Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Tapping dielectric torque from STATIC COMPRESSION of two large magnets

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1

    Tapping dielectric torque from STATIC COMPRESSION of two large magnets

    The word in red is my addition to a statement made by TheoriaApophasis

    “tapping dielectric torque from STATIC COMPRESSION of two large maggies (magnets) in counter-voidance ('repulsion').

    This configuration 'projects' a 90 degree polarization EXACTLY like the face of the 'magnet' in "free space".”

    This is one way to "energize" a coil.

    Since both TheoriaApophasis and Ufopolitics aagree that this is an area that should be explored, there is something I have been interested in working on, and I will share it here. Imagine a tube with a large powerful round neo magnet in the bottom of it. If that neo is wrapped with a coil of wire and voltage is induced, does it cancel out the magnetic field in the neo? It should, but I haven’t tried it yet. On the outside of the tube you have a series of coils with the end of each facing the tube. They can be all around it, up and down its length. As many as you can fit around your tube and along its length.

    Now take your two large magnets that you have bolted together with like faces touching and drop this combo down the tube. It should "float" if you have put the right face down in opposition to the big neo at the bottom of the tube. Turn on the electricity to the coil around the neo at the bottom, allowing the combo magnet to drop, then turn the electricity back off and the neo should shoot up the tube and fall back.

    What might be the advantage of this. Possibly and probably none, but then again, the two noes pass all the coils with the kind of "90 degree field generation" we are talking about on the way up, and AGAIN on the way DOWN. Two for the price of one? The repulsion of permanent magnets used to provide the motive force. Watts used to do that vs how many watts were produced in the coils. The math will tell the tale.

    Just an idea.

    Dave
    “Advances are made by answering questions. Discoveries are made by questioning answers.”
    —Bernhard Haisch, Astrophysicist
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Originally posted by Turion View Post
    The word in red is my addition to a statement made by TheoriaApophasis

    “tapping dielectric torque from STATIC COMPRESSION of two large maggies (magnets) in counter-voidance ('repulsion').

    This configuration 'projects' a 90 degree polarization EXACTLY like the face of the 'magnet' in "free space".”

    This is one way to "energize" a coil.

    Since both TheoriaApophasis and Ufopolitics aagree that this is an area that should be explored, there is something I have been interested in working on, and I will share it here. Imagine a tube with a large powerful round neo magnet in the bottom of it. If that neo is wrapped with a coil of wire and voltage is induced, does it cancel out the magnetic field in the neo? It should, but I haven’t tried it yet. On the outside of the tube you have a series of coils with the end of each facing the tube. They can be all around it, up and down its length. As many as you can fit around your tube and along its length.

    Now take your two large magnets that you have bolted together with like faces touching and drop this combo down the tube. It should "float" if you have put the right face down in opposition to the big neo at the bottom of the tube. Turn on the electricity to the coil around the neo at the bottom, allowing the combo magnet to drop, then turn the electricity back off and the neo should shoot up the tube and fall back.

    What might be the advantage of this. Possibly and probably none, but then again, the two noes pass all the coils with the kind of "90 degree field generation" we are talking about on the way up, and AGAIN on the way DOWN. Two for the price of one? The repulsion of permanent magnets used to provide the motive force. Watts used to do that vs how many watts were produced in the coils. The math will tell the tale.

    Just an idea.

    Dave


    neo wrapped HOW?

    TUBE OF WHAT?



    Picture below, see CENTER, this image under my ferrocell which looks like ANY side of any magnet under a ferrocell .......however it is "free space" NOTHING (so to say),

    a complete high compression projection.


    As such you are seeing a full Ether projection in 'FREE SPACE'.



    See cube magnets on EITHER SIDE OF CENTER PHENOMENA,.......see the pressure "peeling backwards" away from the Ether portal (as id call it)


    What is simply going on is, you're throwing the breaks on reciprocating inertia and causing a 5th polarized "face" to appear resultantly (the other 4 faces are of course the 2 + 2 faces of the 2 maggies)

    Or, simply screeching break and rubber on field inertia in its low pressure-seeking reciprocation.



    Doing this causes a compression of space, a spatial 'rip' and also change the co-gravitational field of an object [and by-god Ive proven that much, believe it or not]........... (ala PROOF from the math of Heaviside and Dr. Oleg D. Jefimenko)

    In enormous power this is HOW a galactic jet works






    Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 09-21-2014, 04:02 AM.

    Comment

    • #3
      I would say a coil of wire around the neo at the bottom of a plastic tube. I have no idea if it would work or what the results might be. I have seen magnetic fields in magnets cancelled through the use of electricity, but have no idea the cost in watts, or if what I have proposed would even work.

      It might be simpler to use an electromagnet in the bottom of the tube to create the magnetic repulsion force. Possibly cheaper in watts of power used. I don't know. I just thought it was an interesting idea.

      The tube does not even have to be vertical, although it would need to be at a steep enough angle that the two noes that have been forced together would fall back to the bottom once they have been shot up the tube by magnetic force.

      I might even have to put the two magnets on a threaded rod that also goes through a hole in the bottom magnet and through a hole in the cap at the top of the tube. The threaded rod would act as both a means of forcing the two magnets together (With nuts on each side of the magnets) and a guide so that they don't impact the sides of the tube and bounce around as they move up and down. A magnetic piston if you will. Maybe machine the threads off the rod everywhere but where they are needed to tighten those two nuts to reduce friction.

      I have no idea if any of this will work, but ideas have to begin with something. I will build it first chance I get and see what happens. It is just ONE way of putting the dialectic torque to work. John Bedini has been gluing like faces of ceramic magnets together for years, and I have a monopole I built with like faces glued together and the coils at 90 degrees to the face. However, I never ran a test to compare results of this kind of magnetic interaction to a standard bicycle wheel with magnets around it.

      Dave
      “Advances are made by answering questions. Discoveries are made by questioning answers.”
      —Bernhard Haisch, Astrophysicist

      Comment

      • #4
        But, had you though of a vertical helical double pass copper coil wrapped around a thin 1 and 1/4" diameter PVC tube in which 1" by 3/4" cylinder N50 gauss NEOS (about 6 to ten) were placed one after the other in TIGHT compression?






        you want THESE magnets for your screw rod testing:::


        I have 3 of them myself

        CMS Magnetics® N50 2x2x1" w Countersunk Hole Neodymium Magnet Block 4 PC | eBay
        Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 09-21-2014, 05:00 AM.

        Comment

        • #5
          I have probably 50 round noes 1" by 1/2 inch N53 with the hole through the center. I plan on making use of those somehow. IF a rod is used as a guide, you really don't need the PVC pipe, just something to hold the rod at the top and at the bottom that it can slide up and down through. Probably a threaded brass rod would be best. And something at the bottom to hold the magnets. If this has any measure of success, then I would get these:
          K&J Magnetics - Products
          Having the shaft move up and down with the magnets was not my original idea, but it does serve a couple different purposes.

          One at the bottom that the rod goes through and then two "bolted" together on the shaft. They are a little pricy, but if they don't work, it is probably time to abandon the project.

          Since the holes in the magnets I have and the ones in the magnets I listed are 1/4 inch, Lowes has plastic spacers that will fit on i/4 inch rod. Several of these, or even some plastic tubing could be put on the rod over the thread to help eliminate some of the friction as it slides up and down. I have most of what I need, except the time to do it.

          Dave
          “Advances are made by answering questions. Discoveries are made by questioning answers.”
          —Bernhard Haisch, Astrophysicist

          Comment

          Previous template Next
          Working...
          X