An Inquiry in to the Alien Reproduction Vehicle

[Gambeir]

Gambeir, That's interesting that you mentioned the Vril craft because one thing I didn't mention in my last post is that I believe the Vril-1-Triebwerk, ARV, and even the OTC-1 are all variations of the same principle. While I may also disagree with Wheeler's theories, I do agree that its best to take one's theories and develop something rather continuing to speculate. Now that the holiday season is over I'll have more time to finish mine. As I stated it'll be yay or nay. Best wishes for the new year to all.

Yes, I agree with you. I was going to make some comment in that direction but have lost my appetite. Still, and while it may not be immediately obvious, there are a number of same/similarities going on in the design of each machine.

Over all, I do think Ken Wheeler has it right where no one else has gotten it right, and that's primarily to due to his own deep inquiry into magnetism. Ultimately, the enabling truth to understanding gravitational control/modification must come out of fundamental concepts derived from the Ken Wheeler dielectric theory; such as an understanding of the hyperspatial medium as a coherent field ver's the incoherent field, and with a coherent field being a pressure field; we here on earth experience various effects an defects caused by the incoherency of this medium, but from basic understandable and rational concepts given by the dielectric theory of the matterium we can easily deduce a simplified understanding of how a body/mass must rationally acquire weight through an an inductive process, a process caused by an incoherent slipstream of reverberating dielectric energies that we and all the other bodies of the solar find ourselves confined within.

As for these ideas about needing vast amounts of electrical power, those ideas are contrary to logical deduction since the weight of a body is almost entirely independent of so~called electromotive force; electricity is not the answer to the problem. In fact it's the reverse, and this idea that electricity holds a key prevents creative thinking and objective rational observation of readily observable facts. All one has to do is to look in a mirror to know that massive amounts of electrical energy is not what's keeping your feet stuck to the ground and so it's entirely illogical to think that electrical power alone can liberate your feet from the earth.

Notes from afar say that even a lunatic and a pompous ass would be in awe of what already exists, and so it is not for no reason that I showed the image of what I call the break~away boy with his mechanical halo set over his head and his angel winged arm patched uniform. The images are for the cognoscenti so that they will know what is real, what is possible, and most importantly of all, it and others do verify the Ken Wheeler view of the matterium.

In short, all you have to do is create a false mass over your head, and then between that false mass and you will reside the null point towards which you will accelerate, and I wouldn't be surprised if the product of such a device created a halo of light: If there's truly evidence of alien intervention I would have to think it's to be found in the form of a golden halo. Regardless of whether there are, or are not aliens, what seems clear is that some people on this planet now have the power of the angels and that my friends is where the reality of artistic adult art collides with the field theory of how the matterium of our reality really works.

[Gambeir]

Gravity is an acceleration towards hyperspace. That's the Ken Wheeler dictum in a nutshell. The Vril Saucer design is an apparent cavitation drive and there is support for this which is physical and which goes beyond the John Saint Clair Patents.

Remember the Clem Motor? Understanding what we now know may warrant a review of the genius of the Clem Motor (for those interested) because we now have a rationale theory of why this motor was doing what it was doing.


https://web.archive.org/web/20120204...y/clemcone.htm
http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/...tion-clem.html

I want to also point out that even though the earth is itself covered in 75% water, mostly salt water, it also has an interior which contains...wait for it ....yes, that's right; oil.
As such we may conclude that a superior or more advanced cavitation drive would involve more than one layer of fluids. It's also somewhat interesting that magnetized water is described as sweet and oil like.
http://www.rexresearch.com/stclair/US2004200925.html
https://patents.google.com/patent/US....+Clair&page=1

Such ideas may cause one to think upon the qualities of the Boyd Bushman magnet inside a rock experiment and what the idea was there as well as what the idea is behind the so called recovered alien artifact that features layers of bismuth magnesium-zinc Metal.
https://www.earthfiles.com/bismuth/


Thinking on these things you have ponder a bit more about the story of levitating cars produced by a Joe Cell.
I'm really hoping that some people exist out there that read this dribble and whom also think upon the whole.
In a way much of this makes complete sense when viewed in retrospect.

If the Ether is considered a medium of superfluidity then supercaviation should be a means to hyperspatial transport and we should know that already.
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/bu...rpedoes-145472

Now undoubtedly there are more and many ways to achieve the desired outcome, but we may start with an understanding about employing super~cavitation as a means of creating a vortex to open a hole to hyperspace.
One of which you may wish to re-think~
http://www.resonantfractals.org/Magn...ngCylinder.htm

Pyramids & tetrahedrons are everywhere. All you have to be is aware enough to catch the clues but are they simply that. Why the laser sign?
Can you make a laser without a prism and what's a prism doing. Just open ended questions to wonder upon.

Which is what this image is about; it's John Carpenter on the set of his cult classic film; "Dark Star"
Do you seriously think this complexity in stagecraft was necessary to create the film?





John%2BCarpenter%2Bon%2Bthe%2Bset%2Bof%2BDARK%2BSTAR.jpg
Credit: http://maddrey.blogspot.com/2017/06/...star-1974.html


We know pyramids can produce usable power so anyone that say's otherwise is ill informed.
https://patents.google.com/patent/US6974110B2/en

Hopefully people are fiddling around, but if you are remember; never apply full power first and here's some reasons why.

https://montalk.net/notes/342/tuning...hic-technology

Additional for kicks link.
https://8kun.top/hover/res/511.html

Did the Nazi's have help, so to speak, in a round about way?
https://newsinstact.com/alien/myster...erious-skulls/
https://worldtruth.tv/mystery-of-the...erious-skulls/

Teleportation forwards in time seems verified by several accounts.
https://coolinterestingstuff.com/the...-rudolph-fentz

Remember as you go forward that we humans here on earth are entrained within an envelope of incoherent dielectric energies cast off by a Star creating the so~called vibratory nature of the quantum field, and our consciousness is tied to the coherency of the field which this Star scatters. As the intake of our star flux's, so too does our own awareness rises and descends, which is to say that as the star's magnetic field grows it's ability to scatter the dielectric becomes more constricted, more confined, and this is because we know that the magnetic field retracts inwards upon itself (magnetism 101).

The result is that right now we humans are more aware now than we have been in a very long time. In other words, you are yourself more connected to the coherent than you would normally be, and as the star moves into a more energetic areas of space that magnetic field will further retracts inwards, which enables the coherent field to flow past the star itself in a more coherent form, giving rise to a greater awareness in humanity.

[Gambeir]

Gambeir, That's interesting that you mentioned the Vril craft because one thing I didn't mention in my last post is that I believe the Vril-1-Triebwerk, ARV, and even the OTC-1 are all variations of the same principle. While I may also disagree with Wheeler's theories, I do agree that its best to take one's theories and develop something rather continuing to speculate. Now that the holiday season is over I'll have more time to finish mine. As I stated it'll be yay or nay. Best wishes for the new year to all.

Thanks, I didn't know you disagreed with Wheeler and I agree that one shouldn't just gulp down what others tell them and that was why I created the little toy tetrahedron + magnets as a model to test the theory that magnetism was a pressure, and that if it were a pressure then that in itself was capable of explaining hyper-velocity travel through a same/similar medium (regardless of whether or not the medium itself moved).

For that toy experiment the dielectric field (magnetism) served as a proxy for it's source of origin which is hyperspatial, Operating on that generality I thought tests could be experimentally worked by using magnets as proxy forms of the condensed coherency of the theorized hyperspatial medium, which as I understand it isn't Wheeler's theory at all but rather Steinmetz's. So I don't think Ken is really involved in this too much other than saying that the dielectric field was a pressure field and which is what tripped my mind in to creating an experiment to test that proposition, because if it was a pressure then it could explain a great deal.

So to recap & because maybe it will be helpful to someone.

Theory holds that the dielectric field is a hyper-spatial field of inertia (energy), which is around us here on earth as an incoherent form due primarily from the Star casting off an in~coherency of the dielectric field and which is theorized as the source for the construction of coherent dielectric force which we call magnetism. It should then (logically) seem that the hyperspatial realm could itself be represented by magnets for experimental purposes.

Here a simple experiment was created to test both Wheelers' dielectric theory of magnetism as a pressure field (*an important concept IMOP) and which would, if proven correct & by extension, demonstrate that a possible error was involved in quantum field theory, and which holds that tetrahedron shaped particles & forming a crystalline matrix are what makes up our reality and therefore (by extension) constructs a so-called space+time fabric, and which then forms an updated Einsteinian view of reality. * If the magnetic field is shown (as it did) that magnets produce a pressure generating field, then by virtue of simplistic pressure producing gradient forms/shapes a tetrahedron would produce and be the simplest geometric form that produces the greatest pressure gradients.

Graphite Glider-A.jpg


Thus, the primary purpose of this toy like experiment was to show (to myself at least) that the hyper-spatial medium, were it to actually be a medium of dielectric pressure, should then be capable of being coaxed into creating propulsive effects using the logic any child would be familiar with according to shapes interacting with fluids and producing ordinary pressure gradients, and if that were the case, as it now seems clear it is, then these theorized tetrahedrons (the quantum theorized particles; Planck scale crystalline particles which form the matrix of our so-called dimension) that those would or could be seen not as particles but rather that just as geometric forms (which is also the fundamental simplest of platonic solids) and have likely been mistakenly theorized as particles making up the space.

See, it is important to realize that no physical object need exist to create the tetrahedronal form in order to produce a differential pressure gradient. For example, a wave or crest of liquid produces such a tetrahedronal form. Something to ponder when revisiting the causes of wave actions or perhaps rouge waves, but the gist of what I'm driving at is that differential mediums which need not be physical solids to develop differential pressure fields, whch of course means propulsive force is the outcome; I hinted that such things may themselves be involved in light itself. How accidental can it be that light is itself subject to diffusion by means of the same tetrahedronal form?

My conclusion is that space is itself made up from a hyper-spatial & incorporeal medium, and the tetrahedron particle along with those of fluids, and light, and or the hyper~spatial medium itself (something to think about) is only a form, a geometric shape which can be almost anything and yet it is capable producing a differential in pressure gradients; ie, energy and which is logically the smallest geometric form which would also produce the greatest pressure gradients from a hyperspatial pressure field, and therefore that form was probably misconstrued as being a physical material object making up space when it was, in reality, only the smallest and therefore most logical particle which would be interacting with a hyper~spatial pressure field.

So apparently it's this hyperspatial field of energy which Joe Parr was researching way back in the 60's/70's. Which is something to ponder given Joe's recorded outcomes.
The above image shows the little experimental apparatus I made from about 100 tiny little neodymium magnets laying under a paper guide tent. I cover the outer paper with pencil lead while experimenting with lead. Lead is diamagnetic, meaning it's a dielectric reflector, like copper is a dielectric reflector. Originally I was experimenting with paper tetrahedrons covered in pencil lead but I didn't realize at that time I had to check the lead to see if it was magnetic since some pencils have iron in the lead. Ideally you would buy some graphite sheet to do this with but I used aluminum in this experimental set up. later I used copper, sandwiched with plastic from a milk carton, and overlaid with another aluminum tetrahedron made from a pop/beer can.

Now of course this has been an on~going educational tool. For example I noticed that the Nazi's had also almost immediately recognized that layering the tetrahedronal form magnified the resultant propulsive force, so overlaying one tetrahedron upon another also has a multiplying effect. The aluminum I ended up using in the first part lead me to understand or see aluminum as a dielectric accumulator of sorts, while copper was a dielectric reflector. The idea here being that you want to consider how these materials are interacting with the dielectric field in order to magnify and multiply their respective properties.

Again remember here none of these will produce straight forward movement, at least ways not yet, but with some angle to the plate you can observe for yourself the various outcomes by using assorted materials and with various layering and so forth. Consider this little kids like experiment a sort of learning tool, something to do that gives you visual cues, and thereby a way to gain another understanding of what materials are about. This experimental set up may look really simple and it is, but what's going on isn't that simple; copper and aluminum are said to be conductors, but in reality copper is a dielectric reflector and aluminum is doing something else, and it is also said to undergo paramagnetic resonance, or nuclear magnetic resonance (EMR) devices.

The reality and truth is that copper is a diamagnetic reflector, it's capable of reflecting or deflecting the pressure field of counter-spatial pressure, whist aluminum, is supposedly a paramagnetic, only becomes magnetic momentarily and only in the precise part which is being covered by a motional/moving magnetic field. If aluminum can undergo so called nuclear magnetic resonance than what is copper doing? These concepts are important to understand outside of conventional notions of what they supposedly are doing according to pure electrical theory and here's why.

The way to levitate is simple enough to understand once you have a clear understanding of why magnets work, why they seemingly try to move together, and so what this means is that to create a levitating device you need to create another mass, known as a false mass, which will then open another point source between the fake false mass and the real mass, and that then makes the real mass chase after this point which is between the fake false mass and the real mass.

This the above is at least one way to go about it, but there are undoubtedly more, and I am thinking about this for a while now. So to simplify, the bottom line seems to be that you want to create another magnetic field, although I'm not entirely positive that it's a magnetic field which forms (another story) but this the main point here is that this newly created energy field cannot be physically touching the same vehicle as you're in; otherwise you've attached a fan to back of a boat and are now trying to inflate sails of the boat & which won't work, so this other energy/matter field (which will become the false mass), it has to be held apart by or otherwise insulated from the actual machine that's creating it.

Now the Nazi Scientists went about this in a very unique way. It would take some experimenting to get the whole accurately worked out but I have gotten the gist of the Vril Saucer worked out.

Thule-Treibwerk-7-B.png

It may not be immediately apparent but this is really a model of the planet earth. It was called the Schumann levitator but really it's derived form the work of Karl Schappeller. Otto Schumann and the Nazi's took over Schappeller's work and Schumann apparently re-engineered it, brilliantly btw, and we have the word of the Eric Hartman (Blonde Knight of Germany) that this was real, we also have at least one account from a then 14 year old boy in Norway who saw a Nazi Saucer airbone standing still over an German Radar Station when it was attacked by at least 3 NorthAmerican P-51 Mustangs. Despite the denials of many it does appear that these saucers were really real, and by eye witness accounts we must accept that the evidence supports the eye witness stories that this design works and that it was real.

This ball is double hulled, it's filled with a dielectric conductor, I think it was probably honey (yes that's what I said) but others hold many other ideas so something to consider, and the inner part of the ball has a piece of metal bowl like that is rung, beaten really, but a powered clapper, and the bowl called a bell attaches to the inner wall of the spherical ball. This creates a high frequency vibration which creates an magneto-accoustic electrical current in the conductive medium (the honey or possibly salt water or other) while the ball itself is spun/spinning.

This forms an so-called implosion of the dielectric medium which we know more commonly as Sonoluminescence , and so what's really going on here is that each and every teeny tiny implosive bubble is carrying an incoherent (formerly magnetic) dielectrical pulse back to counterspace. It's not recycling but going to counter space, and because this is happening in a fluid medium it's also not really attached to the saucer itself, and this is all happening above the physical center of gravity of the machine which then makes for one mass above another and between the which they both want to move towards, but of course it's the real mass which moves (forever) after the false mass which is being created in the microbubbles of the implosions.

Now there's more going on here. Like for example something similar to tuning forks acting upon the tetrahedrons which are apparently breaking up an making in-cohrent the magnetic field much like a prism does with light, and then those incoherent dielectric energies are being feed back to the sphere to be picked up and returned to counter-space by the implosive sonoluminescence generation caused by the interior bell device. This should then be generating a so-called false mass, which is exactly as theorized by Ken Wheeler BTW, as the cause of gravity would be matter seeking counter space (to state it in a nut shell).

[phoneboy]

Gambeir, That's interesting that you mentioned the Vril craft because one thing I didn't mention in my last post is that I believe the Vril-1-Triebwerk, ARV, and even the OTC-1 are all variations of the same principle. While I may also disagree with Wheeler's theories, I do agree that its best to take one's theories and develop something rather continuing to speculate. Now that the holiday season is over I'll have more time to finish mine. As I stated it'll be yay or nay. Best wishes for the new year to all.

[spacecase0]

so I tested the rotating magnetic field setup. The rotating field did move the large static magnetic field. But the radio noise in the setup did not allow me to check the accelerometer readings. It is pretty clear to me that 100W of power into the rotating field is way way to little.

[Gambeir]

Just for the record, what I presently think is that the McCandlish illustration shows the genius of the author and the depth of his knowledge. I think this design probably dates from the late 1950's. I think the machine uses two systems and one principle to enable it to move from the atmosphere to space. In the atmosphere it appears to use an ionized air plasma bubble which envelopes the machine, and I also think it is likely that the plasma bubble is intended to transit to the far infrared field, and which would thereby make the machine invisible to the naked eye as well as apparently radar detection. We know now that plasma does these things and that it also prevents sonic shock waves and hence they hyper~velocities observed support those conclusions. Despite this plasma bubble and all it's attributes I feel that the machine is propelled by a false mass drive and which is housed in the central column.

At this time I really do not wish to further extrapolate what I think as that is likely to interfere with the innate creativity of other individuals.
I will say that the potential (once comprehended) is mind expanding.

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." Arthur C. Clarke

Breakaway Boy II.png

[Gambeir]

During the election results, congress needs the UFO intel, see doc

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cov...fo-disclosures

https://www.complex.com/life/2020/12...-covid-19-bill

Thanks BroMikey

[Gambeir]

Gambier, I will explain it again. When a magnetic field varies with respect to time, in close proximity to a material that "conducts" electricity, an electromotive force will be induced to the conductor. This conductor due to current flow, will initiate a magnetic field to form. These two magnetic fields may "repel" or "attract" each other depending on the arrangement, which imparts a physical and real force.

These forces will act in "magnet and copper pipe experiment", because the pipe can be a conductor of electricity with the material commonly chosen for the experiment (copper for example). Because of the direction the magnetic field in the pipe has been induced (like poles are "touching"), the magnetic field of the permanent magnet and pipe will repel each other. First, the permanent magnet imparts a force on the copper pipe's magnetic field (which pushes the pipe down since the magnetic field is anchored to the pipe), which results in the "weight" increase I have already explained in my past post. Second, the magnetic field of the pipe will push back on the permanent magnet, this is Newton's Third Law of Motion in action. Newton's Third Law of Motion meaning, for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, so if I exert a force on a wall the wall will exert a force back on me. This action will occur for the permanent magnet, which is why its rate of fall to the Earth is slowed.

Now, as far as the "expanding dielectric inertia plane", no, the video I think you're talking about is already explained by Faraday's Law. When you're talking about the "first" video where he talks about magnetism, there's the below one first I found.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lg-blZScZJ0

There he talks about his invented magnetic toy, he doesn't talk anything about the "dielectric inertia plane" in there, so I assume you mean a different video? I found the "Video 1, Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism", there he talks about it, so I'm going to use that video for now. There he makes the claim the "dielectric inertia plane" expands with motion, but this is just unnecessary. Again, the induced magnetic forces will be stronger if the time they occur is less, it is analogous to power (work divided by time equals power, let time be reduced and power rises).

This is why Ken observed less nails being attracted when going slower, and got more nails when moving faster because the induced field was stronger which made the attraction on the nails stronger during that period. The reason why less nails fell is likely because the more attracted nails to the magnet, caused some surrounding nails in the magnetic toy to be slightly displaced. So when other nails fall when Ken flips the toy over, the nails get a bit stuck and we see this. You even see the nails get stuck at around 6:32 in the video even when trying to flip the toy back over. And even when shaking the toy a few seconds later, he has to give a few good shakes to make the surrounding nails that get even a little stuck fall back down.

With this, there is no new magnetic "theory" needed to explain his video, because its already been explained, but due to ignorance apparently not. If there was an issue with modern theories not being able to explain these nails, then it would be talked about, but its not, because it can already be explained to the people who have been educated. I've only found one person in the comments section of that video who attempted to explain the results with known scientific theories, which kind of scares me.

Ken's logic and rejection of basic principles in the context of his "theory", would send us back to the science and understanding of the 17th century. If he says the force on a conductive pipe isn't caused magnetism, but the flawed "induction of weight", then almost all modern technology is flushed down the toilet. For the "induction of weight" to work, there must be: no Faraday's Law, no Lenz's Law, no Newton's Third Law of Motion. So, all foundational electrical understanding and principles that build of off these can be dumped into the trash. No Newton's Third Law, no industrial revolution. Quite a disaster to reject and ignore all of those by assuming they don't contribute in that situation. Ken has repeatability shown his wrongness and ignorance in this, because he doesn't know physics, he can make a "new explanation", and say other explanations are wrong, he knows everything about magnetism, everyone else is wrong because he's right, Einstein is a crackpot and we should call him names and personally insult him. Seriously, this is sounding like delusional behavior to me, it's like watching people deny the Earth is round, yet don't know any science and reject accepted explanations to feel like they're superior. We cannot go down this path for progress. Ken Wheeler is not a luminary for truth if he repeatedly makes these misleading statements. Remember, the "wise" people that watch his videos, seem to be people mostly uneducated in physics and science.

I have already given the scientific explanation to the pipe experiment, just because you don't understand it or it doesn't see simple to you, doesn't change it from established fact. From what I remember, you've told me in conversation already that you don't know physics, what I've given you is already an explanation from the physics perspective. It's been confirmed millions of times throughout the world scientifically, yet you deny what's already been shown in favor of something else unsubstantiated. At the end of the day, you cannot always ignore other information, which is why many people are gullible to this stuff, they ignore, are in denial, or ignorant. What's true is true, and that's how it is.

With Alexey's videos, I don't think its a good idea to jump to conclusions. The videos could've easily been faked with today's digital technology, but I don't know. We can't trust every video or photo, because people will do these things for whatever their own motivations are. So, far nobody has appeared to replicate that device, but I tend to personally learn on the opinion it's likely to be a hoax.

I've heard of that movie you've mentioned. I can enjoy some good Mozart every now and then, I'm personally more of a Bach person to be honest. Bach's music is really beautiful to me, but Mozart is great too.

References:

Video 1 Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWMu0cndKl4
MAGGI, Magnetic Perpetual Motion Art. Neodymium-Yagi device using Magnetosphere and EM Induction: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lg-blZScZJ0
Faraday's law of induction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farada...w_of_induction
Electric generatorhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_generator
Crystal Structures of Metals: https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshel...electroplating.

Doofus I know you think you understand, but please stop trying to convince me to agree with you because I won't, and if you do understand, as you apparently insist, and if you're correct, then you should be able to make a working model: Models have always been the first method of proving concepts. You should make something instead of trying to tear Wheeler down. You're not going to convince me you understand by saying that Ken Wheeler doesn't, and so you should just give that concept up. I think it's really probably proper for you to take your explanations and apply them to your own thread first.

I know you're ideas may work to a certain degree but the fundamental model offered by Ken Wheeler is the correct model and ya know how I know that? I Know that because I reverse engineered the Vril Saucer drawings sufficiently enough to grasp what was taking place, which is something I don't think anyone else has ever done, but what I can say about that is you can use Ken's model and apply it to explain how and why the so called Schumann Levitator works.

It's important to understand that in the Levitator design the counterspatial activity is taking place in a liquid medium, and as such it isn't attached to the vehicle itself but rather is insulated from the body of the machine. In so doing we are not then attaching a fan to the back end of a sail boat hoping to drive ourselves across the water. To understand why that is important you would have to appreciate Ken Wheeler's dielectric theory of magnetism and gravity, but for those who do you can use the gravitational model theorized by Ken Wheeler to explain the operation of the Schumann levitator, and you cannot do that with the system you are proposing.

Yes, it is true that almost everyone whose ever looked at the ARV drawing all have similar thoughts to your own, I've heard them many times, you are not the first one to make such suggestions as the most likely explanation for how it works, of that I can assure you but I doubt that what you think is correct, and not because what you've proposed is inaccurate but rather that it's missing the fundamental understanding of what is actually taking place, and that is where the Levitator design actually proves out the Wheeler model of gravity. It is here where the length of this thread and the course of the historical path taken to conquer gravity becomes valuable in the extreme because to understand the hidden history enables one to understand that the ARV is only another evolutionary experimental step to go beyond the Schumann design. It doesn't mean it is a superior design, it just means it was another probable design, undoubtedly one of many given the virtually unlimited budget available to the defense contractors., but above all else that historical approach shows that the real reason the machine works is because the gravitational model proposed as theory by Ken Wheeler is the correct model and that's really the most important thing to get out of the entire lot.

Gravity is exactly what Ken Wheeler has described it to be and nothing else. It is simply incoherent magnetic/polarized bits of matter all co-joined by random incoherence of their own polarized (ie, magnetic) fields, and which when sufficiently large enough in volume will produce a coherence of magnetism, and when a coherent magnetic field is present then a counter spatial center point is present, and when those exist then gravity exists, and from that point all matter, be it coherent or incoherent, will seek to move towards that point source leading to counter space.

All you need to really do is to create another point source & which is not physically attached to the same vehicle that is creating it. Now I've already given (freely) a clear suggestion of how to accomplish that with the simplified schematic and I've already given, again totally free, a general understanding of the theory of operation to the Schumann Levitator, which actually fits precisely in line with the Ken Wheeler's dielectric field theory of gravity in how it operates, and that cannot be accidental but rather has to be because it is a real working design. Certainly it would take some physical experimentation and testing to get all the details worked out but the over all system, it's theory of operation is clear and understandable to those whom understand Ken's model of gravity.

[BroMikey]

During the election results, congress needs the UFO intel, see doc

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cov...fo-disclosures

https://www.complex.com/life/2020/12...-covid-19-bill

[spacecase0]

interesting idea of how it works, I was not planning on running that test, but I sure will now. I agree that the people in the video are a bit focused, I was only excited at the location of the coils that create the rotating magnetic field that I was previously convinced was in there somewhere.

[phoneboy]

spacecase0, had an Ah Ha! moment with this in early November (at least thats what i believe, gave me a nasty headache). Unfortunately for me, I've alwsys been one of those people who consciously gets concepts all at once. Was on the web, saw an image, and my weird ass brain put all the peices together.

I'm putting together a small $30 proof of concept as you don't necessarily have to do this The ARV way. If it works I'll say yay or nay.

Specifically with regards to the ARV, a high voltage supply is necessary but the caps are only there to store it as most high voltage supplies are current limited. Steering is accomplished a different way, Mccandlishes drawing is a bit misleading.

I believe this device is working like this. Lets say your the big bad wolf and you're suck on a sailboat in the middle of a lake with no wind. You secure yourself to the boat and blow on the sail. Now we all know you wont get anywhere normally. This device is taking the force you apply and separating it from you so its acting on the boat/sail as if it was generated externally. Its remarkably simple as nature does this for you.

The folks on that video you posted are going down the rabbit hole with this device specifically. They're way overcomplicating it

[spacecase0]

I hope I get formatting now. the one researcher was somewhat known, he was at a university, and supposedly the test setup was confiscated by the USA government. If I remember correct, it was 2 copper plates (not sure if they were the same size or not) that were encased in epoxy. when charged it was said to float. the one in brazil was just a website I ran across, he was trying to get the word out on what was going on. and it would seem as if I forgot what the last one was... would seem to be a few holes in my memory lately. it will be a while before I get to the Van de Graaff tests. another way to look at all this is that gravity is caused by a change in how fast time flows. A magnetic vortex like in an atom spends more time on the slow side so it moves in that direction. and time fields are created by a rotating magnetic field (just like the internal spin of atoms). the way this works is that the more intense the time field the slower time on the clock progresses. so we have 3 field forces, time (why not express it in spin...), electricity (call it divergent spin), and magnetism (most seem to agree it is the curl of electricity). Gravity eluded people because it is a side effect of the time field. (the space-time idea makes the math on this so messy that people don't figure it out from that point of view). looking at this from another view, you can get over gravity with high enough voltage on a capacitor, but at least in my tests all the movement is only when you are charging the capacitor, so not super useful for anything more than steering. The ARV is basically an open air electron accelerator, very close to the cyclotron (yes, also asymmetrical to get the required movement). It charges the entire craft to huge voltages by stripping electrons from the craft and adding them to an electron vortex around it that makes even a stronger rotational magnetic field. I am very confidant in all this because I have seen each idea of this work on its own before, putting the parts together is logical step to my experiments (even thought it is pricy and I may not be able to get it done). Only if I fail in this will I go back to earlier experiments and try to show others with video and proper documentation as I failed to do the first time. I think the big thing that people are not looking at is just how critical the rotational magnetic field is to all this. If I can I will at least try to show others what the rotating magnetic field does.

[Doofus Nugget]

I have seen 3 separate researchers claim that voltages in the 2MV to 3MV range creates total weight loss. one was in Brazil, and his website is long gone now. at least he seemed to not know of TT brown. I have been working on building a Van de Graaff generator to test it, but other projects have distracted me. it is not a pricey test to run as I can build all the hardware needed.

Hi spacecase0, that seems interesting, do you know the details on those researchers and what they exactly claimed in detail? If you are willing to do that I'd appreciate it.

Also, maybe as a suggestion for something to test the with a Van de Graaff generator, maybe you could try to check for variation in background radioactivity, to test for Tesla's theory of radioactivity, since the particles he spoke of are apparently positively charged, maybe something could come out of it? And maybe, maybe, since such primary solar ray particles spoken off by Tesla, they could be controlled with high potential fields, to check if their impacts with atomic matter have any correlation to gravitational acceleration experienced? Those would be my suggestions as ideas to use the Van de Graaff in scientific experimentation, at least what I'm most curious about at the moment. I haven't much to spend on experimenting, I'm planning on getting some things during this holiday season to experiment on, I'd be interested in testing the Cavernous Structure Effect since it appears very simple to generate.

And another thought before I forget, I remember in posts you mention you have no formatting capability. If you check at the top bar where you type: there's a camera symbol, link button, upload attachments button, smile face, and letter "A". If this isn't toggled it won't allow you to format/edit your posts in what you'd expect, maybe that's your problem that it became un-toggled? Anyway, good luck on the Van de Graaff then.

[Doofus Nugget]

You're wasting your time with me Doofus. I understand and I'm explaining it clearly. Something you are not doing. If you don't want to accept that Ken Wheeler is the foremost luminary of our time that's your choice, but I will say this is no where near as complex as you're making it out to be.

As an example, all that's happening in the Alexey device is that the aluminum plate forms a proxy artificial electrostatic field and assisted by the crystalline structure of the aluminum which has a greater capacitance due to it's ability to filter and then hold incoherent dielectric energy, and which is made possible by the crystalline structure of the metal: A prismatic effect induced by the crystalline structure of aluminum similar to a piezo~electric in a sense but not the same, which is why the ARV used a piezo~electric quartz as the basis for the so~called capacitor plates in it's design. In the Alexey device spinning the magnets results in an acceleration of their own dielectric planes of dielectric inertia, causing these dielectric accretion disks to expand, a physically proven fact shown in Ken Wheeler's very first video on magnetism, and then these are individually combining with each other to form a larger dielectric accretion disk, and which then gives a multiplicative effect to the accumulation of the surrounding dielectric field.

None of the described actions are visible. UV light is not visible and the dielectric is not visible under normal conditions. Indeed it isn't even officially acknowledged.

Weight in mass is created by the induction of the dielectric when it is co~joined perpendicular to the magnetic. That is clearly visible in the Alexey device. Indeed, it is the predominate foremost visible feature of the model.

I'll be laughing when someday a kid comes up with rubber band powered flying model and hey that's not as far fetched as some might imagine. You simply have to understand what's really happening in order to conceive how it might be possible. I would suggest you watch the Movie Amadeus. Ken Wheeler is the luminary of our time and those wise enough will see and recognize that truth.

Gambier, I will explain it again. When a magnetic field varies with respect to time, in close proximity to a material that "conducts" electricity, an electromotive force will be induced to the conductor. This conductor due to current flow, will initiate a magnetic field to form. These two magnetic fields may "repel" or "attract" each other depending on the arrangement, which imparts a physical and real force.

These forces will act in "magnet and copper pipe experiment", because the pipe can be a conductor of electricity with the material commonly chosen for the experiment (copper for example). Because of the direction the magnetic field in the pipe has been induced (like poles are "touching"), the magnetic field of the permanent magnet and pipe will repel each other. First, the permanent magnet imparts a force on the copper pipe's magnetic field (which pushes the pipe down since the magnetic field is anchored to the pipe), which results in the "weight" increase I have already explained in my past post. Second, the magnetic field of the pipe will push back on the permanent magnet, this is Newton's Third Law of Motion in action. Newton's Third Law of Motion meaning, for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, so if I exert a force on a wall the wall will exert a force back on me. This action will occur for the permanent magnet, which is why its rate of fall to the Earth is slowed.

Now, as far as the "expanding dielectric inertia plane", no, the video I think you're talking about is already explained by Faraday's Law. When you're talking about the "first" video where he talks about magnetism, there's the below one first I found.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lg-blZScZJ0

There he talks about his invented magnetic toy, he doesn't talk anything about the "dielectric inertia plane" in there, so I assume you mean a different video? I found the "Video 1, Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism", there he talks about it, so I'm going to use that video for now. There he makes the claim the "dielectric inertia plane" expands with motion, but this is just unnecessary. Again, the induced magnetic forces will be stronger if the time they occur is less, it is analogous to power (work divided by time equals power, let time be reduced and power rises).

This is why Ken observed less nails being attracted when going slower, and got more nails when moving faster because the induced field was stronger which made the attraction on the nails stronger during that period. The reason why less nails fell is likely because the more attracted nails to the magnet, caused some surrounding nails in the magnetic toy to be slightly displaced. So when other nails fall when Ken flips the toy over, the nails get a bit stuck and we see this. You even see the nails get stuck at around 6:32 in the video even when trying to flip the toy back over. And even when shaking the toy a few seconds later, he has to give a few good shakes to make the surrounding nails that get even a little stuck fall back down.

With this, there is no new magnetic "theory" needed to explain his video, because its already been explained, but due to ignorance apparently not. If there was an issue with modern theories not being able to explain these nails, then it would be talked about, but its not, because it can already be explained to the people who have been educated. I've only found one person in the comments section of that video who attempted to explain the results with known scientific theories, which kind of scares me.

Ken's logic and rejection of basic principles in the context of his "theory", would send us back to the science and understanding of the 17th century. If he says the force on a conductive pipe isn't caused magnetism, but the flawed "induction of weight", then almost all modern technology is flushed down the toilet. For the "induction of weight" to work, there must be: no Faraday's Law, no Lenz's Law, no Newton's Third Law of Motion. So, all foundational electrical understanding and principles that build of off these can be dumped into the trash. No Newton's Third Law, no industrial revolution. Quite a disaster to reject and ignore all of those by assuming they don't contribute in that situation. Ken has repeatability shown his wrongness and ignorance in this, because he doesn't know physics, he can make a "new explanation", and say other explanations are wrong, he knows everything about magnetism, everyone else is wrong because he's right, Einstein is a crackpot and we should call him names and personally insult him. Seriously, this is sounding like delusional behavior to me, it's like watching people deny the Earth is round, yet don't know any science and reject accepted explanations to feel like they're superior. We cannot go down this path for progress. Ken Wheeler is not a luminary for truth if he repeatedly makes these misleading statements. Remember, the "wise" people that watch his videos, seem to be people mostly uneducated in physics and science.

I have already given the scientific explanation to the pipe experiment, just because you don't understand it or it doesn't see simple to you, doesn't change it from established fact. From what I remember, you've told me in conversation already that you don't know physics, what I've given you is already an explanation from the physics perspective. It's been confirmed millions of times throughout the world scientifically, yet you deny what's already been shown in favor of something else unsubstantiated. At the end of the day, you cannot always ignore other information, which is why many people are gullible to this stuff, they ignore, are in denial, or ignorant. What's true is true, and that's how it is.

With Alexey's videos, I don't think its a good idea to jump to conclusions. The videos could've easily been faked with today's digital technology, but I don't know. We can't trust every video or photo, because people will do these things for whatever their own motivations are. So, far nobody has appeared to replicate that device, but I tend to personally learn on the opinion it's likely to be a hoax.

I've heard of that movie you've mentioned. I can enjoy some good Mozart every now and then, I'm personally more of a Bach person to be honest. Bach's music is really beautiful to me, but Mozart is great too.

References:

Video 1 Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWMu0cndKl4
MAGGI, Magnetic Perpetual Motion Art. Neodymium-Yagi device using Magnetosphere and EM Induction: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lg-blZScZJ0
Faraday's law of induction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farada...w_of_induction
Electric generatorhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_generator
Crystal Structures of Metals: https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshel...electroplating.

[spacecase0]

I have seen 3 separate researchers claim that voltages in the 2MV to 3MV range creates total weight loss. one was in Brazil, and his website is long gone now. at least he seemed to not know of TT brown. I have been working on building a Van de Graaff generator to test it, but other projects have distracted me. it is not a pricey test to run as I can build all the hardware needed.