Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Controversy surrounding a Flat Earth and the Gyroscope

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Controversy surrounding a Flat Earth and the Gyroscope

    I've got a better explanation, other than flat earth, upon watching the video up to 3:58

    The aether responds to a vortex, because it is heavily attracted towards cones and conic shapes which geometrically represent the consequence of a vortex, namely: the centripetal forces at work within a vortex helping to shape a cone into existence out of the energy imbued within a physical object which is spinning, such as a gyroscope.

    The aether engages physical space when physical space rotates, as in: a tornado, or a hurricane, or a magnetic field (which also has its own spinning field). Once engaged, your experiment validates, not a flat earth, but a gyroscopic action locking itself into the aether as its reference -- kind of like a ship at port "weighs anchor" by dropping a heavy mass overboard. Thus, the aether, lends to the physical, inertia whenever the physical is set into a force of centripetal motion.

    Now, why would it be necessary to suppose this? To: A) Validate the geocentrists who claim that the earth is round and set into rotation of its own around the sun, and B) Validate the flat earth point of view in which the aether, not the earth, is the source of flatness making the aether serve as a field of reference for everything within itself.

    In other words, the Earth is round, but the Aether is flat.

  • #2
    Originally posted by Vinyasi View Post
    I've got a better explanation, other than flat earth, upon watching the video up to 3:58

    The aether responds to a vortex, because it is heavily attracted towards cones and conic shapes which geometrically represent the consequence of a vortex, namely: the centripetal forces at work within a vortex helping to shape a cone into existence out of the energy imbued within a physical object which is spinning, such as a gyroscope.

    The aether engages physical space when physical space rotates, as in: a tornado, or a hurricane, or a magnetic field (which also has its own spinning field). Once engaged, your experiment validates, not a flat earth, but a gyroscopic action locking itself into the aether as its reference -- kind of like a ship at port "weighs anchor" by dropping a heavy mass overboard. Thus, the aether, lends to the physical, inertia whenever the physical is set into a force of centripetal motion.

    Now, why would it be necessary to suppose this? To: A) Validate the geocentrists who claim that the earth is round and set into rotation of its own around the sun, and B) Validate the flat earth point of view in which the aether, not the earth, is the source of flatness making the aether serve as a field of reference for everything within itself.

    In other words, the Earth is round, but the Aether is flat.
    Check out DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SAYS EARTH IS FLAT & STATIONARY. THE END TO FAKE SPINNING GLOBE



    Sagnac's experiment proves aether is real. Earth is not spinning. Relativity is a lie.
    Last edited by vidbid; 06-23-2016, 02:25 PM.
    Regards,

    VIDBID

    Comment


    • #3
      Sagnac's proof of concept to Jim Murray's Transforming Generator

      At first, I was dismayed that so much effort is applied to this flat earth phenomenon. In fact, I was beginning to presume that our hollow earth has somehow infected the thought processes of flat earth proponents to view their universe as flat on account of earth's very flat shell upon which we all walk.

      But then I realized, to my delight, that Sagnac's experiment validates and predates the principles of Jim Murray's Transforming Generator...

      Fundamentals of the Transforming Generator by Jim Murray

      ...in as much as he has rotated the electrodynamics of a transformer's fields such that 180 degrees of phase relation has turned his transforming generator into an exponential feedback loop of self-destructively immense gain of efficiency...

      https://youtu.be/ddj85px00lM?t=36m30s

      ...making Sagnac the precursor to Murray and Murray making something practical out of Sagnac instead of arguing over it. Whew! What a relief!!

      Thanks, Jim.

      Comment


      • #4
        The History of Flat Earth - YouTube

        For starters watch 00:58:24 to 01:00:09


        Dave Wing

        Comment


        • #5
          SOY REBELDE 2014 FULL HD

          (With English Subtitles)


          Al
          Last edited by aljhoa; 04-21-2017, 03:16 PM. Reason: 901

          Comment


          • #6
            Damage Control

            YouTube is planning to mass-delete flat earth channels.

            https://www.independent.co.uk/life-s...-a8945851.html
            Regards,

            VIDBID

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Vinyasi View Post
              At first, I was dismayed that so much effort is applied to this flat earth phenomenon. In fact, I was beginning to presume that our hollow earth has somehow infected the thought processes of flat earth proponents to view their universe as flat on account of earth's very flat shell upon which we all walk.

              But then I realized, to my delight, that Sagnac's experiment validates and predates the principles of Jim Murray's Transforming Generator...

              Fundamentals of the Transforming Generator by Jim Murray

              ...in as much as he has rotated the electrodynamics of a transformer's fields such that 180 degrees of phase relation has turned his transforming generator into an exponential feedback loop of self-destructively immense gain of efficiency...

              https://youtu.be/ddj85px00lM?t=36m30s

              ...making Sagnac the precursor to Murray and Murray making something practical out of Sagnac instead of arguing over it. Whew! What a relief!!

              Thanks, Jim.
              Check out DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SAYS EARTH IS FLAT & STATIONARY. THE END TO FAKE SPINNING GLOBE
              Broken Link Can Be Found Here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-etEVQle-fA
              Last edited by vidbid; 06-07-2019, 08:17 AM.
              Regards,

              VIDBID

              Comment


              • #8
                In an Age of Technology, We have Many Choices

                Originally posted by vidbid View Post
                YouTube is planning to mass-delete flat earth channels.

                https://www.independent.co.uk/life-s...-a8945851.html
                I like options. That gives me greater freedom of choice.

                So, whenever I get frustrated with one option, such as the strict guidelines which Amazon uses for reviewing submissions to its self-publishing arena (paperback covers of all things!), or the cover art for its Video Partners arena (requiring captions for submitting videos for release in the United States, but no captions required for release of English speaking videos in the UK), then it's nice to know I can head on over to Payhip and submit without any review of my creations requiring strict adherence to guidelines. Whew! What a relief!!!





                Well, when it comes to YouTube, Vimeo is a nice alternative along the same lines of reasoning per above.
                Last edited by Vinyasi; 06-07-2019, 04:46 PM.

                Comment


                • #9
                  From a mathematical perspective, all of existence is flat - not just the Earth

                  "Where ever two dielectric lines of force cross in space, therein lies matter with its associated mass, gravity, EM radiation, etc."
                  Thus is, also, born the source for Oliver Heaviside's two dimensional equation, (1) E=MC^2, in which the square root of both sides can be taken which translates into: (2) Dielectric equals Magnetism times the speed of light not squared whenever we consider space as a uni-dimensional existence.

                  The consequential resultant of the latter uni-dimensional equation (2) is that all of matter and mass is flat, gravity is flat, and the full range of EM spectrum (of X-rays, visible light, heat, etc.) is also flat.

                  Thus, the aether is not flat, but a multiplicity of straight lines which may or may not interact to create flat matter, etc.

                  And the electrostatics of the aether is not flat. It's uni-dimensional from a mathematical standpoint.

                  Does this mean the Earth is flat? I don't know since from the point of view of flatness, anything could be said: that space is curved, or no it's flat, or that space is merely uni-dimensional until we arbitrarily project our own notions upon it. This latter option is Eric Dollard's preferred rendition if memory serves me!

                  https://play.google.com/books/reader...EAJ&pg=GBS.PA0

                  shortened URL...
                  https://is.gd/flatmatter

                  Download URL....
                  https://books.google.com/books/downl...api&authuser=0

                  shortened to...
                  https://is.gd/flatmatterpdf
                  Last edited by Vinyasi; 07-06-2019, 06:31 PM.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X