Energetic Forum  
Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Delicious Digg Reddit WordPress StumbleUpon Tumblr Translate Addthis Aaron Murakami YouTube 2020 ENERGY CONFERENCE - PRE-REGISTER NOW!!!!

2020 Energy Science & Technology Conference
PRE-REGISTER NOW!!!
http://energyscienceconference.com


Go Back   Energetic Forum > >
   

Personal Development Discussions on Law of Attraction and other self-help methods - binaural beats, hypnosis, reiki, meditation, and more.

* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 04-14-2018, 09:22 AM
socratus's Avatar
socratus socratus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Israel
Posts: 423
A brief thought of fundamental basis in Physics.

A brief thought of fundamental basis in Physics.
==
Physics is created on some fundamental basis.
At first the basis was an absolute space and an absolute time.
But after discovering SRT, GRT, QT -* Newtonian basis was changed:
there isn't* absolute space, there isn't* absolute time.
In this situation scientists decided that universe was started
from ''singular point'' (big bang theory).* Most believe in such scenario.
A few don't believe.* Why?
a) Gravity forces are the weakest in nature and cannot
create ''singular point'' in the region as big as the whole Universe.
Gravity forces don't work even in a single galaxy and therefore were
invented unseen - unknown ''dark matter-energy''
(more than 90%-95%* in the universe)
b) Which force created ''big-bang'' is unknown.
c) ''big bang theory'' doesn't explain the principal problem:
''where did masses come from?''
#
Some physicists think: universe can start from vacuum.
Why?
a) About vacuum effect:
a) “ Its effects can be observed in various phenomena
(such as spontaneous emission, the Casimir effect, the
van der Waals bonds, or the Lamb shift), and it is thought
to have consequences for the behavior of the Universe
on cosmological scales. “
/ Vacuum energy - Wikipedia /

b)* Light Created from a Vacuum:
Casimir Effect Observed in Superconducting Circuit
/Science Daily (Nov. 18, 2011) /
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 133050.htm
#
Chalmers scientists create light from vacuum
http://www.chalmers.se/en/news/Pages/Ch ... acuum.aspx
#
Then i can think: vacuum is not nothingness,
if vacuum can somehow create light and particles
then it is possible that universe started from vacuum.
Is this idea gibberish?
Is this idea illogical ?
By the way,* Paul Dirac* wrote:
” The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,*
is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can’t correctly
describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct description
of something more complex? “
And* Einstein and Infeld*quote:
“ We have the laws, but we are not aware what the body
of reference system they belong to, and all our physical
construction appears erected on sand ”.
* /* Book “Evolution of Physics”*/
=====
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ETHER (2).jpg (12.4 KB, 0 views)
__________________
 

Last edited by socratus; 04-15-2018 at 12:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Download SOLAR SECRETS by Peter Lindemann
Free - Get it now: Solar Secrets

  #2  
Old 04-19-2018, 02:22 AM
socratus's Avatar
socratus socratus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Israel
Posts: 423
In the era of Newtonian physics the materialism
was deterministic world.
In the era of Quantum physics the materialism
is probability world.
===
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-16-2019, 01:29 AM
socratus's Avatar
socratus socratus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Israel
Posts: 423
Dark Matter = Quantum Cosmology = Gravity
===
1- Dark matter doesn't emit or absorb light.
2 - Dark matter works only via gravity
3 - Dark matter is extremely cold
4 - Dark matter is extremely weak (the weakest stuff)
5 - Dark matter doesn't carry electric charge
6 - Dark matter is passive / neutral stuff
7 - Dark matter consists of (unknown) elementary particles
8 - Dark matter is much more than ordinary matter
9 - Dark matter must have some interaction with ordinary matter
10 - Dark matter can have non-gravitational interactions
11 - Dark matter must have own sector of existence
===
Ordinary matter interacts through the electromagnetic,
weak and strong forces -- helping the visual matter
of our world to form complex systems
Stars, rocks, oceans, plants and animals owe their
very existence to the unity of the non-gravitational
(EM, weak, strong) forces with ordinary matter.
Familiar picture can be thought of interaction
between antiparticles (antimatter) and dark matter
Antiparticles (as EM forces) 10^36 times stronger
than weak particles of dark matter and therefore
can involve it in a process of ''quantum gravity'',
the earliest state of creation our material World.
#
Scientists search a real / potential candidate for dark matter
=====
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Dark matter.jpg (5.3 KB, 0 views)
__________________
 

Last edited by socratus; 04-16-2019 at 01:34 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-26-2019, 05:01 PM
socratus's Avatar
socratus socratus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Israel
Posts: 423
Some Differences in Scientific Theories
===
1 - Difference between Neaton's and Einstein's
theries of gravitation.
a) Newton used two (2) bodies to explain ''gravity''.
b) Einstein used one (1) single body to explain ''gravity''

2 - Difference between Classical and Quantum mechanics.
a) Classical mechanics has models of objects
b) Quantum mechanics doesn't have model of quantum particle.
===
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-26-2019, 05:04 PM
Pot head's Avatar
Pot head Pot head is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Nunya
Posts: 346
Question

Can you draw any representation of the Quantum?
Maybe try?
Thank ya.
__________________
I have been to another planet. It’s called My Family.
liscensed_pothead@yahoo.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-27-2019, 10:23 AM
socratus's Avatar
socratus socratus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Israel
Posts: 423
Quote:
Originally Posted by socratus View Post
Some Differences in Scientific Theories
===
1 - Difference between Neaton's and Einstein's
theries of gravitation.
a) Newton used two (2) bodies to explain ''gravity''.
b) Einstein used one (1) single body to explain ''gravity''

2 - Difference between Classical and Quantum mechanics.
a) Classical mechanics has models of objects
b) Quantum mechanics doesn't have model of quantum particle.
===
1 - Einstein used one (1) single body to explain ''gravity''
In the real Universe there is plenty of room for more and
more Einstein's GRT ''single bodies''

2 - Classical objects have many - many different forms, but
Quantum particles must have only one standard geometric
form for everyone particle
===
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-27-2019, 10:26 AM
socratus's Avatar
socratus socratus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Israel
Posts: 423
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pot head View Post
Can you draw any representation of the Quantum?
Maybe try?
Thank ya.
Quantum particle is a quantum of light particle
===
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-15-2019, 07:57 PM
socratus's Avatar
socratus socratus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Israel
Posts: 423
Doctrine of Creation
===
Creation is a process.
This process can be known by math / physical laws.
But before to know how this process is going, it needs
to know something about reference frame in which
this process is going. because to describe fish it needs
water and to describe animals it needs another
reference frame -- land. The reference frame has
great influence on physical process. Specific
reference frame is the common ground of all specific creations.
#
The creation began from simple to complex,
from micro-particles world to microworld.
Then it needs to know: in which reference
frame the micro-particles can exist.
#
Today we know -- micro-particles exist in CERN / LHC .reference frame.
========
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-18-2019, 02:10 PM
socratus's Avatar
socratus socratus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Israel
Posts: 423
The language of physics
06/11/19
By Lauren Biron
Word fans, rejoice!
Symmetry is back with another list of 10 common words
that take on a new meaning when spoken by scientists.
Check out the first and second lists,
then take these physics words for a spin, too

https://www.symmetrymagazine.org/art...age-of-physics
===

Spin
It’s easy to imagine a spinning planet, ballerina or
quantum particle because all these objects have
concrete geometrical form.
#
Tunneling
Quantum tunneling is instead a phenomenon in which a particle
can pass through a barrier by Heisenberg's uncertainty principle
#
Quintessence
Scientists use the term ''quintessence'' to discuss the
theoretical idea of an evolving type of dark energy
( Dark energy may be vacuum
https://phys.org/news/2007-01-dark-energy-vacuum.html )
=========
Attached Images
File Type: jpg P - L.jpg (6.1 KB, 2 views)
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-18-2019, 08:20 PM
socratus's Avatar
socratus socratus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Israel
Posts: 423
Infinity and Method of Renormalization
#
Renormalization is a collection of mathematical techniques
in quantum field theory, the statistical mechanics of fields,
and the theory of self-similar geometric structures, that are used
to treat infinities arising in calculated quantities by altering values
of quantities to compensate for effects of their self-interactions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renormalization

So, there are infinities in theories and physicists can get rid of them,
(by renormalization ) and so it seems, they shouldn't care about them.
Basically it means:
"Stop trying to understand things; shut up and calculate"
Everyone is free to take this attitude, but it certainly doesn't explain
why physicists encounter infinities in the first place and hence the
renormalization procedure is needed.
#
My opinion:
The concept of ''Infinity'' has concrete physical meaning and
'' method of renormalization '' could be thought as interaction
quantum particles / fields with an infinite structure of zero vacuum ( T=0K)
when all physical parameters of quantum particles renormalized .
==================
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-21-2019, 12:10 AM
socratus's Avatar
socratus socratus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Israel
Posts: 423
By Chance: Biology - Cosmology
===
Can reasonable child be created from zygote during
270 days of woman’s pregnancy by chance?
Does the theory of probability allow to create reasonable child
during 270 days of woman’s pregnancy by chance?
#
Our human body is a multi-cellular organism made up
of perhaps 100 trillion different cells.
Book: '‘ The unity of Nature'‘
‘'The information content in the nucleus of a single human cell
is comparable to that of a library containing a thousand volumes.'’
/ by Carl Friedrich von Weizsacker, page 40 /
Question:
How can 100 trillion different cells (100 trillion libraries with a
thousand volumes in each) create a child ( by the chance )
during 9 months of woman’s pregnancy ?
#
In my opinion this circumstance is similar to the ''Infinite monkey theorem''
''The infinite monkey theorem states that a monkey hitting keys
at random on a typewriter keyboard for an infinite amount of time
will almost surely type any given text, such as the complete works
of William Shakespeare.''
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_monkey_theorem
#
But according to the modern theory of ‘big bang’ the Universe
exist only 14 billion years.
So, monkey's chance to write Shakespeare's Hamlet is zero.
But woman . . . . ?!
A single zygote evolves and develop 100 trillion different cells that
create reasonable child. By chance it is impossible.
It must take time much more than only 270 days of woman’s pregnancy
Maybe it will take time more than 14 billion years.
Then, maybe, before the ‘ big bang’ was a pregnant woman who
gave life to a child who invented the '‘ big- bang '’ theory (?)
======
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Question.jpg (5.5 KB, 0 views)
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #12  
Old 06-24-2019, 08:04 PM
socratus's Avatar
socratus socratus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Israel
Posts: 423
How to make Theoretical Physics simple
#
To be simple Theoretical Physics needs
a real geometrical form of quantum particle.
It is impossible to take ''point-particle'' or ''string-particle''
as a real image of the quantum particle.
====
Attached Images
File Type: jpg E = 1.jpg (6.8 KB, 2 views)
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-28-2019, 09:31 PM
wayne.ct wayne.ct is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 552
Science means something

The problem is that people mean different things when they say "science". I mean experiments. My friend means logic. Another friend means Big Bang, etc.

Take any one of your big physics words and I would think it hard to come up with less than two definitions for what they mean. In other words, people of science have forgotten the very essence of communication using language. Forget about technobabble. All we really have now is babble! Try to prove this thread really means anything. Now we are talking physics! In other words, loose thinkers using flexible words talking in riddles and sophomoric platitudes.

Have you anything valuable to contribute to progress? Or, is this whole discussion about feelings and politics? All heat and no light?
__________________
There is a reason why science has been successful and technology is widespread. Don't be afraid to do the math and apply the laws of physics.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-29-2019, 03:40 AM
BroMikey's Avatar
BroMikey BroMikey is online now
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by socratus View Post
1 - Einstein used one (1) single body to explain ''gravity''
Einstein has been a proven puppet/ fraud and anything and everything
has some basis in his work. Flawed science. Keep trying you will get
there. I like your ability to reason and quote effects with the name
of the finder. Smart guy.

The fact of the matter is that the E=MC2 is a lie and so is the rest of
his work. Thanks for sharing your collection of ideas. Remember just
about all EXCEPTED names for govt books of discovery or invention
points to Einsteins proof of which there are non. In essence science
today is not real science, only a pile of papers with names written
on them of men who were on the inside and stood to make money.

Say this professor, say that and I'll give you millions. Starting with our
ole pal Einstein. Say it or else is more like it. That's how the controller
get down. Threats, intimidation, manipulation then elimination especially
science matters among all other fields of thought. Control and power
that is the name of the game and so called science is nothing more.

__________________
 

Last edited by BroMikey; 06-29-2019 at 03:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-26-2019, 03:36 PM
socratus's Avatar
socratus socratus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Israel
Posts: 423
Physicists Have Reversed Time on The Smallest Scale by Using a Quantum Computer
MIKE MCRAE 20 JUL 2019
''It's easy to take time's arrow for granted - but the gears
of physics actually work just as smoothly in reverse.''
. . . .
''Researchers from Russia and the US teamed up to find
a way to break, or at least bend, one of physics'
most fundamental laws on energy.''
https://www.sciencealert.com/physici...antum-computer

Does ''The second law of thermodynamics'' depend on TIME ?
Does the cold Universe become hot because TIME wants that ?
Does ENTROPY obey an '' arrow of time '' ?
As researches said: ENTROPY is '' most fundamental laws on energy''
Does ENTROPY (as some kind of ENERGY) depend on TIME or vice versa ?
===

''Virtually every other rule in physics can be flipped and still make sense.''
https://www.sciencealert.com/physici...antum-computer

Yeah. for example:
Virtually, if you put the carriage before the horse, the carriage
somehow will be moving, but Practically, it is an analogy
(as laws of Physics say ) for doing things in the wrong order.
===========
Attached Images
File Type: jpg put the carriage before the horse.jpg (8.4 KB, 2 views)
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-30-2019, 04:42 PM
socratus's Avatar
socratus socratus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Israel
Posts: 423
About Unified FIELD Theory
===
It is impossible using UFT to understand
the whole picture of Universe because the
UFT says nothing about particles.
Quantum wave-particle duality cannot be ignored.
===
Sooner or later all Fields are finished by ''waves collapse''
and then needs ''method of renormalization'' to bring
them again to existence.
#
Einstein:
“I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based
on the field concept, that is, on continuous structures.
Then nothing remains of my entire castle in the sky,
including the theory of gravitation, but also
nothing of the rest of modern physics.”

Quotes of founding physicists
==============
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
vacuum, universe, basis, absolute, physics, big, effect, create, light, problem, fundamental, thought, created, observed, casimir, gravity, idea, description, unknown, forces, singular, point, space, time, started

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Please consider supporting Energetic Forum with a voluntary monthly subscription.

Choose your voluntary subscription

For one-time donations, please use the below button.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v1.4.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
2007-2015 Copyright - Energetic Forum - All Rights Reserved

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

Tesla Chargers