Donald Smith Devices too good to be true

[Farmhand]

When I look at this diagram I see that the direction of turn wrap (curved arrow)
of the Amps arrow is the same as the volts arrow, the only difference is the end
the arrow point is on.

If the coils needed to be opposite wound then this diagram should show a mirror image of the curved arrows, indicating the turn wrap direction to be opposite.
But it doesn't .

The two curved arrows show the same wrap direction in this diagram, just different force directions.



Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Cheers

[Dave45]

Yea my drawing in mpaint is lacking
Here's a pic of two opposite wound springs

This should give everyone a better perspective.

[Dave45]

If we look at creation all around us we see the opposite spin directions, one of my favorite is mining of quartz for crystal radio's they prefer the cw spin direction for their crystals and dont use the ccw spin quartz.

The sun flower show's both spin directions in its design.

The evidence is all around us we could go from example to example

[Farmhand]

If we look at creation all around us we see the opposite spin directions, one of my favorite is mining of quartz for crystal radio's they prefer the cw spin direction for their crystals and dont use the ccw spin quartz.

The sun flower show's both spin directions in its design.

The evidence is all around us we could go from example to example

But why do you equate opposite spin direction to opposite winding of the coils ?

The diagram I posted shows opposite spin direction on the same winding direction
ie. the same piece of wire wound into a long coil when excited in the middle the current amps go one way the electron volts the other.

When you put two opposite wound coils end to end they are a mirror image of
each other and so different to the diagram of Dons to explain it.

Both coils in my opinion should be wound the same, or one coil cut in the
middle to make the center tap then when excited in the middle the electron volts go one way and the current amperes go the other.

Center tap as Dons drawing says.

Like in the diagram, I don't see opposite spin as you put it needing to have
opposite wound coils, I see it as needing one coil cut to make two coils and
the center tap. Like Don instructs to do in one of his video's.

Cheers

[Farmhand]

Here's what I think after pondering it.

The secondaries are wound the same way and when the primary is at the center
tap it's like the "Bloch wall" and being connected to ground as a source of
negative "charge", the center tap is an "input", both coil ends are connected
together to one side of a FWBR and the center tap is connected to the other.

Cheers

[cognito]

Hi folks!

DECISION TO CHOOSE BUFFER CAPACITOR

as we know C=Q/V

C= FARADS
Q=COULOMBS
V=VOLTAGE

A 2 MKFD @ 2000 VOLT CHARGED IN 1 SEC
CAPACITOR CAN PROVIDE OR HOLD

since 1mkfd=1/100000 farad

Q=C*V
Q=0.000002*2000
Q=0.004

SINCE 1 AMP= 1Q/1SEC
WE HAVE .004/1SEC
SO WE HAVE .004 AMP

SO A CAPACITOR 2000 MKFD @ 2000 VOLT CHARGED IN 1 SEC
CAN PROVIDE OR HOLD
Q=C*V
Q=0.002*2000
Q=4 /SEC

SO 4 AMPS/SEC IS PRODUCED OR HELD

AND 4 CAPS 2000MKFD RATED @ 2000 VOLTS CAN PRODUCE
4*4= 16 AMPS CONTINUOUSLY PER SECOND

This depends on how your circuit is made: series or parallel.
4 caps series has 500 MKFD @ 8000 VOLT
4 caps parallel has 8000 MKFD @ 2000 VOLT
So you should calculate you output first (voltage and amps), then calculate the cap(s) for it?

SINCE P=V*I
POWER PRODUCED
P=2000*16
P=32,000 OR 32KW SEC
OR 32K JOULES

REGARDS

ZELINA

addition to caps calculation thing

apply formula

0.5*c*vsquared.f <=>
0.5*c*vsquared.*(f)^2 f=1

The above COMBINED with a "resonate energy induction system" (all electrons moving at the same time in the same direction), make the next move into overunity practical.
This overunity device produces energy at radio frequency ranging into the megahertz range. At radio frequency the Electrons do not pass through the conductor as at lower frequencies. These Electrons encircle the conductor and are free of the conductor's resistance.

According to Don Smith (Resonate Tank Induction Energy Transfer System): W = 1/2 x C x (V)^2 x (freq)^2
Joules = [1/2 x C x (V)^2] x (c.p.s)^2
Joules = {Volts x Amperes x Seconds} Watt Seconds

freq is squared!


WHERE F IS FREQUENCY
IF F IS 30KHZ
THEN 30000 COULOMBS R TRAVERSING AND 120 VOLT IS VOLTAGE OF CHARGING
SO A 2MKFD CAPACITOR CAN HOLD OR DISSIPATE

.5
.000002 ×
120 ×
120 ×
30,000 ×
--------------------------
432 = JOULES SEC

SINCE P=VI
AND I=P/V

432
120 ÷
--------------------------
3.6 = AMPS PER SECOND

SO 4 2MKFD CAN PROVIDE

3.6*4=14.4 AMPS SEC AT 120 VOLTS


RGDS

ZZZZ

Best regards

[T-1000]

Hi T-100, 5Kv on only 1 Winding secondary? thats really impressive...

the secondary is also a caduceus?

also your consumption of 6W is impressive, how much volts/amps are being draw in your system? your flyback puts out AC? how are you firing spark gap and charging the cap with only one wire? not shore if i understanded well...

great! thank you for sharing!!

Hi,

Sorry for some delay, had hard work putting pieces together on the hunt for taking off that high voltage of cold electricity back into hot electricity...

The primary is caduceus - http://drblayney.com/images/jbwnd.jpg Caduceus vs Staff of Asclepius It's function is to generate scalar (torsion) rotating magnetic field.
The 2 secondaries is like 2 Tesla coil secondaries: primary plus each secondary coils masses are equal, the secondary is not longer than 1/4 of resonant frequency wave length.

Both secondaries are wound with left hand+right hand sides from the center to the ends of tube. The most active zone is in the center.
The capacitor and spark gap for primary is fed over 1 wire from flyback transformer over 2 diodes (the flyback transformer itself is in resonance and it's ferrite core is grounded). The "cold" end of flyback transformer comes back to junction of 2 secondary coils in the center (we have open circuit with capacitive action between coils).
The ferrite inside of coils is insullated in the center (otherwise it ends heading up and emitting energy out).

Also the corner stone concept is: the Nature always havе duality - 2 opposites what neutralize energy states in mattery. While in electricity that means we're using hot and cold electricity and to make that we use opposite windings for transforming conventional magnetic field into scalar (torsion) magnetic field. This results cold electricity what we use to regain hot electricity. Please see all Nicola Tesla writings and patents, the truth is buried over there(see what he was repeating over and over again).

P.S> Probably there will be full video over few days, please be patient...

[MonsieurM]

Thanks T-1000; If i may add, it is also buried in the schematics of Tesla's Set up


isn't it Farmhand

I found a better drawing of the magnetically quenched spark gap Page 306 of the IRWNT book. looks like just a coil with a lot of wire and the poles are extended so the coil is far enough below the gap and the added pole piece projections are adjustable and shaped.



Uploaded with ImageShack.us


Cheers

Farmhand, notice the endings of each pole..."2 cones" and a " a disc" if viewed sideways

[cognito]

Well the open capacitor is "not" meant to be the receiver, like I said the energy is transmitted through the ground not through the air.

The transverse waves are shielded yes, but the energy is not going from one open capacitor to the other through the air in the form of longitudinal waves.

If they are close together there might be some capacitive coupling. Which I don't think a faraday cage will shield from either, not sure.

This is from Tesla's court case, Under oath. Source of quote.


So Tesla says that long distance radio reception is more due to Earth currents than radiations of electromagnetic waves.



How can the two resonant points be verified ? I'll watch the video again.

My advice is to study the inventors information (Tesla) not the copiers information (Meyl). It's too easy for them to slip people little furfies.

Cheers

Hi Farmhand,

Point(s) taken!

So Don Smith used a different type of system to "pump or extract" excited electrons nearby in it's earth and air and groundings due to flux lines at the top end of L-two.

Best regards

[Farmhand]

Hi Farmhand,

Point(s) taken!

So Don Smith used a different type of system to "pump or extract" excited electrons nearby in it's earth and air and groundings due to flux lines at the top end of L-two.

Best regards

I'm not saying that, I'm just commenting on Meyl and the Tesla Wireless
transmission system. The Tesla wireless system Meyl chose to promote is the
older version. Why not promote the Magnifying Transmitter" System Which
was a later and better system ? It is possible I agree that some energy could
get into the system through the open capacitor terminals, but the
transmitted energy is meant to go through the ground not the air,
if energy can enter through the open capacitor it can also leak which is more likely.

ELECTRICAL ENERGY - Google Patents

I think Meyl says some dubious things. He says 1000 % efficiency but what
does that mean ? I can get 1000 % voltage gain from my setup but that
doesn't mean much in itself. Is he claiming he can get 10 times the energy out
that he puts in ? I doubt it. I can't say if Don's setup is for real or what it
does but if I were going to build one I wouldn't be so quick to cling to the
opposite wound secondaries thing. I would test both ways, but I would test
two wound the same first. But that's just me.

Cheers

P.S. I apologize for ranting Cognito, but that Meyl guy just annoys me for
some reason. Sorry.

[cognito]

I'm not saying that, I'm just commenting on Meyl and the Tesla Wireless
transmission system. The Tesla wireless system Meyl chose to promote is the
older version. Why not promote the Magnifying Transmitter" System Which
was a later and better system ? It is possible I agree that some energy could
get into the system through the open capacitor terminals, but the
transmitted energy is meant to go through the ground not the air,
if energy can enter through the open capacitor it can also leak which is more likely.

ELECTRICAL ENERGY - Google Patents

I think Meyl says some dubious things. He says 1000 % efficiency but what
does that mean ? I can get 1000 % voltage gain from my setup but that
doesn't mean much in itself. Is he claiming he can get 10 times the energy out
that he puts in ? I doubt it. I can't say if Don's setup is for real or what it
does but if I were going to build one I wouldn't be so quick to cling to the
opposite wound secondaries thing. I would test both ways, but I would test
two wound the same first. But that's just me.

Cheers

P.S. I apologize for ranting Cognito, but that Meyl guy just annoys me for
some reason. Sorry.

No problem Farmhand

Don wrote interesting information (clues) in his book:

"There are four major power sources providing enormous amounts of Ambient Background
Magnetic Wave Energy. They are The Cosmos, Galactic, Solar and Earth's Ambient
Electromagnetic Backgrounds. The Earth's Electromagnetic Field comes from reflection,
deflection and absorption as a result of Faraday's action at a distance from the above.

Magnetic Flux Background maps of the Earth's Surface yield important information regarding
reflection, deflection and absorption of incoming Magnetic Waves, plus action at a distance.
When properly understood, these maps yield a very large Ambient Electromagnetic Energy
Source. When deflected, Magnetic flux from electrons changes to Electrical flux, providing
the Motor System that spins / rotates the Earth... Absorbed microwave flux energy heats
from the inside out, therefore a hot interior Earth.

Wave Phenomenon associated with action at a distance...
All Electromagnetic Energy harvesting methods include a Catalyst, a Collector and a Pump.
Catalyst include sensitization (A process in which a given behavior increases in intensity
simply with repeated occurrences) through doping with certain elements, air and earth
groundings.
Collectors include temporary storage as in Capacitors, Coils and Transformers.
The Pump System Includes induced movement onward to point of use...

Direct access occurs when Magnetic Waves impact a catalyst, spinning the Local electrons sideways, producing useful electrical energy"

Best regards

[Farmhand]

This looks like Dons explanation for the over unity energy present in the system. No big mystery. Just gotta read the documents.



Uploaded with ImageShack.us

In this diagram below there is a hint. It says volts dominate if the L1 is far right,
it doesn't make any sense to me that when the L1 coil is far right and the center
tap is to the left of the L1 that the direction of the coil winding reversing
would be a good thing. I think that if the secondary was wound two halves
opposite wound then when the L1 is moved to the right of center, then to the left
of L1 would be a section of coil with a winding direction reversal.

But I think that if wound both the same this would not be a problem.



Uploaded with ImageShack.us

[T-1000]

The video is out in the wild now
International Friends for Tariel Kapanadze working OU!!! - YouTube

(I am Arunas there)

Have fun watching and try to understand principles as much as you can. If you will want to replicate this, you need to be human with brains and tools, not just like monkey repeating circuit!

[nico]

What is caduceus coil? Can replace caduceus coil with bifilar coil? Is the same?

[cognito]

if we take F^2 fully then resonance condition is lost. so we take one f only and other f is used to maintain resonance. fetching power with resonance maintained.

rgds

Hi,

What I understand...
The L2 bottom cw coil on resonance is "powering" the L2 top coil on the same resonance? Power is f for L2 bottom and f for top coil (combined f^2), so f useable is not f squared but only f, what you calculated above ?

Best regards