Energetic Forum  
Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Delicious Digg Reddit WordPress StumbleUpon Tumblr Translate Addthis Aaron Murakami YouTube PRE-REGISTER - 19 SEATS LEFT!!!*** 2017 ENERGY CONFERENCE ***


* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX


Go Back   Energetic Forum > >
   

General Discussion Other general discussions on topics not listed above.

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator
Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 06-07-2009, 07:33 PM
h20power h20power is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 661
Something New on 9/11

Hi Everyone,

This is something new found on what happened on 9/11 that I think everyone should see: Dr. Steven Jones at UC Davis-May1, 2009 | 911Blogger.com This was on May 1, 2009.

I concider myself to be a man of science and now I have new questions. I would like to know who where the companies that where installing new so-called internet systems throughout the buildings just proir to the event? And I would also like to know who had access to the building elevator systems?

Come up with some more information you would like to know about what really happend on that day.


h2opower.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote

Download SOLAR SECRETS by Peter Lindemann
Free - Get it now: Solar Secrets

  #2  
Old 06-07-2009, 08:04 PM
Aaron's Avatar
Aaron Aaron is offline
Co-Founder & Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,408
Marvin Bush | Securacom

George Bush's brother Marvin Bush is one of the main people that owns the security company in charge of the entire WTC complex. They are the ones with access to everything.

Marvin P. Bush - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Stratesec - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
9/11 Security Courtesy of Marvin Bush
__________________
Sincerely,
Aaron Murakami

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-01-2009, 03:08 AM
aljhoa aljhoa is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,015
9/11939

Gleiwitz incident - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Gleiwitz incident, sometimes incorrectly referred to as Operation Canned Goods, was a staged attack on 31 August 1939 against the German radio station Sender Gleiwitz in Gleiwitz, Upper Silesia, Germany (since 1945: Gliwice, Poland) on the eve of World War II in Europe.

On the night of August 31, 1939 a small group of German operatives, dressed in Polish uniforms and led by Naujocks[2] seized the Gleiwitz station and broadcast a short anti-German message in Polish (sources vary on the content on the message). The Germans' goal was to make the attack and the broadcast look like the work of anti-German Polish saboteurs

Honiok was dressed to look like a saboteur; then killed by lethal injection, given gunshot wounds, and left dead at the scene, so that he appeared to have been killed while attacking the station. His corpse was subsequently presented as proof of the attack to the police and press.[4]

In addition to Honiok, several other convicts from the Dachau concentration camp[2] were kept available for this purpose.[3] The Germans referred to them by the code phrase "Konserve" ("canned goods").
Al
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-04-2009, 03:06 AM
Mad Scientist Mad Scientist is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 563
There are numerous inconsistency's in the "official" story about what happen on 911. But the finding of thermite in the dust is a real smoking gun that is hard to ignore. Yet the MSM has done a pretty good job of doing just that.

Other then the obvious what possible explanation is there for the presence of this thermite? And a weapon grade nano-particle sized one at that.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-17-2009, 04:53 AM
Nadda Nadda is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 314
YouTube - General of US Intelligence says No Plane Hit The Pentagon!!!


On other videos on Youtube, You can watch and listen to ground zero just after the planes hit. You will see firefighters running telling everyone to clear the buildings because "bombs are exploding".....and you can hear them.

There is no excuse for the explosions, they were happening on ground level. Witnesses have said the lobby was "blown up" by the time they got down there when they were escaping....Impossible for the planes to have caused that.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-17-2009, 05:11 AM
Pamela Vicik-Smith's Avatar
Pamela Vicik-Smith Pamela Vicik-Smith is offline
Energetic Science Practitioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 990
So, if the plane did not hit the Pentagon, what happened to the plane and the people on it? I happen to personally know someone who was on that plane and headed to San Fran for a business trip.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-17-2009, 06:11 AM
Nadda Nadda is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 314
I wish i knew the full truth, pamela

Unfortunatly the pentagon has less security on it than my garage... As the only video we are allowed to see is of a time delay traffic stop. Either that Or the footage of the plane will breach national security. Which one could possibly be true?
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-17-2009, 09:40 AM
Joit Joit is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,992
Someone postet somewhere else, that an Airplaine with 6 Blasters did crash few Months after 9/11 at the Atlantic...
I wont say, that this Flight from the Day did crash somewhere else.
__________________
Theorizer are like High Voltage. A lot hot Air with no Power behind but they are the dead of applied Work and Ideas.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-17-2009, 08:29 PM
Nadda Nadda is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 314
Just found this link from Youtube

Operation Northwoods - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proof of the governments real agenda. It took more than one person to assemble an "Operation" of such magnitude, this is the mindset these people in power have. It is every bit as real today as it was in 1962!
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-17-2009, 08:56 PM
Aaron's Avatar
Aaron Aaron is offline
Co-Founder & Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,408
Question where are the people?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pamela Vicik-Smith View Post
So, if the plane did not hit the Pentagon, what happened to the plane and the people on it? I happen to personally know someone who was on that plane and headed to San Fran for a business trip.
Not sure about that flight, but the morning of 9/11, Flight 93 (that supposedly hit in Penn) was announced to be landing at the airport at Cleveland and is reported to have bombs on board. It landed, was taxied to one end of the runway, everyone got off. (Where did they go and what happened to them?)

In the SAME report, they announced that there were "deeply concerned" about Flight 175 (supposedly hit south tower at WTC) also in the same area.

Kind of interesting that this was announced and suddenly it disappeared from the news and remained on the news website and in the archives was online as far back as 2001 when it was released that morning. Not only has the archives been deleted from 2001 showing this but later, they were ordered to delete the story for being "factually incorrect."

What are the odds that they would have put up a story about these two planes with those exact 2 flight numbers before those exact two flight numbers are involved in the 9/11 tragedy.

Here is one archive or the story: WCPO.com - The Web site of WCPO-TV in Cincinnati, Ohio

Plane Lands In Cleveland; Bomb Feared Aboard
Reported by: 9News Staff
Web produced by: Liz Foreman
9/11/01 11:43:57 AM
A Boeing 767 out of Boston made an emergency landing Tuesday at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport due to concerns that it may have a bomb aboard, said Mayor Michael R. White.
White said the plane had been moved to a secure area of the airport, and was evacuated.
United identified the plane as Flight 93. The airline did say how many people were aboard the flight.
United said it was also "deeply concerned" about another flight, Flight 175, a Boeing 767, which was bound from Boston to Los Angeles.
On behalf of the airline CEO James Goodwin said: "The thoughts of everyone at United are with the passengers and crew of these flights. Our prayers are also with everyone on the ground who may have been involved.
"United is working with all the relevant authorities, including the FBI, to obtain further information on these flights," he said.
__________________
Sincerely,
Aaron Murakami

Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-19-2009, 03:39 PM
Nadda Nadda is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 314
wow

Thanks for the link and info Aaron
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-22-2009, 04:45 AM
Mad Scientist Mad Scientist is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 563
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pamela Vicik-Smith View Post
So, if the plane did not hit the Pentagon, what happened to the plane and the people on it? I happen to personally know someone who was on that plane and headed to San Fran for a business trip.
That’s a very good question and we really don’t know the answer. But I seriously doubt that they were on whatever hit the Pentagon.

That was a twin engine plane with the engines out on the wings. If that plane hit the Pentagon would we not expect to see two holes punched building rather then just one? These are big heavy engines yet we are to believe that they just suddenly stopped when they hit the building and yet the fragile body of the plane manages to punch in a hole then the wings fold back and they and the engines are sucked into that hole.

Then the entire plane is virtually consumed by the fire but we are told that we know who was on the plane because their finger prints were recovered.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-22-2009, 05:38 PM
jibbguy jibbguy is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 987
Yes the Pentagon hit is the second-most absurd "conspiracy theory' put out by the government about 9/11 ... The first and most ridiculous tin-foil-hat garbage being of course the "Bldg 7" lies, imo.

They messed up: The early photos show a too-small hole in the building that could not have been made by the Boeing's fuselage, let alone with the two huge Titanium engines.

They later brought over a crane and knocked a much bigger hole there.. But that was done too late, the early photos showing the small hole exist. There is positive proof of the crane enlarging the hole, with news footage of it.

Oddly enough, that was the ONLY side of the Pentagon to have been recently strengthened to resist bombs: The window had been replaced by ballistic plastics, and the structure greatly strengthened... But only on that one of five sides. The plane had to do a very difficult high-speed descending 180 deg. turn to get to that side too, coming in finally level at an amazing 2 foot off the ground.... You would think it would have been a lot easier for an inexperienced pilot to just go straight in.

Several airline pilots with over 20 years' experience, have said they could never have made that extremely difficult maneuver themselves (the plane was supposed to be doing around 500 Knots at the time). This done by a "pilot" who flunked his Cessna training.

PilotsFor911Truth.org

There were approx. 14 cameras that could have shown the event (including some from a nearby hotel and gas station): The FBI confiscated all the tapes, and we were never allowed to see any of them except for that very odd one they released of the parking lot, which is certainly not convincing either way anyway.

If there is no legitimate question here and they are "innocent"... WHY NOT BRING OUT THE OTHER CAMERA FOOTAGE?

...And then there is of course Dick Cheney's famous angry reply... The "HAVE YOU HEARD ANYTHING TO THE CONTRARY!?" statement.

This was reported by U.S. Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta.. Lol rather hard to refute.

Notice how Sen. Lee Hamilton changes the subject immediately when he realizes where this is going

YouTube - 911 Commission - Trans. Sec Norman Mineta Testimony
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-22-2009, 10:24 PM
Aaron's Avatar
Aaron Aaron is offline
Co-Founder & Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,408
9/11 questions

There was a turbine that was like a few feet diameter or something. Anyway, those are way too small for the plane that was claimed to hit.

An eye witness said he saw that is looked like a "cruise missile with wings." It was painted to look like an American Airlines plane. But it is much smaller.

The dimensions of the wheel and jet turbine and visual eye witness report matches a Global Hawk cruise missile.



Here is a pic of the size of an engine of the plane that supposedly hit the Pentagon - these guys could craw inside that thing.



Here is part of the jet turbine from an actual photo taken of the Pentagon wreckage - the diameter is smaller than the length of the man's leg.



EYE WITNESS testimony on CNN's archive:
CNN.com - Up to 800 possibly dead at Pentagon - September 12, 2001

Audio of this:
YouTube - USA Today reporter speaks

"It was like a cruise missile with wings, went right there and slammed into the Pentagon," Mike Walter, an eyewitness, told CNN. "Huge explosion, great ball of fire, smoke started billowing out, and then it was just chaos on the highway as people either tried to move around the traffic and go down either forward or backwards."

Eye witness testimony corroborates with the size of the debris matching the Global Hawk as the most likely contender.

Hotel footage of Pentagon explosion but no plane. Global hawk flying a few feet above the ground would be too small to be seen. A commercial airliner would have been too big to miss.
YouTube - Rare Pentagon 9-11 Surveillance Camera Video of Impact

Rumsfield admitting by slip of tongue plane that crashed in Pennsylvania was SHOT DOWN.
YouTube - Rumsfeld 's Accidental Slip of the Tongue, Flight 93 shot down!
__________________
Sincerely,
Aaron Murakami

Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-08-2009, 06:33 PM
aljhoa aljhoa is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,015
The Exploding Floors of 9-11

This newly released footage of the demolitions of WTC 7 and WTC 1 (North Tower) is very significant. There are several important aspects of the demolitions of 9-11 that are proven by these videos. The first is the incredible amount of pulverization of the concrete in WTC 7, which can be seen in the billowing pyroclastic clouds of dust rolling down the streets during its unexplained collapse at 5:25 p.m. on 9-11. Pyroclastic clouds are usually associated with volcanoes and are composed chiefly of rock fragments of explosive origin.
Christopher Bollyn
see also:
Missing Links
Al
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-27-2009, 11:54 AM
rickoff's Avatar
rickoff rickoff is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 3,283
About the Pentagon

The most convincing evidence I have seen so far, that no plane hit the Pentagon, is found in the investigative videos linked below. A plane did fly low and towards the Pentagon, and this is confirmed by more than a dozen reliable eyewitnesses. The flight path, though, according to the witnesses, is entirely different than the path shown in the "official" version, which had the plane approach from the south side of the Citgo gas station, and at an angle. Two of the eyewitnesses were actually Pentagon policemen who were at the Citgo gas station and saw the plane fly over at the north side of the gas station, and close to Arlington Cemetery, which is seen just above the yellow lines in this photo:

In the above photo, the green line represents the "official" flight path, while the yellow lines represent the flight paths observed and reported by several eyewitnesses. Near the center of the photo, and in between the green and first yellow line, is the Citgo gas station where two Pentagon security officers were located at the time of the incident. Both officers stated emphatically, when interviewed on videotape, that the plane flew over at the north side of the Citgo, where the yellow lines are seen.

The operator at the Pentagon helipad control tower, located adjacent to the impact area at the Pentagon, also stated that the plane approached from the north side of the Citgo, and this would be nearly a straight in path rather than the angle path of the official version. The official version promoters had to stick to their story that the plane flew in on the south side of the Citgo at an angle, because that would be the only path of impact that could possibly match the penetration damage. Therefore, since the credible and multiple eyewitness accounts have the plane coming nearly straight in on the north side, the plane that was seen could not possibly have caused the damage, so could not have struck the Pentagon. Since no plane struck the Pentagon, it is only logical to assume that the plane seen by the witnesses actually lifted up to clear the top of the Pentagon at about the same time that the blast occurred. This would be supported by witness statements that the plane flew in at a low speed, but then throttled the engines shortly before the explosion. Very interesting videos, and well worth a watch.

pentagon flyover - Google Videos (The PentaCon)

The Pentagon Flyover - How They Pulled It Off#

The North Side Flyover - Part 1#

See also North Side Flyover Part 2
__________________
 

Last edited by rickoff; 11-21-2010 at 07:47 PM. Reason: added further expanation
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-01-2009, 07:54 AM
rickoff's Avatar
rickoff rickoff is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 3,283
Further clarification about the Pentagon

I'm not sure that everyone understood the significance of my previous post, so went back in to edit it and explain how the eyewitness accounts conclusively prove that an airplane did not hit the Pentagon on 9-11. By the way, these witnesses were all interviewed by the government, and the investigators who made these videos obtained records of those interviews through the Freedom of Information Act, and were thus able to track the witnesses down. As I stated previously, two of the witnesses were Pentagon police officers who just happened to be at the Citgo gas station as the plane flew by, and another witness was working in the helipad tower at the Pentagon. There were two additional witnesses who worked at the Citgo station, several witnesses who were outdoors working at Arlington Cemetery, witnesses who were visiting the cemetery, and others who were outdoors and directly beneath the flight path of the plane at various locations which all corroborate a north side pass of the Citgo station, with a nearly straight in approach. This is very important, because it flies in the face of the official version, which states that the plane flew in at an angle on the south side of the Citgo station, snapping off several metal lamp poles. Incidentally, one of the "official" version witnesses was a cab driver who stated that one of these large poles came smashing through his windshield as it fell over. He was photographed with the pole laying on the highway, next to his cab. Interestingly, the lads who made the videos that I linked to in my previous post interviewed the cab driver and showed the actual cab that was involved. The damage had never been repaired, and the cabbie kept the car in his back yard. The windshield did have a hole through it on the passenger side, but quite interestingly there was no damage whatsoever to the hood! We're talking about a rather tall, large, and heavy metal light pole. The video interviewers went back to see the cabbie at a later date, after talking with the several witnesses who refuted the official flight path, and confronted the cabbie with that information. He then changed his story and said he now remembered being north of the Citgo on the highway when his cab was struck, but the "official" photos clearly showed him being south of the Citgo, along the "official" flight path. It is truly amazing that our government expects us to believe their official version of the events when all the evidence is to the contrary.

Rick
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-01-2009, 04:48 PM
jibbguy jibbguy is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 987
You know, one thing in that video series about the Pentagon eyewitnesses that was kinda creepy to me was the new Air Force Memorial that has been built recently there.

It is hideous and UGLY. To me, it seems as if it is a daily reminder of fear for all those who work at the Pentagon to keep their mouths shut and just go along with it all.

Memorials should be more on a Human scale, so people can walk up and interact with them. This thing is like talons ripping at the sky: It is less a reminder of those who died for our country, than of the ability of Man to kill others. I can't imagine this thing getting approval normally...

It is like a giant psy-ops reminder to keep in line or they will get you; and reminds me of something Saddam or the old Soviets would have built.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-01-2009, 09:35 PM
rickoff's Avatar
rickoff rickoff is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 3,283
Hey Steve,

Can you post the video link and give me an elapsed time coordinate so I can take a look at that? I'd appreciate that. It does sound rather strange from the way you describe it.

Best 2 u,

Rick
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-01-2009, 11:49 PM
jibbguy jibbguy is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 987
Sorry m8, i was referring to another vid series "9/11-The Pentagon Attack".
It's very well done with compelling evidence. There are at least 8 eyewitnesses with the same story, that clearly contradicts the official report.

Part 1
YouTube - 9/11-The Pentagon Attack Part 1 of 8

In the beginning of Part 3, you can see it but it shows up in several of the others as well.

YouTube - 9/11-The Pentagon Attack Part 3 of 8
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 10-02-2009, 02:28 AM
rickoff's Avatar
rickoff rickoff is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 3,283
Okay, Steve, I see it clearly about 22 seconds in on the Part 3 video. It really does look wierd and ugly, and with the 3 spikes, or horns (whatever you might call them), it looks more like a fitting tribute to the Trilateral Commission, or perhaps a New Age version of the Devil's trident fork.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-02-2009, 03:54 AM
Aaron's Avatar
Aaron Aaron is offline
Co-Founder & Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,408
9/11

Rick,

I did see some of the video you posted. I haven't seen that take on
the Pentagon issue and is very compelling.

One thing is for sure - about 60% of the people on the 911 commission
came forward and said they were completely lied to about the information
they were given about 911. That ought to wake a few people up if they
even see the significance of that. That is not evidence, it is proof of a
cover up and anyone that denies that is simply not in touch with reality.

I agree that it is difficult to prove who or what is behind it but for anyone
at this stage to believe there is no cover up is simply committed to self
deception.
__________________
Sincerely,
Aaron Murakami

Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-02-2009, 05:10 AM
rickoff's Avatar
rickoff rickoff is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 3,283
Aaron, I fully agree, and I know there is a groundswell of support for a real investigation of the facts. This time, though, the investigative group's leader and members should not be appointed by the government, and should have totally unrestricted access to any and all evidence and documentation that is requested by them. I know the government would like to delay such investigation until all evidence is destroyed, all documentation shredded, and all relevant witnesses have died - either naturally or by "accident." That's why it is imperative that the investigation move ahead with all due haste. Since it was a coverup operation, you can be sure that a great deal of the physical evidence, and most of the paper trail evidence, in the case is already long gone. Still, if we can clearly see that the 911 events were falsely reported to us then an investigative team should be able to see the same inconsistencies.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-19-2009, 04:56 PM
aljhoa aljhoa is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,015
The Ground Truth, the Story behind America's Defense on 9-11

Quote:
Originally Posted by rickoff View Post
Aaron, I fully agree, and I know there is a groundswell of support for a real investigation of the facts. This time, though, the investigative group's leader and members should not be appointed by the government, and should have totally unrestricted access to any and all evidence and documentation that is requested by them. I know the government would like to delay such investigation until all evidence is destroyed, all documentation shredded, and all relevant witnesses have died - either naturally or by "accident." That's why it is imperative that the investigation move ahead with all due haste. Since it was a coverup operation, you can be sure that a great deal of the physical evidence, and most of the paper trail evidence, in the case is already long gone. Still, if we can clearly see that the 911 events were falsely reported to us then an investigative team should be able to see the same inconsistencies.
APFN - 9-11 Exposed - Finally the Truth about 9-11.

APFN Contents Page

Al
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-23-2009, 03:38 AM
jibbguy jibbguy is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 987
Enjoy

YouTube - How To Destroy a 9/11 Truther
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-23-2009, 05:04 AM
rickoff's Avatar
rickoff rickoff is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 3,283
Good video, Steve. It makes me wonder if the debunkers actually are using this satirical video as their training course material.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-27-2009, 05:47 AM
rickoff's Avatar
rickoff rickoff is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 3,283
The 9/11 Commission Rejects own Report as Based on Government Lies

By Gordon Duff
Salem-News.com

In John Farmer’s book: “The Ground Truth: The Story Behind America’s Defense on 9/11″, the author builds the inescapably convincing case that the official version... is almost entirely untrue...

The 9/11 Commission now tells us that the official version of 9/11 was based on false testimony and documents and is almost entirely untrue. The details of this massive cover-up are carefully outlined in a book by John Farmer, who was the Senior Counsel for the 9/11 Commission.

Farmer, Dean of Rutger Universities' School of Law and former Attorney General of New Jersey, was responsible for drafting the original flawed 9/11 report.


Does Farmer have cooperation and agreement from other members of the Commission? Yes. Did they say Bush ordered 9/11? No. Do they say that the 9/11 Commission was lied to by the FBI, CIA, Whitehouse and NORAD? Yes. Is there full documentary proof of this? Yes.

Farmer states...“at some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened... I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The [Norad air defense] tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years. This is not spin.”

The 9/11 Commission head, Thomas Kean, was the Republican governor of New Jersey. He had the following to say... “We to this day don’t know why NORAD [the North American Aerospace Command] told us what they told us, it was just so far from the truth. . . " When Bush's own handpicked commission failed to go along with the cover up and requested a criminal investigation, why was nothing done?

9/11 Commission member and former US Senator, Bob Kerrey, says, "No one is more qualified to write the definitive book about the tragedy of 9/11 than John Farmer. Fortunately, he has done so. Even more fortunately the language is clear, alive and instructive for anyone who wants to make certain this never happens again."

With the only "official" 9/11 report now totally false, where do we go from here? Who is hurt by these lies? The families of the victims of 9/11 have fought, for years, to get to the truth. For years, our government has hidden behind lies and secrecy to deny them closure.

In 2006, The Washington Post reported..."Suspicion of wrongdoing ran so deep that the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, according to several commission sources. Staff members and some commissioners thought that e-mails and other evidence provided enough probable cause to believe that military and aviation officials violated the law by making false statements to Congress and to the commission..."

What does Farmer's book tell us? Farmer offers no solutions, only a total and full rejection of what was told and his own ideas concerning the total failure of honesty on the part of the government, a government with something to hide.

Farmer never tells us what. Nobody could keep a job in the public sector speaking out more than Farmer has. What were Farmer's omissions? There are some. Now that we know that intelligence given the 9/11 Commission wasn't just lies from our own government but based on testimony coerced through torture from informants forced to back up a cover story now proven false, a pattern emerges.

We know that, immediately after 9/11, many more potential suspects and informants were flown directly to Saudi Arabia by Presidential order than were ever detained and questioned. We will never know what they could have said. Their testimony would have been vital to any real investigation were they not put beyond the reach of even Congress and the FBI.

Putting aside all other questions of recent evidence of CIA involvement with Bin Laden prior to 9/11 or altered physical evidence involving the Pentagon attack, any failure to call to account the systematic perjury committed by dozens of top government officials, now exposed as a certainty is an offense to every American.

What do we know? We know the conjecture about 9/11 still stands but for certain, we know we were lied to, not in a minor way, but systematically as part of a plot covering up government involvement at nearly every level, perhaps gross negligence, perhaps something with darker intent.

Are we willing to live with another lie to go with the Warren Report, Iran Contra and so many others? Has the sacrifice of thousands more Americans, killed, wounded or irreparably damaged by a war knowingly built on the same lies from the same liars who misled the 9/11 Commission pushed us beyond willingness to confront the truth?

Have we yet found where the lies have begun and ended? There is no evidence of this, only evidence to the contrary. The lies live on and the truth will never be sought. The courage for that task has not been found.

Can anyone call themselves an American if they don't demand, even with the last drop of their blood, that the truth be found?

How long have we watered the Tree of Deceit with the blood of patriots?

================================================

Gordon Duff is a Marine combat veteran and a regular contributor to Veterans Today. He specializes in political and social issues. You can see a large collection of Gordon's published articles at this link: VeteransToday.com.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-31-2009, 02:49 AM
Mad Scientist Mad Scientist is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 563
Ah but you shouldn’t be so conspiratorial you need to look at all the plus things that 911 helped government bring into existence.

911 provided the perfect excuse to invade Iraq. It allowed for the adoption of patriot act which in turn allowed for the suspension of many of those pesky individual rights. It ushered in the use of military troops to patrol our cities as something that is obviously perfectly normal. And of course it is perfectly normal to have TV cameras on street corners so the government can keep a watch on you. For everyone’s safety it is also OK to require your cell phone be able to track you and listen in to your conversations, even when you think it is turn off. Naturally we will have no problem with government signing treaties that give away our national sovereignty.

Why if it were not for 911 all of these goals would have been much harder for our leaders to get passed. So whatever you do always remember that the government loves you it is your friend and would never do anything to harm you. Just keep repeating that mantra as you are handed the cool-aid.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-31-2009, 07:33 AM
Nadda Nadda is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 314
Thats astonishing information rickoff and i completely agree mad scientist.

Has anyone thought about the technological aspect? What has our military been doing for the last 25 years? Was the stealth bomber Really americas lastest and greatest development in aviation? With every jet fighter "known" to exist being powered by fuel injection, i find it a bit odd the government has no publicly known interest in finding the alternative source when the "well" runs dry. Will the world resort to flying theyre war machines on veggie oil?

I personally believe i've seen enough video evidence to prove the existance of very advanced machines, (such as the footage of infared balls of light flying in formation) and the fact that the government claims they couldnt have reached those airliners fast enough clearly displays they had no intention of stopping what was happening. Or maybe saving thousands of lives just arnt worth exposing the technology. Either way, as mad scientist posted, its evident just how much they really do love us...

Any one know of any new aviation technology thats been developed since 1985 that i'm unaware of?
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-31-2009, 06:41 PM
ANTIQUER's Avatar
ANTIQUER ANTIQUER is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: 0rlando,fl., u.s.a.
Posts: 482
New Tech.

Nadda;

Check out the stuff at Snowlabs. Pretty impressive.

YouTube - SnowLabsRatedX's Channel

Al
__________________
Antiquer
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Please consider supporting Energetic Forum with a voluntary monthly subscription.

For One-Time Donations, use admin@ this domain > energeticforum.com

Choose your voluntary subscription

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v1.4.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
2007-2015 Copyright - Energetic Forum - All Rights Reserved

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

Tesla Chargers