The Real History of the Ed Gray Motor by Mark McKay
Energetic Forum  

Go Back   Energetic Forum > Energetic Forum Discussion > Renewable Energy
Homepage Energetic Science Ministries Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Renewable Energy Discussion on various alternative energy, renewable energy, & free energy technologies. Also any discussion about the environment, global warming, and other related topics are welcome here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #181 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2012, 11:21 PM
MonsieurM's Avatar
MonsieurM MonsieurM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 10,038
Send a message via MSN to MonsieurM
Quote:
Originally Posted by purelyconstructive View Post
Indeed. The asymmetry is actually expressed inside the magnetic field itself. One of the effects that I did not mention was that a jet of monopolar magnetism comes out of the bottom half of toroid, but not the top. The pinch point acts as a nozzle.
theoretically speaking we are then breaking the fractal chain as the asymetry is not to be found at all levels .... imho

it's just a thought
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #182 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2012, 03:11 PM
ZeropointEnergy's Avatar
ZeropointEnergy ZeropointEnergy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 176
Clarifying the Rodin Coil.

Quote:
Originally Posted by purelyconstructive View Post
The Wisdom contained in such philosophies is priceless, for through it we can begin to embody the mindset that allows us to Lovingly Create such technologies endlessly for the betterment of ALL.

However, if others might find it useful, I will try to share as simply and succinctly as I possibly can what I think is happening and why...

When one pulses DC into both wires of a properly made Flux Thruster Atom Pulsar (or "Rodin Coil") there are many effects that take place simultaneously. However, we will concern ourselves with just one of them for the moment:

The curvature of the wire is such that the magnetic field generated around it approaches a Phi spiral. Because the coil is bifilar (i.e.: has two windings), you have two Phi spirals meeting end-to-end (one rotating clockwise and the other counter-clockwise).


Rodin Coil Activation w/ Pulsed DC


Phi Spirals of Magnetism

These counter-rotating magnetic fields converge to a point. This point is a plasma pinch. It can also be thought of as a center of gravity...literally. You are generating a gravitational field.

To put it in the context of Walter and Lao's work, replace the term "plasma pinch" with Doubly Charged Sphere in this instance. I believe that their conical coils are generally designed to accomplish something similar to what has just been described.

So why do you need the fields to approach Phi as closely as possible? Because Phi waves both add and multiply at the same time, and the geometry of the Phi spiral is recursive. As Dan Winter would put it, this is an "infinite fractal compression of charge".
Hey Purelycontructive,

Thankyou for your explaination of the rodin coil as the phi spiral magnetic field was not 100% clear till now, only the anti-gravity effects and the central magnetic field.

This encouraged a further research into the properties of this effect and how to best utilize the anomaly. Will the plasma pinch act as appear with the correct ratio spirals/turns as many Rodin coil to not exhibit rotating magnetic fields from the youtube clips out there?
(I define this as the central, or Zeropoint of Radiant matter and then after the White light is most commonly Green outer shell, then Magenta/Purple plasma.)

P.S: I kids plastic ring is the best choice for different dimensions for a Rodin coil unless you have a easier option.

Regards
Zero
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #183 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2012, 03:17 PM
ZeropointEnergy's Avatar
ZeropointEnergy ZeropointEnergy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 176
1st July 2012 Effects!!

Hey Group,

I have some interesting effects from an experiment last night that I would like some input on these anomalies



My favourite anomaly.

Here is the whole 10 pics from last nights experiments.

Radiant Anomalies pictures by ZeropointEnergy - Photobucket

Regards
Zero
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #184 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2012, 04:05 PM
MonsieurM's Avatar
MonsieurM MonsieurM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 10,038
Send a message via MSN to MonsieurM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeropointEnergy View Post
Hey Group,

I have some interesting effects from an experiment last night that I would like some input on these anomalies



My favourite anomaly.

Here is the whole 10 pics from last nights experiments.

Radiant Anomalies pictures by ZeropointEnergy - Photobucket

Regards
Zero

you should add it to the visual effects observed thread .... may i say quite impressive

Visual Phenomena Observed in Tesla, TARIEL KAPANADZE etc.. Research


thank you ZeropointEnergy for sharing the info ... it is very much appreciated


Last edited by MonsieurM : 07-02-2012 at 04:08 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #185 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2012, 04:44 PM
cplouffe cplouffe is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by purelyconstructive View Post
This is a very keen observation. I encourage you to continue with this line of reasoning.

I too see it as a series of nested vortices. Like this:



And I also agree that, because it is a fractal, you should be able to use the same pattern on any level of scale (whether we are speaking of the formation of each element, or the periodic table as a whole):



The reason why I made it a cone in this way was because I figured that, since the East-West Polarity is generally associated with disintegration, it would be equivalent to the "end" of the periodic table that contains the radioactive elements.
Great! I just wanted to make sure I am on track. haha. I seem to understand something and then have to go back and re-read different parts of different books and then that helps me with another.... then go and meditate on it.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #186 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2012, 05:26 PM
cplouffe cplouffe is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 24
Some thoughts on mixing Walter Russellís cosmology and Rodinís Vortex Math. I watched this video by Jamie Buturff and decided to make one of the paper devices. The Solfeggio are Family Number Groups - Not Frequencies 2/2 - YouTube You may need to watch to see what I'm talking about.

So after making one, I felt like I should try and match it to Walter Russellís cubed wave field. So I opened up the device and put them together to form a cube. I needed 6 and they all fit together nicely. It is interesting to see the #s line up with 9 on ever spot that Walter mentions where a sphere should be. All the 3s and 6s(on the underside of the flaps of fortune teller) come together in the middle of the cube to all touch and create another 9 or another sphere. (48 9s to be exact = 432 )

Posting as links because of image size.
http://lightcoalition.org/wp-content.../06/VMcube.jpg

So then I took Rodinís family # groups and fingerprint of god and matched them to Walter Russellís 0-1-2-3-4 0 4-3-2-1-0 of creation. So where the 9 shows up for Rodin we would get the doubly charged sphere. Maybe the 0s on each end are the 3s and 6s because they alternate. Alternating + Ė per Rodin but could be generation/radiation for WR. Thoughts?

So the 124 Ė 875 would be the wound up parts of the locked potentials. With the 9 or 4-0-4 (same thing?) In the middle.

http://lightcoalition.org/wp-content.../06/index.jpeg

Just throwing out ideas to see what fits. So I wanted to be able to follow the doubling circuit (octave geometry) with the Rodin node points on top of the cube. After switching around the 1,8,4,5 I was able to get something. I could then follow the 124 emanation 875. It created spiral arms around the cube just like the Walter Russell 4 rivers of light.

http://lightcoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/VMtopcube.jpg
Then I marked where 3 and 6 could be and long that line it seems to alternate just like in VM. So I have no idea what it meansÖ. But it is food for thought.

http://lightcoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/VMtopcube36.jpg

I also took the sequence and added it to Walterís wave and formula of locked potentials.

http://lightcoalition.org/wp-content.../06/VMwave.jpg

So I wanted to submit this to see if there are any correlations. Is it just cute?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #187 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2012, 07:21 PM
MonsieurM's Avatar
MonsieurM MonsieurM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 10,038
Send a message via MSN to MonsieurM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cplouffe View Post
Some thoughts on mixing Walter Russellís cosmology and Rodinís Vortex Math. I watched this video by Jamie Buturff and decided to make one of the paper devices. The Solfeggio are Family Number Groups - Not Frequencies 2/2 - YouTube You may need to watch to see what I'm talking about.

. Is it just cute?
Excellent vid cplouffe .... it becomes obvious when you hear him explain ..... got to finish watching it ..... Thank you again
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #188 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2012, 01:05 AM
cplouffe cplouffe is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by purelyconstructive View Post
Indeed. Very interesting video! Thank you for sharing it. And I would also like to thank you for sharing your ideas about mixing the Russell Cosmogony and VBM. I saw the post last night on LightCoalition and started to think about it...Forming them into a cube like that is an excellent idea! I need to play around with it more.

Here is how I would match up the Fingerprint of God with the dynamics of the Wave. This post will assume a general familiarity with both Vortex Based Mathematics and the Russell Cosmogony.



The colors describe what I mean, but I will try to give a brief explanation:

The right-half of the Doubling Circuit is positive, counting up (1-2-4), just like the right-half of the wave (+1, +2, +3). And of course, the left-half is inverted (8-7-5 and -1, -2, -3). The rotations also match up (CW on the right, CCW on the left). The pinch point where you turn around in the middle is equivalent to ++404++, the Doubly Charged Sphere.

The ratios inside Walter & Lao's Universal Mathematics (2:1 and 1:2, 4:1 and 1:4, 8:1 and 1:8) are essentially Doubling and Halving (x2, x4, x8, 1/2, 1/4, 1/8). In fact, there is a page in The Rodin Glossary (pg. 139) that describes how to relate Walter & Lao's Periodic Table to the structure of the ABHA Torus. Within it, Marko even refers to these as "Compression and Decompression Ratios". Remember how all our geometries expand and contract according to The Universal Heartbeat as we move along The Octave Wave? Rhythmic Balanced Interchange.

To give a simplified example of how to relate the Periodic Table to the toroid, think of a 9-pointed star, one for each of our inert gases.



Trace out this star with your finger clockwise, beginning with Alphanon at the top. As you pass from point-to-point, you will see that you eventually end up back where you started, passing through all the elements as you do so. Remember, the Periodic Table ends where it begins.

The tiny yellow dots in the middle of the star are equivalent to our ++404++ elements, while the alternations between red and blue show each half of each wave. If you were to think of this star as one winding of a Rodin Coil, then the red and blue would be equivalent to passing over and under the body of the toroid every time you pass through the hole in the middle of it!

Definitely some fun stuff!
Nice!! Thanks for your great post, as always!

I had asked recently if anyone had tried setting up WR's transmutation experiment with Rodin coils rather than conical coils. Could it be easier to adjust frequency rather than having to change windings for strength of the coils? For oblating with E/W and prolating with N/S.

I am gathering all the info I can to try and reproduce myself someday.

** oh and I will have to check out that page you mentioned.

Last edited by cplouffe : 07-03-2012 at 01:06 AM. Reason: add
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #189 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2012, 10:25 AM
ZeropointEnergy's Avatar
ZeropointEnergy ZeropointEnergy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 176
Anytime!

Quote:
Originally Posted by MonsieurM View Post
you should add it to the visual effects observed thread .... may i say quite impressive

Visual Phenomena Observed in Tesla, TARIEL KAPANADZE etc.. Research


thank you ZeropointEnergy for sharing the info ... it is very much appreciated

Hey MM,

It was my pleasure and I uploaded these experiment pics to the Visual Phenomena Observed in Tesla, TARIEL KAPANADZE etc.. Research thread.

Thankyou for taking an interest, since we can generate various colours depending on the input frequency allows us to see the
relationship between Radiant effects due to magnetic reasonance feedback conditions
These can be replicated and here is a clip with a set 44Hz input frequency and a smaller #23 coil measuring 2 Ohms +/-0.1.

Plasma Effects in a Neon Bulb due to Radiant Anomolies at 44Hz - 15th May 2012.AVI - YouTube

Enjoy

Regards
Zero
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #190 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2012, 11:30 AM
ZeropointEnergy's Avatar
ZeropointEnergy ZeropointEnergy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 176
Rodin coil utilizing Vortex based Math.

Quote:
Originally Posted by purelyconstructive View Post
No problem. I'm glad to be of help in any way I can.

There are characteristics that the coil must embody in order to get the desired effects. As far as I understand it they are generally as follows...

In regards to building it

Mandatory:

*Two conductors of equal width to each other. They should have the same number or wraps.

*One gap space of equal width to area taken up by one of the conductors. The conductors should NOT cover the entire surface of the toroid.

*Either air or plastic core. No metal.

*Longest Mean-Free Path of Least Resistance - Meaning that the wire around the body of the torus has to have the least acute incline as possible. In other words, the wire should curve gradually, making nearly horizontal stripes, not vertical ones.

Optional:

*Changing Aspect Ratio - Meaning that the wire should be flat along the outside of the toroid and become tighter towards the inside of the toroid without differing in mass (i.e.: without changing the amount of material used). This enhances the effect.

In regards to powering it

Mandatory:

*The current must be Pulsed DC. It cannot be AC. Reversal of current cancels out the effects.

*Shearing
The pulses in the first wire must move against the pulse in the second wire.

*Synchronized Electricity
In an ideal situation, one would have a pause between the first set of pulses and the next set of pulses to allow the magnetic field to collapse. There is more to this concept of timing, but it requires an explanation of some of the mathematics.

The more detailed aspects (such as the interrelation between the Magic Circle, outer periphery, and cross-sectional diameters of the toroid to the arc of the wire) I am still trying to determine. Unfortunately, I have not done much testing yet. It seems likely that one would notice interesting effects even without exact timing or dimensional ratios.

Really interesting pictures by the way. If you don't mind me asking, what is your set-up?
Hello,

First off I do not mind you asking about the circuit as is a simple 555 timer in astable mode to generate a set input frequency, then just capture the inductive spike with diodes backwards to only collect the Radiant/Negative energy. I only have a roughly hand drawn circuit or would post it
Faster switching semiconductors and a short duty cycle seems to be the key as when even a low duty cycle of 8% the 92% off times allows for fluctuations of magnetic reasonance feedback oscillations. Coil to test ASAP with this will be the Rodin coil when constructed. I obtained the idea from "Ufopolitics" thread and have posted there many times about the circuit and all things radiant
Bifilar coil has always been used in either Bedini technology or other oscillator circuits to generate my Radiant anomalies.

Thankyou for the Notes on Vortex Based Mathematics link that will aid me in the construction of the Rodin coil.

Mandatory:

*I always make my coils with using a drill at either end and then trim off any slight variation to ensure equal inductance/capacitance if any reading this do not have a set method. This may not be the most efficient out there but has worked for me.

*The distances between the spirals looks to be the easiest achieved by placing markers (pins for example) to begin the first winding to hold tight in place. Is there there a set number turns/distance I need for 12 section Rodin coil?
Most of this content is still hard to grasp and I figure is a Fibonacci sequence of around? Since the coil is a sum of 12 points maybe 30-40 turns? 34 is in the sequence and if they sum together will equal 408 at reasonance.

*I was going to use plastic torrid to wind on.

*Longest Mean-Free Path of Least Resistance - Meaning that the wire around the body of the torus has to have the least acute incline as possible. In other words, the wire should curve gradually, making nearly horizontal stripes, not vertical ones.

This is not clear other than neat curves on outer edges and nice linear winds?

In regards to powering it

Mandatory:

*I was going to use a solid state oscillator circuit (pulsed DC) to demermine the ideal frequencies before a use one of my Bedini Monopole motors, probally a small model at 4000-8000RPM. SS is better since the motor is low Hz and and the SS circuit can reach MHz.

*Shearing

*Tesla bifilar coil should achieve the desired function?

*Synchronized Electricity

*This can be achieved by varying the input frequency with a CRO/DSO on both channels to map the variables. However, tuning is not as simple and thus would take time to determine the ideal parameters. Then could be replicated in expanded models.

*The magic circle is a unknown concept and will read the VBM link

P.S: I will try to find a generic torrid shaped kids toy so that others can replicate this if they wish. 0.4mm copper wire (AWG#26) was most probally going to be my choice since #18,#23 may be greater cross sectional area than needed.

Regards
Zero
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #191 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2012, 05:38 PM
MonsieurM's Avatar
MonsieurM MonsieurM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 10,038
Send a message via MSN to MonsieurM
wanted to add the following table as it bridges both WR and Rodin

Rafael Poza's Elements and the Magnetosphere




from : a better way to present the periodic table

:cheers

thanks you again : ZeropointEnergy
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #192 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2012, 08:45 PM
barbosi barbosi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 247
I found sometimes confusing Walter Russell's "sequential vs. instantaneous" concepts. And because we are circling around fractals, I would like to share something I find fascinating.

Anyone who was researching the "the golden ratio" might have pondered on its formula:

Phi + 1 = Phi^2

Many know the link between Phi and Fibonacci numbers, but I could not find any reference to similarities with Mandelbrot set, aka fractals. You may search but I would put here the formula:

z(n+1) = z(n)^2 + c

If one makes c=-1, then we'll get:

z(n+1) + 1 = z(n)^2


Beside the obvious similarity, I would dare to say z(n) - or fractals, look like the sequential representation of instantaneous Phi.

Like Fibanacci numbers, fractals are a sequential struggle (as above, so bellow style) to achieve the perfection of the timeless characteristics of Phi. Or like Walter Russell said (see the attached picture):
Attached Images
File Type: jpg NoStateOfMotion.jpg (14.0 KB, 11 views)

Last edited by barbosi : 07-03-2012 at 08:47 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #193 (permalink)  
Old 07-04-2012, 02:53 PM
ZeropointEnergy's Avatar
ZeropointEnergy ZeropointEnergy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 176
Rodin Coil

Quote:
Originally Posted by purelyconstructive View Post
The doughnut rings usually used are called "Rock-a-Stack" by Fisher Price. They are around $4 USD at Wal-Mart. I think it is the blue one that has the dimensions closest to ideal, although I am not certain.



12 wraps is what is normally given within the work, but using Fibonacci numbers like this makes perfect sense. I would like to try that!



Essentially, yes.




Like a pancake coil? Not that I know of. There is a big emphasis upon the spiral geometry. We use two wires because we want the current moving in opposite directions.



Sorry about that. I should have explained it more clearly.

The Magic Circle is just the inner circumference of the toroid:


And what I meant was that I was trying to find these interrelationships:


Please keep me updated on what you find in your testing. You have a strong understanding of what it entails, and I have a feeling you will get the effects we are aiming for. Good luck and be safe!
Hello,

Quote:
Originally Posted by purelyconstructive View Post
The doughnut rings usually used are called "Rock-a-Stack" by Fisher Price. They are around $4 USD at Wal-Mart. I think it is the blue one that has the dimensions closest to ideal, although I am not certain.

I grabbed 2 of them for a few variations of the windings and I have seen the blue plastic toy in the replication online.
Fisher Price Rock-A-Stack - David Jones
I'm in Australia and was the cheapest option other than a Kids store/Shopping centre (mall)

Quote:
Originally Posted by purelyconstructive View Post
Essentially, yes.

Thankyou, the pins idea will ensure the winds are correct like the pic you linked

Quote:
Originally Posted by purelyconstructive View Post
Like a pancake coil? Not that I know of. There is a big emphasis upon the spiral geometry. We use two wires because we want the current moving in opposite directions.

Just the bifilar winding like in a helical coil, but really there are all the same pancake, torrid or conical coils wound in the standard bifilar parallel connections. Unless we litz them of coarse

Quote:
Originally Posted by purelyconstructive View Post
Sorry about that. I should have explained it more clearly.
The Magic Circle is just the inner circumference of the toroid:

This makes PERFECT sense now and have been pondering on that relationship

Quote:
Originally Posted by purelyconstructive View Post
And what I meant was that I was trying to find these interrelationships:

Understanding the concept in a simple Rodin coil that a few make and obtain the same results will be the first step. Therefore, quantifying any of the "interrelationships" a variable at a time will enable clarity for the unknowns. IMHO.

Thankyou for the encouragement and it was this thread that confirmed a few of my theories, plus clarifyied the metaphysical side of WR work that was not sinking in my logical brain
I will make this coil. I have 100% confidence it will work as desired and will obtain some amazing B-field torsion effects. I have wanted to build one of these devices for year but Tesla + Bedini tech take up all my time and with the help from people from this thread it will be done correctly.

Regards
Zero
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #194 (permalink)  
Old 07-04-2012, 02:56 PM
ZeropointEnergy's Avatar
ZeropointEnergy ZeropointEnergy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 176
More study!

Quote:
Originally Posted by MonsieurM View Post
wanted to add the following table as it bridges both WR and Rodin

Rafael Poza's Elements and the Magnetosphere




from : a better way to present the periodic table

:cheers

thanks you again : ZeropointEnergy

Hey MM,

Thankyou for the link and have some more study/research

Regards
Zero
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #195 (permalink)  
Old 07-17-2012, 03:03 PM
cplouffe cplouffe is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 24
Bedini

Has anyone seen the papers that John Bedini has on Walter's work? I watched a video with Tom Bearden and John about transmutation etc... I was just wondering if anyone has seen the book he was showing in the video. The video was from The Energy from the Vacuum series. Thanks!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #196 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2012, 10:00 AM
ZeropointEnergy's Avatar
ZeropointEnergy ZeropointEnergy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 176
Yes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cplouffe View Post
Has anyone seen the papers that John Bedini has on Walter's work? I watched a video with Tom Bearden and John about transmutation etc... I was just wondering if anyone has seen the book he was showing in the video. The video was from The Energy from the Vacuum series. Thanks!
Hello,

Not the papers but the experiments inspired from Walter Russell's work

The DVD is in the "Energy from the Vacuum" series, #18. When covering transmutation he holds up Walter Russell's book, "The Universal One" and said all the information is in there if we want it. I don't want to be spoon fed but has taken years to build up the nerve to read his work. Therefore, a replicatable experiment is where my mindset is focused on.

Bedini does show the Silver+Ruby slag from the process and the gold transmuted from the copper substraights.
I was inspired to try a test with Hydrochloric acid as described in the EFTV#18 DVD, but I failed to obtain much growth on the steel/also an iron rod in the months was sitting there (used 5 different mineral samples and was suprised NONE showed any promise)
As annoyed as I was by this at the time, now is an opportunity to work out where I went wrong/or how to do it correctly and share it with others to achieve the same results as I will upload.

You are attacking this technology from an angle that is needs clarity for me to 100% grasp the fundermental concepts, time will tell and has been true to form of late

Regards
Zero
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #197 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2012, 06:16 PM
cplouffe cplouffe is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeropointEnergy View Post
Hello,

Not the papers but the experiments inspired from Walter Russell's work

The DVD is in the "Energy from the Vacuum" series, #18. When covering transmutation he holds up Walter Russell's book, "The Universal One" and said all the information is in there if we want it. I don't want to be spoon fed but has taken years to build up the nerve to read his work. Therefore, a replicatable experiment is where my mindset is focused on.

Bedini does show the Silver+Ruby slag from the process and the gold transmuted from the copper substraights.
I was inspired to try a test with Hydrochloric acid as described in the EFTV#18 DVD, but I failed to obtain much growth on the steel/also an iron rod in the months was sitting there (used 5 different mineral samples and was suprised NONE showed any promise)
As annoyed as I was by this at the time, now is an opportunity to work out where I went wrong/or how to do it correctly and share it with others to achieve the same results as I will upload.

You are attacking this technology from an angle that is needs clarity for me to 100% grasp the fundermental concepts, time will tell and has been true to form of late

Regards
Zero
Yes I have read most of WR's work... and REREAD after a light bulb goes off. I am now in the phase of gathering as much as I can to replicate and test myself. Intuitively I feel like the powder, acid, seed piece is not the direction I want to head in. I feel like the results John was getting with the furnace was missing the control of the coils etc... He was getting hit and miss results. It feels like other more readily available materials can be used.

Being able to adjust the pressure condition or position on the octave wave of the element being used is critical to me. So adjusting based on the gyroscopic principle will be key.

Working out the math for coil windings, power supply, etc... is where I am at. So I was hoping some of that info could be in papers like John has.

But of course all of the knowledge and power is within us. We just have to decentrate and go within. haha
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #198 (permalink)  
Old 07-24-2012, 07:46 AM
ZeropointEnergy's Avatar
ZeropointEnergy ZeropointEnergy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 176
Coil is easy

Quote:
Originally Posted by cplouffe View Post
Yes I have read most of WR's work... and REREAD after a light bulb goes off. I am now in the phase of gathering as much as I can to replicate and test myself. Intuitively I feel like the powder, acid, seed piece is not the direction I want to head in. I feel like the results John was getting with the furnace was missing the control of the coils etc... He was getting hit and miss results. It feels like other more readily available materials can be used.

Being able to adjust the pressure condition or position on the octave wave of the element being used is critical to me. So adjusting based on the gyroscopic principle will be key.

Working out the math for coil windings, power supply, etc... is where I am at. So I was hoping some of that info could be in papers like John has.

But of course all of the knowledge and power is within us. We just have to decentrate and go within. haha
Hello,

We have all the infomation for the coils and the only unknown is the thickness of the wire to determine the amount of current allowed to pass through that wire. Since the concept is to use HV we can ascertain that any small gauge will work fine, I will use 0.4mm, 0.56mm and 1mm to compare down the track. I have a different concept to achieve with the Conical coils but there is parallel's and thus on the same path. We need to understand the fundermental concepts of these coils, then expand the applications.

Using a Neon Sign Transformer (NST) or more if want to vary the input to the 2 coils is the easiest way. I was going to use a variac to control the HV or multiple spark gaps to achieve the fluctuations.

P.S: I feel the information on the "Walter Russell Generator Coils Replication" posted here was not correct since they used a random variable of 50% less and not what is the logical conclusion.

Regards
Zero
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #199 (permalink)  
Old 07-24-2012, 05:10 PM
MonsieurM's Avatar
MonsieurM MonsieurM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 10,038
Send a message via MSN to MonsieurM
ZeropointEnergy , check out this post ..... it might interest you

Tesla Stinging Impulse Rays

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #200 (permalink)  
Old 07-25-2012, 12:13 AM
ZeropointEnergy's Avatar
ZeropointEnergy ZeropointEnergy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 176
ok.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MonsieurM View Post
ZeropointEnergy , check out this post ..... it might interest you

Tesla Stinging Impulse Rays

Hey MM,

I did start to read that thread at the beginning, has been 3-4 weeks since
I checked on the progress. Thanks for the reminder

Edit: Was a book by Joseph Henry in 1886, I'm suprised thought was other info

Regards
Zero

Last edited by ZeropointEnergy : 07-25-2012 at 12:19 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #201 (permalink)  
Old 07-25-2012, 10:29 PM
cplouffe cplouffe is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeropointEnergy View Post
Hello,

We have all the infomation for the coils and the only unknown is the thickness of the wire to determine the amount of current allowed to pass through that wire. Since the concept is to use HV we can ascertain that any small gauge will work fine, I will use 0.4mm, 0.56mm and 1mm to compare down the track. I have a different concept to achieve with the Conical coils but there is parallel's and thus on the same path. We need to understand the fundermental concepts of these coils, then expand the applications.

Using a Neon Sign Transformer (NST) or more if want to vary the input to the 2 coils is the easiest way. I was going to use a variac to control the HV or multiple spark gaps to achieve the fluctuations.

P.S: I feel the information on the "Walter Russell Generator Coils Replication" posted here was not correct since they used a random variable of 50% less and not what is the logical conclusion.

Regards
Zero
Wow... great info. Thanks! I will add this to my info list. I was thinking of different power supplies and I am glad you mentioned the NST. I had wondered that.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #202 (permalink)  
Old 07-26-2012, 08:12 AM
ZeropointEnergy's Avatar
ZeropointEnergy ZeropointEnergy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 176
:)

Quote:
Originally Posted by cplouffe View Post
Wow... great info. Thanks! I will add this to my info list. I was thinking of different power supplies and I am glad you mentioned the NST. I had wondered that.
My pleasure and that will obtain the desired control of the HV variables.

P.S: I would use 2 seperate NST's.

Regards
Zero
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #203 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2012, 01:32 AM
StweenyA's Avatar
StweenyA StweenyA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Home is where the heart is
Posts: 161
Lightbulb Reference: Iron would melt on Jupiter at 2degC

Quote:
Originally Posted by grizli View Post
Why Russell Claims that melting point of for example Iron lowers when we go far away from the sun. For example Iron melting point in jupiters position is only 2C.

How is it than possible that space ships for example that NASA sends, I mean probes are not melted for example on the surface of Mars? When Melting point of for example Iron in Mars distance of the sun is pretty lower than at Earth positions

Those are Russell notes from Universal One, so very hard to understand, does not make sense?
Quote:
Originally Posted by seth View Post
Hi Grizli!

Can you give me a page reference for this claim - Ive been reading some of his work, and I like it - but I'd like to read this claim for myself, because I understand your criticism and I'd like to see if I'd interpret it in the same way...

At the end of the day, I think all claims must be backed up by experiments...and preferably ones that make me master of the visible universe. Muhahahha!
The reference is: The Universal One, page 120. Enjoy
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #204 (permalink)  
Old 11-09-2012, 12:14 AM
StweenyA's Avatar
StweenyA StweenyA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Home is where the heart is
Posts: 161
Question Molecule diagram, or atoms reacting diagram?

I have been studying "New Concept of the Universe" hard... And whilst I seem to be slowly grasping some concepts, there is one thing that is still getting me down.

I don't think anybody else understands it either, because nobody seems to talk about it, or they ignore it as though it's not important.

But if we can really visualize it, I think the veil could be lifted... So please don't pretend to understand, or tell me that you know if you can't explain - because that means you don't know either.
If we did really know, then there could be a more intimate understanding of all the elements and how they come together. H2O, as the classic example. We would then know precisely how we could apply the coils to 'transmute' elements, or molecules.

No-where in his books have I once seen a diagram of molecules, or elements reacting, whether they are elements of the same substance, or elements of different substances.
Whenever I see a diagram, its always only of a single octave, with single elements in it. I am beginning to find this a bit odd...

Why is this? Does he even know? Or is this the ultimate mystery that's left for us to figure out, that can either make or break his cosmology theories.

I would appreciate an explanation.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #205 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-2012, 02:46 AM
StweenyA's Avatar
StweenyA StweenyA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Home is where the heart is
Posts: 161
@purelyconstructive, thanks so much for the post!

Wow, I didn't haven't seen that notes document before! Did you write it? Is there any way I can download it to read on my tablet? scribd won't let me download. Thanks
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #206 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2012, 11:49 PM
artoj's Avatar
artoj artoj is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 146
Ode to Walter

As an artist, I am in concordance with Water Russell, please enjoy.

This is a revamp on the circular 1926 Table of Elements By Walter Russell.

His table had only 121 total elements:
(9 Inert, 63 Elements, 49 Isotopes )= 121
If you complete the table at Nobelium in place of the omega Tomion then you have:
(9 inert, 63 Elements, 56 isotopes ) =128
This is the complete table:
(11 inert, 70 Elements, 68 Isotopes)= 149
The Academic version would be:
(7 inert, 43 Elements, 68 Isotopes) = 118 and an array of subatomic particles(not defined).

You must remember this is the Russellian version, isotopes are a musical division of the elements.
Also apha and omega Tomions are joining.

This is one of the diagrams from one of the chapters in my new book. This is version 1.

I have added new particles to complete the table.

Before alpha Tomion : 3 added Elements + 1 Inert Gas

ETHERON - As per Chris Illertís model
TESLARON - Nicola Tesla
RUSSELON - Walter Russell
GOGUNON - Gogu Constantinescu

After omega Tomion : 19 added Isotopes + 4 added Elements + 1 Inert Gas

Regards Arto
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #207 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2012, 10:04 AM
MonsieurM's Avatar
MonsieurM MonsieurM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 10,038
Send a message via MSN to MonsieurM
artoj .... and thank you for the amazing reproduction of WR Table of elements


Quote:
Originally Posted by artoj View Post
As an artist, I am in concordance with Water Russell, please enjoy.

This is a revamp on the circular 1926 Table of Elements By Walter Russell.

His table had only 121 total elements:
(9 Inert, 63 Elements, 49 Isotopes )= 121
If you complete the table at Nobelium in place of the omega Tomion then you have:
(9 inert, 63 Elements, 56 isotopes ) =128
This is the complete table:
(11 inert, 70 Elements, 68 Isotopes)= 149
The Academic version would be:
(7 inert, 43 Elements, 68 Isotopes) = 118 and an array of subatomic particles(not defined).

You must remember this is the Russellian version, isotopes are a musical division of the elements.
Also apha and omega Tomions are joining.

This is one of the diagrams from one of the chapters in my new book. This is version 1.

I have added new particles to complete the table.

Before alpha Tomion : 3 added Elements + 1 Inert Gas

ETHERON - As per Chris Illertís model
TESLARON - Nicola Tesla
RUSSELON - Walter Russell
GOGUNON - Gogu Constantinescu

After omega Tomion : 19 added Isotopes + 4 added Elements + 1 Inert Gas

Regards Arto
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #208 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2012, 02:54 PM
cplouffe cplouffe is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 24
Does this not go against the foundation of Walter and Lao's work? Why the need to add more inert gases which adds more octaves? Just curious.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #209 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2012, 03:42 PM
artoj's Avatar
artoj artoj is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 146
Ode to Walter

Hi, as you can see I did not diminish his 9 octave cycle. Walter used Tomion as the alpha and omega of his musical element octaves, this completes the 9 octaves as Walter envisioned. I gave it some new information that can be seen to extend his table. The added 4 smaller particles were there to complete the cycle of octaves as the aesthetic sensibilities and the logic of Mr Russell would have done. Added information can be a way of reconciling the differences that the modern nuclear scientists cannot. This table had been slowly worked up over the last 10 years. The added octaves are only for completeness, this is a reverence of his understanding and hopefully generate some thought into the modern misunderstanding of nuclear physics.

Remember he formulated this in 1926, I replaced the unknowns with the current names and the extension only exists because of new knowledge. Walter would not want dogmatism replacing creativity as all his writing and artwork show.

I have presented this table to the Energetic forum freely, I hope it can of great value to those who seek knowledge, Thank you and Regards Arto.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #210 (permalink)  
Old 11-19-2012, 04:34 PM
artoj's Avatar
artoj artoj is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 146
Ode to Walter

Addendum:

Please read Chris Illerts "Alchemcy Today", not the a simple read but, it clearly demonstrates the need to re-write how nuclear physics operates. I knew Chris back in the 1990's not long after he shook up the Einstein crowd of misinformers with his clarity and complete knowledge of nuclear physics as the system understood it. What Chris did with one line of simple maths replaced the rubbish they scribbled on 2 blackboards.

Regards Arto
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
2007 Copyright ? Energetic Forum? A Non Profit Corporation - All Rights Reserved