Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hacking the Aether by Aaron Murakami

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hacking the Aether by Aaron Murakami



    All the basic fundamental laws of physics are debunked.

    This presentation, Hacking the Aether is something that I have been wanted to share for many years. It’s roots are in my popular book The Quantum Key but I go much deeper into many of the concepts and tie it all together in a way that has never been accomplished.

    At the 2017 Energy Science & Technology Conference, many people commented over the weekend that Hacking the Aether should be the presentation that starts the conference every year because it sets such a foundation and in fact should be the presentation that everyone watches if they’re interested in Free Energy or related technologies.

    This is basically Energy Physics 101 and amazingly, there were many attendees including some academics that shared their enthusiasm about the presentation and agreed with ideas that were shared! Times are changing and that kind of agreement tells me that we’re definitely on the right track and that the Time is at hand to start taking these ideas to the mainstream!!

    Essentially, this is a simple Unified Field Model that ties together the Aether, Gravity, Inertia, Time, Electricity, Open Systems, and many other natural concepts in a way that they all fit together like a seamless picture. And, this is all done with very simple analogies, common sense and elementary school math with junior high school equations. Just about anyone can understand and appreciate what is being shared in Hacking the Aether even if they do not have technical background.

    Learn more about Hacking the Aether by Aaron Murakami here: Hacking the Aether by Aaron Murakami
    Sincerely,
    Aaron Murakami

    Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
    Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
    RPX & MWO http://vril.io

  • #2
    Aha! I Knew it. its not some sort of substance.
    after reading book and articles about aether, do you also see aether as a real and concrete physical reality as an ultra mundane corpuscles whose density is many times of metal but fluidic in nature so it can pass through ordinary matter?. as how others describe it?

    quoting from the sypnosis from the link

    POTENTIAL vs ENERGY & HOW TO TAP THE AETHER

    You'll see what is necessary to actually tap the Aether so that it becomes potential that can be used in electrical circuits or even mechanical gravitational systems. This goes to the heart of what Energy and Potential actually are and you will soon realize that even those who are apparently advanced in the energy sciences are misusing both terms. There is no such thing as Energy as it is only a verb that describes the activity of potential being reduced to a lower potential.

    Comment


    • #3
      aether

      Originally posted by ricards View Post
      Aha! I Knew it. its not some sort of substance.
      after reading book and articles about aether, do you also see aether as a real and concrete physical reality as an ultra mundane corpuscles whose density is many times of metal but fluidic in nature so it can pass through ordinary matter?. as how others describe it?

      quoting from the sypnosis from the link

      POTENTIAL vs ENERGY & HOW TO TAP THE AETHER

      You'll see what is necessary to actually tap the Aether so that it becomes potential that can be used in electrical circuits or even mechanical gravitational systems. This goes to the heart of what Energy and Potential actually are and you will soon realize that even those who are apparently advanced in the energy sciences are misusing both terms. There is no such thing as Energy as it is only a verb that describes the activity of potential being reduced to a lower potential.
      I actually do see it as a substance - almost can be described as a pure massless charge, but is to be considered as something.

      The density of the aether governs all actions in the Universe but the density changes depending on the mass of an object that displaces it creating a densifying affect of the aether against the object. That determines various strengths of gravity on a motionless object. Or, density is determined by the rate of acceleration of an object through space ("motionless" aether) - the faster the acceleration, the more meters of aether per second it encounters creating a relative increasing of density of the aether against the object.

      That is gravity and inertia and what causes them. This explains every relativistic principle while discarding the erroneous blunder of claiming that mass curves space, which violates an equal and opposite reaction. You can see how this is corrected in the presentation.

      The aether can pass through matter, but the more dense the material, the more resistance the aether encounters and it exerts a stronger push. That is gravity. Or the faster an object accelerates, there is more aether per unit of time pushing on the mass of the object thereby offering more resistance to its movement.

      The common thought is the Aether is in-compressible, but it is a half truth that is somewhat deceptive because the Aether can absolutely vary in its own density, which means it is compressible to a certain point just as it can be decompressed until there is a true vacuum, the lack of Aether, since space isn't filled with Aether, space is Aether.
      Last edited by Aaron; 08-10-2017, 05:02 AM.
      Sincerely,
      Aaron Murakami

      Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
      Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
      RPX & MWO http://vril.io

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Aaron View Post
        I actually do see it as a substance - almost can be described as a pure massless charge, but is to be considered as something.
        But not a "Physical" and tangible Substance right?..

        I understand the Gravity by aether explanation but sees a flaw in it(or maybe I just overlook the explanation). If the aether is going to the center of the earth.. where does it go to? there must be some sort of exit point of aether..

        I'm into this book "Aethro-Kinematics" by steven rado. so far This book have been the most understandable explanation of aether for me..
        because he explains it by Mechanical perception and Kinematics (motions), but still I have a lot of questions..

        I am interested in your material and plan on buying, I hope you can entertain questions and clarifications.. and if you are, might I ask how are you going to respond?.. If we are to discuss here publicly.. it might affect your sales.

        Comment


        • #5
          aether model

          Originally posted by ricards View Post
          But not a "Physical" and tangible Substance right?..

          I understand the Gravity by aether explanation but sees a flaw in it(or maybe I just overlook the explanation). If the aether is going to the center of the earth.. where does it go to? there must be some sort of exit point of aether..

          I'm into this book "Aethro-Kinematics" by steven rado. so far This book have been the most understandable explanation of aether for me..
          because he explains it by Mechanical perception and Kinematics (motions), but still I have a lot of questions..

          I am interested in your material and plan on buying, I hope you can entertain questions and clarifications.. and if you are, might I ask how are you going to respond?.. If we are to discuss here publicly.. it might affect your sales.
          Aether acts on the physical world so can be tangible in that sense - it is like a pure charge. Whether it is tangible or not is up to how you want to perceive it. Whether it is tangible or not is one thing, it remains the noun, which is the thing, which is the source potential.

          Your perceived flaw is based on an assumption that the Aether comes to a stop in the middle of the Earth and I never said that it does. Watch my presentation first and you will understand why it does not come to a stop.

          I've discussed these concepts openly in both forums for years so I enjoy these topics. Also, discussing these concepts doesn't take away from the presentation because the whole presentation really need to be seen to have the holistic view of the model - very difficult to deduce it all by a few discussions.
          Sincerely,
          Aaron Murakami

          Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
          Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
          RPX & MWO http://vril.io

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Aaron View Post
            I've discussed these concepts openly in both forums for years so I enjoy these topics.
            Glad to hear (i mean Read lol)that!

            and I hope you don't get the wrong Impression that I'm trying to get into an argument, English is not my main language, and I learned english through movies,books and articles. so somehow I adopted terms that are rather inappropriate.
            Last edited by ricards; 08-10-2017, 05:57 AM.

            Comment


            • #7
              Gravity

              I really just overlook it,

              I found the explanation where does aether go when it reaches the center, according to the theory, aether was compared to an Isotropic,Homogenous (all pervading) Ideal Gas. and gravity phenomenon was compared to a 3D spherical sink,

              It is being suggested that aether is being consumed in the creation of matter the term he used was "Matter is forming and evolving".
              so when Aether is consumed/condensed, the surrounding Aether is at the same time experience a rarefaction (action and reaction concept), this in turn creates an Inflow of aether toward the sink, and if Aether is constantly consumed, this will result in a constant flow of aether towards the center of earth, thus the idea of concept of gravity and leads to another theory (expanding earth) off-topic.

              this concept led me to think that If Gravitational force is what's causing atmospheric pressure, and aether flow is whats causing gravity, then "Vacuum" (of empty space) would not exist as it is the Ambient pressure of cosmos (1 pressure).. (same Idea where "Cold" does not exist as it is the ambient temperature of cosmos).
              The Idea of "Vacuum" is perceivable to us because we are pressurized beings under a pressurized environment, and somehow we set the Pressure on earth as the ambient.

              relating to energy its being suggested according to the theory that Aether does not have a potential but a kinetic energy.

              Only stating what I percieve no claims.

              I have been reading this book only for a month and and mostly by voice reading (text to speech).. so I might have just misunderstood things, but so far this is what's forming on my mind.

              I tried to make a purchase last night and failed, I sent you a PM aaron, still interested in your material. hope you can help. thanks in advance.
              Last edited by ricards; 08-11-2017, 08:10 AM. Reason: I realized it should be 1 pressure, changing terms

              Comment


              • #8
                help

                Originally posted by ricards View Post
                I really just overlook it,

                I found the explanation where does aether go when it reaches the center, according to the theory, aether was compared to an Isotropic,Homogenous (all pervading) Ideal Gas. and gravity phenomenon was compared to a 3D spherical sink,

                It is being suggested that aether is being consumed in the creation of matter the term he used was "Matter is forming and evolving".
                so when Aether is consumed/condensed, the surrounding Aether is at the same time experience a rarefaction (action and reaction concept), this in turn creates an Inflow of aether toward the sink, and if Aether is constantly consumed, this will result in a constant flow of aether towards the center of earth, thus the idea of concept of gravity and leads to another theory (expanding earth) off-topic.

                this concept led me to think that If Gravitational force is what's causing atmospheric pressure, and aether flow is whats causing gravity, then "Vacuum" (of empty space) would not exist as it is the Ambient pressure of cosmos (1 pressure).. (same Idea where "Cold" does not exist as it is the ambient temperature of cosmos).
                The Idea of "Vacuum" is perceivable to us because we are pressurized beings under a pressurized environment, and somehow we set the Pressure on earth as the ambient.

                relating to energy its being suggested according to the theory that Aether does not have a potential but a kinetic energy.

                Only stating what I percieve no claims.

                I have been reading this book only for a month and and mostly by voice reading (text to speech).. so I might have just misunderstood things, but so far this is what's forming on my mind.

                I tried to make a purchase last night and failed, I sent you a PM aaron, still interested in your material. hope you can help. thanks in advance.
                For any customer service needs, please send an email to help at emediapress dot com.
                Sincerely,
                Aaron Murakami

                Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
                Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
                RPX & MWO http://vril.io

                Comment


                • #9
                  I think I know now what Energy Really is, I was in the right mindset afterall. I only have gone through the slide to check if there was missing, cant help my self but read through..
                  I really like that statement after the quote from Jan Denise. pg 263 of quantum key

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    getting work from aether

                    Originally posted by ricards View Post
                    I think I know now what Energy Really is, I was in the right mindset afterall. I only have gone through the slide to check if there was missing, cant help my self but read through..
                    I really like that statement after the quote from Jan Denise. pg 263 of quantum key
                    If we know that energy = work, then all we have to do is describe the exact process of what happens when work manifests. And if we know the aether was indeed proven to exist, then between those two things, we can rewrite the books from scratch with a more sensible approach.
                    Sincerely,
                    Aaron Murakami

                    Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
                    Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
                    RPX & MWO http://vril.io

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      The Same Mechanical Mindset.

                      The spelling of the word, A-e-t-h-e-r, indicates a
                      redefining of this medium by starting over from the
                      era of Descartes' mechanicism, with the firm conviction
                      that the human mind, which has evolved by the
                      sensations of the mechanical world, can only comprehend
                      nature through mechanical pictures, or cannot
                      comprehend it at all! In this realm of mechanicism,
                      action at a distance is unthinkable and the only conceivable
                      transmission of force from one body to
                      another is by actual bodily contact through collision.
                      Motion can only be caused by motion, and can
                      only produce motion in turn.


                      Quoted from the Book I'm reading, which points the same thing as your last statement in the presentation. and I totally agree with it.

                      The part about the "Time" is really impressive, its as If you put yourself in a Reality in which your not affected by Aether, and observe everything, Time moving fast and time moving slow.

                      I never really understood what a "Dipole" is until now. so thank you!

                      When it comes to Gravity, Inertia. Its the same exact perception.
                      (not sure about electricity I haven't got through all that part of the book.).

                      now I understood why you said "Space is Aether" There is no vacuum other than that the absence of aether. but stating that somehow is confusing IMO specially if your talking casually about our current preception when we mention "Space" (Area/Volume available). but space is space I understood that not 3D .

                      Overall this is a really great presentation! Thank you for your work and dedication on this.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        It got me thinking..

                        If there is no such thing as "Storing the Potential Energy".. then Joseph Newman's statement of the "current is only a catalyst" might be true as well,.. also I remember him stating the same thing that there is no Potential Energy, Only Kinetic..

                        If we have already spent the energy to create a large magnetic field over such large area of a coil with a large inductance with very large resistance... we have created a dipole.. then... the inductive kickback would be of very large voltage, with little current,.. and if we put a large capacitor that can withstand that voltage.. that capacitor will charge (another dipole).. and the capacitor will discharge to the same coil (another dipole)... and so on until everything is balanced through resistance.. so if we want to benefit from that.. we make a that coil into a transformer with low magnetic coupling so as not to destroy the oscillation.. preferably a step-up one so that it will be able to charge big set of capacitor..

                        Have you taken part any of Tesla Transformers or Don Smith's work in the past?..

                        I do not remember you covered Magnetism in the presentation.. do you have plans?.. I would like to understand how is this Magnetism described as the "Swirling of Aether"..

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X