Tweet
Thread to compare Nunez POE and Henrichs GAAV-coil
It became quite clear that people have difficulties to understand the difference between Garuḍa Absolute ABHA Vortex Coil and POE-coil. But if one wants to make ABHA-shape of Randy Powell's as a coil, then one should choose GAAV-coil (CC4.0):
The calculation for this Garuḍa Absolute ABHA Vortex Coil (CC4.0) is: if n is the number of, in this model, round wire frames;; and k is the number of the grooves for wires in that frame.
The absolute ABHA form is achieved by computation for itŠ: if n=k, then in this coil n = k + 1 and ofcourse then also k = n - 1
simple example: 12 grooved GAAV-coil has 13 cirle or other way shaped frames, or 8 grooved 9 frames etc.
compared to POE-coil's computation: if n = k, then n = k , which is wrong calculation, if one wants to achieve ABHA-shape FULLY!
simple example: 12 grooved POE-coil has 12 circle frames
???? ????? Garu?a Ta?it - Garu?a Ta?it
The calculation for this Garuḍa Absolute ABHA Vortex Coil (CC4.0) is: if n is the number of, in this model, round wire frames;; and k is the number of the grooves for wires in that frame.
The absolute ABHA form is achieved by computation for itŠ: if n=k, then in this coil n = k + 1 and ofcourse then also k = n - 1
simple example: 12 grooved GAAV-coil has 13 cirle or other way shaped frames, or 8 grooved 9 frames etc.
compared to POE-coil's computation: if n = k, then n = k , which is wrong calculation, if one wants to achieve ABHA-shape FULLY!
simple example: 12 grooved POE-coil has 12 circle frames
???? ????? Garu?a Ta?it - Garu?a Ta?it
Comment