 |
|
|||||||
| Psychic & Paranormal TRV, Remote Viewing, OBE, Psychic Phenomenon, Synchronicity, Metaphysics, and other related topics. |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
05-31-2007, 12:50 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
The Killshot
The Kill Shot - Ed Dames - how come major Dames is selling this info if it is going to affect half of the global population.
Shouldnt he warn countries that will be affected or this report is not real. Any ideas?     
|
|
05-31-2007, 03:49 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
The problem
Anyone here knows Law of Attraction. If mass population knows this Killshot, got into there system, got paranoid, these people fear this so called future event and because of this fear (LoA) it will create this event, even if it is not meant to happen.
...And if its true we're history.... Henrii
|
|
06-01-2007, 01:04 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Why are we talking about it?? We don't want to attract this....I rarely watch the news, or read the paper....it is all bad news, why do I want this in my life....I am much happier being "oblivious" to the bad stuff. It is not that I am not aware of what is going on in the world, or want to help others, but on a daily basis I find it overwhelming to deal with all of the worlds problems.
|
|
06-07-2007, 11:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Fear Sells
I checked out this site. I have two words for you folks:
Fear Sells. Note that this information is not being given away. Note the hyper slick presentation. Note the presence of a movie trailer. And the low low price of $24.95 for this information. I'll say it again. Fear Sells. I wouldn't give it a second thought, if I were you. I'm certainly not going to... love & hugs Chansonette
|
|
06-08-2007, 01:14 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Options?
I agree that we might be creating it attracting it and so on. We must however consider the posibility of it being true. Some people on this forum excluding myself have had some form of access to the akashic. I would prefer that someone actually verifies if this is a probable event and if so by how much. I would rather prepare then live in ignorance. I again see the dangers of attracting too much attention to this and a number of other events that might be set to occur. But I for one would rather know then not..
I don't know if this is the full video but I found it on google.
|
|
06-08-2007, 01:45 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Body Language
His body language suggested something not being clear. A feeling of insecurity. One hand over his other arm. This can be because he is in front of the camera, or it can be about the information spoken of.
|
|
06-09-2007, 01:00 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
There is a lot of talk in the Remote Viewing world about not being able to remote view anything past the year 2012.
I have never met, nor spoken with Ed Dames, however, I have read and heard him speak a lot about sessions that have been done over the last couple of decades detailing a series of events that result in the world be a very different place. Probably if you do a search on Art Bell's Coast to Coast website you will find some archived interviews with Dames talking about this subject. It appears to be one of the more popular subjects that he speaks about. I have never bothered remote viewing this....it does not hold an interest for me, however, I see how it would for some. I prefer to work targets that are of general interest to me, or targets that relate to my optimum in a particular circumstance....for instance my optimum domicile. If I am at my optimum, how can I be in any better place, regardless of what may happen? 
|
|
06-09-2007, 03:58 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
love & hugs Chansy
|
|
06-09-2007, 05:14 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Optimum
Quote:
I don't understand the terms, but I think you re describing self-actualization. In other words working on targets that help better yourself. I would be interested in learning of world events. So far that expectation is the only one that still holds some ground with me. The Mayan thing is starting to fade. I also saw the website of John Titor (I think that was his name). That he came back from the future etc. I guess for me figuring these things out is part of my own self-actualization. I don't think I would believe anyone else's account anyways. Part of the reason I wanted to OBE was to see things for myself. Stopped trusting the psychics and others people intuitions. That is part of the reason I wish to TRV. In the end my goal is to understand, myself and the world.
|
|
06-09-2007, 09:00 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Interesting stuff
Hi Bluelq!
You bring up many interesting subjects. I have literally been wanting to TRV John Titor for several years now...just have not made the time for it. The claims made are most interesting, and I will definitely get a round tuit and find out if the info posted about him is true. Regarding Technical Remote Viewing....it is a very strict, and sometimes boring, process, where one sits at a desk with paper and pen and follows a set of protocols prompting their subconscious to download information from the collective. This is very different than OBE's, astral projection and certain other experiences/processes that go by the name remote viewing. Optimum, when used in reference to TRV target cueing, is really rather rudimentary, not measuring up to the status of self-actualizing...it simply means, what is best all things considered. So if I were to cue a target: Kevin Pirolo/optimim domicile/12 months from current time The above is simply asking, for information about the best house for me to be living in 12 months from today. By best, that means taking every possible factor into consideration. Have fun on your adventure through life!
|
|
06-09-2007, 05:30 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ohh I got the bug
I was wrong in my previous posts, you are correct. Indeed astral vision and TRV are an entirely different process. They both might tap into the matrix but the technique is very different. I was under the impression that TRV was an image type viewing. After seeing some videos I have realised that is not the case.
WHichever the case, the bug has bitten me too. I am trying to find a way now to get those videos. Can't wait. As for Titor, I kept thinking about him last night. If indeed he was from the future, then the whole civil war thing did not occur. The 1%-2% variation was false and so on. More importantly though is the why. He did not give any concrete information about events, he actually instilled a weird future moral code. Death penalty and so on. Based on that people had enough with war. So half the people you know have died, water is scarce, people still believe in God, but could kill without a thought to survive? It seems logical but does not feel right. If indeed their is faith then humanity must follow. Notice he did not mention anything about LOA, as it was not that well know in 2001. More significant is the why? Why did he even tell us he is here. If I went back I wouldn't say a word. It serves no purpose, it can't change my future, I shouldn't have it change this timeline's future so why. If I did says something then I would say it all, not just general quotations of a possible outcome. Yet he feels honest, that indeed he is from the future. As such I come to only one other conclusion, he is from the future but does not have a good purpose in his actions. He is not here to help. That somehow adds up with my gut feeling.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
