Hey People,

Is anybody here on the same page as I am when I say I would like to see more work and study done on the stem cell module with specific reference to such health issues as spinal cord injury (SCI), and others that stem cell research has shown has promise of being treatable with? Specifically, I would like a PATHS study conducted on the efficacy and effectiveness of the stem cell module (or any other) on SCI and its symptoms and its findings documented.

There is A LOT of talk, research and campaigne going on out there about the potentials of stem cell on several health issues and I would like to see PATHS, with it's own "brand" of potential and possibilities get in on this crusade.

It is increasingly becoming convincing that PATHS has something great to offer, and I strongly believe that if this study is conducted and a positive outcome gotten, it will be an even bigger launching pad for PATHS to get out more into the open and become known to more people worldwide.

SCI patients are probably the biggest and loudest campaigners for stem cell research and funding, which the US government is sadly dragging it's foot over, and anybody or company who shows even the slightest promise along this line will no doubt receive a good share of this publicity and attention.

I believe that conducting this study with detailed findings will make PATHS more acceptable and believable, especially to the skeptics (of which I am NOT one of ), and more. PATHS will be able to say more authoritatively that our stem cell module was able to do so and so in X amount of people with this particular case.

Please share your thoughts and opinions on this.

Regards,

Kanayo

The Research Team at PATHS has a list of hundreds of Modules competing for development work.

Various aspects of Stem Cell applications are right up there near the top.



Important notes: PATHS products do not claim to be medical in nature, nor do we offer any scientifically verifiable studies. We do not compete in the traditional realm of science or allopathic medicine. We are not interested in grants, funding, sponsorship, endorsement, or acceptance from the scientific or medical community (or any Government, for that matter).

PATHS products are based on an entirely new paradigm in Consciousness Science, utilizing largely undocumented quantum principles.

Portions of the Mission Statement at Energetic Science Ministries accurately reflect our Mission at PATHS, S.A.

While we do have anecdotal evidence, and on some Modules we do in house (mostly unpublished) scientific measurements of results, we do not seek to prove anything in a traditional scientific manner.

There is no category in "science" as it is currently defined, for what we do. Many have called what we do a spiritual "technology".

Whatever name one puts to it, we will let the results that people experience speak to the efficacy of the PATHS products.



That being said, there are several factors that we consider when prioritizing Module development:

1. The amount of Light it will bring to the planet
2. The number of people it will help
3. The level of urgency involved in the subject being addressed
4. The number of hours required for research and development of the finished Module. Some Modules can be developed with as little as 100 hours of work, others take thousands.

5. Some can be tested and released in a matter of 1-2 months, others require as much as a year.

Because there are thousands of possible Module applications, all these factors are weighed out in the decision making process of what Modules will be worked on next.

1. The amount of Light it will bring to the planet
2. The number of people it will help
3. The level of urgency involved in the subject being addressed

Was wondering how you measure these? Do you do some kind of TRVing, AK testing, dowsing, etc.? Just really really curious how you measure how much "Light" something brings, and whether I can learn how to do it for my own life too

1. This is totally subjective, based on discussion amongst the staff and requests from customers and affiliates. (we have a pretty intuitive team)

2. This is based on the number of people that would benefit from a Module, for instance, there are far more people suffering from depression than diabetes.

3. We consider something like diabetes being more urgent a subject than getting a tan without going in the sun.

And, we look at the other factors also~

4. The number of hours required for research and development of the finished Module. Some Modules can be developed with as little as 100 hours of work, others take thousands.

5. Some can be tested and released in a matter of 1-2 months, others require as much as a year.

It is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we do our best to balance all the factors to arrive at priorities that are most beneficial to the planet.