Tweet
Innovation: abstraction and reality: plogiston and Ideal gas.
===
Quote by Albert Einstein about the value of Innovation:
“We can not solve our problems with the same level of thinking that created them.”
#
There are two ways of innovation.
a) to solve a problem with one absolutely new idea
( like Planck's quantum of action)
b) to solve a problem looking it from another point of view
( like was solved problem that '' heat is not a phlogiston substance,
but a dynamical form of mechanical effect'' that* slowly* evolved
into the new science of* ''thermodynamics'')
#
The ''phlogiston theory'' was accepted for more than 100 years.
Today, in my opinion, there is another kind of ''phlogiston theory''.
We know this a new* kind of ''phlogiston theory''.from about 1800
by the very old name* ''the theory of ideal gas.
More than 300 years we accept ''an ideal gas'' as an abstract theory.
#
What is an ideal gas ?
a) Ideal gas has the temperature T=0K* ( −273.15 °C)
b). Ideal gas molecules do not attract or repel each other.
c) Ideal gas molecules themselves take up no volume.
#
We usually remember the first things we learn.
The second thing it seems not so important and
the brain refuses* to pay attention on this subject.
For example.
At first in the school we were taught that
''ideal gas''(with temperature T=0K) is an abstract model,
Later we were taught that vacuum is not ''empty, dead place ''
because some kinds of ''quantum virtual particles'' exist there .
As result, the brain refuses to tie ''an abstract ideal gas'' with vacuum.
For me it sound strange.
If the vacuum was accepted as a some real substance
(book :* '‘Dreams of a final theory'’
'‘ It is true . . . there is such a thing as absolute zero''
by Steven Weinberg. Page 138.)
then why the ''ideal gas'' is still* an abstract model?
#
The thermodynamics was created from ''an ideal gas''
In ideal gas molecules /* particles don't interact each other.
But thermodynamics / heat is result of interaction between* particles.
Then i can suggest - small quantum's changes allow ideal particles
create thermodynamic effect.
#
In my opinion ''ideal gas'' is not an abstract model.
It is possible to apply all laws of ''ideal gas'' to zero vacuum
because they both have equal temperature: T=0K and then
the potential characteristic of vacuum's ''virtual particles''
will be clearly known.
Later using* Quantum theory and Lorentz / Einstein SRT
it is possible to understand how the potential characteristic of
''virtual particles''* change / transform* into Planck's dynamic
quantum particles of action.
#
The changes / transformations between potential and active
states of quantum particles are going according to
'' The Law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass''.
This law dictates that quantum particles off energy/mass cannot die,
they can only change / transform* their faces / images.
===========
===
Quote by Albert Einstein about the value of Innovation:
“We can not solve our problems with the same level of thinking that created them.”
#
There are two ways of innovation.
a) to solve a problem with one absolutely new idea
( like Planck's quantum of action)
b) to solve a problem looking it from another point of view
( like was solved problem that '' heat is not a phlogiston substance,
but a dynamical form of mechanical effect'' that* slowly* evolved
into the new science of* ''thermodynamics'')
#
The ''phlogiston theory'' was accepted for more than 100 years.
Today, in my opinion, there is another kind of ''phlogiston theory''.
We know this a new* kind of ''phlogiston theory''.from about 1800
by the very old name* ''the theory of ideal gas.
More than 300 years we accept ''an ideal gas'' as an abstract theory.
#
What is an ideal gas ?
a) Ideal gas has the temperature T=0K* ( −273.15 °C)
b). Ideal gas molecules do not attract or repel each other.
c) Ideal gas molecules themselves take up no volume.
#
We usually remember the first things we learn.
The second thing it seems not so important and
the brain refuses* to pay attention on this subject.
For example.
At first in the school we were taught that
''ideal gas''(with temperature T=0K) is an abstract model,
Later we were taught that vacuum is not ''empty, dead place ''
because some kinds of ''quantum virtual particles'' exist there .
As result, the brain refuses to tie ''an abstract ideal gas'' with vacuum.
For me it sound strange.
If the vacuum was accepted as a some real substance
(book :* '‘Dreams of a final theory'’
'‘ It is true . . . there is such a thing as absolute zero''
by Steven Weinberg. Page 138.)
then why the ''ideal gas'' is still* an abstract model?
#
The thermodynamics was created from ''an ideal gas''
In ideal gas molecules /* particles don't interact each other.
But thermodynamics / heat is result of interaction between* particles.
Then i can suggest - small quantum's changes allow ideal particles
create thermodynamic effect.
#
In my opinion ''ideal gas'' is not an abstract model.
It is possible to apply all laws of ''ideal gas'' to zero vacuum
because they both have equal temperature: T=0K and then
the potential characteristic of vacuum's ''virtual particles''
will be clearly known.
Later using* Quantum theory and Lorentz / Einstein SRT
it is possible to understand how the potential characteristic of
''virtual particles''* change / transform* into Planck's dynamic
quantum particles of action.
#
The changes / transformations between potential and active
states of quantum particles are going according to
'' The Law of conservation and transformation energy/ mass''.
This law dictates that quantum particles off energy/mass cannot die,
they can only change / transform* their faces / images.
===========
Comment