Cosmic Induction Generator by John Polakowski

The Real History of the Ed Gray Motor by Mark McKay
Energetic Forum  

Go Back   Energetic Forum > Energetic Forum Discussion > Renewable Energy > John Bedini
Homepage Energetic Science Ministries Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

John Bedini Discussion threads relating to John Bedini. Bedini SG, Bedini SSG, Crystal Batteries, etc...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2010, 11:27 PM
vrand vrand is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 444
Bedini Tesla Switch Solar Amplifier

Bedini's "Tesla Switch Solar Amplifier" is available now for orders.

Quote:
Renaissance Charge - Intelligent Solutions to Premature Battery Failure

Tesla Solar Power Amplifier. The newest Bedini charger for offline solar charging/controlling. Three products rated for 10A, 20A, or 30A 12/24V solar panels and battery systems. See a prototype picture for details. Will ship within two months of ordering in order of payments received.
Tesla Switch Solar Charger to debut at Bedini conference
Tesla Switch Solar Charger to debut at Bedini conference
Free Energy Convention - Windows Live


Looking forward to learning what it does and how it performs

Why the need for solar panels?

Regards, Mike R.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2010, 11:51 PM
Xenomorph Xenomorph is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 538
Itīs probably a marketing consideration.
There is a huge demand for solar chargers in the coming years and the company
already has a line of non-solar battery chargers.
Too bad Bedini pulled the youtube vids, he explained the functionality pretty well there. Very vaguely i remember that he stressed the feature of
majorly increasing the amps in the pulse to the battery in comparison to normal
solar chargers.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2010, 12:35 AM
Matthew Jones Matthew Jones is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,086
There are few people having success duplicating a device that is at least, similar.

Use for the Tesla Switch

Read back about 4- 6 pages worth.

Cheers
Matt
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2010, 12:50 AM
vrand vrand is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 444
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xenomorph View Post
Itīs probably a marketing consideration.
There is a huge demand for solar chargers in the coming years and the company
already has a line of non-solar battery chargers.
Too bad Bedini pulled the youtube vids, he explained the functionality pretty well there. Very vaguely i remember that he stressed the feature of
majorly increasing the amps in the pulse to the battery in comparison to normal
solar chargers.
Yeah, the videos were removed. Maybe Bedini is making new ones?

Is this the Tesla Switch from back in the early '80's where he switches around the batteries to tap negative energy and negative time?

Quote:
Mike Mueller's paper on "Experiments with a Kromrey & a Brandt-Tesla Converter" with Comments by Tom Bearden:
http://www.scene.org/~esa/merlib/Mueller.pdf
The more energy one uses for loads the more charge to the batteries?

It sounds like tapping free electricity to me. Strange why the need for the solar panels.

Regards
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2010, 01:11 AM
theremart's Avatar
theremart theremart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,412
As before...

I am waiting to hear the results, and see what the specs are. Glad there is a release date.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2010, 01:18 AM
EgmQC EgmQC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by vrand View Post
........
It sounds like tapping free electricity to me. Strange why the need for the solar panels.

Regards
He will never make a OU product with his business name on it , its just a no brainer to do that, all investor will retract they share because of the high risk of fraud, so many business have proclaimed so many time to have a OU device and at the end it was just a fake that now people don't really put credit to that type of claim when its time to invest. Bedini make really great product and all his product do what its wrote on it, nothing more, nothing less. There the marketing side and the product side , you saw one side but that don't mean its related to the second side

Best Regards,
EgmQC
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2010, 02:55 AM
Xenomorph Xenomorph is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 538
Or Energenx will simply never officially claim that their product operates at OU even if it does. That way they give no room to critics, no reason to attack them, if they have never made any such claims.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2010, 03:11 AM
vrand vrand is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 444
Quote:
Originally Posted by theremart View Post
I am waiting to hear the results, and see what the specs are. Glad there is a release date.
Yeah, first come first served, and will ship within two months of ordering. So looking at 2 months max before the end user test results come in.

Anyone here going to purchase a unit? If so could you please post your test results on this forum

Regards, Mike R.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2010, 03:49 AM
vrand vrand is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 444
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthew Jones View Post
There are few people having success duplicating a device that is at least, similar.

Use for the Tesla Switch

Read back about 4- 6 pages worth.

Cheers
Matt
Nice work Matt

It look like you have spent a lot of time researching and experimenting with the Tesla switch.

What do you think of the new Bedini Tesla Switch Solar Amplifier?

Is it over unity, and if so, is it tapping negative time and negative energy?

Regards, Mike R.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2010, 04:19 AM
EgmQC EgmQC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xenomorph View Post
Or Energenx will simply never officially claim that their product operates at OU even if it does. That way they give no room to critics, no reason to attack them, if they have never made any such claims.
Not at the price he sell it, in his patent he will need to explicitly wrote that his device is OU, else .... you know what i mean, someone will make 2-3 modification and fill a patent for a OU device, not a solar charger so 2 different entity completely , impossible to fight back.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2010, 04:28 AM
ashtweth's Avatar
ashtweth ashtweth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,493
Send a message via Skype™ to ashtweth
Perhaps the Q is, is it OU or not?, i think it must be, if you can charge a battery from a LOWER solar voltage potential source (when solar is down) to attain a higher battery voltage charge then gentle man and Jenna/Rose we must QUESTION is this OU or is this some thing conversed we have over looked?, sounds to me like it has to be OU

John B removed his videos showing OU, we have them backed up thanks to Nivver, but the point is, how can you charge a battery via lower voltage (as this can) and get a higher current into them, if its not using the voltage potential only charge? Hmmm.

I think We need MATT or Bitz to TEST these, i DON'T want to know how it works, but if the PROCESS is A NEW DISCOVERY, dont forget we need a new genre of FREE ENERGY ENGINEERING (like a non profit research and development center) to study FREE energy, people can get a commercial charger that is OU they are NONE THE WISER TO HOW MANY DEVICES ARE MISUNDERSTOOD AND SUPPRESSED,

whee is the security?, we have better devices and so does john he has the Krom device and more. These devices must have better security by having a designated faculty to work on this genre of NEGLECTED engineering and to start the needed research effort to bring back this lost technology.

Despite ALL FREE energy inventors not making it to the market with their device(s), it does not mean that their technology did not work. History shows us that they never had the successful METHOD to get their technology known and accepted publicly to capacity, (For example Steven Marks - There are MANY more).

We must remember what was said in the public disclosure project, if just ONE of the 500 Military/Norad/Nasa/government witness testimony reports are true, just ONE, then what does that mean?

If just one of the devices mentioned in Panacea's FREE energy suppression documentary (researchers edition) is tangible (many are) AND got suppressed.And as a result could of got humanity off fossil fuels.

Where is the RESEARCH CENTER to revive these lost devices and work on this new genre of engineering?. Faculties have always rejected these inventors findings. Where is the security and support? Is there any body teaching these FREE energy methods PUBLICLY to advance education? Is the KNOWLEDGE Secure? Does a sale of the FREE energy device alone erect any engineering faculty to address this NEGLECTED science?

Panacea has been working with Trevor James Constable, Trevor has had advanced weather modification technology for nearly 20 years.Yet the faculties just like in the case of alternative medicine and FREE energy technology have no grasp or research/course for covering it.

It has only been due to the engineers in the OPEN SOURCE FREE energy community that this information has remained alive and not lost. These open source FREE energy engineers who work on NO budget are qualified and have the needed aptitude to resurrect, accept and advance these technologies to help humanity, not to mention have the capacity TEACH them.

why did john post the OVER UNITY charger here? It's us who have the capacity to spread the word TO CAPACITY.

The METHOD of PUBLIC delivery needs as much address. The historical record shows that it is critical that the public and inventors ADDRESS and express CONCERN when taking these FREE energy devices out there, but every one thinks they have the answers.

10 hours of footage contains others just like these engineers who thought they had the answer to deliver the technology conventionally too. If you look on the how they went wrong page one the panacea one inventor this year has already gone just like another last November. We are sure that they both thought that they had the answers to to secure the technology also.

I think we will talk to John K about validating the SCIENCE not method, of this device, this should help humanity.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2010, 04:30 AM
Xenomorph Xenomorph is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 538
Quote:
Originally Posted by EgmQC View Post
Not at the price he sell it, in his patent he will need to explicitly wrote that his device is OU, else .... you know what i mean, someone will make 2-3 modification and fill a patent for a OU device, not a solar charger so 2 different entity completely , impossible to fight back.
I disagree. Who sais that you have to mention OU in the patent?
As long as it describes the functionality and the elements sufficiently exact, the patent
is non-ambiguous.
Patents usually never go into the finest details and number crunching
of input/output values is not included.
Gray for instance (and others) also elegantly avoided to use the term free energy anywhere.
Doing so also majorly increases the chances to actually get the patent through

Last edited by Xenomorph : 05-20-2010 at 04:33 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2010, 04:40 AM
ashtweth's Avatar
ashtweth ashtweth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,493
Send a message via Skype™ to ashtweth
EgmQC some good points there how the MAINSTREAM SCIENTIFIC ETHOS looks at OU (public reaction to un independent validated claims). This is useful info. BTW, in regards to what brother Xen said, are you aware of how many patents mention OU?

Ash
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2010, 05:03 AM
vrand vrand is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 444
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xenomorph View Post
I disagree. Who sais that you have to mention OU in the patent?
As long as it describes the functionality and the elements sufficiently exact, the patent
is non-ambiguous.
Patents usually never go into the finest details and number crunching
of input/output values is not included.
Gray for instance (and others) also elegantly avoided to use the term free energy anywhere.
Doing so also majorly increases the chances to actually get the patent through
Some famous OU researchers have mentioned OU in their patents, such as Dr. Puharich and his HHO electrolysis invention and Stan Meyers with his water fuel designs. They just explain that is comes from the environment and is not a closed loop system. Tom Beardon in his MEG patent explains it as re-gaging with the virtual particle flux.

Dr. Randall Mills and his Blacklight Power Co. claim OU in his patents using his own theories to explain where the extra energy comes from. They received $10's of millions of funding from investors to build power plants.

John Bedini is world famous for his free energy research work and to not mention OU in his patents is strange. Why would his products exhibit OU if his patents don't mention any possibility of it? Why would investors put money in another "battery charger" company? What is so special about his product compared to the 1000's of other chargers on the market?

Looking forward to hearing more of Bedini's latest product

Regards
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2010, 06:06 AM
EgmQC EgmQC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by ashtweth View Post
Perhaps the Q is, is it OU or not?, i think it must be, if you can charge a battery from a LOWER solar voltage potential source (when solar is down) to attain a higher battery voltage charge then gentle man and Jenna/Rose we must QUESTION is this OU or is this some thing conversed we have over looked?, sounds to me like it has to be OU

John B removed his videos showing OU, we have them backed up thanks to Nivver, but the point is, how can you charge a battery via lower voltage (as this can) and get a higher current into them, if its not using the voltage potential only charge? Hmmm.

..................

.
Joules Thief, step up transformer , cap+diode voltage doubler ,SSSG, etc etc There alot of way to archive what you think is the main point.

For the current , well , 18-24v input source depending of the output voltage , you only have to fill 2 cap in series and dump it in parallel to the output ,you get Higher Amps lower voltage, if you need more voltage for a low voltage source, step up/charge cap in serie/dump in parallel.

There Alot of possibility on how he does , nothing was very clear and its why he removed it i think. We didn't see any screenshot of a scope shot so we cant know for sure if the rise/fall of the Input/Output match, if the output is 3 time bigger but 3 time shorter you got nothing more, analogue meter cant show that nor digital, need a scope here.

Until we see the patent for this specific device, there nothing indicating its OU and its not claimed to be OU if you read the description of it.

Best Regards,
EgmQC
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2010, 06:33 AM
Jules Tresor's Avatar
Jules Tresor Jules Tresor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 364
It's on internet since many years :)

Good morning guys,

lost in the sea of free energy devices, you forgot that major invention from John, that he is going to manufacture now: his solid state battery pulser, that he names now Tesla Solar Switch.

I have always been surprised that nobody ever tried to replicate it, it's the most simple of devices.

Basic logic chip, transistors and capacitors ... exactly as you saw in the video by John that has now removed prior to start selling the device.



Abstract: Technical Field:
(0001) The invention relates generally to a battery pulse charger using a solid-state device and method wherein the current going to the battery is not constant. The signal or current is momentarily switch-interrupted as it flows through either the first channel, the charge phase, or the second channel, the discharge phase. This two-phase cycle alternates the signal in the two channels thereby allowing a potential charge in a capacitor to disconnect from its power source an instant before the capacitor discharges its stored potential energy into a battery for receiving the capacitor's stored energy. The capacitor then disconnects from the battery and re-connects to the power source upon completion of the discharge phase, thereby completing charge-discharge cycle. The battery pulse charger can also drive devices, such as a motor and a heating element, with pulses.

full patent here: Zero Point Energy - John Bedini Solid State Generator - MDG 2007

I wish I was an expert in electronic, because I would have free electricity since a long time, but for my private use, because it's patented
Is it a US only patent, or worldwide cover ?!

John Bedini is the greatest electrical genius of our time

Last edited by Jules Tresor : 05-20-2010 at 06:38 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2010, 11:44 AM
Xenomorph Xenomorph is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 538
Quote:
Originally Posted by vrand View Post
Some famous OU researchers have mentioned OU in their patents, such as Dr. Puharich and his HHO electrolysis invention and Stan Meyers with his water fuel designs. They just explain that is comes from the environment and is not a closed loop system. Tom Beardon in his MEG patent explains it as re-gaging with the virtual particle flux.

Dr. Randall Mills and his Blacklight Power Co. claim OU in his patents using his own theories to explain where the extra energy comes from. They received $10's of millions of funding from investors to build power plants.

John Bedini is world famous for his free energy research work and to not mention OU in his patents is strange. Why would his products exhibit OU if his patents don't mention any possibility of it? Why would investors put money in another "battery charger" company? What is so special about his product compared to the 1000's of other chargers on the market?

Looking forward to hearing more of Bedini's latest product

Regards
Did you read? This is exactly what i have said. No specific mention of the term "OU", like "I claim that my device is an overunity device ...", but various sneaky ways to basically express the same fact with careful words.

You have to understand that most investors get scared if they hear the term OU or free energy, because the establishment has demonized and ridiculed inventors who do so. Still the paris academic doctrine of the late 19th century prevails, that there canīt be a "perpetuum mobile" and the establishment-dependent scientific community still adheres to it.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2010, 03:13 PM
Jbignes5 Jbignes5 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 1,014
Yeah thats Funny..

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xenomorph View Post
Did you read? This is exactly what i have said. No specific mention of the term "OU", like "I claim that my device is an overunity device ...", but various sneaky ways to basically express the same fact with careful words.

You have to understand that most investors get scared if they hear the term OU or free energy, because the establishment has demonized and ridiculed inventors who do so. Still the paris academic doctrine of the late 19th century prevails, that there canīt be a "perpetuum mobile" and the establishment-dependent scientific community still adheres to it.

The real problem is they invalidate their own idiom. Show them an atom and have them explain why does it run perpetually. If as they say there is no such thing as perpetual motion why do we exist? We ARE in perpetual motion 24/7. We are in a perpetual motion changing from one state to the next. Nothing they can say or do will change that.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2010, 07:59 PM
vrand vrand is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 444
Reading the Tesla Switch thread and found some comments from John Bedini on the Tesla Switch Solar Charger:

OU COP 2.79
Quote:
#1508 (permalink)
01-07-2010, 09:46 PM
John_Bedini
Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 177

Tesla Switch
Bit's,
I cant say much as this is a company product, but when it finally dawns on what you just saw. you will know to keep working and you will get it. I do hope the best for the world.
But I will do everything one can do to get it out. its plain and simple no heat in the batteries at all. It's a Modified Tesla Switch Solar Charger, but can be used on the motors also.
53 watt in 148 out. here is the link. I won't answer the question you posted, but you guys are very close.
JB
YouTube - MVI_2378.AVI
Theory of Operation:
Quote:
#1558 (permalink)
01-10-2010, 11:24 AM
John_Bedini
Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 177

Tesla Switch
Ok,
I'm going back all over what we discussed here, I will start at ground zero if I must do that. It should be quite easy to make the simple circuits work.
Aaron is correct that what Peter and I discussed has been ignored. I also found that what Bill and Ray handed me as a diagram does not work, something is missing from the switch. Where did I get that wave, across the switching transistors in the four battery Tesla switch.

"Ronald Brandt did not invent the switch as he just was trying to figure out what the circuit was that was powering his electric car and why it kept blowing up"
.
The key factor may be the driver transformers!!!!!!!!! in the original circuit.

Baldinelli is the guy Aaron is talking about, this is the key to the success of the system. In the statements by Gabriel Kron, it is said what to change, Leroy pointed this out in a early post here. The currents can be very confusing as they take place in semiconductors.

Kron calls them
'lamellar' currents, A network with the simultaneous presence of both closed and open paths. And, noting a type of armor composed of small plates or lames laced together. Can be Interpreted as, small branch currents combining to form one big current, any semiconductor works this way, even different types of rocks.

“When only positive and negative real numbers exist, it is customary to replace a positive resistance by an inductance and a negative resistance by a capacitor
This is a sneaky statement but correct.
Looking at this statement, if collecting negative energy we use the capacitor, example, SG circuit.

The battery acts just like a capacitor, resistor, inductor. what is in the SG circuit that uses the positive, the coil. The semiconductor runs on 'lamellar' currents, how else could it move electrons, but through holes, which are branches or small pipes.[/size]

John B
There are 3 power versions of the Tesla Switch Solar charger:

12/24VDC 10A Solar Amplifier
12/24VDC 20A Solar Amplifier
12/24VDC 30A Solar Amplifier

With a COP of 2.79, what would be the Power In vs Power Out for these units?

Regards, Mike R.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2010, 05:34 AM
Jules Tresor's Avatar
Jules Tresor Jules Tresor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 364
I bought the basic 10A Bedini Solar Switch, and hope to loop it on a battery bank on my electric bicycle
May be it's possible to kind of self loop if we use a converter before the switch:

battery to motor
+ battery to converter (24V to 240V) + transformer (240 to 24V) to switch

Off course there will be lots of loss in the converter + transformer, but it might work. 2 months before testing, waiting for post mail

If not I will have to set of batteries ans swap them on a regular basis, or with the help of voltage controler ... don't know yet

I won't comment on this thread until I have something constructive to say, it's a place for replication and experiment, not critics. Please forgive my excessive comments (and no need to respond to this post .

Thanks and good luck.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2010, 07:39 AM
ashtweth's Avatar
ashtweth ashtweth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,493
Send a message via Skype™ to ashtweth
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jbignes5 View Post
The real problem is they invalidate their own idiom. Show them an atom and have them explain why does it run perpetually. If as they say there is no such thing as perpetual motion why do we exist? We ARE in perpetual motion 24/7. We are in a perpetual motion changing from one state to the next. Nothing they can say or do will change that.
show me ONE thing in the universe that's still
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 06-07-2010, 03:10 AM
ashtweth's Avatar
ashtweth ashtweth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,493
Send a message via Skype™ to ashtweth
Quote:
Originally Posted by vrand View Post
Reading the Tesla Switch thread and found some comments from John Bedini on the Tesla Switch Solar Charger:

OU COP 2.79


Theory of Operation:


There are 3 power versions of the Tesla Switch Solar charger:

12/24VDC 10A Solar Amplifier
12/24VDC 20A Solar Amplifier
12/24VDC 30A Solar Amplifier

With a COP of 2.79, what would be the Power In vs Power Out for these units?

Regards, Mike R.
More of the OU stuff on the PES page
Tesla Switch Solar Charger to debut at Bedini conference

Charger gets here soon will confirm HERE, lets not tell people who dont understand OU that's it OU YET, or they will say "perpetual motion device", that will hurt Rick, John and many others, they dont believe OU yet, we need to be conservative . OU must come into validation by being SELF EVIDENT, by particular disclosure. Have some ideas ill share soon.

John has done well to show us HERE, lets make sure we dont make that a bad decision for him.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 06-07-2010, 07:35 AM
elias's Avatar
elias elias is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,129
Quote:
The key factor may be the driver transformers!!!!!!!!! in the original circuit.
Quote:
The currents can be very confusing as they take place in semiconductors.
Hi

Can anyone extend what Bedini was trying to convey with these statements?

I am curious! Bedini is looking for these special currents, which as he says take place in semiconductors! This reminds me of EFTV8 which Daniel Sheenan was talking about extracting energy from a simple P-N junction, or even I remember Dr Stiffler talking about the same thing. Talking about the fact that the excess energy comes from the diode, namely the p-n junction.

Now, i wonder if the depletion area, causes the vacuum pour in energy?

I even remember how gotoluc managed to amplify the simple spark in the sparkplug by adding some diodes parallel to the secondary of the ignition coil?!

I only wonder, why? Why haven't we been studying the simple diode as an energy extraction device?

I think that most of us know and have observed here that we can light up an led which is a type of diode, by changing potential on one of its terminals, with the other terminal floating. Just find a function generator and hook one of an LED's terminals to it, it will light up dimly, but it will, without drawing any external current!! meaning that it generates its own current, coming from the environment. Dr Sheenan believes it comes from the heat in the environment, others say it comes from the vacuum. All of us working with pulsing semiconductors have observed the "cooling effect" these devices have.

Some other people such ad Dr Jan Pajak say: Dr Eng. Jan Pajak - autobiographical note (in English)
Quote:
Therefore I do research on such still unknown phenomena as "technical telekinesis" (means the "reversal of friction"), as telepathy, as gravity, as thermal energy of electrons, etc.
The reversal of friction (technical telekinesis) is converting heat into motion, which is what happens according to Dr Sheenan in a P-N Junction.

I think that the simple devices that we call diodes, should be taken seriously.

We should design many different experiments with diodes. Pulsing them with one terminal and high voltages, and extracting energy from them.

Hope to see more "understanding" about the diode. I also remember Bedini talking about the LATTICE structure of the silicon, which can act as a pump for the Aether. A P-N junction is two types of Silicions, that meet each-other. Male and Female, and the energy of the vacuum is captured from the Bloch wall which where the opposites meet.

Elias
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 06-07-2010, 01:20 PM
Matthew Jones Matthew Jones is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,086
Quote:
The key factor may be the driver transformers!!!!!!!!! in the original circuit.....The currents can be very confusing as they take place in semiconductors.
Quote:
Can anyone extend what Bedini was trying to convey with these statements?
This is real simple to understand if you think about it for one minute. One thing you need to look at is the negistor by JL Naudin. Bedini said in that very same post this is what is happening but Naudin is not catching the power.
I am not sure how Mr John is doing it but....
If you look at a circiut like the Big Joule Thief (See thread for original schematic). You can set this type of circiut into resonance.
If you disregard the Bridged output of the circiut and you use the the DIODE output to discharge into a large capacitor. This will induce the oscilation to grow. IE a negistor effect.
Initially you will see a very short oscillation but it will grow, like the negistor.
The positive part of the oscillation is created from the power we put in and run through the coil. The negative part of the oscillation comes from the the transistor turning off. It goes Negative.
This creates a large potential difference in the capacitor. That can be discharged and stepped down to proportionate levels of voltage creates lots of amperage.
For the most part it is simple to understand and see the concept. The hard part is to drive the setup in a fashion that will continually put out with out long period of growth. You gotta find the balance or find the driving mechanism to increase the production.

If you still stumped as to what I am saying I'll draw some picture and set a small thing up and film it.

Matt
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 06-07-2010, 02:29 PM
Xenomorph Xenomorph is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 538
@Matt: That sounds good. Maybe you could really make a small set-up for the sake of illustration? I always wondered how to trick negative resistance oscillators into delivering power, this could be a way.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 06-07-2010, 05:59 PM
Matthew Jones Matthew Jones is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,086
This is a drawing. The caps are backwards.

Nvisser has got a better way of charging the caps in parallel and discharging in series. Go to the Tesla Switch forums and find it.

I'll post a movie with the scope shot as soon as You Tube gives me a link. In the movie the effect is not happening because I did not tune it very well. I'll tune one this evening and get a picture for ya.

Matt

Last edited by Matthew Jones : 06-07-2010 at 06:07 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 06-07-2010, 06:42 PM
Xenomorph Xenomorph is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 538
@Matt:

For this to work as you described, the "A" switching would have to happen at the negative halfwave of the collector voltage?
How would you drive the switches?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 06-07-2010, 07:08 PM
scratchrobot's Avatar
scratchrobot scratchrobot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 159
zpe_bedini_solidstate

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jules Tresor View Post
Good morning guys,

lost in the sea of free energy devices, you forgot that major invention from John, that he is going to manufacture now: his solid state battery pulser, that he names now Tesla Solar Switch.

I have always been surprised that nobody ever tried to replicate it, it's the most simple of devices.

Basic logic chip, transistors and capacitors ... exactly as you saw in the video by John that has now removed prior to start selling the device.



Abstract: Technical Field:
(0001) The invention relates generally to a battery pulse charger using a solid-state device and method wherein the current going to the battery is not constant. The signal or current is momentarily switch-interrupted as it flows through either the first channel, the charge phase, or the second channel, the discharge phase. This two-phase cycle alternates the signal in the two channels thereby allowing a potential charge in a capacitor to disconnect from its power source an instant before the capacitor discharges its stored potential energy into a battery for receiving the capacitor's stored energy. The capacitor then disconnects from the battery and re-connects to the power source upon completion of the discharge phase, thereby completing charge-discharge cycle. The battery pulse charger can also drive devices, such as a motor and a heating element, with pulses.

full patent here: Zero Point Energy - John Bedini Solid State Generator - MDG 2007

I wish I was an expert in electronic, because I would have free electricity since a long time, but for my private use, because it's patented
Is it a US only patent, or worldwide cover ?!

John Bedini is the greatest electrical genius of our time
I just finished replicating the circuit and made a video.

Will do some more testing later

scratchrobot
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 06-07-2010, 08:06 PM
Matthew Jones Matthew Jones is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,086
OOPS
I didn't put the note on the thing. Switch the "A"'s on and charge. Turn the A's off and the B's on to discharge.

Heres a movie. YouTube - CapCharge.MPG.
This is not setup with discharge just shows the thing swinging the charge up.

Matt
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 06-07-2010, 08:41 PM
scratchrobot's Avatar
scratchrobot scratchrobot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 159
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthew Jones View Post
This is a drawing. The caps are backwards.

Nvisser has got a better way of charging the caps in parallel and discharging in series. Go to the Tesla Switch forums and find it.

I'll post a movie with the scope shot as soon as You Tube gives me a link. In the movie the effect is not happening because I did not tune it very well. I'll tune one this evening and get a picture for ya.

Matt
Thanks for sharing, I have to try this
Maybe the switching can be done with some more MJL's and a picaxe?
What do you think?

scratchrobot
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post! share on MyspaceShare on FacebookTweet this thread
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
2007 Copyright ? Energetic Forum? A Non Profit Corporation - All Rights Reserved