ReGenX Coils and ReGenXtra switching

[Treacle]

In fairness, it should be noted that any generator has a counter-action of the rotor with the stator only for the good ones, it is very smooth and for the cheap ones with sticking, when the rotor rotates, this interaction takes away drive energy in any case... Modern generators and motors make of higher quality iron capable of working at 400 or more hertz.
https://youtu.be/LMB2Rrpz9yg
Models with a core winding almost do not create losses at idle, although even under minimum load they slow down. It would be fair to make a comparative test of ReGenX with just such a generator

[Treacle]

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20140111054A1/en
You should have noticed that the Thane C. Heins bifilar coil with a wire of two parallel wound conductors whose ends are connected in series, has an increase in inductance which allows you to get more voltage but with less current. But the main reason for the small inductive interaction is the placement of the coil in the middle of the magэnetic circuit where there is practically 0 magnetic field ...
Perhaps a PWM that shortens the coil allows for more efficiency:
https://youtu.be/YqpSNbDFhEshttps://...be/YqpSNbDFhEs

[BroMikey]

...
Suppose there are 2 high-speed multipolar generators with the same groups of coils but with cores of different materials: 1) iron; 2) ferrite. 1) generation compensates for a part of the expended energy and replenishes the source so that the same consumption as in 2) at idle and no more comes out. TE will be idle consumption with a ferrite core is equal to the consumption of loaded with an iron core. Too high magnetization reversal frequency for 50 (60) hertz transformer iron leads to its (induction) heating for a better understanding of the link to researchers below and the experiment with ferrite:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAXtB_7RkEg
(you can watch from the middle), of course ferrite is less suitable for motors ... and not practical ... <br> Regen-x technology is a bad core + high inductive resistance of the winding works like a bud to compensate for the Lenz law, but in fact, compensation only occurs which can be avoided. Modern generators and motors make of higher quality iron capable of working at 400 or more hertz and almost do not create losses on the twentieth. Researchers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUoyuiQTrRA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfRxsC9yumQ
ETC Or am I wrong?

All of your input is excellent. Very intelligent. However let me make this short and sweet. MY generator does not care which core I use though it may be improved as you said. The real secret is in the way the coils are wound together to form a MULTIFILAR COIL. In my case 50 strands 72 feet long each (Looks like a rope) are turned onto a spool and later connected in series. Start there, you will never let it go.

Also using cancellation magnets to oppose the attraction side core drag further will increase COP.

[Treacle]

...
Suppose there are 2 high-speed multipolar generators with the same groups of coils but with cores of different materials: 1) iron; 2) ferrite. 1) generation compensates for a part of the expended energy and replenishes the source so that the same consumption as in 2) at idle and no more comes out. TE will be idle consumption with a ferrite core is equal to the consumption of loaded with an iron core. Too high magnetization reversal frequency for 50 (60) hertz transformer iron leads to its (induction) heating for a better understanding of the link to researchers below and the experiment with ferrite:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAXtB_7RkEg
(you can watch from the middle), of course ferrite is less suitable for motors ... and not practical ... <br> Regen-x technology is a bad core + high inductive resistance of the winding works like a bud to compensate for the Lenz law, but in fact, compensation only occurs which can be avoided. Modern generators and motors make of higher quality iron capable of working at 400 or more hertz and almost do not create losses on the twentieth. Researchers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUoyuiQTrRA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfRxsC9yumQ
ETC Or am I wrong?

[BroMikey]

Thane Heins releases a video had been working on since the early 2000's and then posts one of many experiments. For all you late bloomers. Before he moved on he let his work be noticed in 2008. It takes years guys better get going.

Old thinking

Complete with university speech tick and tape measure clicking

[BroMikey]

................................

Part 2 Cancellation Magnets thanks to MadMack, present company not excluded
That tiny 10mm shaft is as smooth as a silky garment plus my fingers are calloused and dry yet with
no effort I can move the rotor along out of the locked position while running drag has been cut to a minimum. Not bad, I am patting myself on the back. Someone needs to do it I will get the job done you slugs.

[BroMikey]

Your logic is like this:

2 rotors.
Green one and a blue one.
Green rotor draws 2 amps.
Blue rotor draws 5 amps. That is observable fact.
Your conclusion is blue rotors draw more amps than green rotors.

you reject Newton's First Law.

bi

Where does this space chicken get blue and green for the color of the 2 rotors. The amp draw is 1.8amps and 2.9amps respectively. If you can't get that right you need your head examined. The rotors are black dimwitts.

Dave what planet does this guy live on? Are you serious about a conversation with a low IQ #@&^%? Seriously?

[bistander]

bi

That the amp draw increased with the larger rotor is an observable FACT. You can argue theory all day long, but the amp draw still went up, which is what I said would happen. Period. I was right. What does that make you? I'll give you a clue...WRONG.

What was I wrong about?

bi

[Turion]

bi

That the amp draw increased with the larger rotor is an observable FACT. You can argue theory all day long, but the amp draw still went up, which is what I said would happen. Period. I was right. What does that make you? I'll give you a clue...WRONG.


bi is WRONG
https://youtu.be/LFlnhVQLWPk
https://youtu.be/RvB3arCUPNg

I can do this all day.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfYie-NRL2Q

[bistander]

bi

That the amp draw increased with the larger rotor is an observable FACT. You can argue theory all day long, but the amp draw still went up, which is what I said would happen. Period. I was right. What does that make you? I'll give you a clue...WRONG.
...

Your logic is like this:

2 rotors.
Green one and a blue one.
Green rotor draws 2 amps.
Blue rotor draws 5 amps. That is observable fact.
Your conclusion is blue rotors draw more amps than green rotors.

Yes, I believe you. The amp draw increased with the heavier rotor, but not because it is heavier.

That's what I've said from the start. But you don't believe me which means you reject Newton's First Law.

bi

[Turion]

bi

That the amp draw increased with the larger rotor is an observable FACT. You can argue theory all day long, but the amp draw still went up, which is what I said would happen. Period. I was right. What does that make you? I'll give you a clue...WRONG.


bi is WRONG
https://youtu.be/LFlnhVQLWPk
https://youtu.be/RvB3arCUPNg

I can do this all day.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfYie-NRL2Q

[bistander]

... And that Newtons law was not applicable to the REAL WORLD. ...

This statement from you says to me that you think you know more about the physics of motion than Newton. You've made similar similar statements before.

I'm certain that Newton formulated his laws to apply to the real world. And they do. You do not have the option to apply or reject law to your liking. It's there. You don't understand it and choose to deny it. You'd benefit from learning and using fundamentals such as Newton's Laws of Motion to your advantage.

bi

[BroMikey]

Newtons law was not applicable to the REAL WORLD. But you weren't having any of that at the time. But NOW it's your excuse for being wrong? Talk about TWO FACED. Wait, if you're the JOKER and TWO FACE, that must mean I'm Batman.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHOVwy4b6kI

About 2+ amps for the new rotor, just the rotor, each additional coils adds 1.5 extra amp X 10 coils

I like your post above. Newton is talking about an object out in space near the edge of the galaxy where little gravity can pull on a solid mass. No heat, no light but even then space materials floating around in it that will cause friction. Newton's law is metaphysical not practical just like math equations. Or theoretical mumbo gumbo
And the people put in their $1 to see the movie to ooh and aah, Newton is our hero.

Pop 2 coils on that thing. I'll bet it jumps up 3 amps everytime. Happy Quikcrete SEE-Ment Man
Better hurry the sun is going to be blazing hot.

[bistander]

Increased mass, (WEIGHT) causes increased FRICTION on the bearings, which is one of the FUNDAMENTAL unbalanced forces. Are you denying that the amp draw on the motor increase with the larger rotor in the video? Are you? ARE YOU? There are two choices. Either I FAKED the video, or I am correct. Which is it?

bi is WRONG
https://youtu.be/LFlnhVQLWPk
https://youtu.be/RvB3arCUPNg

That the amp draw increased with the larger rotor is an observable FACT. You can argue theory all day long, but the amp draw still went up, which is what I said would happen. Period. I was right. What does that make you?

All I am saying, and have ever said on the subject, is in total agreement with Newton's Law, that, when moving at a constant speed, any difference in power is NOT due to a difference in mass.

bi

[Turion]

Increased mass, (WEIGHT) causes increased FRICTION on the bearings, which is one of the FUNDAMENTAL unbalanced forces. Are you denying that the amp draw on the motor increase with the larger rotor in the video? Are you? ARE YOU? There are two choices. Either I FAKED the video, or I am correct. Which is it?

bi is WRONG
https://youtu.be/LFlnhVQLWPk
https://youtu.be/RvB3arCUPNg

That the amp draw increased with the larger rotor is an observable FACT. You can argue theory all day long, but the amp draw still went up, which is what I said would happen. Period. I was right. What does that make you?