Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Kromrey - G-field effect

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Kromrey - G-field effect

    Since the other thread about generators that speed up under load has degenerated into insults I'm starting this new one in the hope that we can keep it clean.

    This is for people who have done experiments and already know the basics.

    I just wanted to share a few thoughts and findings based on my experiments with my dc motor driven two coil setup.

    First of all we know that in order to see acceleration effects under loaded or shorted condition we need to attain a critical frequency. To be more precise we need a magnet to move past the coil above a certain speed, meaning faster than the current buildup in the coil in order to get the delayed Lenz effect, which is what gives us low drag or even speed up conditions.

    One would think that fitting as many magnets as possible around the rotor is best as it raises the frequency for the same rpm. From my experience this is not the case. I mean bigger rotors with more magnets are better, but not too many.

    Who has studied the Kromrey generator knows that compared to a standard generator, on the Kromrey the rpms can be lowered down to almost 50% of full speed while still delivering almost full output power to the load. This I have verified personally. In fact the output is based on the core demagnetisation while the magnet is leaving the core. The demagnetisation needs time to occur based on load impedance/resistance, so we need enough space between one magnet and the next. I could find no improvement adding magnets after certain amount, Thane Heins like.

    The other thing is magnet - core gap. My conclusion is that as close as possible is best in order to see speed up conditions. But you need a solid structure that can handle the huge forces if you use neo magnets.
    From Bedini's notes it seems that when the setup is "built right" with the right load we should see a decrease of about 50% of input power. Personally I haven't been able to see this, but what I'm thinking is this:

    Let's say you have rotors who's magnet/coil gaps can be adjusted while in operation. Let's say you're so far away with the rotors that they don't even affect the coils, that's our base line speed (and input power). If we start moving the magnets closer to the coils (open) we start to see some drag and deceleration. If we then short the coils (our base line speed has to be over the critical frequency) our speed goes back to almost base line speed.
    If we move the magnets to get an extremely narrow gap we see a strong deceleration, but also a much bigger acceleration when we short our coil, or add the right load. What I mean is, the smaller the gap the bigger the speed difference between the unloaded and the loaded (or shorted ) condition. This might be how Bedini could report such a hug he difference between loaded and unloaded.

    Bifilar coils: franky, although they act a bit as capacitors I don't think bifilar coils have a magic role in this case other than simplifying finding the right number of turns, especially if you have many strands to play with. You need the largest wire (more amps) you can fit while allowing you to have enough turns to get the needed self inductance, which at a given speed will give you no drag or speed up.

    About what I wrote at the beginning, one thing I need to think about some more is, if we get basically the same output for much lower rpms and input power, why bother getting up to the critical frequency..? I know this doesn't sound right, need to think some more........

    Mario
    Attached Files

  • #2
    Another thing I wanted to add, from my experiences this effect works with all kinds of setups, even with magnets on one side of the coil only. It works with NNNN and NSNSNS arrangements. The setups with magnets on both sides of the coils or even where the magnetic path is closed through the rotor (iron rotor) simply make the whole thing way more efficient.

    Mario

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Mario View Post
      Since the other thread about generators that speed up under load has degenerated into insults...
      Mario
      Sorry about that but some things have to be vented..

      Originally posted by Mario View Post
      First of all we know that in order to see acceleration effects under loaded or shorted condition we need to attain a critical frequency. To be more precise we need a magnet to move past the coil above a certain speed, meaning faster than the current buildup in the coil in order to get the delayed Lenz effect, which is what gives us low drag or even speed up conditions.
      I can't interpret what "critical frequency" means but generally for acceleration to happen with just a shorted coil you need 2 things, High Speed rotor (Lots of opposing magnets NSNSNS or Real fast rotation) and High impedance/resistance in the coil. And by the way NNNN or NSNSNS are the same thing. 2 north magnetic side my side produce a S field between them.

      So my starting point for that is usually a 10 ohm coil at 2000+ rpm. When the coil is shorted you gain about 100 rpm. This is easy to replicate with a few big magnets and a #24 wire, I believe at 1000ft on a spool that contains soft iron in the core.
      The only real way I have found to use this method is to combine it with a coil that will slow everything down less than 100 rpms. Use the accelerator coil to offset this. Or several.

      The other option is to lower impedance and use a metal offset on the coil. You can extend the metal out of the ends of the coil a given amount and it will add to the acceleration. Naudin show a good experiment of this happening.

      For either one if these if you wanna pull power from them directly and continue with the acceleration the best option is a Ferro Resonant Transformer. Once you understand what they are you should understand what I am about to tell ya. You can tune the induction response with the gap and the impedance of the primary has to be 1/2 that of the gen coil, and the whole thing has to be set up to limit current.

      Now the Kromrey is a different machine and even different than the GFlux generator. I believe the G Flux generator John shows on his website didn't accelerate under load. In this case the geometry of the machine is important.
      The Kromrey and this type of Generator have to be completely saturated and uninterrupted by stray field, Not so easy. The entire LOOP has to have a flux density of ?X? amount. X being a question still up in the air...Maybe someone else knows. The material around the loop also has to saturate evenly with out to much hangup.
      And remember because a lot of people forget even though its called a generator and it accelerates it is not a COP=> 1. Its a converter. It was designed to create a safe electrical cold type energy. Thats it?
      You see more of this with Leedskalnins PMH at the breaking of the magnetic loop. Both release this current.

      There is 2 other types of acceleration as well but since One of them we just stumbled on and the other I know only very little about I am not going to go into them, except to say they can all be used together.

      Matt
      Last edited by Matthew Jones; 08-14-2015, 06:04 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Mario View Post
        Another thing I wanted to add, from my experiences this effect works with all kinds of setups, even with magnets on one side of the coil only. It works with NNNN and NSNSNS arrangements. The setups with magnets on both sides of the coils or even where the magnetic path is closed through the rotor (iron rotor) simply make the whole thing way more efficient.

        Mario
        Thanks Mario for your data and a special thanks to those who add

        into the mix to help guys like me up to speed. No box of rocks

        sound coming out of this baby. Nice pro job.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Mario View Post
          Since the other thread about generators that speed up under load has degenerated into insults I'm starting this new one in the hope that we can keep it clean.

          This is for people who have done experiments and already know the basics.

          I just wanted to share a few thoughts and findings based on my experiments with my dc motor driven two coil setup.

          First of all we know that in order to see acceleration effects under loaded or shorted condition we need to attain a critical frequency. To be more precise we need a magnet to move past the coil above a certain speed, meaning faster than the current buildup in the coil in order to get the delayed Lenz effect, which is what gives us low drag or even speed up conditions.

          One would think that fitting as many magnets as possible around the rotor is best as it raises the frequency for the same rpm. From my experience this is not the case. I mean bigger rotors with more magnets are better, but not too many.

          Who has studied the Kromrey generator knows that compared to a standard generator, on the Kromrey the rpms can be lowered down to almost 50% of full speed while still delivering almost full output power to the load. This I have verified personally. In fact the output is based on the core demagnetisation while the magnet is leaving the core. The demagnetisation needs time to occur based on load impedance/resistance, so we need enough space between one magnet and the next. I could find no improvement adding magnets after certain amount, Thane Heins like.

          The other thing is magnet - core gap. My conclusion is that as close as possible is best in order to see speed up conditions. But you need a solid structure that can handle the huge forces if you use neo magnets.
          From Bedini's notes it seems that when the setup is "built right" with the right load we should see a decrease of about 50% of input power. Personally I haven't been able to see this, but what I'm thinking is this:

          Let's say you have rotors who's magnet/coil gaps can be adjusted while in operation. Let's say you're so far away with the rotors that they don't even affect the coils, that's our base line speed (and input power). If we start moving the magnets closer to the coils (open) we start to see some drag and deceleration. If we then short the coils (our base line speed has to be over the critical frequency) our speed goes back to almost base line speed.
          If we move the magnets to get an extremely narrow gap we see a strong deceleration, but also a much bigger acceleration when we short our coil, or add the right load. What I mean is, the smaller the gap the bigger the speed difference between the unloaded and the loaded (or shorted ) condition. This might be how Bedini could report such a hug he difference between loaded and unloaded.

          Bifilar coils: franky, although they act a bit as capacitors I don't think bifilar coils have a magic role in this case other than simplifying finding the right number of turns, especially if you have many strands to play with. You need the largest wire (more amps) you can fit while allowing you to have enough turns to get the needed self inductance, which at a given speed will give you no drag or speed up.

          About what I wrote at the beginning, one thing I need to think about some more is, if we get basically the same output for much lower rpms and input power, why bother getting up to the critical frequency..? I know this doesn't sound right, need to think some more........

          Mario
          It takes a while to break through the programming, however, in time one, I, realized that Lenz's Law as we interpret it relates specifically to the relation between the inducing magnets and stator winding under the influence of the inducer. This being the case, to reduce the negative effects that the law has on the circuit, we need only increase the distance between the inducer and the induced, specifically, we need to increase the distance between the inducing magnets and the stator coil.

          According to Faraday, all that is required to produce a potential in a coil is for there to be a change in the magnetic environment of the coil. In this particular case, the magnetic environment of interest is the core of the coil. Changes in the environment of the core will result in the generation of potential. With this in mind, the distance between the "core" and the inducer should be as close as possible, and as before mentioned, the distance between the inducer and the coil should be such that the induced field is peaking at or around the zero crossing (TDC), yes, we want the voltage node to move to TDC, bringing the system into what could be considered as resonance from a geometry stand point, a situation where the induced potential, and induced current (when the coil is shorted) is coincident with the point of maximum flux density at TDC.

          By varying the position of the coil with relation to the inducer, we control when the peak induced voltage or point of maximum change in flux takes place with relation to the point of maximum flux density found at TDC. The idea here being to bring the maximum flux change point closer to the point of maximum flux density, up to coincidence when system geometry allows.

          It seems that at the end of the day it's all about manipulating "Magnetic Current" for the expressed purpose of establishing geometry based resonance. When done correctly, any coil can be used, regardless of its inductance and resistance, and we are not limited to frequency, meaning, the acceleration effect can and does manifest at much lower RPM, the lowest I have personally experienced being around 300 RPM +/-. One thing to keep in mind, if you are using a pulse motor to drive your gen like I do, expect consumption to increase with increasing RPM, a good thing under certain circumstances.

          Attached you will find a image of the machine I tested. In the finial machine the only iron present is in the form of welding rod in cores, there is no common iron circuit shared between the two coils, coils are supported using Plexiglas. With 13mH @ .8 ohm, acceleration can be detected beginning between 25-28Hz, using a 6 pole rotor.

          Regards
          Attached Files

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Matthew Jones View Post
            Sorry about that but some things have to be vented..



            I can't interpret what "critical frequency" means but generally for acceleration to happen with just a shorted coil you need 2 things, High Speed rotor (Lots of opposing magnets NSNSNS or Real fast rotation) and High impedance/resistance in the coil. And by the way NNNN or NSNSNS are the same thing. 2 north magnetic side my side produce a S field between them.

            So my starting point for that is usually a 10 ohm coil at 2000+ rpm. When the coil is shorted you gain about 100 rpm. This is easy to replicate with a few big magnets and a #24 wire, I believe at 1000ft on a spool that contains soft iron in the core.
            The only real way I have found to use this method is to combine it with a coil that will slow everything down less than 100 rpms. Use the accelerator coil to offset this. Or several.

            The other option is to lower impedance and use a metal offset on the coil. You can extend the metal out of the ends of the coil a given amount and it will add to the acceleration. Naudin show a good experiment of this happening.

            For either one if these if you wanna pull power from them directly and continue with the acceleration the best option is a Ferro Resonant Transformer. Once you understand what they are you should understand what I am about to tell ya. You can tune the induction response with the gap and the impedance of the primary has to be 1/2 that of the gen coil, and the whole thing has to be set up to limit current.

            Now the Kromrey is a different machine and even different than the GFlux generator. I believe the G Flux generator John shows on his website didn't accelerate under load. In this case the geometry of the machine is important.
            The Kromrey and this type of Generator have to be completely saturated and uninterrupted by stray field, Not so easy. The entire LOOP has to have a flux density of ?X? amount. X being a question still up in the air...Maybe someone else knows. The material around the loop also has to saturate evenly with out to much hangup.
            And remember because a lot of people forget even though its called a generator and it accelerates it is not a COP=> 1. Its a converter. It was designed to create a safe electrical cold type energy. Thats it?
            You see more of this with Leedskalnins PMH at the breaking of the magnetic loop. Both release this current.

            There is 2 other types of acceleration as well but since One of them we just stumbled on and the other I know only very little about I am not going to go into them, except to say they can all be used together.

            Matt
            @ Matt,

            from what I know the G-field or G-flux machines are simply JB's versions and advancements of the Kromrey generator. According to the results posted on his site he got a COP of about 12…
            What you described about metal offsets sounds like what Erfinder wrote?
            The Naudin experiments on this matter are very interesting.

            @Erfinder

            I see what you mean, and I remember you telling me this before.. I made a few solid state experiments some time ago but I forgot about it since my results weren't worth mentioning, the secondary coil had to be slided down quite a bit to achieve an out of phase condition, and the output at that point was extremely low.
            But now that you reminded me I will play with this on my generator setup. I wonder if this works with magnets on both sides as well… I intend to find out

            Mario

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Mario View Post
              @ Matt,

              from what I know the G-field or G-flux machines are simply JB's versions and advancements of the Kromrey generator. According to the results posted on his site he got a COP of about 12…
              I know but, I also know quite a few who have replicated it and no one has seen that. I was actually present for one, it was built perfectly, had wound DC motor and speed controller the whole works and it tested to 92%. The power that came out of it was completely neutral, you could charge a battery on either pole from the bridge rectifier.

              As easy as it looks the trick cannot be that well hidden, if there is any trick at all.

              Kromrey didn't speak of it in his patents, and the story gets told down the line over time and seems to have been getting better every time I heard it.

              If you spend the money to build one just don't start out with high hopes.

              Matt
              Last edited by Matthew Jones; 08-17-2015, 11:13 AM.

              Comment


              • #8
                How the Kromrey Converter works

                I have a link to a book which describes the phenomenon very well in my opinion, I will post that at the end of my response. I have built a Kromrey converter, it can be seen in the youtube video entitled "tips on Kromrey Converter". I made this video a while ago so the info is a little outdated.

                First of all, the OU effect is related to the phenomenon of cold electricity in this device. In order for this unit to operate correctly, you are looking for it to turn batteries, resistors, and light bulbs cold. The cold effect is basically taking heat from the environment (the hot core) and turning it into endothermic current. Thus, when you load it, it speeds up.
                Secondly, you should know that cold electricity exhibits itself when a standing wave is created in a ferro resonant coil. Essentially the magnetic field in the core reflects off of the ends of the core, and when this effect happens in resonance within the core and the coil is wound so that it is resonant at this frequency as well, the magnetic waves in the core stack up and accelerate the electric waves in the coils. The coil should have a very high Q factor.
                At ferro resonance, the voltage lags behind the current 90 degrees so that when voltage is zero current is maximal. At this stage, your coil outputs cold electricity and many amazing effects can be witnessed such as cold batteries, OU, etc.

                I realized that the coils need to be wound in the same direction so that one coil is the reverse inductor of the other. Bedini created an analog of the VTA where the magnetic field lines are closed in the system so as to allow full saturation of the core (which is very important). With closed magnetic field lines the coil geometry changed from a caduceus coil to the split caduceus coil design that Bedini used in this device. Just like the VTA, a fully saturated core is oscillating a resonant caduceus coil creating the effect of interest.

                It is also worthwhile to mention that when a core is saturated and then returns to a zero state abruptly, an unbelievable amount of cold electricity flows out of the core itself in reference to ground.

                All of this info can be found in this book if you really try to understand the phenomenon the author is discussing. Take a look at the reactor core diagram as it is very similar in operation to the Kromrey: http://www.serenitystreetnews.com/HE...RE-OU-v5.1.pdf

                And, most importantly, don't give up. Share your results, and have fun because this is the cutting edge of technology and it truly is fun.
                Last edited by Ajay; 09-29-2015, 04:18 PM.

                Comment


                • #9
                  A few more thoughts on attaining resonance of a ferromagnetic core

                  It was mentioned in this thread that Cold Electricity is a high frequency phenomenon. I would like to point out that although the manifestation of this phenomenon tends to happen at high frequencies, it does not mean that this must always be the case.
                  For instance, the Kromrey Converter does not need 20k rpm to manifest OU. Bedini ran his at relatively low rpm. This is because there are two types of resonance. There is the type of resonance that is constantly supplied energy at the correct frequency (like a LMD circuit constantly being supplied energy from a signal generator), and there is self resonance (like a bell hit with a stone, the energy supplied in one rapid transient, and the structure resonates because the pulse was done at the correct duty cycle to stimulate resonance).
                  When we are trying to attain self resonance of a Kromrey converter, we are activating and deactivating the coil with a sharp transient of the correct pulse width to stimulate self resonance of the core. The goal is to create a coil that will resonate at either the fundamental resonant frequency of the core or a harmonic thereof.
                  The magnets can be rotated but it is more efficient to have a bunch of stationary magnets if you are looking for the lowest consumption from the motor, which is what Bedini was looking for to test OU.The key is that the magnets are only saturating the core for two brief periods every cycle. As you accelerate the rotor, the amount of time that the core is saturated becomes shorter and shorter, until it reaches the pulse width of the natural frequency of resonance for the core. After that, the coil (of high q factor) must be matched to this frequency.

                  So here is a case where low frequency (below 20khz) stimulation of the magnetic field causes cold electricity effects. This self resonance phenomenon is also why a core which is abruptly saturated and then deactivated will contain cold electricity in the lattices of the core (which is extracted in reference to the ground).

                  It seems to me that capacitors can also be used for tuning in the Kromrey device.
                  I hope that helps,
                  Ajay
                  Last edited by Ajay; 09-29-2015, 05:26 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    have you?

                    Dear Mario, i looked at the picture of your machine.
                    First, do not use NEO magnets, use ferrite magnets or magnets that are between N=5 and N=15. Bedini said that NEO's saturate the core and this is not what we want.
                    Second, all your magnets share the same support, i would recommend using a support made like a cross 90 degres apart made in a magnetic material like ferrous metal.
                    Third, your coils must be trifilar wound, that means, use 3 magnets wires and wound them in the same time, after that, you have to connect them in parallel to lower the impedance (for each coil). This will act as a buck-boost coil. Then you connect the 2 coils in series.
                    Make sure you are using laminated steel as a core for your coil, or use solder rods.
                    If you can, make your trifilar coil with a drill like Bedini showed in one of his video, this will benefit the buck-boost effect.
                    Nice work.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X