Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The One True Math Of God

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The One True Math Of God

    Fractions and decimals are mind parasites! Get rid of them and everything becomes divinely simple. Golden ratio phi = 1 without decimals and fractions. Logarithm e = 2 without decimals and fractions. Square the circle pi = 4 without decimals and fractions, its not ratio of circumference to diameter its ratio of perimeter of enclosing square to diameter. All math that uses fractions and decimals is inherently wrong. Dollard kinda figured it out with his analysis of counter space. Hes making it too complex though. In 'A Common Language For Electrical Engineering' Dollard uses a little story to explain span v distance, density v area, and concentration v volume. Span is 1 per 150 feet, distance is 15 miles. Density is 1 per 50 acre, area is 1000 acres. Concentration is 1 per 8 cubic ounces, volume is 1 half-gallon. Its not immediately noticeable but there is a underlying principle hiding in Dollards assessment that Im not sure even Dollard noticed. Span is the smallest unit of measurement, distance is the number of the smallest unit of measurement, density is the smallest unit of measurement squared, area is the number of the smallest unit of measurement squared, concentration is the smallest unit of measurement cubed, volume is the number of the smallest unit of measurement cubed. Everything must be rooted in 1, fractions and decimals dont exist in nature.I suspect the 'PER' in 1 PER 150 feet, is shorthand for the word perimeter. The ratio of the perimeter to diameter equals pi aka 4. Im still fleshing out this concept. I know I am correct, its obvious Im correct, I just need to confirm it. Get rid of fractions and decimals, everything becomes divinely simple.
    The smallest unit is 1, you can't have a piece of a unit, you just have a smaller unit. Fractions of 1 unit of something is not that something anymore, its just a piece of that something. You can't have fractions of a unit and still call it a unit of that thing. When measuring…

  • #2

    Eric Dollard brilliantly simplifies the complexities of electrical engineering in his book, 'A Common Language For Electrical Engineering'. In it Eric throughly dismantles hundreds of mind parasites that have infected the fields of mathematics, science, and engineering for centuries. I am going to attempt to remove the few parasites that he missed, as well as the original parasite that got us in this mess in the first place, fractions and decimals!

    Energy in its most arch-typical form is embodied in the phenomenon of Electricity, but what is Electricity? Now our wheels even more stuck in the mud! But we have important clues, namely that of polarity, not plus or minus so much but more like male or female. This thought follows from Goethe to Tesla and Steinmetz. Thus Electricity, in order to manifest, a UNION must develop. This is the union of the “male”, or projective, and “multiplied by” the “female”, or receptive. Hereby, the male is the dielectric field in counterspace (of per centimeters), and the magnetic field or female in space (of centimeters squared). Space in c.m. squared is what you pay for in “real estate”, counterspace in per c.m. is the space between the lines on a ruler, or between molecules in a crystal.
    'A Common Language For Electrical Engineering' - Eric P Dollard - Transmission 1 page 3 [underline and bold emphasis mine]


    The concept of Dollards counterspace becomes much simpler to picture in the brain when the words 'counter' and 'space' are swapped. It shouldn't be called 'counterspace' it should be called 'spacecounter', because thats what it represents. It is the smallest unit of measurement. 'Space' equates to the number of 'spacecounters'. Spacecounters PER cm is the PERimeter of the enclosing SQUARE of total SPACE(A number greater than or equal to 1 spacecounter). 'Spacecounter per cm' is the smallest unit of measurement for the 'space in cm squared'. In other words, the PERimeter of the SPACE containing multiple(or 1) SPACECOUNTERS is the smallest unit of measurement for the AREA of the SPACE SQUARED. Squared is literal, it literally means draw a square.
    For the Electricity extant between a pair of wires in your lamp cord, the closer the wires, the more capacitance, and thus the more Dielectricity. Conversely, for the same cord, the farther apart the wires, the more inductance and thus the more Magnetism. Therefore it is seen that the smaller the space (the more counterspace) the more Dielectricity that can be stored, and conversely the larger the space between the wires (the more real estate) the more Magnetism that can be stored. Very simple, do not let your mind make it any more complicated than that!
    'A Common Language For Electrical Engineering' - Eric P Dollard - Transmission 1 page 3 [underline and bold emphasis mine]
    The underlined statement is a 100% correct statement but it is unnecessarily complex and not intuitive(albeit a hundred times more intuitive than how it is taught in modern science). When a layperson reads the underlined text they think, 'how can there be more of something the smaller the space gets? That doesn't make any sense.' Switch counterspace to spacecounter to get '...the smaller the space (the smaller the spacecounter required [so technically usually more 'spacecounters' but really its just a smaller base unit of measurement]) the more precise and therefore smaller dielectric grid squares of magnetism... the larger the space between the wires (the larger the spacecounter needed [so technically usually less 'spacecounters' but really its just a larger base unit of measurement]) the less precise and therefore larger dielectric grid squares of magnetism...'
    In the previous transmission it was shown that the electric induction, bound between the wires of a lamp cord, was the union of two distinct fields of induction, the dielectric in counterspace, and the magnetic in space. These fields consist of discrete lines of force. Thus these lines exist as individual units or quanta of inductive force. Both fields exert mechanical force upon the bounding system of socalled “conductors”. These mechanical forces, those of the dielectric, and those of the magnetic, exert actions so as to increase their coefficients of induction, that is the dielectric “capacitance”, and the magnetic “inductance” are increased. Hereby, the dielectric field draws the conductors nearer to each other, increasing the counterspace. Conversely the magnetic field pushes the conductors away from each other, increasing the space. Hereby we may say that the dielectric field is contractive, and the magnetic field is expansive. Hence the resulting electric field of the union produces a resultant force upon the bounding conductors. This resultant force thus may be expansive, null, or contractive, depending upon the relative densities of the dielectric and the magnetic force fields respectively.
    'A Common Language For Electrical Engineering' - Eric P Dollard - Transmission 2 page 6 [underline and bold emphasis mine]
    Once again a 100% correct and valid assessment, but also unnecessarily complex and somewhat unintuitive(albeit a thousand times simpler than modern sciences 'quantum' nonsense). To simplify, swap counter with space in the word 'counterspace' to make 'spacecounter'. Instead of the first underlined it can be more simply stated 'union of two distinct fields of induction, the dielectric, the grid square size of magnetism measured in the spacecounter, and the magnetic, the number of dielectric grid squares(of magnetism) in space.
    So far I think the concept of space and counterspace in its basic form is established. Counterspace, as that space between the lines on a ruler is an apt descriptive analog. A ruler divided in millimeters has less counterspace than a ruler divided in nanometers. This is obvious. (think in terms of capillary action)
    'A Common Language For Electrical Engineering' - Eric P Dollard - Transmission 2 page 8 [underline and bold emphasis mine]
    Switch counterspace with 'spacecounter', things become much more simple. The underlined becomes "Spacecounter, the smallest single unit of measurement(or precision) is an apt descriptive analog. A ruler divided in millimeters has a larger spacecounter than when a ruler is divided in nanometers(and therefore smaller spacecounter)." Counterspace to spacecounter is a huge improvement and will help facilitate the complete removal of fractions and decimals from everything in existence.
    The necessity of fractions and decimals within math, science, and engineering is zero, nada, none. Fractions and decimals must be purged, they parasitically infected the human mind and consciousness thousands of years ago, and have drastically stalled the human race, moreso than any other factor imo. All math that seemingly requires fractions and decimals use low precision measurement units (large spacecounters), instead of fractions and decimals they should simply use higher precision measurement units(smaller spacecounters).

    Floating point aka fractions and decimals are 100% unecessary.

    spacecounter.png

    NOTE: Im still working out the 'e=2 and pi=4' but the rest is solid(besides a possible typo).
    Last edited by Spells Of Truth; 03-18-2020, 04:56 AM.

    Comment


    • #3
      https://spellsoftruth.blog/2020/03/1...sion-of-space/

      Comment

      Working...
      X