Energetic Forum  
Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Delicious Digg Reddit WordPress StumbleUpon Tumblr Translate Addthis Aaron Murakami YouTube 2018 ENERGY CONFERENCE - ALL SEATS SOLD OUT!

2018 Energy Science & Technology Conference
Sponsored by Teslacoin Foundation

Teslacoin Foundation

http://tesla-coin.com


Go Back   Energetic Forum > >
   

General Discussion Other general discussions on topics not listed above.

* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #301  
Old 06-07-2018, 04:32 PM
dyetalon's Avatar
dyetalon dyetalon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 125
Ok, since everyone is having trouble with understanding what we are seeing in the cell, here are a couple of cartoons showing magnetic equipotential of a dipole:

from wiki: "An equipotential region of a scalar potential in three-dimensional space is often an equipotential surface, but it can also be a three-dimensional region in space"

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equipotential)



and this one has cute little arrows indicating direction...



Same thing, different view and values
Attached Images
File Type: gif equipotential lines.gif (12.0 KB, 59 views)
File Type: gif dipole-equipotential.gif (23.4 KB, 45 views)
__________________
 

Last edited by dyetalon; 06-07-2018 at 04:38 PM.
Reply With Quote

Download SOLAR SECRETS by Peter Lindemann
Free - Get it now: Solar Secrets

  #302  
Old 06-07-2018, 08:46 PM
Markoul's Avatar
Markoul Markoul is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 188
Timm,

For an electric point charge, field lines are straight lines therefore the isolines since there must be perpendicular to the force lines all the time are closed lines, circles. For an electric dipole the isolines are the ones you show in your cartoon diagram (purple).


However, since there is not yet the magnetic charge particle discovered there are no isolines for magnetic fields.

To say that ferrocell is not showing the magnetic flux but isolines is not true.

Magnetic dipole fields are curved space force fields and therefore can not have isolines.

On the other hand electric dipole fields are straight line interacting monopole force fields.

The fact that the isofield of an electric dipole matches the flux field of a magnetic field (dipole) is just another strong indication in nature that Electrism is actually the inverse of magnetism.




EM
__________________
MSc. Electronic and Computer Engineering, TUC, Greece
MSc. VLSI Systems Engineering, UMIST, U.K.
BSc. Electronic Systems Engineering, Victoria Univ. Manchester & UMIST

Last edited by Markoul; 06-07-2018 at 08:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #303  
Old 06-07-2018, 10:00 PM
dyetalon's Avatar
dyetalon dyetalon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 125
Quote:
Originally Posted by Markoul View Post
Timm,

For an electric point charge, field lines are straight lines therefore the isolines since there must be perpendicular to the force lines all the time are closed lines, circles. For an electric dipole the isolines are the ones you show in your cartoon diagram (purple).


However, since there is not yet the magnetic charge particle discovered there are no isolines for magnetic fields.

To say that ferrocell is not showing the magnetic flux but isolines is not true.

Magnetic dipole fields are curved space force fields and therefore can not have isolines.

On the other hand electric dipole fields are straight line interacting monopole force fields.

The fact that the isofield of an electric dipole matches the flux field of a magnetic field (dipole) is just another strong indication in nature that Electrism is actually the inverse of magnetism.




EM
I'm struggling to understand your first paragraph.
There are no straight lines in 3-D space. I'm talking about curved space, like a magnetic field.

An iso-line can be curved. It's called a contour line and Michael Snyder wrote a couple of papers on the subject using his Ferrocells.

I can give you references, if you like.

And, how will you explain the appearance of the Bloch region (null) without potential difference?
__________________
 

Last edited by dyetalon; 06-07-2018 at 10:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #304  
Old 06-08-2018, 10:25 AM
Markoul's Avatar
Markoul Markoul is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 188
Timm,

Here is an electric charge in normal space.


fig.1

Arrows are the open srtaight force lines. Circles are the isolines (equipotential).

Here below is the same diagram for an electric dipole with opposite charges in normal space. Force lines (arrows) may curve but are still open lines start to end. Isolines are indicated again by circles except the straight line in the middle of the field. Isolines must be always perpendicular the to electric force lines.


fig.2

Also notice that force vectors by definition are always a straight arrow (vector) pointing to a single direction and therfere can not be curved in space. Therefore a force line is different than a force vector and therefore we say that in every point of a force line there is a force vector tangent to this point which is the dfinition actually of a force line.

Contour lines or surfaces are isolines or issurfaces to indicate same amplitute or altitude and are more used in geosciences.

The thing is, taking the classic image of the force lines on a magnetic field, magnetic fields are different, they don't have open force lines (since there is no monopole magnetic field) all the force lines are closed forced lines by definition and therefore you can not draw isolines in a an already closed circle. In a nutshell there is no equipotential diagram for magnetic fields.


fig.3

Search the literature if you don't believe me. Electric dipole flux is different than magnetic dipole flux, compare fig.2 and fig.3 This is because electric flux is essential caused by monopole charges whereas there is no monopole magnetic charge.

EM
Attached Images
File Type: png Magnetic Field Lines.png (47.8 KB, 55 views)
File Type: png Capture1.PNG (42.4 KB, 49 views)
File Type: png Capture2.PNG (54.4 KB, 51 views)
__________________
MSc. Electronic and Computer Engineering, TUC, Greece
MSc. VLSI Systems Engineering, UMIST, U.K.
BSc. Electronic Systems Engineering, Victoria Univ. Manchester & UMIST

Last edited by Markoul; 06-08-2018 at 11:02 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #305  
Old 06-08-2018, 11:20 AM
Markoul's Avatar
Markoul Markoul is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 188
@Timm

Quote:
And, how will you explain the appearance of the Bloch region (null) without potential difference?

The net potential difference of the two toroidal pole fields back to back are responsible for the Bloch region showing up in the ferrocell.

You can not really see the real Bloch line since it is zero and will not light up in the ferrocell, only the neighboring lines.

Although Brian Kerr used a trick and made the line visible here I believe:

__________________
MSc. Electronic and Computer Engineering, TUC, Greece
MSc. VLSI Systems Engineering, UMIST, U.K.
BSc. Electronic Systems Engineering, Victoria Univ. Manchester & UMIST
Reply With Quote
  #306  
Old 06-08-2018, 05:39 PM
bistander bistander is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,141
Magnetic vector potential

Quote:
Originally Posted by Markoul View Post
... In a nutshell there is no equipotential diagram for magnetic fields.
...
Isn't this an example?



Quote:
A 2D Square Magnet plot 3.png
Now, we will make a colorful filled contour plot of the vector potential, and plot it underneath the box, but on top of boring gray scale plot we made. We will also include a colorbar.


Quote:
Now, let's plot white magnetic field vectors on top of the vector potential plot. We will also make sure that the longest arrow length is the grid spacing.

Ref.
https://casaguides.nrao.edu/index.php/PlotBasics
Attached Images
File Type: png 300px-A_2D_Square_Magnet_plot_3-1.png (58.1 KB, 50 views)
File Type: png 300px-A_2D_Square_Magnet_plot_4.png (72.3 KB, 51 views)
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #307  
Old 06-08-2018, 05:51 PM
dyetalon's Avatar
dyetalon dyetalon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 125
Quote:
Originally Posted by bistander View Post
Thank you.

As I said before- same thing, different view.
You can not have a zero without two opposite potentials.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #308  
Old 06-08-2018, 06:55 PM
bistander bistander is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,141
Nanorods

Hey dyetalon,

Stumbled upon this.




https://www.comsol.com/blogs/gaussia...rray-nanorods/

Regards,

bi
Attached Images
File Type: png Reflection-and-edge-diffraction-effects-large-1.png (137.8 KB, 48 views)
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #309  
Old 06-08-2018, 08:57 PM
Markoul's Avatar
Markoul Markoul is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 188
Quote:
Originally Posted by bistander View Post
I don't know where you found this and what the guy who did that was trying to do but this is dead wrong.

First of all looking at his code these plots are not product of any measurements or simulated (theoretical calculated values) he just draws graphics to demonstrate the software. He probably has mistakenly took electric fields as magnetic fields. If this was correct the internet would be bursting with equipotential plots of magnetic fields.

From Maxwell's equations we know that an curled isoline (closing at itself) in a magnetic field would immediately mean zero magnetic field ∇ ⋅ B = 0.

In other words all magnetic fields are divergence free meaning all force lines must return to the poles and therefore can not have isolines (this is not the case of electric fields). He also states that this is a vector potential field (whatever he means by that?) and never says that these are isolines.

You can see that this are not isolines and thus equipotential field because he then draws vectors!! Equipotential fields are scalar fields and don't have vectors.

I think this guy has not a glue of what he is doing although by ignorance he draw the magnetic flux of a magnet as shown by the ferrocell I admit



Who the **** is this guy?

EM

p.s. and yes by saying that a magnetic dipole field has no isolines this means that there are no two points in a magnetic field which have the same vector potential as it is defined mathematically except the Bloch domain wall.

Magnetic Vector Potential
__________________
MSc. Electronic and Computer Engineering, TUC, Greece
MSc. VLSI Systems Engineering, UMIST, U.K.
BSc. Electronic Systems Engineering, Victoria Univ. Manchester & UMIST

Last edited by Markoul; 06-08-2018 at 09:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #310  
Old 06-08-2018, 09:47 PM
bistander bistander is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,141
Magnetic vector potential

Quote:
Originally Posted by Markoul View Post
I don't know where you found this and what the guy who did that was trying to do but this is dead wrong.

First of all looking at his code these plots are not product of any measurements or simulated (theoretical calculated values) he just draws graphics to demonstrate the software. He probably has mistakenly took electric fields as magnetic fields. If this was correct the internet would be bursting with equipotential plots of magnetic fields.

From Maxwell's equations we know that an curled isoline (closing at itself) in a magnetic field would immediately mean zero magnetic field ∇ ⋅ B = 0.

In other words all magnetic fields are divergence free meaning all force lines must return to the poles and therefore can not have isolines (this is not the case of electric fields). He also states that this is a vector potential field (whatever he means by that?) and never says that these are isolines.

You can see that this are not isolines and thus equipotential field because he then draws vectors!! Equipotential fields are scalar fields and don't have vectors.

I think this guy has not a glue of what he is doing although by ignorance he draw the magnetic flux of a magnet as shown by the ferrocell I admit



Who the **** is this guy?

EM

p.s. and yes by saying that a magnetic dipole field has no isolines this means that there are no two points in a magnetic field which have the same vector potential as it is defined mathematically except the Bloch domain wall.

Magnetic Vector Potential
Quote:
Magnetic vector potential
The magnetic vector potential A is a vector field, defined along with the electric potential ϕ (a scalar field) by the equations:[2]

{\displaystyle \mathbf {B} =\nabla \times \mathbf {A} \,,\quad \mathbf {E} =-\nabla \phi -{\frac {\partial \mathbf {A} }{\partial t}}\,,} {\displaystyle \mathbf {B} =\nabla \times \mathbf {A} \,,\quad \mathbf {E} =-\nabla \phi -{\frac {\partial \mathbf {A} }{\partial t}}\,,}
Obviously the equation didn't copy and paste so well. It said that the magnetic field vector B is equal to the curl of the magnetic vector potential A

From wikipedia

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_potential

Edit:
Quote:
The magnetic scalar potential ψ is sometimes used to specify the magnetic H-field in cases when there are no free currents, in a manner analogous to using the electric potential to determine the electric field in electrostatics. One important use of ψ is to determine the magnetic field due to permanent magnets when their magnetization is known.
Also from the referenced Wikipedia.
__________________
 

Last edited by bistander; 06-08-2018 at 09:56 PM. Reason: Added quote
Reply With Quote
  #311  
Old 06-09-2018, 01:43 PM
dyetalon's Avatar
dyetalon dyetalon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 125
Quote:
Originally Posted by bistander View Post
Obviously the equation didn't copy and paste so well. It said that the magnetic field vector B is equal to the curl of the magnetic vector potential A

From wikipedia

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_potential

Edit:

Also from the referenced Wikipedia.
And let me add a little more here:
Iron filings will not respond the same way as nanoparticles do to a magnetic field.

For one thing, the iron filings are ferromagnetic and the nanoparticles are paramagnetic (actually, superparamagnetic) and can not maintain magnetization after the applied field is removed.

WE ARE AFFECTING THE MAGNETITE AT THE ATOMIC LEVEL !
I propose we are kicking out electrons to a higher energy state and that's why we are seeing potential difference with a null between.
Iron filings are not capable of such an action or response.

Folks, I will prove this 100% before I die


"The basis for magnetism can be explained at the atomic level. Electrons have both an electrical charge and a spin, it can be called a charge in motion. Any moving charge gives rise to a magnetic field. The spin of an electron can be oriented in one of two directions, either up or down. When electrons pair up in an energy level they will have opposite spins and their magnetic fields will cancel. In some atoms there can be more electrons with spins in one direction than the other because they are not all paired up (Pauli Exclusion Principle). The result is that there is a net magnetic field for the atom. This is a paramagnetic material. When placed in a magnetic field the atoms in a paramagnetic material will tend to align their fields with the external one, i.e., the North Pole of each atom will align with the North Pole of the applied magnetic field."

https://lecturedemos.chem.umass.edu/...ucture9_6.html
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #312  
Old 06-09-2018, 07:46 PM
Markoul's Avatar
Markoul Markoul is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 188


The above figure describes essentially all quantum mechanics today.

it is a deuterium isotope hydrogen atom consisting of one proton one neutron and one electron

Photon is the carrier of the EM force holding holding the electron in to the atom.

Gluons are the strong nuclear force carries holding the quarks inside the protons and neutrons of the nuclei of an atom.

W ans Z bosons are the carriers of the weak nuclear force holding the protons and neutrons together inside the atom. Sometimes (radioactivity) an up quark is transformed to a downquark and the nuclei breaks, proton radiation. At the same time a neutrino is released.

The influence of gravity on a single atom is minuscule compared to the other acting forces described.

The whole atom is moving inside the Higgs field which is defining the rest mass of the atom.

In order to produce electron current out of the superparamagnetic dielectric magnetite nanoparticles you must knock off electrons out of the atoms. You can do that either via radiation with a specific frequency and above of EM E=hf depending the material. For Fe3 and O4 I believe this must be in the γ rays range.

or through a very strong applied electric field through the field emission phenomenon which will excite the Fe3 metal in the magnetite.

Reference https://www.physicsforums.com/thread...n-atom.875191/

or possible via a strong dynamic external magnetic field which will produce actually and Electric field and and thus EM

but ionizing the paramagnetic magnetite by just applying a strong static magnetic field i find it very difficult, the reason is although it will act uppon their magnetic moment of the electrons inside the magnetite atoms trying to pull them out, at the same time due to the electric charge of the electron it will squeeze them to tighter orbits around the nuclei.

https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/...ugh_to_ionize/

But again mainstream could prove wrong once again!

...so keep trying... and please don't die!


EM
Attached Images
File Type: png forces particles cariers.PNG (525.3 KB, 51 views)
__________________
MSc. Electronic and Computer Engineering, TUC, Greece
MSc. VLSI Systems Engineering, UMIST, U.K.
BSc. Electronic Systems Engineering, Victoria Univ. Manchester & UMIST
Reply With Quote
  #313  
Old 06-09-2018, 11:19 PM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is online now
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 951
Too many peeps here smoking PARTICLE FANTASIES



No branch of modern "science" (bullshyt religion inhabited by mathematicians) has defined the term FIELD.

Not a single one


Fields have NO QUANTITY, that the realm of PHYSICS has co-opted the definition of Fields is an absurdity. The QUANTIFIED effects of cause and effect interactions measured, in either Joules, or Watts, or Amperes is DENOTATIVE and DESCRIPTIVE…….none of which EXPLAINS what A FIELD IS, nor magnetism

Quantum mechanics has UTTERLY co-opted the definition of magnetism along with the source of quantums religion, that being light. But quantum is Atomistic. Its very foundation is built upon “wave particle dualities” of which light is NOT a particle, and a WAVE is not a thing, but what a thing DOES!

“The magnetic field between magnetic dipoles. It is caused by the exchange of virtual photons.” - Insane position of GR & QM

“This medium of propagation, the Ether must exist. This medium must be a prominent thought in our investigations” Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism – J.C. Maxwell

When you remove the ether you MUST necessitatively replace it with particle fantasies and “messenger particles”. These absurd fantasies are not the inputs or outputs of ANY experiment ever done.


HERES AN INSANE DEFINITION: “Such skyrmions are quasiparticles—they do not exist in the absence of a magnetic field.” ----The mathematical concept of the skyrmion was invented over fifty years ago by high-energy physicist Tony Skyrme

“Nothing is more fantastical and a travesty of how nature works than is quantum theory. Its very basis has no relationship to reality.” – W. Russell

Most so-called scientists today are NOT scientists rather mathematicians….and fundamentally if it cant be quantified and counted by a mathematician, then it doesn’t really exist in their eyes.

“All literature on this subject (Relativity & and curved ‘space-time’) is futile and destined to oblivion” - N. Tesla

“A virtual particle is an abstraction, which facilitates in calculations and understanding, the term is very vague and loosely defined, they never appear as inputs or outputs of experiments, their existence is questionable at best,…however they are very useful in rendering concepts and making equations balance out”. QED FEYNMAN

“Where common sense and intuition failed, we (the insane relativists) had to create a new form of intuition based upon abstract (unreal) mathematics. When common sense fails, we must create uncommon sense.” -Leonard Susskind, professor theoretical physics, and priest of the cult of Quantum

“The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be SANE to think clearly, …..but one can think deeply and be quite insane.” TESLA


__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #314  
Old 06-10-2018, 06:39 AM
Markoul's Avatar
Markoul Markoul is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 188
@Ken

I know all these are distortions and different manifestations of the aether field (or dark energy as I call) as well different densities of light manifested as matter.

However, balls is just a model, mere representations, (if you ask an scientist they know that these are nothing like balls) and the mainstream accepted linguistic terminology and and vocabulary in order to communicate with each other.

If this linguistic approach is hindering now to see things clear and to find the truth is a big subject for debate.

As I have said in the past , modern science reached a crossroad and had to choose between One Stone and Tesla...unfortunately she took the wrong turn ...or choose the wrong hole!...stupid *****!

So, I admit I don't have your background and can not talk about these things other than with the balls language.

How you would describe the above picture with your words?

...But then with whom I could exhange ideas? You and a couple more guys??

You see what the problem is?

EM
__________________
MSc. Electronic and Computer Engineering, TUC, Greece
MSc. VLSI Systems Engineering, UMIST, U.K.
BSc. Electronic Systems Engineering, Victoria Univ. Manchester & UMIST

Last edited by Markoul; 06-10-2018 at 07:32 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #315  
Old 06-10-2018, 07:19 PM
bistander bistander is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,141
Analogy

Imagine, if you will, an intelligent person who is blind from birth. Now explain, in common and in scientific terms, what light is to that person.

Now imagine doing that when you are also blind from birth.

Can you realize the difficulty? Is this not like the problem with discussion on magnetism?

Regards,

bi
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #316  
Old 06-12-2018, 11:02 PM
BrianKerr BrianKerr is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 2
Finally I have been accepted to post. Thanks Admin. Thanks for inviting me Mikrovolt.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #317  
Old 06-12-2018, 11:41 PM
Markoul's Avatar
Markoul Markoul is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 188
Hello Brian!

Good to have you here!

EM
__________________
MSc. Electronic and Computer Engineering, TUC, Greece
MSc. VLSI Systems Engineering, UMIST, U.K.
BSc. Electronic Systems Engineering, Victoria Univ. Manchester & UMIST
Reply With Quote
  #318  
Old 06-13-2018, 08:09 AM
mikrovolt mikrovolt is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 784
Welcome Brian, It started on the UFO/Magnetism thread about Ken Wheeler's book.BTW who is giving lecture on July 5th. in Idaho. The conference has been successful and unique at having great people attending in an atmosphere of learning.

Timm started this thread to address FerroCell as it;s discussion, now has more variety of opinions from different aspects. Having the technology
experts here is great it can gather more interest, new ideas, open new avenues of opportunities.

I am still sorting out the various ways Ferro can help us understand the nano-scale environment of ferro and lipids, small charges acting differently from small iron. Also how the optical effects can be explained takes trained eye in what is being seen.

Sorry but it has been a real struggle to make sense. Possibly this will strengthen and agree in part with the UFO /Ken Wheeler thread as the ferroCell gets more attention in the future.

Thanks for sharing your hard work on youtube and taking the time to join everyone here.
__________________
 

Last edited by mikrovolt; 06-13-2018 at 08:16 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #319  
Old 06-13-2018, 06:04 PM
Selfsimilarity Selfsimilarity is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 5
Hey guys,

I so far was reading your conversation while waiting for my accounts approval.
As Im back in contact with Timm, I thought to let you know that I want to join this club of awsome people!

Im Pascal, the one that wrote the webpage What really is Magnetism – Some Thoughts – An Analysis investigating Magnetism Energy Dynamics via Ferrocell (Light) & CRT (Electrons) & Matter (Iron filings). Click on the picture below to see my powerpoint presentation

My journey started quite few years ago where I started to ask questions, because after studying biochemistry, I was not able to explain how our medicine works. So I started digging, deeper and deeper. Ended up at Nassim Haramein with Planks spheres and whirmholes, as he still thinks in Gravity as main driver of our cosmos, ending up with black holes etc. Then I found Kens book, when I was in holidays in France surfing. After reading it, everything started to make more and more sense. I ordered a Ferrocell from Timm and started playing, constently asking myself, what I was looking at. I knew it must be something special, as it points to the flower of life and geometry, that our ancectiors aleady were celebrating.

I have a lot of time to think,every evening 5 hours when Im not working for our pharmaceutical startup trying to improve chemotherapy www.innomedica.ch, in case your interested for more info.

So recently, I though it could be likely that we observe a permanent electric field when looking at a permanent magnetic field through ferrocell, it seems to make a lot of sense to me. They are in 90° phase to the iron filing visualization, point-geometric, fractal, toroidal, just like magnetic field and electric fields, currently understood, only visible in presence of energy, such as light (ferrocell) or electrons (crt)

Better read through my webpage than me now writing everything Ive written there.

Its an absolut honor to interact with all of my idols such as Ken and Timm in a common forum It electrifies me, so excited

Hi all
__________________
 

Last edited by Selfsimilarity; 06-13-2018 at 06:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #320  
Old 06-13-2018, 06:48 PM
bistander bistander is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,141
90°

Quote:
Originally Posted by Selfsimilarity View Post
...
So recently, I though it could be likely that we observe a permanent electric field when looking at a permanent magnetic field through ferrocell, it seems to make a lot of sense to me. They are in 90° phase to the iron filing visualization, point-geometric, fractal, toroidal, just like magnetic field and electric fields, currently understood, only visible in presence of energy, such as light (ferrocell) or electrons (crt)
...
Hi Pascal,

Welcome to this board.

From your paragraph which I quote, the image seen from a ferrocell or CRT resulting from a permanent magnet field is likely that of an electric field and not the magnetic field itself. That concept has merit and fits more closely with what I have been saying.

Thanks for that insight.

bi
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #321  
Old 06-13-2018, 07:08 PM
Selfsimilarity Selfsimilarity is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 5
Hi Bi,

Yes I agree. I think its all about the electric field. What we think about magnetism is rather the effect of the di-electriostatic field.

I think its an electrostatic field that is fully 3-dimensional, permanent opposed spin equilibrium through polarization/disturbance, toroidal, fractal, vibration creating geometry. Resonant/Harmony in relation to matter, pulsed in relation to electron and photon.
The potential is increasing by decreasing volume, up to infinity when infinitely compressed, as light shows. The smaller the wavelength, the higher the energy density. Infinitely small wavelength, infinite potential at zero point. (You cant draw a point, as then it becomes dimensional, its something, yet cant be drawn, everything and nothing at the same time)
__________________
 

Last edited by Selfsimilarity; 06-14-2018 at 06:12 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #322  
Old 06-13-2018, 08:14 PM
Selfsimilarity Selfsimilarity is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 5
What do you think about an electric potential of a permanent magnet that is constantly there (field seen in ferrocell). It should be measureable.
__________________
 

Last edited by Selfsimilarity; 06-13-2018 at 09:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #323  
Old 06-13-2018, 10:32 PM
bistander bistander is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,141
Electric potential

Quote:
Originally Posted by Selfsimilarity View Post
What do you think about an electric potential of a permanent magnet that is constantly there (field seen in ferrocell). It should be measureable.
The permanent magnet doesn't have a measurable electric potential. In fact, some rare earth magnet material is electrically conductive. However I think that the magnet's field when interacting with material and energy external to the magnet develops electric potential(s).

Regards,

bi
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #324  
Old 06-14-2018, 12:44 AM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is online now
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 951
From the Genius of Dr. Oleg D Jefimenko

he wrote many books and taught electrical theory and was one smart MOFO himself......

Faraday was the originator of the concept of the magnetic field, (which is described in terms of "magnetic curves" our present day "magnetic lines of force") however HE NEVER SO MUCH AS SUGGESTED in his works that induced currents were a resultant of changing magnetic fields. ON THE CONTRARY, he clearly associated the phenomena of electromagnetic induction with changing electrical currents. As per Maxwell, he TOO considered EM induction as a phenomena in which a current (or EM force) is induced in a circuit. but not as a phenomena in which a changing magnetic field causes an electrical field. He CLEARLY said that the induced EM force is "MEASURED BY, not CAUSED BY the changing mag field" Just as Faraday, he made NO allusion to ANY CAUSAL link between magnetic and electric fields - Dr. Oleg D. Jefimenko Causality, Electromagnetic induction & Gravitation

Maxwell too considered the electromagnetic induction as a phenomena in which a current is induced in a circuit, but not as a phenomena in which a changing magnetic field causes and electric field. He clearly said that the induced electromotive force is measured by, not caused by the changing magnetic field. Just as Faraday, he made no allusion to any causal link between magnetic and electric fields. - Dr. Oleg D. Jefimenko Causality, Electromagnetic induction & Gravitation

Neither of Maxwells equations nor their solutions indicate an existence of a causal links between electric and magnetic fields. Therefore we must conclude that an electromagnetic field is a dual entity always having an DIelectric and a magnetic component simultaneously created by their common sources: time variable electric charges and currents. - Dr. Oleg D. Jefimenko Causality, Electromagnetic induction & Gravitation

A time variable electric current creates an electric field parallel to that current. The field exerts an electric force on the charge in the nearby conductors thereby creating induced electric currents in them. This in the term “electromagnetic induction” is an actually a misnomer, since no magnetic effect is involved in the phenomena, and since the induced current is caused solely by the time variable electric current and by the electric field produced by that current. - Dr. Oleg D. Jefimenko Causality, Electromagnetic induction & Gravitation
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #325  
Old 06-14-2018, 06:40 AM
Selfsimilarity Selfsimilarity is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 5
Ken, you mention it to be a dual entity - in an equilibrium.

A Dielectric component, and a magnetic component

But we create the permanent magentic component/field by electron spin alignment not by creating "electrons" itself, thats why I think magnetism of rather being an effect than part of the cause regarding the dual-incomensurable dielectric structure. Retroduction would also say there can only be one thing


Coudnt it be that the electron is a permanent existing purly dielectric structure resulting in permanent magnetic effects such as attraction, repulsion, acceleration that are in 90° phase to the dielectric field?
Couldnt the toroid and the hyperboloid be part of the same one thing? The polarized dielectric "hypertoroboloid"?

Regards,
Pascal
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #326  
Old 06-14-2018, 01:50 PM
Markoul's Avatar
Markoul Markoul is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 188
Occam's razor

Dear Selfsimilarity,

Quote:
So recently, I though it could be likely that we observe a permanent electric field when looking at a permanent magnetic field through ferrocell, it seems to make a lot of sense to me. They are in 90° phase to the iron filing visualization, point-geometric, fractal, toroidal, just like magnetic field and electric fields, currently understood, only visible in presence of energy, such as light (ferrocell) or electrons (crt)

I present a more intriguing and simple possibility however.

What if the ferrocell shows correctly the magnetic flux of a dipole magnet and iron filings classical experiment DOES NOT?! And just shows the magnetic dipole interactions of the iron filings with a magnet mistakenly taken for more than 200 yeas as the field of the magnet?

After all the right hand rule gives us a 90° difference between the Electric and the magnetic vector, so why you should expect there to be any other difference than that between the Electric flux and the magnetic flux?

BTW, Welcome to the forum!

Kind Regards,

EM
__________________
MSc. Electronic and Computer Engineering, TUC, Greece
MSc. VLSI Systems Engineering, UMIST, U.K.
BSc. Electronic Systems Engineering, Victoria Univ. Manchester & UMIST

Last edited by Markoul; 06-14-2018 at 07:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #327  
Old 06-14-2018, 04:12 PM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is online now
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 951
Quote:
Originally Posted by Selfsimilarity View Post
But we create the permanent magentic component/field by electron spin

Pascal

There is no such nonsense as electrons.


Tesla said it

Heaviside said it

Dollard said it.


"Mother nature is not a hooker on crack with a bag of bumping particles"- Myself
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #328  
Old 06-14-2018, 08:18 PM
Selfsimilarity Selfsimilarity is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 5
Quote:
Quote:
Coudnt it be that the electron is a permanent existing purly dielectric structure resulting in permanent magnetic effects such as attraction, repulsion, acceleration that are in 90° phase to the dielectric field?
Couldnt the toroid and the hyperboloid be part of the same one thing? The polarized fractal dielectric "hypertoroboloid"?
Please Ken, dont think Im still stuck at the electron
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #329  
Old 06-14-2018, 09:40 PM
Markoul's Avatar
Markoul Markoul is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 188
I'm joining the youtube ferrocell club

Any donations are welcome and F**K You!!...

...just kidding!




EM
p.s. why shoot in 30fps if you can have 60fps?
Also almost all of my videos (about 600) are unlisted, I don't want them to spread out...
__________________
MSc. Electronic and Computer Engineering, TUC, Greece
MSc. VLSI Systems Engineering, UMIST, U.K.
BSc. Electronic Systems Engineering, Victoria Univ. Manchester & UMIST

Last edited by Markoul; 06-14-2018 at 10:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #330  
Old 06-14-2018, 09:51 PM
Markoul's Avatar
Markoul Markoul is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 188
Ferrocell Decipher Quiz!

In order to decipher why we see what we see in a ferrocell I am starting a series of quiz questions.

You are welcome to contribute with your explanations. The winner coming with the best explanation will win a one night stand with the Mother****er previously presented in this thread here.

Quiz Question 1:

Why a ring magnet under the ferrocell does not show a field inside (pole view) fig.1 ring magnet under the ferrocell?




But when a ring magnet is placed above the ferrocell the field inside the ring shows up? Why is that? Fig.2




Bonus!


I've put a ring magnet inside water!!...




EM
Attached Images
File Type: png ring magnet under the ferrocell.png (424.5 KB, 44 views)
File Type: png ring magnet above the ferrocell.png (587.5 KB, 41 views)
File Type: png ring magnet inside water pole view.png (735.2 KB, 45 views)
__________________
MSc. Electronic and Computer Engineering, TUC, Greece
MSc. VLSI Systems Engineering, UMIST, U.K.
BSc. Electronic Systems Engineering, Victoria Univ. Manchester & UMIST

Last edited by Markoul; 06-14-2018 at 10:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
discussion, ferrocell, kens, posers, thread, ferrolens

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Please consider supporting Energetic Forum with a voluntary monthly subscription.

For One-Time Donations, use admin@ this domain > energeticforum.com

Choose your voluntary subscription

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v1.4.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
2007-2015 Copyright - Energetic Forum - All Rights Reserved

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

Tesla Chargers