Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Stan Meyer Bifilar Chokes

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Stan Meyer Bifilar Chokes

    The chokes, power coils, etc.. in Meyer's circuits seemed to have always been very confusing to many people. More people today are understanding how the chokes were designed by simply reading the tech brief that has been under all our noses the whole time.

    Several people in the The H2earth Institute - A Virtual Center of Excellence in Waterfuel Technology such as Josh and others are looking at this very closely. I was surprised to find so many ideas about how the chokes are designed considering the fact that the text descriptions and diagrams in the WFC tech brief are very, very clear.

    Upon further examination, these are my comments, which may be right or wrong, I don't know but they make sense to me

    Here is the tech brief on the wfc by Meyer:
    http://www.esmhome.org/library/stan-...ical-brief.pdf

    Below are a few tidbits from the tech brief on the bifilar, arrangement, purpose, construction, specs, etc...

    Page 6-3

    "Resonant Choke Coils (56/62) of Figure (3-23) (Memo WFC 422 DA) are composed of 430F or 430FR inductance stainless steel film coated (hi dielectric value) wire (typically .004 Ga. or smaller) which are axially (spiralled) Bifilar wound about core bobbin (502), forming individual spiral-wrap (inner to outer circumference and being equally-length) coils (501a xxx 501n) electrically connected in sequencial order to form resistive pickup coil (503)."



    choke #56 is drawn incorrectly - they are wrapped in the same direction. I'll get to that later.



    from page 7-5

    Both Inductors (LI/L2) are Bifilar wound in equal length to optimize the electromagnetic field strength (FL) in equal electromagnetic intensity (FLI = FL2) to encourage and promote "Electron Bounce" phenomenon (700) of Figure (7-9) while adjusting (programmable pulse wave-form) input signal Pulse-Frequency (49a xx 49n) to "tune-in" to the "dielectric property" (Re) of water (85) ... causing amp flow to be reduce to a minimum value while allowing voltage potential (627) of Figure (7-7) to go toward infinity if the electronic components would allow it to happen, as graphically illustrated in (750) of Figure (7-14).



    page 7-11

    "each choke-coil (LIIL2) being of the same impedance value since both coil-wraps (56/62) are Bifilar wound together onto a single spool-bobbin,"


    page 10-1

    "The Amp Inhibiting Circuit (970) of Figure (10-1) as to (690) of Figure (7-8) is composed of two copper wires "Bifilar" wound (wrapped) about a magnetic induction core to allow amp restriction (minimizing current leakage) while encouraging "Voltage Potential"(Va xxx V n) across the water molecule to perform WFC "Electrical Polarization Process", as so illustrated in Figure (7-1) WFC memo (426) titled VIC Matrix Circuit."



    page 10-2

    "VIC Bifilar Wrap Coil-Assembly (10-3B) and VIC Dual Coil Wrap-Assembly (10-3A) both utilize either "E"& I and "U" Inductance Core configurations to concentrate Mutual Inductance Fields (Rp l/Rp2) in order to optimize Amp Inhibiting Process (750) of Figure (7-14). "E" I core shape (10-3B) is most preferable since amp spike surge is minimize during repetitive pulsing operations."



    page 10-4

    "Increasing energy-yield (16/gtnt) still further (xxx 16/gtntnl+ 16/gtntn2 + 16/gtntn ... etc.) is accomplished by increasing the number of Resonant Charging Choke Stages (xxx 56/62n + 56/62n 1+ 56/62n2 + 56/62n ... etc. -S- xxx SS56/62n + SS56/62nl + SS56/62n2 + SS56/62n ... etc.) of Figure (10-4) in "Sequential Order" ( -S-) since the total number of Multi-Coil Magnet bifilar coils (56/62a xxx 56/62n) serially electrically connected together are sequentially electrically linked to an equal number of serially electrically aligned Stainless Steel Resonant Coils (SS/56/62a xxx SS/56/62n) ... allowing eachlboth bifilar coil assembly (56/62a xxx 56/62n -SSS56/ 62a xxx SS56/62n) to be electrically and magnetically energized in the same progressive direction toward Water Gap (Cp) and away from blocking diode (55) of Figure (3-34) as to Figure (10-1) and Figure (10-3) '" keeping amp-surge (inhibiting amp flow) to a minimal level [See Voltage Performance Graph (750) of Figure (7-14)] while enhancing Voltage Potential of Electrical Stress (64/RU-RU'a xxx 64/ST-ST'n) as additional Dual Choke Coils (56/62 _ SS56/62) are included in the stacked coil-array forming Voltage Intensifier Circuit (970) of Figure (10-1) as to (620) of figure (7-1) ... see Dynamic Voltage Waveform (770) of Figure (8-1), once again."


    above pic if only you want to put more bifilar chokes in series

    pages 10-4 and 10-5

    "The magnet Coil-Wire (56/62) is best suited for Voltage inducement while the inductance/capacitance/resistance properties of Stainless Steel coil-wire (SS56-SS62) is appropriately used to restrict electron movement beyond the self-inductance of each energized coil when elevated voltage levels (up to beyond 40 kilovolts) are to be reached/obtained without experiencing any appreciable amount of "Amp Influxing." Generally, magnet coil-wire length is longer than the Stainless steel coil-wire length and magnet bifilar-coil (56/62) is placed on top of Stainless Steel bifilar-coil (SS56/62) to maximize mutual inductance coil-field (Rp2) (adding Rp1 +Rp2) of (690) of Figure (7-8) to cause coil capacitance (Cda xxx Cdn) to help maintain and even increase pulse voltage amplitude (xxx Vn + Vn 1 + Vn2 + Vn .... etc.) while the resistive value (Rs2) of SS Coil-Wire (SS56/62) performs the work of further resisting the flow of amps not inhibited by both self-Inductance fields (Rpl + Rp2), as so illustrated in (690) of Figure (7-8). In all cases, bifilar coils (56/62 - SS56/62) are electromagnetically orientated in the same direction."



    The above pic I drew shows the bare bones bifilar choke system.
    Top is the secondary transformer coil.

    Output through blocking diode goes into one of the bifilar choke winds.

    In figure 10-3B, it is easy to see that the direction the winds are coming off the core that when the positive hits that coil, north is at that side.

    The potential follows through to the outside positive tube through water to negative inside tube.

    Positive potential moves to the other bifilar choke coil (wound the same direction) meaning that north will be at THAT end (opposite of the north on the other coil) and through this coil and to the negative on power supply.

    Both choke coils on the pos and neg tube create opposing magnetic fields against each other. On the on pulse, the pos side choke coil is north by the diode side and south by the pos tube side... the neg side choke coil is north by the tube side and south by the power supply neg. On the OFF pulse, they both reverse and also oppose each other.

    In many diagrams in the tech brief, this exact configuration shows that the choke coils are in opposition at all times on the off and on pulse.

    My picture shows the bare bone system without the electron extraction circuit (EEC) or any coils being tapped.

    Meyer says that the I core (rectangle with line down middle) as shown in fig 10-3B is the best core for the choke since this configuration restricts amps the most.

    More to come and comments and observations on the above very welcome...
    Sincerely,
    Aaron Murakami

    Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
    Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
    RPX & MWO http://vril.io

  • #2
    youtube vid on Meyer's bifilar chokes

    http://www.youtube.com/v/ozpRNpM6FqM
    Sincerely,
    Aaron Murakami

    Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
    Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
    RPX & MWO http://vril.io

    Comment


    • #3
      where can I buy an I core made of river haemetite? Apparently that is what Meyer used, I read that online somewhere. Havnt finished reading the tech brief. I have to read it very slowly.

      It looks like the transformer coils should be wound on the same core also. Is this to do with maintaining the same pulse in the magnetic fields?

      Comment


      • #4
        core material

        not sure of core source

        if power coils wound on same core that means when that is off/on the magnetic field in core can also contribute to the bifilar resonant coils in addition to the the actual voltage potential over wires affecting chokes.

        Is that desireable? I don't know at this time.
        Sincerely,
        Aaron Murakami

        Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
        Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
        RPX & MWO http://vril.io

        Comment


        • #5
          Aaron, have you experimented with different cores as far as electromagnets go? i was thinking about an aluminum or copper tube core would force more of the electromagnetism outwards, instead of absorb it like steel would naturally do.

          Comment


          • #6
            core material

            Yes and any non-ferrous metal like aluminum and copper for a core will create "eddy current" counter current drag and will slow down the frequency and will probably create a lot of heat. air, iron, magnetite, those are all good ones.
            Sincerely,
            Aaron Murakami

            Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
            Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
            RPX & MWO http://vril.io

            Comment


            • #7
              ok, thats twice you taught me something in the same day... one more left


              thank you, probably saved me countless hours of testing hahahaha

              Comment


              • #8
                core material

                LOL! There are some pretty exotic core materials like metglas and so forth but not practical because ridiculous pricing and so forth. For the Bedini coils, I've always used bundled steel welding rod. Much more efficient than solid core.
                Sincerely,
                Aaron Murakami

                Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
                Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
                RPX & MWO http://vril.io

                Comment


                • #9
                  More effecient Bedini coils.

                  Aaron,

                  Tesla would increase his inductance by connecting ends of bifilar or multi-coils in series. Have you tried this? This would further decrease current flow allowing only potential. This allows more effecient use of the same amount magnet wire to build a stronger magnetic field.

                  Here is a link for those of you that need simple explanation.

                  Bifilar Electromagnet

                  If you notice also in the beginning of the FEG book of Bedini ('84), you see the energizer coils in series. My thought is this increases capacity as well as significant potential to be released. With this in mind, make 10-3B as a quadfilar. Two or more strands opposing two or more strands with each opposing pairs in series.

                  Just a thought…

                  Jeremy

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Bifilar Comparison

                    Hi Jeremy,

                    I did this test last night so here is a comparison based on hands on real experiment. The one on left side gave almost twice the voltage pulse at the cap than the right one.

                    Sincerely,
                    Aaron Murakami

                    Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
                    Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
                    RPX & MWO http://vril.io

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Hi Aaron

                      Thanks for the feedback!
                      I am having difficulty to convert your drawing to the correct physical implementation.
                      Is the configuration on the left wired as shown in "Fig 10-3B VIC Bifilar wrap ass" posted a little higher on this page, or is Fig 10-3B the configuration on the right hand side?
                      In other words, is Fig 10-3B the way it should we wired for the highest voltage spike?
                      If not, how should Fig 10-3B be modified to represent the left setup above?
                      Last edited by passion1; 09-02-2007, 12:43 PM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Hi Jeremy,

                        I've just tried that little bifilar experiment as shown in the link but I get the exact same field strenght on both coils, driving at the same voltage and current.
                        Have you tried it? I also did a quick test on the Bedini SS, I had two power strands on one transistor, so I tried connecting the top (end) of one strand to the bottom of the other one, basically if they were parallel in the beginning now they were in series. I got a much higher voltage but the freq was way lower. But the charging rate was the same for both the setups.
                        I think what Aaron did can't be compared to the bifilar in your example as he has his load in between the two coils, that's probably why he had success. Before they were cancelling, now with one side inverted they add up. Correct me if I'm wrong Aaron.

                        best regards

                        Mario

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          physical pic

                          Hi Passion1,

                          here is a literal pic of what is represented in the left side of the comparison pic.



                          also to note the bifilar capacitance should be more than the wfc...so big bifilar chokes. but to experiement with concept can use any bifilar to see the left does give voltage boost.
                          Sincerely,
                          Aaron Murakami

                          Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
                          Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
                          RPX & MWO http://vril.io

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Mario View Post


                            I've just tried that little bifilar experiment as shown in the link but I get the exact same field strenght on both coils, driving at the same voltage and current.

                            Have you tried it? I also did a quick test on the Bedini SS, I had two power strands on one transistor, so I tried connecting the top (end) of one strand to the bottom of the other one, basically if they were parallel in the beginning now they were in series. I got a much higher voltage but the freq was way lower. But the charging rate was the same for both the setups.
                            Mario
                            I just did the same experiment this afternoon. I used one strand and two in series for blocking oscillation…along with two in series for power strands. In both cases, the oscillation was slower. This is not the best way to configure multicoils for the SS.

                            What’s interesting …is the aligned fields of the Bifilar w/ wfc load in between creates a larger compressed potential of the LEM wave. When cathode is properly insulated or conditioned this should further the compressed potential LEM wave. This will cause a larger imbalance allowing the vacuum to interact freely. I have a strong feeling that the Lawton circuit should use a Bifilar or more coils instead of two independent inductors. I may be wrong. But from what I gather from Aaron’s experiment, the field must be aligned. The D12.pdf does not show this! Also, the Lawton circuit does not pick off the electrons furthering the imbalanced high-energy state of the atomic atom. We are only seeing on half of the picture here.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              bifilar

                              Jerdee,

                              I see a lot of "open source" projects that are anything but open source. Everyone seems to continually keep bits and pieces to themselves.

                              Meyer went from individual inductors to bifilar on same core.

                              Definitely a stronger gradient created here.
                              Sincerely,
                              Aaron Murakami

                              Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
                              Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
                              RPX & MWO http://vril.io

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X