Announcement

Collapse

2020 Energy Science & Technology Conference - Pre-Register Free now

Pre-Register for FREE for the 2020 Energy Science & Technology Conference.

Registration Form: http://energyscienceconference.com/r...ation/2020.php
Schedule: http://energyscienceconference.com/2...ence-schedule/
Presenter Bio/Talk Descriptions: http://energyscienceconference.com/2020-speakers/
See more
See less

Radiant Energy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Radiant Energy

    Throughout my venture in this research.. I always hear / read about "Radiant Energy" but what exactly is radiant energy?

    I had always thought that "Radiant Energy" was a term in the FE community and is known in mainstream community as "Inductive Discharge" the effect after the Inductor current was cut-off at a non 0 cycle., the effect of Magnetic Field Collapse.

    But I am reading stuff that states that Radiant Energy was at the Instant of the Closing of the switch...
    some others states that "Radiant Energy" was different than the "Inductive Discharge"

    What exactly is Radiant Energy?.. and how exactly does it happen?..

    I did a quick search and found no discussion here.. If you know of a link you can post here.
    all comments are welcome.

  • #2
    radiant energy is any energy that is passing by
    could be a radio station transmitting in your direction
    could be gamma rays from space
    could be IR radiation from heat
    could be something else entirely
    it is an entire category of energy that most people don't bother looking at

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by spacecase0 View Post
      radiant energy is any energy that is passing by
      could be a radio station transmitting in your direction
      could be gamma rays from space
      could be IR radiation from heat
      could be something else entirely
      it is an entire category of energy that most people don't bother looking at
      That's another thing I forgot to mention,..

      "Radiant Energy" in Mainstream science also is entirely different..

      It is becoming a hindrance or a key to misunderstanding when people communicate..

      most people who work on Pulsing Circuits, use the term "Radiant xxxx" could be Radiant Energy or Radiant Spike..

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Turion
        Thanks turion,

        That article was exactly one of the sources I've been reading,

        according to that, Radiant Energy show's by shortening the "on time", I am not entirely sure If it is somehow related to the "Heaviside Flow", but that is that.

        It also states that there is a Purple/Bluish Color that is "Radiating".
        this phenomenon I have noticed in Charging large capacitors without any resistor (12v). when I charge the capacitor, normally I Touch the "Positive" side first, then after... touching the "Negative"... completing the circuit, It would spark ORANGE sparks.
        But If I go touch the "Negative" first, then Touch the "Positive" completing the circuit. I could See that Bluish Spark but not always, and It doesn't really "Radiate" (maybe the voltage is not enough.) Its just like a blinding flash orb like thing...

        I am not sure If I am overlooking things, but shortening the "On Time" reduced the Current but also reduced the Charge rate, with regards to Pulsed charging.

        Comment


        • #5
          Tesla and others believed that both electrical and magnetic forces were actually streams of Aether gas, which had been fixated in matter. Materials were somehow "polarized" by various "frictive" treatments by which an Aether gas flow was induced in them. Most materials could maintain the flow in*definitely, since no work was required on their part. Matter had only to re*main polarized, transducing the Aether flow. The Aether gas contained all the power. Unlimited power.

          This Aether gas power manifested as the electromagnetic forces themselves, adequate reason to pursue the development of an Aether gas engine. Such an engine could run forever on the eternal kinetic energies of the Aether itself, it being both generated and driven by the stars.

          Tesla believed that radiant electricity is composed of Aether gas. He based this belief on the fact that his zero current coils were not conducting the "slow and dense" charges usually observed in ordinary electrical circuits. Abrupt impulses produced distinctive and different effects ... fluidic effects. The qualities ascribed by Tesla to "electricity" or things "electrical" in his numerous patent texts and press interviews are those, which refer to the Aether gas. Tesla did not refer to electron currents as "electricity". He did not equate "electricity" with electron flow. Whenever Tesla spoke of "electrical" effects he always described their effusive, gaseous quality.

          Tesla referred to space as the "ambient or natural medium". Space, he claimed, was that which "conducts electricity". He had found a means by which this gaseous electrical flow could be greatly concentrated, magnified, and directed. He saw that this radiant electricity was, in reality, a gaseous emanation. An Aetheric emanation. This is why he made constant reference to fluidic terminology throughout his lectures.

          Tom Bearden claims that when a Source ( a dipole ) is connected to a resistive load, the most important part of the principle is the information transfered to the load at the speed of light by the S-Flow. The S-Flow is pure EM energy which flows through the space and outside the conductor. This energy is Free and only this part must be used as a "free lunch". Just after this very short time, after that the switch is closed ( the transient phase ), the current begins to flow in the circuit. This transient phase is named the Relaxation Time. In copper, the relaxation time is incredibly rapid, it's about 1.5 x 10-19 sec. When the current flows ( the permanent phase ), the circuit consumes power from the Source and dissipates energy by Joule's Effet, this phase must not be used in our case.

          So, according to Tom Bearden, for tapping Free Energy, the purpose is to charge a " Collector " during its relaxation time and then, to switch this Collector to a common resistive load, just before that the electrons begin to flow in the circuit.
          Now suppose you suddenly place a potential on the surface of the plates
          (between the two plates) of a battery. That potential takes off like a
          scalded hog in both directions. It flows across the ions in the battery
          between the plates in one direction, and simultaneously it flows out into
          the external circuits to "push the charges" in the other direction.

          In short, if you time things correctly, you can DEPHASE and DECOUPLE the
          two currents in the battery powered system, simultaneously adding potential
          energy to both of them, "for free". You can add potential to BOTH the
          ions and the electrons. The ions can be moving backward in charging mode,
          while the electrons will be driven in the opposite direction in the external
          circuit --- in powering direction
          So the first problem for a COP>1.0 system is how to break up that "stress energy only" assumption. John's way is one way. He actually "splits" the
          potential into two directional fields (which it is; see Whittaker 1903,
          cited in numerous of my papers), one going in one direction to push the
          ions in charging mode, and the other going in the other direction out into the
          external circuit to push electrons in powering mode.

          That's about as simple as it can be explained. At that point, one either
          understands it or one doesn't.
          All these quotes above are from the Bedini webpages... I think these quotes a very important at least they are to me. All underlining was supplied by me as emphasis.

          Dave Wing

          Comment

          Working...
          X