ReGenX Coils and ReGenXtra switching

[BroMikey]

See how Goddamn quiet it gets with just a little scolding and demanding that brain dead give an answer. Slugs. When it gets proven beyond any doubt you all fold up like cripples and walk away "This can't be real" worthless bunch

[BroMikey]

Here it is again. Someone please write something comprehensive that shows the level of education that you have acquired. Even a conclusion of some kind that refers to the video presentation. The subject matter is COILS FOR ELECTROMAGNETS. Not a person has read the Tesla patent? Maybe the ability to understand the patent? I don't know why you guys can't get beyond the programming. Try harder.

Regenerative generating Vs Conventional generating.

[BroMikey]

I tend to wonder what all the hoopla is about... the fact remains that no one has demonstrated a device that performs as claimed.

Yes we have, but you can not see, that's all. I have taken the next step and have shown the infinite relationship between the principles offered and present day generating tech. Turion told me I was wasting my time because most folks do not understand a normal or modern day conventional generating facility.

First you have the operational costs which represents many things surrounding hardware and then the price for keeping the bearings oiled up and the rotor turning.

Next the standard design will consume power at the load. This means when a simple load such as a light bulb is placed across the ac terminals (Say 100 watts) and the COP aka Coefficient Of Power comes into play. For easy of figuring a 90% relationship standard to giant generators, 110 watts energy is required to get 100watts to burn up at the load. This is how generators have worked since I think 1880? Way back.

What you have just witnessed and what I have shown you all twice or better in the past several years along with guys like Thane Heins SHOULD turn on the lights. I you don't see what I am talking about Turion is not going to show a test and change your minds either.

There are principles involved that need to be understood on both sides. Great lengths have been taken to print out long essay of text year after year to help those blind to see and not one person has come back and bothered to take the time to write something intelligent that let's us know that the point was made.

Willful ignorance is no excuse for these new laws. You can not tell a stupid person they are dump and you can not make the blind to see as long as they have already been programmed from childhood to reject reason.

I ask you, have you understood what has been shown by me in video form? If so explain. And don't give me "OH HE ALTERED THE GEN PERIMETERS" of course I did but how? Does anyone with a degree get this stuff. We all have them.

[BroMikey]

Someone said Turion was well educated yet he sees no contradiction between his statement and Newton's. He can't comprehend that according to Newton, and proven beyond a doubt over the past few hundred years, that it takes zero amps (no power) to turn the rotor at the same speed. Therefore the "heavier" rotor also takes zero amps to turn at the same constant speed. So the heavier rotor does NOT take additional amps to turn at constant speed, like I said.


*Unless acted upon by an unbalanced force.

bi

That is because you can make Newton say whatever you want, he had an unbalanced mind unless we are talking about the money (an offer he couldn't refuse) You gotta get with the program. 300 years ago Newton laid out his simple rules and as flawed as those rules are modern day students are drawing a blank.

Haven't peeps ever wondered why a formula was dropped here or there to mesh with another inventor who would come 100-200 years later? Money has ruled the world and inventors will say what they are told to say so the bigger picture can click and tick like a fine tuned watch.

Dr Zeuss books were created by the same class of people who use mind control as a tool to out fox the simple. Look familiar BYE? THEY get to the BYE'S of the world as children.

GUEST_b0c1c4ff-362b-4f8f-85a8-19199a837897?wid=488&hei=488&fmt=pjpeg.jpg

[BroMikey]

BroMikey, Turion,

Why do you guys keep posting here? You can't pursue any idea that might have promise without Bistander crapping all over it.
Apologies for engaging with him on your thread.

This is my thread and everyone is welcome, even pencil neck who has become part of the furniture around here, Don't be overly concerned about BYE, he represents thousands bitter and very hateful attitude of folks who were promised free energy (They Thought) 20 years ago and still can't figure it out yet.

BYE like so many has a learning disability, you can walk him thru the entire process over and over and he still gets upset and confused. Then gives the wrong answer. Just don't promise to hold him hand thru every aspect of the build, we don't want him to wet himself.

[Quantum_well]

Joking aside,the way to do testing is with a variable speed drive motor, a good quality tachometer, a good quality torque sensor and reliable meters .Make a spreadsheet and there you go.
Study relativity,the key to induction is somewhere in there.
You're on a fool's errand if you are anticipating much over 90% with a homemade kludge.
Love to you all.

[bistander]

Newton's first law of motion
... an object in motion stays in motion with the same speed ...*

vs

... heavier rotor takes additional amps to turn. ...

Someone said Turion was well educated yet he sees no contradiction between his statement and Newton's. He can't comprehend that according to Newton, and proven beyond a doubt over the past few hundred years, that it takes zero amps (no power) to turn the rotor at the same speed. Therefore the "heavier" rotor also takes zero amps to turn at the same constant speed. So the heavier rotor does NOT take additional amps to turn at constant speed, like I said.


*Unless acted upon by an unbalanced force.

bi

[Quantum_well]

How about looking into a magnetohydrodynamic design.
I agree,this topic has been bowling along for a decade and more an zilch to show.

[bistander]

I tend to wonder what all the hoopla is about... the fact remains that no one has demonstrated a device that performs as claimed. That's all bistander has been pushing for - proof of a claim. It's easy to make claims with no real evidence and argue about it for a multitude of years, however, all the "hoopla" could be defused with a few simple input/output tests and end it once and for all. Now, I have to admit, it makes for fun reading when your bored and into some drama opposed to any useful information but that only goes so far before it simply becomes annoying and you go back to doing something useful.

Thank you dragon.

... That's all bistander has been pushing for - proof of a claim. ...

Exactly.

Regards,

bi

[dragon]

I tend to wonder what all the hoopla is about... the fact remains that no one has demonstrated a device that performs as claimed. That's all bistander has been pushing for - proof of a claim. It's easy to make claims with no real evidence and argue about it for a multitude of years, however, all the "hoopla" could be defused with a few simple input/output tests and end it once and for all. Now, I have to admit, it makes for fun reading when your bored and into some drama opposed to any useful information but that only goes so far before it simply becomes annoying and you go back to doing something useful.

[Turion]

Cadman,
you are correct. No further engagement with no. That’s his whole goal. Get us wrapped up I dealing with him. Whenever you prove him wrong he ignores it and just goes foreword. Best to add him to the ignore list. Which I will do right after this post.

bi,
My post didn’t prove your point. It proved that once again you don’t know what you are talking about. So I’m done with wasting any of my time on you.

In the last few posts you have done a really good job of showing folks what you are made of. So by if they choose to follow you down your path to energy research they are welcome. Oh wait, you have no path. You have no ideas or devices or plans. All you have is your mouth. Maybe THAT is your free energy device. It certainly seems to continue running all by itself. Anyway, good luck with that. I’m adding you to my ignore list

[Cadman]

BroMikey, Turion,

Why do you guys keep posting here? You can't pursue any idea that might have promise without Bistander crapping all over it.
Apologies for engaging with him on your thread.

[BroMikey]

Hey Turion, Mikey is backing you up. What a team.

bi

It's called the voice of reason inside the ranks of the human race, criminal.

[bistander]

Professor rockin chair crab is grasping at straws as per usual. Git'em Dave. Newton is out dated, that was hundreds of years ago. He was part of the inter-circle, take it or else money. These people like BYE have no discernment whatsoever.
...

Hey Turion, Mikey is backing you up. What a team.

bi

[bistander]

Newton's first law of motion - sometimes referred to as the law of inertia. An object at rest stays at rest and an object in motion stays in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force.
Newton's first law of motion has NOTHING to do with the statement that a heavier rotor takes additional amps to turn. Try again.
And Newton's first law of motion in no way reverses the fact that you LIED.

...
Newton's first law of motion has NOTHING to do with the statement that a heavier rotor takes additional amps to turn. ...

I rest my case. Thank you very much.

bi