Energetic Forum

Energetic Forum (http://www.energeticforum.com/)
-   Personal Development (http://www.energeticforum.com/personal-development/)
-   -   A brief thought of fundamental basis in Physics. (http://www.energeticforum.com/personal-development/20969-brief-thought-fundamental-basis-physics.html)

socratus 04-14-2018 09:22 AM

A brief thought of fundamental basis in Physics.
 
1 Attachment(s)
A brief thought of fundamental basis in Physics.
==
Physics is created on some fundamental basis.
At first the basis was an absolute space and an absolute time.
But after discovering SRT, GRT, QT -* Newtonian basis was changed:
there isn't* absolute space, there isn't* absolute time.
In this situation scientists decided that universe was started
from ''singular point'' (big bang theory).* Most believe in such scenario.
A few don't believe.* Why?
a) Gravity forces are the weakest in nature and cannot
create ''singular point'' in the region as big as the whole Universe.
Gravity forces don't work even in a single galaxy and therefore were
invented unseen - unknown ''dark matter-energy''
(more than 90%-95%* in the universe)
b) Which force created ''big-bang'' is unknown.
c) ''big bang theory'' doesn't explain the principal problem:
''where did masses come from?''
#
Some physicists think: universe can start from vacuum.
Why?
a) About vacuum effect:
a) “ Its effects can be observed in various phenomena
(such as spontaneous emission, the Casimir effect, the
van der Waals bonds, or the Lamb shift), and it is thought
to have consequences for the behavior of the Universe
on cosmological scales. “
/ Vacuum energy - Wikipedia /

b)* Light Created from a Vacuum:
Casimir Effect Observed in Superconducting Circuit
/Science Daily (Nov. 18, 2011) /
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 133050.htm
#
Chalmers scientists create light from vacuum
http://www.chalmers.se/en/news/Pages/Ch ... acuum.aspx
#
Then i can think: vacuum is not nothingness,
if vacuum can somehow create light and particles
then it is possible that universe started from vacuum.
Is this idea gibberish?
Is this idea illogical ?
By the way,* Paul Dirac* wrote:
” The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,*
is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t correctly
describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct description
of something more complex? “
And* Einstein and Infeld*quote:
“ We have the laws, but we are not aware what the body
of reference system they belong to, and all our physical
construction appears erected on sand ”.
* /* Book “Evolution of Physics”*/
=====

socratus 04-19-2018 02:22 AM

In the era of Newtonian physics the materialism
was deterministic world.
In the era of Quantum physics the materialism
is probability world.
===

socratus 04-16-2019 01:29 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Dark Matter = Quantum Cosmology = Gravity
===
1- Dark matter doesn't emit or absorb light.
2 - Dark matter works only via gravity
3 - Dark matter is extremely cold
4 - Dark matter is extremely weak (the weakest stuff)
5 - Dark matter doesn't carry electric charge
6 - Dark matter is passive / neutral stuff
7 - Dark matter consists of (unknown) elementary particles
8 - Dark matter is much more than ordinary matter
9 - Dark matter must have some interaction with ordinary matter
10 - Dark matter can have non-gravitational interactions
11 - Dark matter must have own sector of existence
===
Ordinary matter interacts through the electromagnetic,
weak and strong forces -- helping the visual matter
of our world to form complex systems
Stars, rocks, oceans, plants and animals owe their
very existence to the unity of the non-gravitational
(EM, weak, strong) forces with ordinary matter.
Familiar picture can be thought of interaction
between antiparticles (antimatter) and dark matter
Antiparticles (as EM forces) 10^36 times stronger
than weak particles of dark matter and therefore
can involve it in a process of ''quantum gravity'',
the earliest state of creation our material World.
#
Scientists search a real / potential candidate for dark matter
=====

socratus 05-26-2019 05:01 PM

Some Differences in Scientific Theories
===
1 - Difference between Neaton's and Einstein's
theries of gravitation.
a) Newton used two (2) bodies to explain ''gravity''.
b) Einstein used one (1) single body to explain ''gravity''

2 - Difference between Classical and Quantum mechanics.
a) Classical mechanics has models of objects
b) Quantum mechanics doesn't have model of quantum particle.
===

Pot head 05-26-2019 05:04 PM

Question
 
Can you draw any representation of the Quantum?
Maybe try?
Thank ya.

socratus 05-27-2019 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by socratus (Post 318095)
Some Differences in Scientific Theories
===
1 - Difference between Neaton's and Einstein's
theries of gravitation.
a) Newton used two (2) bodies to explain ''gravity''.
b) Einstein used one (1) single body to explain ''gravity''

2 - Difference between Classical and Quantum mechanics.
a) Classical mechanics has models of objects
b) Quantum mechanics doesn't have model of quantum particle.
===

1 - Einstein used one (1) single body to explain ''gravity''
In the real Universe there is plenty of room for more and
more Einstein's GRT ''single bodies''

2 - Classical objects have many - many different forms, but
Quantum particles must have only one standard geometric
form for everyone particle
===

socratus 05-27-2019 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pot head (Post 318096)
Can you draw any representation of the Quantum?
Maybe try?
Thank ya.

Quantum particle is a quantum of light particle
===

socratus 06-15-2019 07:57 PM

Doctrine of Creation
===
Creation is a process.
This process can be known by math / physical laws.
But before to know how this process is going, it needs
to know something about reference frame in which
this process is going. because to describe fish it needs
water and to describe animals it needs another
reference frame -- land. The reference frame has
great influence on physical process. Specific
reference frame is the common ground of all specific creations.
#
The creation began from simple to complex,
from micro-particles world to microworld.
Then it needs to know: in which reference
frame the micro-particles can exist.
#
Today we know -- micro-particles exist in CERN / LHC .reference frame.
========

socratus 06-18-2019 02:10 PM

1 Attachment(s)
The language of physics
06/11/19
By Lauren Biron
Word fans, rejoice!
Symmetry is back with another list of 10 common words
that take on a new meaning when spoken by scientists.
Check out the first and second lists,
then take these physics words for a spin, too

https://www.symmetrymagazine.org/art...age-of-physics
===

Spin
It’s easy to imagine a spinning planet, ballerina or
quantum particle because all these objects have
concrete geometrical form.
#
Tunneling
Quantum tunneling is instead a phenomenon in which a particle
can pass through a barrier by Heisenberg's uncertainty principle
#
Quintessence
Scientists use the term ''quintessence'' to discuss the
theoretical idea of an evolving type of dark energy
( Dark energy may be vacuum
https://phys.org/news/2007-01-dark-energy-vacuum.html )
=========

socratus 06-18-2019 08:20 PM

Infinity and Method of Renormalization
#
Renormalization is a collection of mathematical techniques
in quantum field theory, the statistical mechanics of fields,
and the theory of self-similar geometric structures, that are used
to treat infinities arising in calculated quantities by altering values
of quantities to compensate for effects of their self-interactions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renormalization

So, there are infinities in theories and physicists can get rid of them,
(by renormalization ) and so it seems, they shouldn't care about them.
Basically it means:
"Stop trying to understand things; shut up and calculate"
Everyone is free to take this attitude, but it certainly doesn't explain
why physicists encounter infinities in the first place and hence the
renormalization procedure is needed.
#
My opinion:
The concept of ''Infinity'' has concrete physical meaning and
'' method of renormalization '' could be thought as interaction
quantum particles / fields with an infinite structure of zero vacuum ( T=0K)
when all physical parameters of quantum particles renormalized .
==================

socratus 06-21-2019 12:10 AM

1 Attachment(s)
By Chance: Biology - Cosmology
===
Can reasonable child be created from zygote during
270 days of woman’s pregnancy by chance?
Does the theory of probability allow to create reasonable child
during 270 days of woman’s pregnancy by chance?
#
Our human body is a multi-cellular organism made up
of perhaps 100 trillion different cells.
Book: '‘ The unity of Nature'‘
‘'The information content in the nucleus of a single human cell
is comparable to that of a library containing a thousand volumes.'’
/ by Carl Friedrich von Weizsacker, page 40 /
Question:
How can 100 trillion different cells (100 trillion libraries with a
thousand volumes in each) create a child ( by the chance )
during 9 months of woman’s pregnancy ?
#
In my opinion this circumstance is similar to the ''Infinite monkey theorem''
''The infinite monkey theorem states that a monkey hitting keys
at random on a typewriter keyboard for an infinite amount of time
will almost surely type any given text, such as the complete works
of William Shakespeare.''
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem
#
But according to the modern theory of ‘big bang’ the Universe
exist only 14 billion years.
So, monkey's chance to write Shakespeare's Hamlet is zero.
But woman . . . . ?!
A single zygote evolves and develop 100 trillion different cells that
create reasonable child. By chance it is impossible.
It must take time much more than only 270 days of woman’s pregnancy
Maybe it will take time more than 14 billion years.
Then, maybe, before the ‘ big bang’ was a pregnant woman who
gave life to a child who invented the '‘ big- bang '’ theory (?)
======

socratus 06-24-2019 08:04 PM

1 Attachment(s)
How to make Theoretical Physics simple
#
To be simple Theoretical Physics needs
a real geometrical form of quantum particle.
It is impossible to take ''point-particle'' or ''string-particle''
as a real image of the quantum particle.
====


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v1.4.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
2007-2015 Copyright - Energetic Forum - All Rights Reserved