So have you actually made an over unity device before, or what?

yeah ok, whutever

I'll tell you exactly what I think.

I think you are a big mouth with a lot of excuses. If you really want to share you would simply do it without all the weasel words. Put up or shut up. This is your post #5, nobody with good sense is going to listen to you. You have zero credibility. All you have is a lot of empty claims. You say you are educated? Show it. There you have it. Exactly what I think.

This point is valid. If I tried to build a computer, comparable with what is available today, with transistors resistors and capacitors like you can buy at radio shack, It would probably be the size of a skyscraper. It would take a lifetime, cost a fortune and need the Nile river in flood to cool it.

"free energy" research is still in the embryonic stage. Even if you have the plans for the most simple device and are told exactly how to do it, many still fail. This has been done with the Bedini SG.

"Free energy" is a myth and depends how you interpret "free" but does not mean it isnt real. I think many of us could build a Bedini SG and demonstrate it adequately enough to get a lot of the top physics guys scratching their heads when trying to explain where all the energy is coming from.

I say dont shoot the messenger, but you have made a bold statement so now you are challenged to share it.

I would say, simple test the Peoples here, if they are able to follow and/or understand or they dont.

And btw dont worry about Peoples here, most of us have an open mind and Trolls, what pop suddenly up after a while are mostly quickly indentified.

A degree in electrical engineering may be required to understand why or how something works, but not how to build it. There are plenty of folks here are capable of building anything you have come up with if YOU are able to provide an adequate description and instructions. Do YOU have a degree in electrical engineering? I do not, but my son does, and there are many areas I know more about than he does from the practical experience I have had working on things.

It is one thing to design a circuit to perform a specific function... (A task an electrical engineer might be called upon to perform.) and quite another to REPLICATE that circuit, something nearly anyone provided with the proper schematics, proper parts list, and step by step instructions should be able to accomplish.

To me this sounds like a smoke screen and your attempt to get people to beg you to disclose what you know. We have had enough people on these forums with nothing significant to share who are on some kind of power trip. We don't need another. Share, or chosen not to, but I have no patience with this nonsense. As I have said before, devices with COP >1 exist. I have seen several and built several. The problem is, that we need devices that produce SIGNIFICANTLY more than >1 to be viable, and we need to focus on improving the existing WORKING devices. If you have one that blows this out of the water, we would all be interested, but so far all I have seen is talk.

I am on the thread Basic Free Energy Device where we are going to take folks through the build of a COP >1 device, but even it isn't going to power your house. Far from it. It needs development. Our hope is that if we get ENOUGH people to build the basic working model, we will have a group who will be dedicated to that process. You could do the same thing here, and what you have may be MANY TIMES better than what we are going to share. I sincerely HOPE so, but I am not holding my breath.

Dave

Energy from empty space



The picture above show the relation between energy with charge and voltage, the value itself not important, the relation is important.
1. Energy is the product of capacitance and voltage
2. Energy also the ratio of charge to capacitance
3. Capacitance is space thus energy comes from space.
This shows that high voltage doesn’t mean that it has high energy if the capacitance is low.



Picture above show what happen when energy in a capacitor is used to power a load. Everything becomes zero. Voltage, energy and charge are gone.



This second picture show difference configuration, instead of directly power a load. The load is power in series with initially discharge capacitor. As you can see, the amount of charge doesn’t change even if energy is used. Only the capacitance change, this proof that power can be produce from change in capacitance or change in space.
This is the basis for free energy device like the tesla switch or the 3 battery system because this device relies on powering a load while charging capacitor or battery. Since the charge does not get destroy, the battery will maintain it charge.


There are two way to produce free energy from this principle..
1 . involve an electric motor or dc motor, rather difficult because it require mechanical work.
2. Combine this principle with new faraday law of induction that i modify to explain the creation of free energy.

About faraday law of induction
Since tesla have proof that electricity can travel trough space because space is just capacitance or really low capacitance(space has high impedance), that mean if the electrical signal voltage and frequency is high enough than electricity can travel trough space with zero loss. Combination of this knowledge and faraday law will change how we understand process of induction.

in fact it doesn't require to be a genius to understand it for example look at Richard Willis from magnacoaster
so you are wrong, don't fool others

Dave
I appreciate your ability to show healthy skepticism without the mudslinging.
Ronald Reagan once said "trust, but verify"
I say, let the man/woman have the mike, let him/her lay it out and see if it can be duplicated or at least shown to be for real. (before shooting them down)

Android3000
Let's hear what you have, what you just showed with the caps is very close to what has been shown to happen in the 3 Bgs and has been shown in Patrick Kelly's "guide to free energy" using small batteries.
I have actually done that with batteries and small bulbs, charging one battery while discharging another battery through a bulb in series between the batteries. Batt 1 lights the bulb and charges Batt 2 then you swap them and do it over and over. What that simple experiment shows is very similar to the 3 bgs, the load can be run much longer in that configuration than just simply running the bulb from the 2 batteries directly.
So I for one would be interested in what you have to say, but by all means do it here in the open forum for all to partake and join in.

Android3000,
I understand the theory. Do you have a device that demonstrates it in a practical application that others can replicate? If so, let's start building. If not, I have spent the last 10 years working with versions of the 3BGS and variations (Benitez Patents) of the Tesla switch. I happen to KNOW they will work, but also incredibly difficult for the average builder to tune and KEEP working. So much so that 99.9% of people will give up. And I will CONTINUE with research in that direction. It is nice to know others are looking at the same kinds of things and working along the same lines. But the proof is in the pudding. Without a device to replicate, we are just discussing theory, and theory won't power my house. It takes a physical device to do that. If you have one, what is the input and output and please show us and let's get going on construction.
Dave

I agree, let's go!

Well, I see the solution in Sawt emoticon. 3bsw won't work, Benitez patent would. You will appreciate if you read Richard Willis patent. To get something extra you have to interact with external force field

@ android3000

you started your thread by : Free energy is a myth...., after that you said about your teacher stories at the university and the advices they gave to you not to follow this path ( now Free energy isn't a myth )!

it's up to you what you want to do, you can help ... sometimes we could help by just watching what other people are doing and trying the same thing and posting results.

you could help by providing hard to find information for example, etc ....


That actually the big problem, plan, book or video can’t help you build a working device

this not true, they help a lots the only exception is the complexity of the device... don't compare electronic microchip with free energy device because the knowledge about open energy device is old ...

so you have the choice .... just choose your path !

@ android3000
Ok. So how do you want to fill the gap to create a pool for Energy what can feed the source again.

It seems the wireless transfer of energy without losses is not really common knowledge. Also not, how you want create that energy at your circuit.


All. cant you all make some contructive comments instead just pointing out its nothing new for now ?