3 Battery Generating System

[blackchisel97]

Just thought I would post this for you all.
Bedini's SG, Gen Mode, Splitting The Positive - YouTube

Does this look a little familiar??

It sure does!

Thanks

[Turion]

Greetings all!!!!

Just thought I would post this for you all.
Bedini's SG, Gen Mode, Splitting The Positive - YouTube

Does this look a little familiar??

[liber63]

Qeg

Hi Dave! Hi, everybody else
Sorry I write something that is not to do with 3GBS, but i got very excited.
I think we have pretty good news!
You might already know that.
QEG -- Fix the World Organization Interview by PESN

QEG -- Fix the World Organization Interview by PESN; April 3, 2014 - YouTube

I am so excited that it came out openly. Of course it seems a bit expensive to built but if it stays, it will be much more cheaper in one year or two. If they don’t succeed to kill the whole thing somehow.

I am still doing experiments with 3gbs though! I will never stop these. I have inserted a flywheel in the system. I will get back if i have good news about it.
I also think, as Dave said, that Big Motors with the right loads will be better for 3GBS. But no money for new experiments now!

[Sawt2]

It has been a week since my prev. Test, so I "braved" the cold for another test.
The temps have been lows in the 20s, highs in the 40s, most of the week.
I was pleased to find my batteries doing well. Primary 1 was at 12.81, primary 2 was 12.70 ( all but completely back to original voltage) batt 3 was at 5.48.
My setup was this: 3BGS (splitting the pos.) going to a cap with a diode in both pos before cap, then the energizer run from the cap, chg batt on the energizer was 10.08 V. Then I had a 24 volt motor running off batt 3 via the PWM.
I had meters on all batts. And one on the cap. I turned it on dialed up the pwm so the energizer would run, let it come up to speed, tuned the pwm so that batt 3 sat at 13.4 to 13.8'. Primaries sat at 12.31 and 12.33. Here's the cool part the charge batt went from 10.08 to 11.79 in about 1 hour 10 min. And the primaries never budged. (Next wknd I am going to try to run the test on sat and leave it run for a while, maybe let it go overnight.) I wonder if I may be very close to having the system balanced in such a way to preserve the primary voltages? I am excited to see what the voltages recover to tomorrow. One thing to remember, actually two things, these are 2.9 amp hr batts, the energizer pulls 145-160 ma plus I am running the 24 volt motor off batt 3. And it seems that batt 3 may be coming around??? I think I did mention about building a batt. Position changing switch. I wonder about things like " can I change the batteries positions around at a speed necessary to trick the system into not depleting the batteries at all, while still running the energizer to charge batteries" (the tesla switch)I almost forgot to mention the cap voltage would fluctuate between 8.40 and 13.65, no clue on that one folks!!! But it does do better with the cap then without it. Oh well that's it for now, hope I didn't bore you too much.

Dave
I appreciate your interest, I don't find this boring either, I would like to see more folks reporting results. By the way I will make the time soon to draw out the schematics for you. It's nothing special just what I learned here on this thread plus a cap, 2 diodes to see if there is anything coming back from the energizer to the batts. ( I don't think I will leave them in permanently) and I have a pwm on the second motor for an attempt to balance the system.

All
I went out tonight to see what the batts recovered to. Primaries were at 12.72 & 12.65 Batt 3 is at 6.48. Chg batt is at 10.69. Although my primaries did not come back to original voltage the loss was minimal (in my opinion) however the gains in the chg batt and batt 3 more than made up for the losses in the primaries. Well I am planning another test on sat if all goes as planned.

[Turion]

Cornboy,
I have kinda lost track of what is going on with UFO's thread at this point. Have their been some replications that indicate you guys are getting more out than in from that rewind process? To be honest, I had some of my BEST results using my rewound UFO motor with the 3BGS setup. My only problem was my build job was so crappy it would not hold together long enough for me to really test it the way it needed to be tested, and I have rewinding another one on my long list of things to do. The motor wouldn't quite fit in the case right when I added another set of brushes and commutator to the other end of it, so it had serious issues. But when it was running I saw charging of both primaries while running a load off the third battery. Enough to encourage me. What is the price of the kit now, and where can I order it? The link to "Primary Voltage Increasing" below is using a UFO wound motor.

Dave

[Cornboy 555]

Other folks might think this stuff is boring, but not me. The more people that try this, the more bits of information we gather. Some day all those bits will add up to a solution we all can use.

Can you draw the schematic out and post it here? i think I have it, but want to make sure.

One of the things Luther and I have talked about is the success we have seen using bigger motors with large loads.It's almost as if the bigger motor is a much more effective generator and because of this we see longer run times. Sometimes I wonder if the reason we haven't gotten what we want is because none of us have used a big enough motor with big enough loads on it. I think Luther is going to be testing that hypothesis soon, and will probably post some results here.

Dave

Hey Dave, this stuff is never boring to me, you should order a UFO imperial kit, it is the best value ever, if you want to try a larger motor.

You can wind it anyway you choose.

Regards Cornboy.

[Turion]

Bored??

Other folks might think this stuff is boring, but not me. The more people that try this, the more bits of information we gather. Some day all those bits will add up to a solution we all can use.

Can you draw the schematic out and post it here? i think I have it, but want to make sure.

One of the things Luther and I have talked about is the success we have seen using bigger motors with large loads.It's almost as if the bigger motor is a much more effective generator and because of this we see longer run times. Sometimes I wonder if the reason we haven't gotten what we want is because none of us have used a big enough motor with big enough loads on it. I think Luther is going to be testing that hypothesis soon, and will probably post some results here.

Dave

[Sawt2]

Sawt2,

Thanks for the update. Where did your primaries end up after your run (after a rest)?

Dave

It has been a week since my prev. Test, so I "braved" the cold for another test.
The temps have been lows in the 20s, highs in the 40s, most of the week.
I was pleased to find my batteries doing well. Primary 1 was at 12.81, primary 2 was 12.70 ( all but completely back to original voltage) batt 3 was at 5.48.
My setup was this: 3BGS (splitting the pos.) going to a cap with a diode in both pos before cap, then the energizer run from the cap, chg batt on the energizer was 10.08 V. Then I had a 24 volt motor running off batt 3 via the PWM.
I had meters on all batts. And one on the cap. I turned it on dialed up the pwm so the energizer would run, let it come up to speed, tuned the pwm so that batt 3 sat at 13.4 to 13.8'. Primaries sat at 12.31 and 12.33. Here's the cool part the charge batt went from 10.08 to 11.79 in about 1 hour 10 min. And the primaries never budged. (Next wknd I am going to try to run the test on sat and leave it run for a while, maybe let it go overnight.) I wonder if I may be very close to having the system balanced in such a way to preserve the primary voltages? I am excited to see what the voltages recover to tomorrow. One thing to remember, actually two things, these are 2.9 amp hr batts, the energizer pulls 145-160 ma plus I am running the 24 volt motor off batt 3. And it seems that batt 3 may be coming around??? I think I did mention about building a batt. Position changing switch. I wonder about things like " can I change the batteries positions around at a speed necessary to trick the system into not depleting the batteries at all, while still running the energizer to charge batteries" (the tesla switch)I almost forgot to mention the cap voltage would fluctuate between 8.40 and 13.65, no clue on that one folks!!! But it does do better with the cap then without it. Oh well that's it for now, hope I didn't bore you too much.

[Sawt2]

Sawt2,

Thanks for the update. Where did your primaries end up after your run (after a rest)?

Dave

Dave
I made quick trip to the shop to verify voltage, it has been 5 days of lows in the 20s high in the 40s. Primaries are sitting at 12.81 and 12.67. Batt 3 is at 5.96
I am encouraged by this, I am currently working on a switch that will rotate the batteries. In my book these batteries have done well. I am going to do some tests in the coming months, comparing work done by the batteries straight out and then work done by batteries via the 3 BGS and then adding my position switching device. I will continue to share results as time permits.

[Turion]

Sawt2,

Thanks for the update. Where did your primaries end up after your run (after a rest)?

Dave

[Sawt2]

All
We got a little break from the cold here in the northeast, so I wanted to check in on the 3 bgs my primaries were sitting @ 12.69 & 12.84 batt 3 was @ 3.42. Hooked it up to run the energizer off the positives and a taillight bulb off batt 3 via pwm motor controller. So! What I did was ran the energizer up to operating rpm and then adjust the pwm to run the bulb.
Upon initial hookup batt 3 went up to 20.8 volts and climbing, I slowing turned the pwm on while watching bat 3. I tuned it till bat 3 sat @ 14.3, primaries were @ 12.37.(I almost forgot to mention the charge batt on the energizer, it started at 10.98, during the time running the setup the charge bat ran up to 11.10) I let it run like this for about a half hour, once during this time the primaries flickered to 12.38 but for the most part they just stayed @ 12.37 for the whole run. ( keep in mind these batts are 2.9 amp hour, my energizer pulls 140-160ma and the bulb pulls .9 amp at full power, I had it dialed down some.)after the half hour the the primaries recovered to 12.56 within five minutes, batt 3 was at 8.64 and the chg batt went to 11.03. Not sure where the voltages will recover to.

[Turion]

shylo,
I check this thread every single day to see if anybody is still working on the 3BGS or like concepts. Sounds like you're having some fun. I've got two different setups running, experimenting with variations on the third battery.

Also, as you mentioned, working on Steele's generator as well as the motor/generator project Matt Jones and I have been working on for over a year. That one is now up and running, but I need to do some ing test runs to have the data to make some decisions.

No time!!! LOL. And no money either. Robbing Peter to pay Paul, as my Grandma used to say.

Dave

[shylo]

adjusting the load

Hi All, I was exp. today ,not using the 3Bgs , though ,since I flushed my dead bat(it's special) .
Just the 2 primaries , and a standard pm motor, but I added a 3rd brush ,2 comm. positions off the +brush...
Use a common ground, but supply , 1 of the primaries , off 1 brush use the other for drive.
One causes rotation ,and charges a 2nd battery.
How much charge the 2nd battery receives, depends how you load the motor. Also the amount of load keeps changing. Something to do with how batteries discharge , they seem to rush forward , then relax, then repeat.
Keeping them in the , rush forward, aspect is the hard part.
Add a brush to a 12 pole com in the center ,use a diode ,and feed a 2nd battery, keep a common ground, then just keep flipping the batteries back and forth?

Hey Dave watching the Braden with great interest....time and money

[ainvision]

Which Analogy Do We Choose?

Nikola Tesla for all his intuitiveness, sheer genius and observational skills declared he did not know what 'electricity' actually was. He certainly knew what it was not!

Ed Leedskalnin said he knew what electricity was and considered IT to be a transference of 'alternating magnetic particles'. The splendid series of videos about Ed Leedskalnin by Imhotep Labs on YT is very informative and clearly put. I thoroughly recommend them!

If you add Ed's theory to that of Sir William Crook's passage of infinitesimal 'tubes of force' (most notably revised by William Lyne in his book 'Occult Ether Physics') you get a magnetically focussed helical 'electrical' spiral wave of 'electricity' carrying along the 'aether' within itself. Can anyone say, "Inertia?"

Bill Lyne then goes on to present his case regarding 'Nazi Flying Saucers' and that they use a copper plate on all six sides (cubic perspective) which the leading coil producing a pulsed HF HV pulse and its diametrically opposed coil producing an HF AC waveform. The idea being that the etheric tubes of force 'electricity' are dissolved liberating the ether formally within them and eliminating inertia. Unfortunately this idea is very difficult (in its present analogy) to understand. Let me present a different analogy...

If we consider the 'electricity' fore and aft to exhibit acoustic properties then we may consider this. If the fore signal is pulsed HV DC (E.g. 144 MHz) and the aft HV AC (E.g. 144 MHz - in both directions) then if both signals are synchronized then a spacial absence (moving vacuum - 2 times force) should be formed fore and the combination of the aft AC and DC signals should create disharmony and cancel each other out (null zone). Since Nature abhors a vacuum and the acoustic properties of this analogy should be nullified then surrounding space should fill this rear vacuum and create thrust. I'm quite sure Bill Lyne will not tell you this during his conference speech, but you can ask him lots of questions.

If this analogy is accurate then an aft frequency of pulsed HF HV DC 180º out of phase may also work (Thomas Townsend Brown Thrusters anyone?). You might try that concept within your motors that capture Back EMF too. I hope this has been informative.

[Tishatang]

@Artv

Thanks for the heads up re bat 1 and restoring dead bats. Yes, for such a simple circuit, sure adds up to a lot of questions.

Chris