4" mags) plus 5 coils on south side. Total of ten coils. I think the plywood 2'x4'x3/4"was $16.88 each. I got 3 of them.

36752986_1994134713950690_6749382277773393920_n.jpg36832214_1994134727284022_1656998223883010048_n.jpg

The larger circles will be cut out to make it easier to install/remove coils. The smaller red circles is for something else. I will replace the wooden dowels I used with aluminum rods or bolts with the pvc spacers.

Still need to order another spool of magnetic wire for next coil.

More to come as money and life allows.
Dave, Is there any other way to stop the wabble of rotor without extra side rotors? I've not much room for them.
wantomake
__________________
 

Last edited by wantomake; 07-07-2018 at 07:22 PM.

Download SOLAR SECRETS by Peter Lindemann
Free - Get it now: Solar Secrets

  #3872  
Old 07-07-2018, 07:28 PM
wantomake's Avatar
wantomake wantomake is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 905
Not sure

Quote:
Originally Posted by kryszal05 View Post
Hi All,

I am also still in. Just have a busy period in work and didn't have really time to build anything. I am interested in small version as well, because could not afford for big one right now.
I know Dave doesn't like when people build from any scrap is on the hand, but maybe smaller version will forgive not best quality materials.

I have modified motor to Matt's specs so far and prepared OSB boards for generator's side walls.

We just need 18 guys more

Lukasz

EDIT: Sorry, I forgot to ask. This 8" rotor should be the outer rotor size or magnets centre?
Lukasz,
Does my last posted picture answer your question? Forgive me for not understanding your question. I'm a little thick in the head sometimes.

wantomake
__________________
 
  #3873  
Old 07-07-2018, 09:18 PM
Matthew Jones's Avatar
Matthew Jones Matthew Jones is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,741
Quote:
Originally Posted by i_ron View Post
Sorry Matt, I stepped over the line there. You have both referenced it and when David calls the present system obsolete I just thought it was a valid topic. It was on the forum around christmas time or the new year.

I know you like to keep everything secret whereas i am all for open source so a difference of opinion there for sure but no need to stop your valued posts.

I still think an off line working group would be the answer.

I have deleted the post... if you will delete the quote in your 3892 then it is gone

Ron
Its obsolete because with my knowledge of the 3 battery system, my motor, and now I can make a generator that accelerates self run. But its not stable and it not ready to share. Worst of all no one deserves to see it. No one has even tried to merry the whole thing up and make it run, except wanttomake. And if I was to guess, maybe wrong, he's out of money for the time being.

Fact is I am looking hard into solid state but its just theory and then I gotta wonder, Did DAVE tell this guy. Is this guy reading emails and listening to my phone calls. What the F*ck is going on. You pushed for the gen now you have it. I gave it to you the other day. Build the coils and be happy.

Until some things get built I am done with ya'll. No one on this forum is capable of being able to even replicate the stuff I am playing with. Then I am not even allowed to help with the outdated stuff cause no one builds it.

I wish you guys just try to get up to speed. This sh*t works I have no doubt.

Matt
__________________
ADD BROMIKEY TO YOUR IGNORE LIST He is a saboteur bent on the systematic distraction of every good topic on this forum and since he has been here most working threads have shut down. He is the enemy. If you have blocked him already add this to your signature and encourage others to block him as well. His onslaught of rambling in large text and his constant attempts to misinform at the excuse of being stupid should no longer be tolerated.

USER CP/Ignore list.

Last edited by Matthew Jones; 07-07-2018 at 11:42 PM.
  #3874  
Old 07-08-2018, 01:41 AM
wantomake's Avatar
wantomake wantomake is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 905
Nail head

You are right there Matt I'm low on funds. A person that was supporting this build just talked to me today. They want to sit down to see how they can start funding me again. They are preppers and want something if the lights go out. So do I.

But I still got some cutting done today on the stator boards.

wantomake
__________________
 

Last edited by wantomake; 07-08-2018 at 01:44 AM.
  #3875  
Old 07-08-2018, 03:33 AM
SkyWatcher's Avatar
SkyWatcher SkyWatcher is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,418
Hi all, just for fun and those that like the twilight zone.
Matt, you say "what the f*** is going on", I take it you are not aware yet, that reality is not what we were taught.
It is malleable, try to lighten up a bit, it's just a ride, albeit a realistic and persistent one.
Carry on.
peace love light
__________________
 
  #3876  
Old 07-08-2018, 04:32 PM
i_ron i_ron is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 206
OT

[QUOTE=Matthew Jones;311637
What the F*ck is going on.

Matt[/QUOTE]

Sometimes I can read between the lines with the best of them!

We are all connected.

But the world changes,

We have a cherry tree by the back door. Thirty years ago to step outside the hum of the bees was deafening. This year there were maybe as many as 6 cherries on the tree and not one bee. The ground was ankle deep in failed fruit stems.

Since Fukushima the whole Pacific ocean is dying

Since military weather manipulation California is toast.

Take Hawaii

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kLnL08-fRY

Is the end getting closer?

Perhaps we need to put aside our differences and share more that we had originally intended.

Take Care,

Ron
__________________
 
  #3877  
Old 07-08-2018, 06:33 PM
Matthew Jones's Avatar
Matthew Jones Matthew Jones is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,741
Ya that all sounds real glorious, the sharing stuff I mean, but that seems to only hold true until the bill comes due.

No one helps financially. Never.. Stuff starts hitting you for 30-40 grand a year that whole COMPLETE sharing thing seems pretty drab.

And besides when something not of use to me anymore I do share it, and still very few even try.

Matt
__________________
ADD BROMIKEY TO YOUR IGNORE LIST He is a saboteur bent on the systematic distraction of every good topic on this forum and since he has been here most working threads have shut down. He is the enemy. If you have blocked him already add this to your signature and encourage others to block him as well. His onslaught of rambling in large text and his constant attempts to misinform at the excuse of being stupid should no longer be tolerated.

USER CP/Ignore list.
  #3878  
Old 07-08-2018, 10:21 PM
i_ron i_ron is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 206
OT

This is a repost from Norman Wootan on EV Gray.

But it does suggest a solid state model.
-------------------------------------------------------

I think I can see what you have been trying to tell us but not really telling us about isolating the load from the supply, this is an old idea that we talked about in the 1950s, but it does work. Let me explain:

Let's say we have a coil with both leads going to the common terminals of 2 two-way changeover switches. From the load terminals of the two-way changeover switches let's say that we connect the applied voltage supply on the left side terminals, and we connect the load to the right side terminals.

So in effect our coil leads are connected to the common terminals of the 2 two-way changeover switches, and then the coil can be switched on to the left side terminals to the applied voltage supply, to get a pulse, and then switched to the right side terminals to the load, to put the resulting collapsing field spike into the load.

Every time we switch the changeover switches to isolate the coil from the supply voltage, we supply a voltage spike to the load and by doing it many times a second we have a useful OU output to the load.


Here is something from my notes that I came across while investigating more about collapsing field technology some years ago. I don't know the name of the author or owner of this document.


CFT- (Collapsing Field Technology) - Updated 2008

In electrical systems, the term "back emf" actually refers to the equal and opposite force field accompanying the "forward emf", in any "symmetrical" electrical system.
In magnetic systems, the corresponding term is "forward and back mmf", rather than "forward and back emf".


All rotating motors actually turn themselves from the broken symmetry that is created inside them. The present engineers have been trained that they must pay to put extra energy into the system, just to break its symmetry. That of course is totally false. Otherwise, a rotating electron (with its continual spin) would not spin.


In a normal motor, we are trained to put in a coil (say, there in the back mmf region) and then we pay to put in a sudden surge of EM energy to that coil, so that it momentarily overrides (cancels) the back mmf force. In short, we momentarily make the system asymmetrical, so that its net back mmf is less than its forward mmf.


That means that now the motor retains at least some of its excess acceleration and excess angular momentum added to the flywheel and shaft in its previous acceleration (forward mmf) zone, but we are "paying" (the electric power grid) to have this occur.


Anyway, once that broken symmetry between forward and back mmfs is there, with the back mmf deliberately reduced to less than the forward mmf, the motor will self-rotate because of its own system asymmetry.


The fact that this effect has for over one hundred years been viewed as a problem to be designed out of electrical systems, perhaps because of greed, and no on had seriously considered it as a source of abundant free energy. Everyone knew it was there, but no one recognized its potential.


The standard, as manufactured, electrical generator systems can be modified inexpensively to the Over-Unity / Asymmetrical design concept.

By the addition of a second set of commutator brushes and / or the addition of a second slip ring assembly in the present electrical generators,
Over-Unity output, or asymmetrical rotation is achievable in hours.


These additional elements are to collect / scavenger, the collapsing fields (C.E.M.F.) of both the the armatures and field coils of present electrical generator sets.


Present design throws away this tremendous amount of electrical energy in the collapsing fields.(C.E.M.F.) You pay for it, why not get the utility of it?


Everyone who makes use of electrical circuits have always considered the collapsing field effect to be a nuisance because, when using a mechanical relay coil in an electronic circuit, it would cause a current to be pumped back into the circuit, creating havoc. One solution to the problem of C.E.M.F. was to install a diode across the coil leads and when the power was removed, the C.E.M.F. caused a current to flow which passed through the diode and to be dissipated as heat in the coil itself and not in the circuit.


On the armature / exciter element just install a second set of brushes or slip rings the exact amount behind behind the driver units, needed to collect the C.E.M.F., of the armature field collapse, to take it out of the system for additional output generator utility.


On the field coil system, just install a second set of brushes / slip rings the exact amount behind the original primary field coil system needed to collect the C.E.M.F. of the field coils collapsing fields for utility, when taken out of the unit as additional generator output utility.


The additional new C.E.M.F. outputs can easily be phased to the original output system load wiring.
These modifications more than doubled the generators output power at small modification cost / time, and no increase in operating costs.


This general design modification allows for most any currently manufactured electrical generator set to be an over-unity design; and with some additional external modifications a self-standing over-unity configuration can be obtained on most commercial electric generators by any competent electrical engineer. Why pay for fuel / power that you have available in your generator system already?


Again, just collect (scavenger) the C.E.M.F. of the armature and field coil"s collapses for far- over unity operation of these devices, and with external circuit additions, stand alone, fuelless electrical power is available to everyone, in the form of an off the shelf, self-substaining, asymmetrical, electrical generator.


The same modifications can be made in most manufactured motors as they can be made into generators easily.


Just scavage the armature and field coil collapses , control it with an external circuit, and you have a stand-alone over-unity electrical generator.

©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©

Below is a stationary "motionless electromagntic generator design, based on the Alexander patent, that has been built experimentally; No far out 0 point vacuum explanations needed;

©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©©

The best form would have no moving parts.
Looking at at the common transformer, and how it works, supplies the answer.


In any kind of transformer, electricity is transferred between the two coils by the magnetic field. When a coil is initially powered up or switched off, that coil creates a magnetic field which causes an initial rush of electricity, usually called a 'voltage spike.'


In conventional electronics, this voltage spike is suppressed to protect the other components from damage. In collapsing field technology (CFT), that voltage spike is harnessed, not suppressed.


If I take a DC signal generator power supply, and connect it to the primary of the transformer, I can make a generator of sorts.


I'll turn on the DC signal in the primary coil windings for just an instant, and then turn it off.
In the secondary there is a flux linkage following of the primary signal that is some 90% of he input power.


But we can recover also, the secondary's field collapse for an additional 90% of input power.


Thus, any transformer secondary will produce about 180% of the input power in this mode, with a gradually applied quarter sine or sawtooth wave shape. input DC signal.


But wait, we are throwing recoverable power away in the primary coil winding's field collapse. By applying the DC power input signal and then , when the input power is cut off, switch the primary winding's field collapse to the output also, the primary field collapse contributes at least another 90% to the output, for a grand total of about 270% gain, in this design.


The DC power signal must only take primary winding up and then let go (open ) at the top voltage.
Thus, the primary can be switched to the output to recover it's field collapse, that is in synchronozation with the secondary's field collapse.


Simple electronic switching can accomplish all of these functions, at little power usage and low cost.Therefore, the gain of a transformer over-unity generator would probably be about 250% output power to input power, and no mechanical motion needed.


Many old motors and generators could be adapted to the transformer design, given above.


The armature must be fixed permanently stationary and the air gap between armature and field coils filled with iron filings. The air gap iron filings, or iron powder filling is to make the best use of the primary's ( armature ) full flux power.


This makes for best transformer action and the highest power gain possible with this conversion design.


Cooling, through holes, can be left in the air gap if necessary in these units. The external switching electronic circuitry is the same as common transformer design, above.


All we have done is to turn the motor / generator into a reasonable transformer.


What is happening in this design is that for one"up"( power signal ) in the primary coil, we get the "up" ( field build ) in the secondary coil and the " downs" ( field collapses ) of both the secondary and primary coil as output power


Think of the primary coils as coupled "springs" and it will all be clear.


This transformer / generator design has been the nature of electromagnetic coils all the time--we just never saw it.


And if the unit is actuated 60 times a second, allowing for the counter-electromotive force field collapses, it makes the standard household 60Hz electrical generator.


This design concept is the natural last step after recovery of secondary collapses was introduced in generator designs.


The same gain principle and results could then be achieved in capacitor systems.


The charge (up ) cycle from the secondary plate and the two discharge cycles from both the secondary and primary plates would be the output power.


The basic external switching electronics is generally the same as in the transformer designs.


These designs are in the basic nature of energy storage / transfer elements---one input allows for the utility of the one input transfer and the two storage collapses or discharges as output power ( about 300% gain )
__________________
 
  #3879  
Old 07-09-2018, 12:33 PM
ilandtan's Avatar
ilandtan ilandtan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 311
Initial Concepts Testing

Using parts I had, I assembled three batteries, unmodified 12V MY6812B, My Tesla/Slayer TX/RX circuit.


Results:
  • Was able to run the motor and charge all batteries to 13V by cycling them in the battery 3 position
  • If I drove my Tesla TX across Battery 3 the battery 3 would not charge and would deplete
  • When I placed my Tesla TX between the two positives of 1 and 3 (parallel to motor)charge time decreased and a noticeable audible reduction of speed on the motor
  • Unloaded the motor draws .25 A
  • Nominal current for Tesla TX is .5 A
  • Charging all batteries took about 10 hours, off and on; the configuration kept a 9W LED illuminated on the TESLA RX (wireless)

On my second round of charging battery 3, I noticed a decrease in my RX output and halted to use a wall charger for battery 1 and 2.

Conclusion: The battery 3 get's charged, while you are driving load between the positives.

Inference: If that motor can drive an efficient generator, that might break the relationship between Input/Output. COP>1
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 3B-DB v1.0 Testing.jpg (515.5 KB, 60 views)
__________________
 

Last edited by ilandtan; 07-09-2018 at 01:35 PM.
  #3880  
Old 07-10-2018, 06:32 AM
SkyWatcher's Avatar
SkyWatcher SkyWatcher is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,418
Close i_ron, I AM saying, we're in TRON, just a ride, be kind to each other, that helps.
Carry on.
peace love light
__________________
 
  #3881  
Old 07-10-2018, 10:33 AM
Vinyasi's Avatar
Vinyasi Vinyasi is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: southern california
Posts: 562
Lightbulb Dead Battery is the Poor Man's Reactive Converter?

After reading Ossie Callanan's description of his setup ...

http://www.fluxite.com/WorkingRadiantEnergy.pdf

... it becomes suggestive that every time someone uses the term "radiant" that I should substitute the term "reactive"?

This would make a lead acid, dead battery a poor man's converter for turning reactive power into generative power?

Causing a reaction among electronic components isn't anything new. Standard electronics theory poses this to be a problem rather than an asset waiting to be exploited.

Jim Murray has claimed that if we did anything similar to his SERPS technology, by sending back into the grid the results of his technology, then Tesla's forecast would come true.....that we'd be boosting the grid by a factor of one thousand.

But he, and Eric Dollard, have both used synchronous generators/motors to turn reactive power into something useful: Jim while he was working for Bechtel Steel in Michigan and Eric at his naval shipyard lab in the city of Richmond, California. In both cases, the utility electric company didn't like what either of those fellows were doing by outsmarting the municipal scammers.
__________________
 
  #3882  
Old 07-10-2018, 11:35 AM
wantomake's Avatar
wantomake wantomake is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 905
Anyone can build

Good morning to All,
Have made progress on the Dave's upright generator this week. The objective now is redesigning my plywood model to match Dave and Matthew's model.

I'll repeat this again. Those two have put alot of time, resources, thought, and heart into building the 3BGS and upright generator. Therefore I replicate exactly because my eyes and hands have seen SUUL and large reed switches glow purple bright plasma by coil shorting. Yes I got amazed with the heat buildup but this isn't first plasma display I've seen.

Now all the needed details are here posted freely. I'm not being negative or belittling anyone. My shop has basic low tech equipment. My funds, time and knowledge is worse than the shop. I want to finish this project to show with basic tools and materials anyone can replicate the same setup Dave and Matthew gave us All.

The videos prove I got the 3BGS to balance and power a load at same time. Now to add to that system with the upright generator. I will post more pics or videos as I can.

Thank you to All who replicate this system. My hope speaks of success for us All.

Dang it thermal dynamics my coffee needs nuked.
wantomake
__________________
 
  #3883  
Old 07-11-2018, 08:01 AM
kryszal05 kryszal05 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 13
Thanks for support

Quote:
Originally Posted by wantomake View Post
Lukasz,
Does my last posted picture answer your question? Forgive me for not understanding your question. I'm a little thick in the head sometimes.

wantomake
Hi wantomake,

Everything is fine with you, it's my problem. Sometimes, even in my native language I can't express what I have in my mind. So I am sorry for beeing not precise when asking a questions.

Thank you very much for the photos, they explained a lot. But I am not sure when Dave was saying about 8" rotor he meant his basic design, which you are replicating or he said about smaller rotor. What I understand, your rotor is 11".

I think I will follow your path and try to build the same size generator, as smaller/different version causes only more questions and misunderstandings, but again for this I will have to find/order new parts.

Can't wait to see your progress on photos or videos. I am so excited like it would be mine own machine

Thanks for all your help and determination,
Lukasz
__________________
 
  #3884  
Old 07-11-2018, 12:05 PM
wantomake's Avatar
wantomake wantomake is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 905
Quote:
Originally Posted by kryszal05 View Post
Hi wantomake,

Everything is fine with you, it's my problem. Sometimes, even in my native language I can't express what I have in my mind. So I am sorry for beeing not precise when asking a questions.

Thank you very much for the photos, they explained a lot. But I am not sure when Dave was saying about 8" rotor he meant his basic design, which you are replicating or he said about smaller rotor. What I understand, your rotor is 11".

I think I will follow your path and try to build the same size generator, as smaller/different version causes only more questions and misunderstandings, but again for this I will have to find/order new parts.

Can't wait to see your progress on photos or videos. I am so excited like it would be mine own machine

Thanks for all your help and determination,
Lukasz
You are very much welcome Lukasz,

I'm glad the pictures helped. The rotor pictured is 10 7/8" exact diameter and the thickness is 1/4" per rotor. That is actually 2 rotors with 1 piece plexiglass between them. The magnets are 2" x 1/4" and it takes 12 of them. The axle hole at center is 5/8". I'm sorry these are all American standard measurements. I believe it is ABS black polycarbonate material.

I'll try to get a side view picture posted today for you.
Be encouraged and I can't wait t see your excited post after you witness the SUUL and voltage this Dave upright generator puts out.

Coffee is needing a little nuking up.
wantomake
__________________
 
  #3885  
Old 07-11-2018, 04:19 PM
Vinyasi's Avatar
Vinyasi Vinyasi is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: southern california
Posts: 562
Arrow A mechanical switch is a parametric oscillator.

Ossie uses a reed switch. A mechanical switch is a parametric oscillator due to the dielectric air gap (in between the poles of that switch) vary their dielectric spacing, and hence their capacitance, over time.

This, plus his use of a dead bank of batteries to convert reactive power into usable power makes this a viable method of synthesizing electricity from its constituent ingredients of magnetism, electrostatics and variations of either or both over time.

--------------------------

A set of brushes on a DC motor are parametric if their voltages sparking across their air gaps (at the commutator) varies over time. This is the equivalence of a dielectric parametrically varying its capacitance over time. But in this case, its the byproduct of capacitance, namely: the voltage charges on either side of a capacitor's dielectric, which is varying rather than the dielectric's capacitance. The end result is the same: parametric excitation.

It is the dead battery turned around (in reverse) which is creating this variation of voltages across the DC motor's sparking air gapped set of brushes in its commutator. This inversion of batteries, paired with batteries #1 and #2, creates a conflict of voltages which vary -- either over time, or else simultaneously -- and is the direct equivalence of a varying dielectric.

Although a coil of wire is also capable of parametrically varying its induction over time, it is not overunity. For the dimensionality of a transverse wave's induction is strictly confined to space while the dimensionality of capacitance is inversely proportional to space since longitudinal waves only exist in counter-space.

A longitudinal electric wave may only travel in counter-space. Transverse waves travel in space. A longitudinal wave "sees" its distance across the dielectric of a capacitor as being inversely proportional to the same distance it must travel across a capacitor's dielectric in space.

While, by comparison, the transverse wave in a wire, or more poignantly in a coil, must travel the same distance in space as it does in space.

In other words, we build our circuits in space and so we have space as our reference frame. And transverse (electromagnetic) waves hang out with us in our world of preferred references.

But longitudinal waves hang out in counter-space wherein their dimensionality is inverted from our's, and transverse wave's, spatial characteristic. In other words, in space, speed is distance traveled over time, while in counter-space, speed is time over distance traveled. This is why Ohms Law is also inverted whenever we consider the negative of resistance as compared to its more familiar variety of positive resistance, aka: Ohms Law becomes Mho's Law (or, Siemens) when positive resistance becomes negative in a spark gap or in a gas discharge tube (such as in a neon bulb or in a fluorescent tube minus its ballast).

This dimensional inversion is what results in faster than the speed of light rate of traversal of longitudinal waves in counter-space in as much as this is an illusion. Nothing actually travels faster than the speed of light. It just looks that way since we're taking our measurements in space while a longitudinal wave travels in counter-space wherein the distance traveled is not the same as it is in space. Instead, it's much shorter. So much so, that the conversion of a longitudinal wave back into an equally energetic transverse wave makes it appear as if the time between the conversion of a transverse wave (existing here in space) into its longitudinal equivalent prior to its embarkation through the medium of counter-space followed by its returning to its transverse format passes a reduced quantity of time from which we falsely conclude that the speed of a longitudinal wave travels faster than the speed of a transverse light beam traveling in space. This illusory inversion becomes accentuated the greater is the distance in space (which the longitudinal wave cannot travel in) since the equivalent distance in counter-space is reduced. This only happens in the dielectric of a capacitor or the dielectric of capacitance in general occurring in other circumstances, such as: across sparking air gaps, or the vacuum of a vacuum tube or in outer space, or across bedrock deep underground.

For example, Tesla experimented bouncing a longitudinal wave off the moon and recorded an increase to the speed of light by a factor of fifty, or 5,000%, while Eric Dollard recorded a mere 26% increase over the spatial distance of a few thousand feet back in the 1980s while conducting his analog computer experiments with the assistance of Peter Lindemann and Thomas Brown.

Newton's Cradle is a perfect analogy to why, and how, a transverse wave must convert into a longitudinal wave in order to pass through a compressed medium (such as: bedrock), or a tsunami sound wave traveling through the depths of the ocean, or an electric wave traveling through the equivalent medium of compression, namely: a vacuum, before a longitudinal wave converts back into a transverse wave upon exiting the compressed (or vacuous) medium which it traveled through.


This apparent increase to the speed of light across the dielectric of a capacitor -- or an air gap across a sparking commutator brush in a DC motor -- also manifests an increase in energy. This, too, is an illusion, (although a happy illusion) for our senses and our meters will not know any different, nor will our electric bill! Since the Laws of Physics (to date) only deal with spatial considerations, free energy may appear to defy Physics. Yet, their vernacular does consider this possibility. They call it Quantum Mechanics rather than the Aether. And there is a body of knowledge already behind parametric oscillations of the mechanical variety with its electrical equivalent lagging not far behind...

Parametric Excitation and Oscillation of both the Electrical and Mechanical Realms

This leads me to strongly conclude, what I have been (recently) weakly suspecting, that: parametric oscillation or excitation is the *only* method for producing overunity in 'free energy' devices and methods.

And since (now) I have a direct relationship equating reactive power with the populist alternative notion of radiant power -- along with various techniques for reclaiming the wasted current and voltage of reactive waves getting out of phase which each other, namely: the poor man's reactive converter of a fully sulfated, dead, lead-acid battery (or, a synchronous generator/motor), then it is safe to assume that the broad topic of 'free energy' is actually a simple matter for anyone to attempt the analysis of.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinyasi View Post
For I have determined that reactive and radiant are one and the same thing. Nothing mysterious here, except that standard theory poses reactive to be a problem not waiting to be exploited, but rather avoided.

Ossie Callanan and Dave Bowling may have discovered that a dead fully sulphated lead acid battery is a simple alternative to synchronous generators/motors (or Jim Murray and Paul Babcock's SERPS or Eric Dollard's analog computer caps and coils) for converting reactive power into usable generative power.

http://www.fluxite.com/WorkingRadiantEnergy.pdf

http://is.gd/FerdinandCap

http://www.energeticforum.com/73799-post24.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsrbaCJo3Qw

Energetic Forum - View Single Post - Tesla's Electric Car
Quote:
This latest post at my Tesla 1931 Pierce-Arrow EV conversion demonstration concerns the ridiculousness of insisting on "Energy IN must equal Energy OUT" whenever applied to electricity. Our understanding of electricity is a delusional enterprise when we apply this dictum from physics to it. Electricity does not exist as an entity for it is merely a blend of magnetics and electrostatics over time. The only thing consumed, and not by us, is time. For time slips by; each moment replaced by the next making change over time possible. But we don't consume magnetics. We could destroy it if we overheated a permanent magnet. But that merely accelerates its aging process and is not relevant to expenditure of an electrical energy source. So consequently, the use of magnetics is a renewable/reusable resource. Electrostatics can also be reusable if we don't intend to convert it into current. In other words, if I put a capacitor inline with one terminal of a battery, then that capacitor effectively blocks the discharge of that battery. And if both are placed in an A/C circuit, then the battery merely lends its influence as a voltage source without being allowed to expend itself. This is known as D/C saturation of an A/C circuit. Since I'm getting my current from magnetics, I can afford to merely get voltage from electrostatics. These two sources are reusably free over limitless time. So long as we think of electricity in a vague sensibility, we allow electricity as a conceptual singularity when in fact it is a blend of these three ingredients of electrostatics and magnetics varying over time. These three ingredients are freely available. It's time which is limited. Time is not free since we lose it no sooner than we gain it. Thus, we may consider that time is the only expendable product in any energy equation -- especially since so much of energy mechanics is translatable. For instance, mechanics is directly translatable into electrodynamics. So, energy is not free since it does not exist as we know it. But its constituent ingredients are freely reusable except for time. So, time is the shortcoming to free energy making free energy no longer free since we pay for time lost whether or not we use time. So, free energy does not exist. Yet, free electricity does exist if we ignore time. Thus, free energy is a delusional state of mind to which we are all collectively subject.
__________________
 

Last edited by Vinyasi; 07-11-2018 at 05:34 PM. Reason: grammar
  #3886  
Old 07-11-2018, 08:31 PM
Turion's Avatar
Turion Turion is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,463
Conclusion

There are two things you need to have fixed in your head before what I am going to post means anything to you. If you dispute either one of the following FACTS, then don’t bother with the rest of this post.
1st. When a pulse motor is run between the positives, you CAN recover some (between 60-90%)of the energy used to run the motor if you have the correct circuit with the right batteries and motor.
2nd. Coils that are wound correctly can delay Lenz long enough that it actually assists in the acceleration of the rotor rather than retarding it and causing drag on the motor.

With those two things, and investing a tremendous amount of time to tune the system, you can run your motor for free with a very small load. Nothing dramatic, but REAL never the less.

The final piece is a generator that has all but eliminated the magnetic lock, and speeds up under load. There are a couple ways to build that generator. One involves timing and switching and all kinds of things that have to work correctly. The other is all mechanical. I chose the mechanical method as it was easier for me to build. More expensive, but I don’t have to depend on electronics for it to work.

I probably have close to $15,000 invested in different builds of this generator over the years, so GIVING it away when I KNOW money could be made from it has been a difficult decision. It would be NICE to get SOME of that money back, if just to use on other projects. Especially since I doubt seriously if FIVE people actually build it. I HAVE shared the construction details with others, so there has never been a risk that the secrets would vanish if something happened to me. And my youngest is an engineer, so he and I have had MANY talks about this stuff.,

If you build it as I have shown, it will run on less than 240 watts constant input, of which you can recover all but about 60. You should get betweenn1800 and 2000 watts constant output. You can figure the 👮 of that for yourself.

There is still a TON of research that needs to be done. Like how many magnets can I put on a rotor and have it still work like I want it to. What is the ratio of nagnet to open space between magnets on the rotor. How much flux WILL the coils hold? Will using thicker magnets give me MORE output? How about if I put a cap in parallel with every coil? What happens THEN?

I’m going to be busy moving for at LEAST two months as the house we are moving into needs to be remodeled before we move in, and the house we are selling needs to be remodeled before we sell it. So all that research is now on YOU!

By the way. This is not a high quality video I am charging you for. It is a simple YouTube video that gives you everything you need to know to build an overunity system. If you DON’T do it, you have nobody to blame but yourself. If you don’t have the money, recruit a couple friends and chip in together.

If you can show me ANYBODY, on ANY forum who has disclosed a WORKING setup that puts out MORE than this one, I’d like to know WHERE.

COP PLUS Generator - YouTube
__________________
“Advances are made by answering questions. Discoveries are made by questioning answers.”
—Bernhard Haisch, Astrophysicist
  #3887  
Old 07-11-2018, 08:44 PM
Vinyasi's Avatar
Vinyasi Vinyasi is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: southern california
Posts: 562
Getting a bit more technical...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinyasi View Post
A mechanical switch is a parametric oscillator.
We can begin to refer to the Vedic delineation of counter-space versus space by their expression...

PURNAMEEDA PURNAMEEDAM = Two fullnesses: fullness of fullness versus fullness of emptiness. This comports with one's compliment arithmetic used by computers' machine language assembler whenever they subtract a number from itself at the bits and bytes level of the computer's register (32 bit vs 64 bit, etc): negative zero is the result.

{Nobody likes that answer, so they perform a slight of hand variation using something called two's compliment in which they make negative zero magically disappear.}

This also comports with the I Ching, also known as: Chinese Book of Changes, filled with 64 hexagrams composed of two trigrams for each hexagram. One of the eight trigrams is composed of three solid lines signifying "Chien" - Creative Energy, while three broken lines represent K'un, the Receptive Intelligence. This, in the Sanskrit, is known as Sat-Chit(-Ananda): Energy and Intelligence (and Bliss). This is also known in the Tao as Yang and Yin.

What does any of this have to do with counter-space and space? Well... I'm getting to that...

From this basic duality, it begins to become slightly more complicated...

The absolute fullness of fullness is the transcendental being on the side opposed to Creation, namely: purusha personified by EEshwara which literally translates from the Sanskrit to mean: evolutionary progression of all beings (EE + swara).

Between this absolute and its Creation is a gap known as Dharma which negotiates between these two opposing fields.

And then over on our side is Creation known variously as: Maya (illusion), Prakritee (Creation) and the field of the Three Gunas. Though, this latter definition is not the whole story.

The Three Gunas are causative agents involving: creation (out of the principle known in Vedic lore as: Sattwa), maintanance (as Rajas) and destruction (as Tamas) persondified by the dieties of Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva, respectively. These three exist in counter-space.

Their three respective effects exist in space, our world, and are known as the three Ayurvedic doshas of: Vata, Pitta and Kapha.

Vata, personified by Ganesh (who is Wisdom), is a blend of Sattwa and Rajas. Pitta, personified by Surya (the Sun), is a blend of Tamas and Rajas. Kapha, personified by Mother Divine (Nature), is a blend of Sattwa and Tamas.

This is all background information -- none of which will help electrical engineering to the slightest degree unless you want to know the name (not the phone number) of the one in charge of whatever area of Reality you have a gripe, or concern, or inquiry about. To get the respective diety's phone number to answer your concern (by gaining a little bit of their perspective) requires the additional skill of a yogi practicing bija (seed) mantra meditation. Or else just plain good fortune gained through devotion and service to these "tasks at hand".

Space gives (wave)form to the formlessness of electrical energy. Energy is equivalent to the aether of counter-space. Electrical energy does not come from the aether, it is the aether apart from whatever waveform gives electrical energy its shape and functionality. The abstraction of a wave is content free in and of itself. Yet, a wave makes formless energy countable and measurable. So, the energy of the aether is real in a very concrete sense while the abstraction which gives electrical energy an embodiment to incarnate within is not concretely real, but is a mere abstraction of thought: our thoughts or that of Divinity at its Origin.

This may appear as heretical science, fringe science, to those not familiar with science in its more robust form as practiced by scientists of a bygone era, or in our collective futures, in which scientists and priests will become blended into one profession.

To understand science is to understand God. To understand both is an expansive prognosis devoid of schisms in either one.
__________________
 
  #3888  
Old 07-11-2018, 08:50 PM
Matthew Jones's Avatar
Matthew Jones Matthew Jones is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,741
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinyasi View Post
A LOT OF STUFF!!
This does not really pertain to the thread. Unfortunately the Callahan stuff is just a rework of John Bedini's stuff. Most people have no real conception of either one of them. So maybe you can spare us ancient history and the very drab hope that simulation can help and go start your own thread. Bro Mikey maybe a couple of others would be happy to discuss this mystical stuff with you.

Thanks For understanding

Matt
__________________
ADD BROMIKEY TO YOUR IGNORE LIST He is a saboteur bent on the systematic distraction of every good topic on this forum and since he has been here most working threads have shut down. He is the enemy. If you have blocked him already add this to your signature and encourage others to block him as well. His onslaught of rambling in large text and his constant attempts to misinform at the excuse of being stupid should no longer be tolerated.

USER CP/Ignore list.
  #3889  
Old 07-12-2018, 01:02 AM
yaro1776 yaro1776 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 46
Hey Dave,

Thanks for sharing the well done video of the gen set and its design/build details. Your explanation and logic for the adjustable unequal number of smaller magnets within the coil holder is very good. Same applies to the size and number of the Neo's in the main rotor.

Been following your progress with Matt's input for awhile now on the 3BGS project and continue to be impressed. Would love to build this but have a couple of other long term obsessions that are eating up my play time, but then things can change in a heart beat.

Big thanks to all that are pushing this thread along.
Yaro
__________________
 
  #3890  
Old 07-12-2018, 01:36 AM
wantomake's Avatar
wantomake wantomake is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 905
Cat is out of the bag

Well the secret is out now. Well done Dave on the video. Not sure why but it is your build.

I guess we will see how many will build this machine and use that opposing magnet method. I want to and plan to. You are moving again eh? We are in the process of renovating our home. What a pain.

Now ALL the details of this generator are posted.

Wow!!!

We will see
wantomake
__________________
 
  #3891  
Old 07-12-2018, 01:58 AM
Turion's Avatar
Turion Turion is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,463
Matt built a machine that output more than it took to run. I replicated it and then went a little nuts building a BIG machine. It taught me a lot. I remember running it with two coils, and when I added two more it quit speeding up under load. It took me days to figure out WHY. Everything I understand about working with this stuff I got from building machines, watching them run, and making them better.

There are probably going to be people who say this generator won’t work. Just like there are those who insist the 3 Battery setup won’t work. You don’t have to build a $2,000 machine to see if the principles work. You can apply them to ANY machine you have running.
__________________
“Advances are made by answering questions. Discoveries are made by questioning answers.”
—Bernhard Haisch, Astrophysicist
  #3892  
Old 07-12-2018, 04:06 AM
SkyWatcher's Avatar
SkyWatcher SkyWatcher is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,418
Hi vinyasi, yes, please start a thread about what some are not even willing to respect.
I respect you and whatever you have to share.
Would love to hear more of your thoughts about this illusion, again, that others wish to stay unaware about, it's ok, each to their own.
Carry on everyone and forget this post even exists, as you will anyway.
peace love light
__________________
 
  #3893  
Old 07-12-2018, 05:09 PM
Turion's Avatar
Turion Turion is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,463
Generator

By the way, if someone decides to sell kits for the generator based only on what has been shared on the forum, or go into business selling completed generators, I hope you have lots of liability insurance. That is a proof of concept video ONLY. You run that thing AS SHOWN for too long, and you will have an unpleasant surprise.. You notice I didn’t show ANY coils on ANY of the machines I showed. I purposely took them OUT. I never showed a complete machine running. So ALL of my secrets are not yet out there. Using the coils we have described on the forum, you can run it for about an hour. After that your coils will be slag. What I know cost me in terms of $$ and time. If you want to know what we know, you’ll have to invest BOTH. All I’ve given you is about an 8 year head start. That means you have a couple years of research to do.
__________________
“Advances are made by answering questions. Discoveries are made by questioning answers.”
—Bernhard Haisch, Astrophysicist
  #3894  
Old 07-12-2018, 11:45 PM
Matthew Jones's Avatar
Matthew Jones Matthew Jones is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,741
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyWatcher View Post
Hi vinyasi, yes, please start a thread about what some are not even willing to respect.
I respect you and whatever you have to share.
Would love to hear more of your thoughts about this illusion, again, that others wish to stay unaware about, it's ok, each to their own.
Carry on everyone and forget this post even exists, as you will anyway.
peace love light
It just doesn't belong here. Wake up, he's just dropping it here because people are reading. It detracts from the overall project that is being laid out here. Between post a bunch of relic nonsense.
You like that though? Makes sense to you? Goofball!
__________________
ADD BROMIKEY TO YOUR IGNORE LIST He is a saboteur bent on the systematic distraction of every good topic on this forum and since he has been here most working threads have shut down. He is the enemy. If you have blocked him already add this to your signature and encourage others to block him as well. His onslaught of rambling in large text and his constant attempts to misinform at the excuse of being stupid should no longer be tolerated.

USER CP/Ignore list.
  #3895  
Old 07-13-2018, 03:10 AM
SkyWatcher's Avatar
SkyWatcher SkyWatcher is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,418
Oh please matt, lighten up a bit man, i told him to start a new thread, i didn't say to continue that topic here.
Carry on.
peace love light
__________________
 
  #3896  
Old 07-13-2018, 05:54 AM
Turion's Avatar
Turion Turion is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,463
Simple System

If you don't have a lot of money and have a Matt motor and can afford a couple boost modules (the $3.00 kind) here is the simplest system I can think of that will PROVE this all works. And will TEACH you that you ALWAYS look to use the potentials!!!!
Attached Images
File Type: bmp One battery system.bmp (1.17 MB, 1 views)
__________________
“Advances are made by answering questions. Discoveries are made by questioning answers.”
—Bernhard Haisch, Astrophysicist
  #3897  
Old 07-13-2018, 06:01 AM
Turion's Avatar
Turion Turion is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,463
Proof of Concept

If you have the stuff, give this a shot. It's as CHEAP as you will get.
Attached Images
File Type: bmp One battery system.bmp (1.17 MB, 123 views)
__________________
“Advances are made by answering questions. Discoveries are made by questioning answers.”
—Bernhard Haisch, Astrophysicist
  #3898  
Old 07-13-2018, 12:22 PM
wantomake's Avatar
wantomake wantomake is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 905
Opposing magnets

Got the 3/4" magnet in yesterday. Will stop by Lowe's to match the diameter with pvc pipe to hold it in place.

This is how I'll size and build the opposing magnets between the coils. Being that my stators are wood and the between coils space is limited.

Will see what will work to adjust distance of magnet toward the rotor magnets.

Yes you guessed it coffee nuking time,
wantomake
__________________
 

Last edited by wantomake; 07-13-2018 at 12:25 PM.
  #3899  
Old 07-13-2018, 12:31 PM
Vinyasi's Avatar
Vinyasi Vinyasi is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: southern california
Posts: 562
Too bad my name is not Eric Dollard...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthew Jones View Post
This does not really pertain to the thread. Unfortunately the Callahan stuff is just a rework of John Bedini's stuff. Most people have no real conception of either one of them. So maybe you can spare us ancient history and the very drab hope that simulation can help and go start your own thread. Bro Mikey maybe a couple of others would be happy to discuss this mystical stuff with you.

Thanks For understanding

Matt
...since you got all this stuff for free.

A while back, it was asked of Eric or someone else to drop in and explain why this system works. Sorry I helped.

Maybe you've figured it out by now. I've only read up to page 13 of this thread.

No need to linger, 'tho I enjoy your posts.
__________________
 
  #3900  
Old 07-13-2018, 02:47 PM
ewizard's Avatar
ewizard ewizard is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Outside the Matrix
Posts: 1,122
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turion View Post
If you have the stuff, give this a shot. It's as CHEAP as you will get.
Thanks Dave. I know this is probably a dumb question but could you indicate which side is input and which is output on the boost module in the diagram. I'm assuming I know the answer but would like to be sure. Also the boost module next to the battery does not have the negative output connected. Is that correct? I know some of these modules have the negative in and out tied together.
__________________
There is no important work, there are only a series of moments to demonstrate your mastery and impeccability. Quote from Almine

Last edited by ewizard; 07-13-2018 at 03:14 PM.
Closed Thread

Tags
save, system, generating, battery

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Please consider supporting Energetic Forum with a voluntary monthly subscription.

Choose your voluntary subscription

For one-time donations, please use the below button.


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v1.4.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
2007-2015 Copyright - Energetic Forum - All Rights Reserved

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

Tesla Chargers