Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Eric Dollard

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sputins
    replied
    J.S. Bach

    Originally posted by dR-Green View Post
    This may or may not be of interest, BBC documentary:

    Bach: A Passionate Life

    BBC - Bach: A Passionate Life - John Eliot Gardiner - YouTube

    Thanks dr Green. I sat down with a glass of wine (or two) with the sound volume turned up loud. I found this doco extremely stirring! I loved it. I would highly recommend this doco to anyone who wants more insight into Bach, Tesla and even Eric.



    Music for the Glory of God

    At 40.32 shows something which is most interesting, a puzzle in the music within the portrait of Bach. The music can be read both normally as seen and also upside down and backwards.

    As Eric has said, the beginning is the end and the end is the beginning.



    With his secret smile, he hides something so simple yet so complex. It took 100 years for people to start working it out, which parallels the concepts of Tesla which also took 100 years for someone (Eric) to figure out.

    The clue was in the title. Not three voices but six.



    JS Bach, father to twenty children to two wives, his life also that of tragedy as many of his children died as did his first wife.

    Bach was heavily inspired by Martin Luther. Luther while in confinement, considered Black Ink to be his best weapon against the devil. Luther wrote a translation of the New Testament from the Greek to German, which also established the roots of the German language from many dialects.

    “Without music man is little more than a stone”. – Martin Luther.

    JS Bach was a Scientist who used music as an expression, rather than Mathematics.

    Within ‘The Art of Fugue’ he inscribes his own name B A C H into the music then it suddenly ends..




    Sputins.
    Last edited by Sputins; 11-27-2013, 12:59 AM. Reason: missing pics, too much wine.

    Leave a comment:


  • James Barker
    replied
    Originally posted by dward View Post

    Something eric mentioned awhile back was that if you were standing under the bolinas antenna field while say new york was operating, that you could also, potentially be found standing under the new york array as well. This is really what i would like to research! How to make space A in location A also be space A in location B. Anyone have any insights on that? Any suggestions for avenues of experimentation? .
    From the teslasflyingmachine yahoo group:

    Tesla wrote of having invented a kind of television. Looking at the
    description in "Ralph 24C 41+", it raises an interesting possibility.

    Specifically, Eric Dollard talks about the Alexanderson system being
    capable of "if you stood under one antenna, you'd be standing under both
    simultaneously." Gernsback describes the television as allowing you to
    look into the screen and look around the room, like a hologram.

    I wonder if Tesla figured out how to produce a similar effect to the
    Alexanderson system, but on a two-dimensional surface -- creating a visual
    portal from one "screen" to the other, with the transmission beam acting
    not as a modulated signal but something more akin to a wormhole.

    Leave a comment:


  • dR-Green
    replied
    This may or may not be of interest, BBC documentary:

    Bach: A Passionate Life

    BBC - Bach: A Passionate Life - John Eliot Gardiner - YouTube

    John Eliot Gardiner goes in search of Bach the man and the musician.

    The famous portrait of Bach portrays a grumpy 62-year-old man in a wig and formal coat, yet his greatest works were composed 20 years earlier in an almost unrivalled blaze of creativity.

    We reveal a complex and passionate artist; a warm and convivial family man at the same time a rebellious spirit struggling with the hierarchies of state and church who wrote timeless music that is today known world-wide. Gardiner undertakes a 'Bach Tour' of Germany, and sifts the relatively few clues we have - some newly-found.

    Most of all, he uses the music to reveal the real Bach.

    Leave a comment:


  • orgonaut314
    replied
    On the 'medical quack' side of the secundary coil.

    Direct after the first experimental day I experienced very much the need to go to toilet and I was shaking as in fever. The next day I felt much better. The successive days I was using the coil shorter time but I felt a nice feeling on the stomach. Now I have used the coil more days and I find that my stomach pain is disappearing along with the acid and I feel very energetic when the coil is active for a long time.

    For completeness I should add that I have an earth copper tube that I have drilled into the ground (very easily) with a drill machine. Took little effort to get 3 meter into the ground. It is connected as a very clean ground. Don't know if that part contributes because of the 'vril'?

    disclaimer: all experimental

    Leave a comment:


  • orgonaut314
    replied
    For those with a physics background (like me I’m a physics engineer) this article might be interesting:

    http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0010036.pdf


    'The experiment is described which shows that Coulomb interaction spreads with a limit velocity and thus this kind of interaction cannot be considered as so called “instantaneous action at a distance”’

    Theoretical one can model the longitudional wave in the Maxwell equations using imaginary wavenumbers. The resulting wave is called an evanescent wave. This wave is known to science and has weird properties like tunneling through a waveguide. If you have two waveguides parallel than the evanescence transports energy from tube one to the other. Exactly like our mutual induction transports energy from ring to ring.

    But This article shows that the abstract mathematical solution has properties like the lines of force are at infinity immediately. Now this above mentioned experiment shows that this is not the case. These coulomb lines propagate with a finite velocity just like they are matter themselve! So the evanescent solution in the Maxwell equation does not hold and is a mathematical abstraction. Not evanescence but the longitudional Tesla wave explaines what we call evanescence and the ether exists!

    Paul Dirac brings the point in the conclusion. It is very clear.
    'P.A.M. Dirac wrote ([9], p. 32): “As long as we are dealing only with transverse waves, we cannot bring in the Coulomb interactions between particles. To bring them in, we have to introduce longitudinal electromagnetic waves and include them in the potentials Aμ.” It is known, however, that generally accepted Maxwellian electrodynamics forbids the spreading of any longitudinal electro-magnetic perturbation in vacuum. So Dirac writes ([9], p. 32): “The longitudinal waves can be eliminated by means of a mathematical transformation...”. But after this transformation one gets the theory in which a charge is always accompanied by the Coulomb field around it, i.e. ([9], p. 32) “Whenever an electron is emitted, the Coulomb field around it is simultaneously emitted, forming a kind of dressing for the electron. Similarly, when an electron is absorbed, the Coulomb field around it is simultaneously absorbed”.
    In accord with the above it was shown [1-4] that the Coulomb interaction “works” instantaneously, if one accepts that basic equations of classical electrodynamics are right. On the other hand our experiment shows that the Coulomb interaction, at least, does not spread instantaneously. The proper inference from this experiment is that the Coulomb interaction cannot be considered as so called “instantaneous action at a distance” and, in turn, the basic equations of classical electrodynamics can be incomplete and moreover, their application is even limited in classical electrodynamics.’

    -----

    Now I would like to add that Eric posted an article By the father of the Maxwell equations: Oliver Heaviside that argues just the same that these lines of force cause the apparent relativistic mass. This backward force is caused by the Coulomb lines bending backward when a particle is accelerated making it apear as if it cannot be accelerated beyond the speed of light. Very important historical experiment for Einstein!

    Heaviside used this argument of the bending Coulomb lines to disprove relativity. If given enough time to settle the Coulomb lines, the particle could be accellerated far beyond the speed of light he believed and I think he might be very right!

    Leave a comment:


  • dward
    replied
    Originally posted by dR-Green View Post
    I think that was the Alexanderson antenna. Eric did post a scale model of it a while back for the 160 metre band but the research/development on that is part of his classified work. But the material is there for you to get your research started with the scale model.
    I didn't realize THAT was what was classified.
    I have been looking at his antenna model, as well as going back through the non edited version of his tesla society talk(i think that's where it was anyway) In which he talks about all that stuff.

    The whole point of my interest in this is the idea that you can make two spaces one space. It is a fascinating idea!

    Face slap moment here. I was not thinking about radio interference with Le bon's experiments. In which case you are right, a CIG setup or maybe transmitting on the science band would be best.

    Madhatter
    It's very possible that I have no freaking clue what i'm talking about but I have to start somewhere.

    The idea which has inspired me goes something like this: to create a situation where Teleporter A and Teleporter B are linked, much like with the A/C Grid issue about generating in one far off place and getting the energy to another far off place in the same time reference, in otherwords, canceling space. If it can be done in a transmission line across a desert why can't it be done using the earth as the conducting medium? The hard part, I believe is in creating conditions for complex matter to exist as itself, without destructing, in which case we need the concept of Bi location.

    I don't believe that one must account for every single bit of matter in the thing transported(can you imagine how ungodly complicated that would get?!) but to create a field situation where bi location is occurring, Then you just shut off the switch on one machine and there you exist in the other place. That is Eric's concept anyway, but I think it's the most workable one i've heard of. I am open to other avenues but the KISS principle should be enforced here.

    Leave a comment:


  • madhatter
    replied
    It's a very broad stroke of the brush, from a physics view it entails quantum entanglement. The trick if you will would be to be able to determine or decide which location to 'collapse' to, think transporter in star-trek. Now whether that is occurring under the alexander array, I have not a clue.

    another point to keep in mind, solid objects are not solid. where does your finger tip end and the table top begin? what keeps things from 'merging' into one another?

    I'm trying to figure out how to write the rest of this post in terms that would make some sense or at least be understandable to those without a background in physics.

    touching on the bending of space and time, while mathematically anything is possible there are many things that need to occur to make it possible that we do not have the ability or energy to do so.

    hopping across the globe in tele-porters, would require massive amounts of energy. one of the issues is that people are not wholly separate from 3d-space. seeing as how we are all comprised of atoms and electrons, to blink out of one location would literally be tearing ourselves out of space. electrons tunnel, they move thru other dimensions if you will while being regulated to a specific location in our dimensional time and space. So while we may use terms of 'folding' or 'bending' space what really mean is to travel hyper-dimensionally. electrons do that at there quantum scale as it actually has zero spacial size, so in a way on the macro scale we do as well. That allows us and everything else to move about space-in-time. the equivalent rest energy* of an electron is ~0.5MeV, how many electrons are we made of?

    *. I'm ignoring the debate over relativity and relativistic mass charge here as either way there is a lot of energy in an electron.

    Originally posted by dward View Post
    Seriously, what is up with insane people! I am a northern guy. Are crazy rascists common in these circles?! How about we talk about electrical research and not deranged theories from white supremisists.

    Something eric mentioned awhile back was that if you were standing under the bolinas antenna field while say new york was operating, that you could also, potentially be found standing under the new york array as well. This is really what i would like to research! How to make space A in location A also be space A in location B. Anyone have any insights on that? Any suggestions for avenues of experimentation?

    Eric also has insinuated, i think, that its these lmd waves that make space scalar/time scalar situations possible, but i could be misinterpreting his lectures.

    Leave a comment:


  • dR-Green
    replied
    Originally posted by dward View Post
    Something eric mentioned awhile back was that if you were standing under the bolinas antenna field while say new york was operating, that you could also, potentially be found standing under the new york array as well. This is really what i would like to research! How to make space A in location A also be space A in location B. Anyone have any insights on that? Any suggestions for avenues of experimentation?

    Eric also has insinuated, i think, that its these lmd waves that make space scalar/time scalar situations possible, but i could be misinterpreting his lectures.
    I think that was the Alexanderson antenna. Eric did post a scale model of it a while back for the 160 metre band but the research/development on that is part of his classified work. But the material is there for you to get your research started with the scale model.

    Leave a comment:


  • dR-Green
    replied
    Originally posted by dward View Post
    Youre probably right. The reason i suggested it is that it appears to be made of things many of us have lying around. Id like to work onreplicating some of his work but at the moment my work schedule is a bit nuts.... perhaps after christmas i can get started.

    Orgonaut, ive never thought to apply these principles to his mechanics before: nice.
    As you say the coils we're working on here would be suitable, but that's a single pole so I'd say a CIG (balanced) type setup would be best because it doesn't transmit and cause interference, which is probably more of an issue now than when those experiments were originally done.

    Leave a comment:


  • dward
    replied
    Seriously, what is up with insane people! I am a northern guy. Are crazy rascists common in these circles?! How about we talk about electrical research and not deranged theories from white supremisists.

    Something eric mentioned awhile back was that if you were standing under the bolinas antenna field while say new york was operating, that you could also, potentially be found standing under the new york array as well. This is really what i would like to research! How to make space A in location A also be space A in location B. Anyone have any insights on that? Any suggestions for avenues of experimentation?

    Eric also has insinuated, i think, that its these lmd waves that make space scalar/time scalar situations possible, but i could be misinterpreting his lectures.

    Leave a comment:


  • SERG V.
    replied
    My other answers can be found here

    Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze



    Regards
    Сергей В.

    Leave a comment:


  • dR-Green
    replied
    No offence SERG V, but Obama my ass.

    Free yourself - forget about it. It's only an issue because you choose to concern yourself with it. I don't watch the news or propaganda box so I have no idea what's going on in the rest of the world. I don't need to, funnily enough it makes absolutely no difference to my life, in fact it leaves my mind free to think about the things I choose as opposed to what others want me to think. You should try it.

    Leave a comment:


  • dward
    replied
    Originally posted by dR-Green View Post
    I don't know what Eric or John have in mind exactly but I think a CIG would be quite suitable for something like that.
    Youre probably right. The reason i suggested it is that it appears to be made of things many of us have lying around. Id like to work onreplicating some of his work but at the moment my work schedule is a bit nuts.... perhaps after christmas i can get started.

    Orgonaut, ive never thought to apply these principles to his mechanics before: nice.

    Leave a comment:


  • d3x0r
    replied
    Originally posted by orgonaut314 View Post
    About the software Eric has the analogue lumped models that you could studie. However the Magnifying coil does things that are not possible with analogue networks.

    On the thing you write about apparent power I was thinking of the following experiment where someone uses a bifilar Tesla coil and produce more power in the wires connected to the coil than is produced in the induction cooking plate under the coil. He measures the power including all harmonics.

    Perhaps I was thinking the first power meter measures the normal transversal power through the induction cooker and on the scope he has the voltage and current caused by the longitudinal wave produced through the Tesla bifilar coil. Than clearly this power is larger. Perhaps there would be no power gain if the longitudinal input power was measured, by measuring the transversal power a certain loss is accepted that is later on regained.

    Full GEGENE Demo and explanation tutorial - YouTube
    The GEGENE : a Great Efficiency GENErator with a Tesla bifilar coil...

    The Wattmeter measures 1148 Watt at the INPUT of the induction cooker.
    The output power is something like 2405 Watt.

    I think his other experiments show that a heater does not produce the same amount of power that lightbulbs do? Perhaps this longitudinal power is not easy converted to heat?
    I've been watching Igor Moniz for a while on youtube, he's been working with such a circuit.(he usually says in french(?) and then in english or vice versa)...

    IT (induction transformer) - "AC/AC" - YouTube

    As always; could be the frequency disturbing the meter readings...

    Magnifying coil.... I read more of the notes from Dr Green's thread... interesting idea... simultaneous n0 start of quarter wave in both..... what about a diode in the middle? or even something seemingly redundant - a 2 diodes in opposite directions in series with the magnifying?

    Power Transmission in a lumped circuit Scenario 2 - YouTube

    Leave a comment:


  • orgonaut314
    replied
    Originally posted by d3x0r View Post
    Hello all;

    He suggests that there are dynamic changes in LC in tesla's apparatus that result in changes in (apparent power)... but doesn't really point to the... changes leaving one to theorize....

    Anyone done a software simulator of eric's presented theory which is a laymans expression of steinmetz, maxwell, heisenburg (no that was a different show) et al. would think it wouldn't break as badly as my circuits break SPICE for instance.
    About the software Eric has the analogue lumped models that you could studie. However the Magnifying coil does things that are not possible with analogue networks.

    On the thing you write about apparent power I was thinking of the following experiment where someone uses a bifilar Tesla coil and produce more power in the wires connected to the coil than is produced in the induction cooking plate under the coil. He measures the power including all harmonics.

    Perhaps I was thinking the first power meter measures the normal transversal power through the induction cooker and on the scope he has the voltage and current caused by the longitudinal wave produced through the Tesla bifilar coil. Than clearly this power is larger. Perhaps there would be no power gain if the longitudinal input power was measured, by measuring the transversal power a certain loss is accepted that is later on regained.

    Full GEGENE Demo and explanation tutorial - YouTube
    The GEGENE : a Great Efficiency GENErator with a Tesla bifilar coil...

    The Wattmeter measures 1148 Watt at the INPUT of the induction cooker.
    The output power is something like 2405 Watt.

    I think his other experiments show that a heater does not produce the same amount of power that lightbulbs do? Perhaps this longitudinal power is not easy converted to heat?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X