Energetic Forum  
Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Delicious Digg Reddit WordPress StumbleUpon Tumblr Translate Addthis Aaron Murakami YouTube ONLY 13% OF SEATS AVAILABLE!!!*** 2017 ENERGY CONFERENCE ***


* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX


Go Back   Energetic Forum > >
   

Renewable Energy Discussion on various alternative energy, renewable energy, & free energy technologies. Also any discussion about the environment, global warming, and other related topics are welcome here.

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator
Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #91  
Old 01-06-2012, 12:12 AM
dambit's Avatar
dambit dambit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 492
Send a message via Skype™ to dambit
I don't know why, maybe it's too early in the morning for me, but your description just blew my mind.

It seems so simple now. I really need to start building soon.

Cheers,

Steve
__________________
You can view my vids here

http://www.youtube.com/SJohnM81
Reply With Quote

Download SOLAR SECRETS by Peter Lindemann
Free - Get it now: Solar Secrets

  #92  
Old 01-06-2012, 01:08 AM
dambit's Avatar
dambit dambit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 492
Send a message via Skype™ to dambit
I think in that diagram the object labeled ++ is the heating element and does not rotate. All of this, in my opinion, would be submerged in water or have water channels cut into it (like in an engine block) to generate steam. The second device in the PDF posted earlier is the rotary device.

As far as the positioning of the bifilar coil, I'm not sure yet.

Cheers,

Steve
__________________
You can view my vids here

http://www.youtube.com/SJohnM81

Last edited by dambit; 06-18-2012 at 04:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 01-06-2012, 07:15 PM
barbosi barbosi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 270
Thanks for not letting derail this thread.

The scope, as I see it, is far beyond lighting a bulb in a poor household and applications are limited only by one's imagination.

All this is not a far event, nor a SciFi one. Is happening right under our very eyes:

‘Time Cloak’ Makes Events Invisible

Russell's lenses are right there in that picture (attached also for safe keeping). This article explains also in its core the Philadelphia Experiment, which the gossip says it was designed and directed for a while by Tesla himself.

It's a shame that the picture disappeared from the original web site:
Pentagon-backed 'time cloak' stops the clock (Update)

The point is that Russell's Science is applied nowadays to alter the perception of reality or after others, the hologram we all live. If I could do just that, I personally would quit my poor household when I feel cold and jump right on a sunny beach. I won't have to worry about food or lack of any material possessions. I would just live the joy of love for all life. And if I could do that, imagine what kind of world we all could create to live in.

And for that, Russell himself (and I quoted him) tells us that we have to take only the inspiration from our teachers and work to achieve our desires for the purpose of regiving. Copy/paste of one's individual work has not much value, unless it serves as inspiration for greater work. And when I say that, I say it with great respect towards all individuals who had in the past and still have nowadays some of their work to offer.

As an old Chinese (I believe) saying warns us, "The finger pointing to the moon, is not the moon". (Try to show to your pet dog the moon and see how he directs all his attention to your finger.)
Same, the teachings of our teachers (or our peers) are not the knowledge. But just inspiration for our own work to create through the knowledge.

I believe it is no mistake that Russell's Home Study Course starts with what is and how to do "Meditation". It's a pity that nowadays, not many discuss, it is almost like we should be ashamed about it. It's like we are ashamed of our nakedness and we need to cover ourselves with the cloth of our Ego.
Russell teaches us how to meditate, which when properly done, delivers all the answers we desire from the infinite reservoir of knowledge.

Regards.

PS With this I hope I explained somehow the nature of my frustration and I apologise if I offended someone with my impatience. It appears to me we cannot rush the time. Oh! Wait a minute, what was all the fuss about cloaking time? Can we alter time? Well... That's all folks...
Attached Images
File Type: png Temporal-cloak.png (54.5 KB, 32 views)
__________________
 

Last edited by barbosi; 01-06-2012 at 11:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 01-06-2012, 10:07 PM
MonsieurM's Avatar
MonsieurM MonsieurM is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 10,078
Send a message via MSN to MonsieurM
Quote:
Originally Posted by purelyconstructive View Post
Indeed. This cuts right to the very core of what our existence is all about. "The Great Work" is to first become aware of, and then operate from, one's Center. "Gnosis" is a knowing of Oneness. Today, I had written a short post at another forum describing this very thing:



Levitation, Interstellar Travel, Teleportation, Transmutation, Materialization, and all other such "technologies" are connected in principle. And it seems very likely that all of them are about to enter into human awareness in a very real (and possibly even dramatic) way simultaneously. Whether that way is constructive or destructive is up to the choices of every individual.

Further, the understanding of the operation of these technologies requires a particular way of thinking. When we think more in terms of potentials and energies (i.e.: vibrations) all seemingly "paranormal" phenomena are automatically given a plausible scientific explanation as well:

*"Psychic Abilities" (e.g.: "Precognition", "Clairvoyance", "Auric Sight", "Telepathy", "Telekinesis", etc.),
*"Pre-Birth" and "After-Death" Experiences, "Past Lives" and "Reincarnation",
*"Ghosts" and other "Bodiless" Entities,
Etc.

All of Reality is now open to us. What are we doing with that knowledge?
just had to say thank you ...could not have said it any better
__________________
“Signs and symbols rule the world, not words nor laws.” -Confucius.
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 01-06-2012, 10:14 PM
MonsieurM's Avatar
MonsieurM MonsieurM is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 10,078
Send a message via MSN to MonsieurM
Quote:
Originally Posted by purelyconstructive View Post

All of Reality is now open to us. What are we doing with that knowledge?


Grow up maybe

Quote:
The real mystery of life is not a problem to be solved, it is a reality to be experienced.' - J.J. Van der Leeuw .
__________________
“Signs and symbols rule the world, not words nor laws.” -Confucius.

Last edited by MonsieurM; 01-06-2012 at 10:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 01-06-2012, 11:55 PM
Farmhand Farmhand is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,389
Quote:
Originally Posted by barbosi View Post
Using same terms but the idea is the different as Russell's writing ;
Sorry MonsieurM, I had to twist your phrase (above) to make a point



In my opinion, with regard to WR's definitions, often the terms like Back Electromotive Force (BEMF) and Couter Electromotive Force are misunderstood reflecting the area of education. These words pass as a slang on different professions and often may look even contradictory.
Dr. Lindemann will describe it as it manifests in electric motors. A counter motive force (which in my opinion is different than BEMF) which will generate an opposing magnetic field, yada, yada, yada....
John Bedini will describe it as the spike generated when a current is suddenly interrupted while flowing through a coil. As a friend pointed out a long time ago, Tesla considered the spike not being BEMF, nor counter EMF (CEMF). Better quote the master when talking about radiant energy.



Walter Russell defined radiative action as the return to the Source, fulfilling the desire for rest. Radiating away from the compressed action which forms also matter. Integrating event (EMF) vs. disintegrating event (BEMF). The so called "radiative spike" in Bedini terminology, is in fact just pure EMF. dI/dt in this case is INFINITE and an oscilloscope cannot display it. Not in amplitude, nor in duration. A later spike... yes, but that is the effect of radiant event.
Yes, the collapsing magnetic field of an inductor produces forward "emf" not
back "emf" , the "emf" from the magnetic field collapse is opposed by it's own
back emf . Back emf cannot be harvested, it exists only to oppose the flow of
current in a wire, as far as I can tell. In my opinion it is like a shadow, it can't
be caught.

To me it makes no sense when people say they are capturing Back emf. If the
BEMF was removed when emf is applied almost unrestricted current flow would
occur in a low resistance coil. When there is no emf there is no BEMF so I
can't see how it could possibly be harnessed or captured, but it is used all the
time when we apply emf. Electricity wouldn't make much sense without it.

P.S. When people say the are breaking or beating Lenz's law are also kind of
saying they have beaten BEMF or found a way to capture it, but they are
mistaken in my opinion. It would be like trying not to cast a shadow standing
in the sunlight, or like grabbing the shadow and holding it, it can't be done.

We just should accept that we cast a shadow when we stand in the sun.

Cheers
__________________
 

Last edited by Farmhand; 01-07-2012 at 12:04 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 01-09-2012, 08:04 PM
Kali__ma__Amar Kali__ma__Amar is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 5
Hello,

I'm happy to see some new interest in Dr's cosmology.
I also ran upon it some years ago, and it got me in it's grips since then...
A journey for your life...

Unfortunately on the net, there seems to be very few students of his cosmology. So a profound exchange isn't possible.
There wasn't (and IMHO still isn't) a good Wikipedia-page about him and his cosmology. Back then I at least made a list of all the books, to make the introduction easier for new students.
There was a time, when the philosophy forum was still there, where some deeper discussions were possible. Unfortunately it has been sold to the able2know forums and then it simply died...

If some of you are interested in it. Here is a better picture of Dr's coil in the magnets-article (I also don't know, why exactly this pic is in such a bad quality in the pdf that is available online):



It's not exactly from the magnets article, but from the IECEC-article. But they are anyway the same...

I personally am a quite intuitive person. This is why I always immediately feel inside myself, if I read anything, and look if it resonates within me. If it does, it is the truth or at least is currently meant for me. If it doesn't, then I simply drop it. (E.g. this is why I was never interested in the TPU/Bedini/...-stuff)
But IMHO the works of Dr (Russell), Schauberger, Keely and Schappeller belong to the same realm.
Also Reich had some interesting discoveries and findings, but IMHO he never got the picture complete.
Also especially the work of Karl von Reichenbach profoundly gives Dr's cosmology a firm experimental proof.
But of these, IMHO Schappeller is closest in his description to Dr's cosmology. So if people are interested, then maybe they can get some inspiration from him.

Although I studied all his books, and the important ones, several times over now, I'm still far from understanding his cosmology. As he said, the truth doesn't come by reading the books. The books just inspire you and get you into the right vibratory realm of consciousness, but the truth has to come from within.

Anyways. I personally think, although things like the table of elements are a nice optical feature to look at, at the beginning, the more profound basic questions are much more interesting.
This is why I like so much the small book "The Russell Genero-Radiative Concept". In it he explains his cosmology with several practical experiments.
IMHO if you can really understand them, you will have a much more solid ground to go further in his cosmology.
But as I said: I cannot claim myself to really understand all of them. I had a very thorough technical education, so this maybe blocks my view now from the real truth...
Example:
One of the statements I still do not get is: Why do two electrically positive charged bodies repel (as they are both in a preponderantly charging state)?
His explanation always goes into a magnetic explanation. I know, for him they are equals. But you don't see any magnetic field around a charged body. Or does the polarization arise due to the potential drop of the environment and therefore they get equally polarized in the same environment and then therefore they get repelled?

The basic question some may have: Is Russell right?

As I said, for me, I have the feeling it is the truth.
But even if I wouldn't have it. During the last years more and more unusual observations, which were made, which completely puzzled mainstream science, were exactly predicted like that by Dr a long time ago.
Just a recent example:
When a few months ago the new space probe for Mercury delivered it's data, scientist were baffled. It obviously looked as if mercury had somehow shrinked in it's size.
Well Dr told this a long time ago, as long as a planet is nearing the sun's equatorial plane, on it's spiral journey outside, it will shrink due to the higher potential pressure in this region. This happens for quite newly born planets. Planets like the earth e.g. are already through this and now only expand and expand and expand until they disappear into insignificance to become later regenerated.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 01-15-2012, 10:59 AM
MonsieurM's Avatar
MonsieurM MonsieurM is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 10,078
Send a message via MSN to MonsieurM
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by purelyconstructive View Post

The note document has been updated as well.

Started reading your Notes ...they are quite an eye opener...thank you

just on observation...Your notes became Crystal Clear when I Applied the First Principle: Principle of Mentalism: Universe is all Wave

the following animation also helped:



you can find the picture of this animation in this folder: called it Time Warp of a Standing Wave

time warp standing wave pictures by MonsieurM - Photobucket

also this:

__________________
“Signs and symbols rule the world, not words nor laws.” -Confucius.

Last edited by MonsieurM; 01-15-2012 at 11:48 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 01-15-2012, 11:58 AM
MonsieurM's Avatar
MonsieurM MonsieurM is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 10,078
Send a message via MSN to MonsieurM
As I read your notes, patterns start to match up:

For Instance the following image:




seem to match with:




__________________
“Signs and symbols rule the world, not words nor laws.” -Confucius.
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 01-15-2012, 01:26 PM
MonsieurM's Avatar
MonsieurM MonsieurM is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 10,078
Send a message via MSN to MonsieurM
I don't know if you read about him:

Leon Sprink - Antigravity - patents

some of the experiments you propose resemble the experiments he ran



Quote:
Instead of the expensive and time consuming chemical method of obtaining free
nitrogen in LIMITED quantities, Nature's method would produce free nitrogen
cheap, quickly, and in UNLIMITED quantities. It is not necessary to call attention
to the value of commerce and to agriculture, not to mention soil regeneration, that
this method of obtaining nitrogen would be to the world.
In September, 1927, I demonstrated this principle of dual polarity control by
arranging two pairs of solenoids - one pair with more windings than the other - in
such a manner that the dual polarity of Nature was simulated.
With a steel or glass disc for an equator and a steel rod for amplitude, I adjusted my
solenoids approximately to a plane angle where I roughly calculated oxygen
belonged in its octave. I improvised an adjustment apparatus which would enable
me to fasten any adjustment securely at any angle I chose.
I then inserted a few cubic centemeters of water in an evacuated quartz tube which
had electrodes at each end for spectrum analysis readings.
__________________
“Signs and symbols rule the world, not words nor laws.” -Confucius.

Last edited by MonsieurM; 01-15-2012 at 01:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #101  
Old 01-15-2012, 02:03 PM
Dave45 Dave45 is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,501
Quote:
Originally Posted by purelyconstructive View Post
The various Aether Theories, Electric Universe Models, Fractal Cosmologies, Digital Physics Theories about Holographic Universes, Spherical Standing-Wave Models of Matter, etc. all find their convergence in Music. Even a cursory glance of each of these things yields an understanding of their Interconnectedness.

Electrical phenomena are scalable in nature; their patterns show up self-similarly, on every level of scale, and are thus fractal. Recursion is a simple process and leads to complex organic patterns (like in Life Game). And whether sound waves or electrical waves, all wave phenomena follows musical patterns.

Power Laws (Harmonic Series, Inverse-Square, Surface Area:Volume, etc.).

I feel that the term "Music of the Spheres" refers to the various "Spheres" (or planes of existence), rather than just the motion of the bodies of the solar system.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

My conception of Aether may seem more philosophical in nature, somewhat akin to the ancient concept of it being the "One substance" out of which all manifest things find their Birth and Rebirth. However, to call it "substance" does not mean it is "material" per se, but that it is Reality itself.

Not an inert medium for that transmission of waves (although waves can travel through it), but also a generator of waves. It is the only thing that is Self-Creating, and The Creation Process happens from every Point of it Infinitely and Eternally. It is Reality itself.

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

The note document has been updated as well.
So very true, and when we realize this aether is energy that our Creator put in motion that is still reverberating throughout our universe still creating, we are starting to wake up.
This is a very interesting thread I cant believe I havent been keeping up with it, I'll catch up when I have time.
__________________
Half of the Answer is knowing the right Question

Last edited by Dave45; 01-15-2012 at 02:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 01-20-2012, 05:47 AM
StweenyA's Avatar
StweenyA StweenyA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Home is where the heart is
Posts: 169
Great posts all, so much to wrap my mind around.

Haven't posted in awhile, because work has been keeping me very busy, and anyway, I try to only post when I feel I have something to add, and not just to break the silence. I hope I'm not thought of as "half dedicated" because of that...

anyway..

I was just thinking about the so-called "anti gravity" inventions (ufo's too), that have to rotate around the Y axis in order to take off...

Well, gravity according to WR is centripetal... spinning in the one direction.... so if you spin the anti-gravity device (magnet maybe?) in the other direction, wouldn't you be able to counter gravity?
__________________
‎"It's all in the MIND"
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 01-20-2012, 09:45 AM
petar113507 petar113507 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 243
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by MonsieurM View Post




With another picture from MM to build on the concept of the inertial planes walter russell talked about in The Universal One.

because those red/blue from the coral castle picture look an awful lot like the "recessive opposite"...



I think that russell shows us -- if we connect the dots between his drawings, how he visualized the "inertial planes"...



The commonality of the positives being on the left side, and the negatives on the right in two is enough to indicate the common angle -- viewed instead in a shift in perspective.

Russell's inertial plane was the stable position in which the opposite (+/-) forces could cancel out.

I think that if we can move the inertial plane (plus heating/cooling) it can "lock" and cool in that (modified) potential position.

Has anyone seen EFTV 18 "Transmutation", or given serious thought to John Milewski's "Growing gold from glass"?

I know I can't be the only one out there thinking that they're very similar processes accomplishing "transmutation" using similar processes...

Hope to spark discussion about the inertial planes...
(sorry it took this long to join it )

==Romo
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 01-20-2012, 11:11 AM
dambit's Avatar
dambit dambit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 492
Send a message via Skype™ to dambit
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonsieurM View Post

Hi All,

This image means absolutely nothing to me. It just looks like a broken clock. I have no idea what it represents and I have been unable to find an explanation for it. Can someone kindly educate me on this?

Also, no actual build progress yet on the coils as actual work is quite busy at the moment. I will get them started soon though.

Cheers,

Steve
__________________
You can view my vids here

http://www.youtube.com/SJohnM81
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 01-21-2012, 04:40 AM
petar113507 petar113507 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 243
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by dambit View Post
Hi All,

This image means absolutely nothing to me. It just looks like a broken clock. I have no idea what it represents and I have been unable to find an explanation for it. Can someone kindly educate me on this?

Also, no actual build progress yet on the coils as actual work is quite busy at the moment. I will get them started soon though.

Cheers,

Steve
The formula of locked potentials, is what that chart is referring to.





Pretend that that arrow can move -- It's easy to see in the visual imagination.

That inner spiral that the arrow is moving along, is russell's periodic table.

You can move the arrows so that the butt of the arrow is pinned to the element you want to see the potential of.

Let's look at oxygen, and nitrogen -- gasses which russell was supposedly able to transmute (see documents prior posted)

So, we find oxygen on his periodic table



If the snakes head is north....


I'd bet the arrows point is north.

The tail, the south pole -- if placed as a "dominant" force (the coil with a wind or two more) , along those line angles -- might be something russell could have suggested in his drawings.

If in the very least -- we know the rough parameters of his water vapor transmutation; some angles would be simple enough to test...

Water vapor into dominantly nitrogen, or oxygen....

I am winding seashell coils, because I think they mimic russell's cones. I'd like to freeze them....
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 01-21-2012, 04:56 AM
petar113507 petar113507 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 243



When the back part of the arrow is pointing from 1+, the pointer goes to 1- along the maze (seen highlighted by green) -- if the arrow were spinning it would make a cone -- a wider cone....





First two potentials the "cones" are not intersecting in motion with very rigorous energy exchange with the space around it -- so they are more nebulous.



Russell described a self-resembling, and self-repeating universe (Sounds holographic, or fractal, no ?) --

And the "cones" contract more in motion -- the center point of the periodic table is carbon....



In Russell's table, the spheres are the noble gases, and from them, the elements grow...


Imagine that from the spheres (noble gasses) are here in the center of MM's picture...



a slight distortion in a controlling "cone's" (Vertical) position, produces an "Inertial plane" along a different locking potential axis. So that if the top plane were squeezed close enough together it would look like the carbon molecule.



Those little notches on the side of that colorful circle indicate the "inertial plane" -- where the magnetic feild "neutral center" -- needs to be. That is, I think where the n/s cancel out.

Bedini uses different iron cores that extend outside his generator coils. Russell uses one coil which is slightly more powerful to create an off-center "neutral" zone, in the gas as it is cooling? If we direct where that off-center neutral zone is, in the gas, I think we control what element we can transmute some of the gas into...

Russell figured a pretty interesting way to visualize how "canceling" regions of these cones looked like different states of matter.

Check out rex research where the two cones.
Walter Russell -- Energy Generator Coils

the intersecting region of the coils looks a bit like MM's "time warp standing wave".

Image hosting, free photo sharing & video sharing at Photobucket


==Romo
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 01-21-2012, 05:07 AM
petar113507 petar113507 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 243
I think in order to understand russell's work, we need to learn how he used many different diagrams to express the different contracting and expanding dimensions.



and the formula of locked potentials is one way to interpert some of those dimensions expanding and contracting....

I personally think russell wanted to give us a system to predict properties, and transmute substances into other apparent substances.

it is at least very interesting to see how methodical and subtle some of these coincidences seem to be in his detailed work....


==Romo
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 01-21-2012, 12:25 PM
MonsieurM's Avatar
MonsieurM MonsieurM is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 10,078
Send a message via MSN to MonsieurM
Thank you Romo for this enlightening explanation...one think i would like to add...imo....if the Universe is All Mind...what is the fastest way to re connect with the All Mind...Your Imagination because you are emulating the Process of Creation of the All....You will be putting yourself in a State of Harmony with the Universe

some quotes from Tesla:

Quote:
“Though free to think and act, we are held together, like the stars in the firmament, with ties inseparable. These ties cannot be seen, but we can feel them.”
Quote:
“Our first endeavors are purely instinctive prompting of an imagination vivid and undisciplined. As we grow older reason asserts itself and we become more and more systematic and designing. But those early impulses, though not immediately productive, are of the greatest moment and may shape our very destinies. Indeed, I feel now that had I understood and cultivated instead of suppressing them, I would have added substantial value to my bequest to the world. But not until I had attained manhood did I realize that I was an inventor.”



Quote:
Originally Posted by petar113507 View Post





I think that russell shows us -- if we connect the dots between his drawings, how he visualized the "inertial planes"...



The commonality of the positives being on the left side, and the negatives on the right in two is enough to indicate the common angle -- viewed instead in a shift in perspective.

Russell's inertial plane was the stable position in which the opposite (+/-) forces could cancel out.

I think that if we can move the inertial plane (plus heating/cooling) it can "lock" and cool in that (modified) potential position.

Has anyone seen EFTV 18 "Transmutation", or given serious thought to John Milewski's "Growing gold from glass"?

I know I can't be the only one out there thinking that they're very similar processes accomplishing "transmutation" using similar processes...

Hope to spark discussion about the inertial planes...
(sorry it took this long to join it )

==Romo
__________________
“Signs and symbols rule the world, not words nor laws.” -Confucius.

Last edited by MonsieurM; 01-21-2012 at 12:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 02-02-2012, 06:34 PM
electronicsounds's Avatar
electronicsounds electronicsounds is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Malta
Posts: 48
Send a message via Yahoo to electronicsounds
what am I not understanding?

In the book'' new concept of the universe'' in page 15/98 it is said that fast moving short waves simulate solids, while slow moving long waves simulate the gasses of space which surround solids.......but on the other hand in the periodic table diagrams included, gases are pictured as the fast moving short waves.
Has anyone else had this problem while trying to understand Walter's work?
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 02-06-2012, 12:15 AM
petar113507 petar113507 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 243


I think that means, if you look at the entire concept he is describing -- his words might be describing similar but opposite processes -- which may appear to contradict each other according to our understanding of what was being described.

I think as he gives a more detailed explaination of his comprehension of this concept using different words, decribing space around bodies to sustain form in motion.

I do not mean for this to be offensive or mystifying, but I think that he was trying to express the concept of form of bodies, and that by trying to split hairs with our present 'handful' understanding -- wont necessarily allow us to understand what he intended to impart as a concept, or what he meant.

==Romo
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #111  
Old 02-06-2012, 08:12 PM
electronicsounds's Avatar
electronicsounds electronicsounds is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Malta
Posts: 48
Send a message via Yahoo to electronicsounds
thanks for your help petar113507 and purelyconstructive

@ petar113507: no offense taken mate, I asked because was not able to comprehend, there's nothing to hide,language is really limited when talking about such concepts, thanks for your help
@ purelyconstructive: thanks, the way you looked at the concept helped me picture things better
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 02-08-2012, 02:00 PM
dambit's Avatar
dambit dambit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 492
Send a message via Skype™ to dambit
purelyconstructive,

Thanks for you above description. Yours is the one that has been the clearest for me to understand. Thanks to those who also gave a description of the cosmic clock image. This is a perfect real-world example of why Walter Russell repeated what he was saying in numerous ways. So that one of the descriptions would get through, so to speak.

Cheers,

Steve
__________________
You can view my vids here

http://www.youtube.com/SJohnM81
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 02-09-2012, 12:02 AM
cplouffe cplouffe is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by purelyconstructive View Post
As far as I understand it, this is a way of relating rate of vibration to the different states of matter in a general sense. "Fast moving short waves" of energy simulate solids because of their speed. Around the same section they write something to effect of "if a spider web could move fast enough, it would simulate a solid steel disk". Inversely, "slow moving long waves" simulate gases because they are more tenuous in comparison.

On the periodic table, I believe the wave seems shorter towards the first octaves (where the gases are) and longer towards the later octaves because the atoms seem to be getting larger throughout. Perhaps in this case it would be easiest to think of the wave as mainly depicting size, and not necessarily rate of vibration.
First I want to say that I love this thread and the different takes from different people. I have finished A New Concept, and Secret of Light recently and have now started Atomic Suicide. I love this stuff.

So anyways... I actually just finished the page where it shows the 9 octaves of matter chart and on the next page it says

"The universe might very appropriately be likened to a harp of nine strings, with nine tones in each string. In our diagram the strings are all indicated as of the same length for simplicity. In Nature the lower string is the longest. They grow gradually shorter up to the 9th."

So that is saying that Octave 1 is longest?
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 02-09-2012, 02:28 PM
MonsieurM's Avatar
MonsieurM MonsieurM is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 10,078
Send a message via MSN to MonsieurM
I wanted to bring your attention to Walter Russell's Periodic Table coupled with the following principle:


Here is a quotation by Walter describing some early experiments:

Quote:
In September, 1927, I demonstrated this principle of dual polarity control by
arranging two pairs of solenoids - one pair with more windings than the other - in
such a manner that the dual polarity of Nature was simulated.
The same Applies to the shape of an Egg

The South Pole of an Egg (ie the smaller tip) is smaller than the North Pole (ie: the bigger tip )







------------------take the example of Quartz: SiO2....look at Silicone and Oxygen

__________________
“Signs and symbols rule the world, not words nor laws.” -Confucius.
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 02-09-2012, 02:46 PM
cplouffe cplouffe is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by purelyconstructive View Post
It is no problem electronicsounds and dambit. Glad I could be of help. I really enjoy conversing with you all about this subject.



I believe you are correct. The 9-Stringed Harp layout is a little different from the spiral one. I think it does something like this:



On the spiral one, we start off small and get larger (from zero to infinity). On the harp string one, we start off big and get smaller (from infinity to zero). Both describe the same thing in different ways.

In general there is an intense inward compression in all directions for those elements at the beginning of the table as they arise out of The Still Magnetic Light ("the womb"). These elements are said to be "generoactive".

At the same time, there is an intense outward expansion in all directions for those elements at the end of the table as they decay back into The Still Magnetic Light ("the tomb"). These elements are radioactive.

It ends where it begins.
Ah I see what you’re saying. I guess mating the spiral and harp string charts are hard for me to visualize at the moment. I am going to try and create a few 3d models to get a better understanding. I seem to understand the dueling vortices principle and the centripetal/centrifugal forces but then when I try to think about it as harp strings I get confused.

So that chart is just another way to think about it the same thing. But is it more literal where the harp string principle is built into the spiral if we were to kind of straighten it out? Much thanks!!
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 02-09-2012, 08:33 PM
cplouffe cplouffe is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 24
Ok after studying and matching up all 3 charts I see what was missing. Harp string, No.1, and spiral.

In the harp string chart he has them labeled different. For example he shows the straight line for each octave without adding that is HAS to be a spiral or the octaves are wrong.

For example: Whenever the you get to 0 from red to blue it then JUMPS up and starts the next octave. The chart looks like it is all on one but during the transition to gas side or negative blue side it moves up to the next octave higher.

That makes the spiral chart much easier to comprehend. I may redo the chart as a reference point for myself. Fun!

Oh and I see that all the lines he has in the middle starting at 6th octave are the isotopes(although most of you prob already knew that ).
__________________
 

Last edited by cplouffe; 02-09-2012 at 08:34 PM. Reason: sp
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 02-09-2012, 11:59 PM
Bodkins's Avatar
Bodkins Bodkins is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,051
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonsieurM View Post
To resonate water, you would apply 393, 436, 524, and 589.5. However, this may not be a "hard and fast" rule, because we know that the highest frequency will contain all of the lower frequencies at harmonic intervals, but at lower amplitude.......
this is water that sounds like..... Water Resonance freq,? Walter Russell - Understanding and applying his work - YouTube


@peace Bodkins
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 02-12-2012, 02:23 PM
cplouffe cplouffe is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 24
Hey guys... I am wanting to create a 3D model of the periodic chart. But I was looking at one of the other charts and it has a 10th octave. hmmm. I haven't read that in any of his stuff yet. Am I missing something?

Also I feel like I need to build it as a spiral from larger at the bottom to smaller at the top, but I have to have the inertia line in there. So... does the wave loop out and then come back to the inertia line to connect? Just higher up, correct? But then I read about ellipsoids. How does that work if it looks like semi-circles of a wave.

Thanks for any help!
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 02-14-2012, 09:14 AM
dambit's Avatar
dambit dambit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 492
Send a message via Skype™ to dambit
So because energy travels in both directions, one could consider the elements of matter to be points in a "conical double helix". Sort of like the gene markers in our DNA double helix.
__________________
You can view my vids here

http://www.youtube.com/SJohnM81
Reply With Quote
  #120  
Old 02-14-2012, 12:05 PM
cplouffe cplouffe is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 24
Great!! Thanks for that explanation. That is my next step. Asking within and trying to get answers. A little too much time lately searching external sources.

I am almost done with Atomic Suicide. But I have read Secret of Light, and a New Concept without ever seeing the 10th. So I see now.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Please consider supporting Energetic Forum with a voluntary monthly subscription.

For One-Time Donations, use admin@ this domain > energeticforum.com

Choose your voluntary subscription

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v1.4.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
2007-2015 Copyright - Energetic Forum - All Rights Reserved

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

Tesla Chargers