2020 ENERGY CONFERENCE - PRE-REGISTER NOW!!!!

## 2020 Energy Science & Technology Conference PRE-REGISTER NOW!!! http://energyscienceconference.com

 Energetic Forum Inertia and Spin.(maybe a philosophical thought)
 User Name Remember Me? Password
 Register FAQ Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
 Eric Dollard Magnetizer Products Tesla Chargers 2019 Energy Conference Energy Science Forum Donate Energy Times Advertising

 Personal Development Discussions on Law of Attraction and other self-help methods - binaural beats, hypnosis, reiki, meditation, and more.

* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX

#1
04-27-2018, 07:06 AM
 socratus Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Israel Posts: 452
Inertia and Spin.(maybe a philosophical thought)

Inertia and Spin.(maybe a philosophical thought)
===
1. Aristotle.
Every object needs force/power/energy for its moving.
No force - no movement.
2. Newton.
Of course the great Aristotle is right saying that there is
no movement without forces. I respect him very much and
I won’t make a fool myself quarreling with him.
However I can say more and explain Aristotle’s opinion
by the formula F = ma.
It means,
the force of moving object depends on acceleration of mass.
But here I have two opportunities / possibilities:
a) The acceleration appears as a result of outside influence.
One moving body interacts with another body (moving or resting).
b) But if I have only one, single body moving in the straight line
and it doesn’t interact with another body it means that this body
also must have an acceleration.
In this situation I don’t know how the acceleration appears,
I don’t know if it is inner acceleration of body,
But this kind of acceleration must exist and I will name it “inertia”.
3. Mach.
Newton doesn’t know the reason of inertia, but maybe inertia
depends on all stars, on all the matter in the Universe.
4. Planck.
Newton’s inertia is very strange, and Mach’s idea is strange too.
But if I will take that our Universe looks like a “black body “ then
I can suggest that must be some very small particle (quant)
which can move “inertial body'' with constant speed c = 1
over a period of time.
I will write this “inertial” moving of quanta by formula: h = Et.
But really, it is hard for me to believe that I am right.
5. Einstein.
Of course Planck is right.
But I don’t like the way he reached the result.
He says nothing concrete about the particle and the reason
of this acceleration’s beginning.
I will take another road.
If I use the Boltzmann resting particle (R/N = k) and give him
Wien’s displacement constant (b), as an acceleration,
then the particle will have the Planck’s impulse
but now the formula of impulse will be: h = kb.
Planck’s formulas and my own are equal, as they explain
behavior of quant (light quanta) from different point of view.
6. Goudsmit – Uhlenbeck.
It is all well.
But we can see different kinds of movements in the real Nature
And look at Planck’s formula h = Et. It includes time (t).
And time, by its nature, is a limited - relative parameter.
It means that this particle cannot go straight at all time
with constant speed c = 1.
This kind of moving must be temporary and can change.
So, another possibility is that the particle can ''spin'' around itself
and we will write this kind of moving by formula h = h/2π.
7. L. de Broglie and W.Heisenberg.
These two spins of particle are very important parameters,
and we will try to explain all phenomena in the Nature using
only these parameters. (h and h = h/2π)
But, unfortunately, neither had success.
Why did they fail?
Because to use only ''spin'' parameters (h and h = h/2π) are not enough.
The spin parameters belong to the particle what has also another parameters:
speed (c) and volume (a) and all together they can create particle which
we call electron: e^2 = αh*c. ( Sommerfeld's fine-structure constant formula)
Now using electron (E=h*f) and Boltzmann particle (R/N = k) it is possible
to explain the beginning of star formation (gravitation) and later all another
phenomena of Nature.
==================
Attached Images
 Inertia.png (6.1 KB, 0 views)
__________________

 Download SOLAR SECRETS by Peter Lindemann Free - Get it now: Solar Secrets
#2
04-30-2018, 07:36 AM
 socratus Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Israel Posts: 452
For the movement we must pay energy-money.
Your car wouldn't move even one inch without energy.
The same is about an ''inertia'' movement.
There isn't inertia without energy.
But Newtonian conception of ''inertia'' says nothing
about the forces/ energy of inertia.
#
The idea of energy for '' Inertia'' was discovered by Einstein.
In 1905 Einstein wrote paper :
“ Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy content?”
As he realized the answer was:
“ Yes, the inertia depends on its energy E= Mc^2.”
How can E=Mc^2 be responsible for inertial movement of quantum particle?
Nobody explains the details of such possibility of inertia movement.
Somebody wrote:
“An old professor of mine used to say
that anyone who can answer that question
what inertia is, would win a Nobel Prize. “
===========================
__________________

 Tags particle, moving, acceleration, body, formula, parameters, inertia, nature, explain, constant, time, don’t, means, h/2π, spin, kind, speed, planck’s, planck, boltzmann, r/n, strange, impulse, straight, write

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules

Please consider supporting Energetic Forum with a voluntary monthly subscription.

 Choose your voluntary subscription \$5 : \$5.00 USD - monthly \$7 : \$7.00 USD - monthly \$10 : \$10.00 USD - monthly \$25 : \$25.00 USD - monthly \$50 : \$50.00 USD - monthly \$75 : \$75.00 USD - monthly \$100 : \$100.00 USD - monthly \$175 : \$175.00 USD - monthly \$250 : \$250.00 USD - monthly

For one-time donations, please use the below button.

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:26 PM.

 Energetic Forum - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Top