Motor Generators

[BroMikey]

I watched that video before. I watched it right after it was FIRST posted. I watched it again when YOU posted it

SImple Motor plāns attached

matt motor is a reject, I like cop8 the newman motor is a reject. A window motor is fine

[BroMikey]

How 3D metal printing works $160,000

Soft magnetic composites (SMCs) were prepared from three different ferromagnetic powder particles: iron powder ASC 100.29, spherical FeSi particles and vitroperm (Fe73Cu1Nb3Si16B7) flakes. Two types of hybride organic-inorganic phenolic resins modified with either silica nanoparticles or boron were used to design a thin insulating layer perfectly covering the ferromagnetic particles. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometry confirmed an incorporation of silica or boron into the polymer matrix, which manifested itself through an improved thermal stability of the hybrid resins verified by Thermogravimetric-differential scanning calorimetry (TG-DSC) analysis. The core-shell particles prepared from the ferromagnetic powder particles and the modified hybrid resins were further compacted to the cylindrical and toroidal shapes for the mechanical, electrical and magnetic testing. A uniform distribution of the resin between the ferromagnetic particles was evidenced by scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis, which was also reflected in a rather high value of the electrical resistivity. A low porosity and extraordinary high values of mechanical hardness and flexural strength were found in SMC consisting of the iron powder and phenolic resin modified with boron. The coercive fields of the prepared samples were comparable with the commercial SMCs.

[Turion]

I watched that video before. I watched it right after it was FIRST posted. I watched it again when YOU posted it and made claims that it produced all this ELECTRICAL power, which I knew to be impossible, having built MANY similar devices. If it is TORQUE you are looking for, I would recommend the Ron Cole motor rather than the Lindemann attraction motor. It is MUCH easier (and cheaper) to build, and I know from experience that when you fire a coil to create an electromagnet that is located BETWEEN TWO PERMANENT MAGNETS, you get the advantage of MUCH GREATER TORQUE!!!! EXPLOSIVE torque. Ron's design also has the MAGNETIC LOOP so you do NOT have CEMF or back EMF and you CAN capture the collapsing spikes from TWO coils instead of one. The size of the coils determines the collapsing spike.

The motor I have seen that I believe to be BETTER than both of these, ALTHOUGH I WOULD MAKE NO SUCH CLAIM UNTIL I SAW A SIDE BY SIDE COMPARISON is the Matt Jones simple motor. It fires the coils between two permanent magnets as does the Ron Cole device. It uses LARGE coils which give a lot more electrical output and torque. You can have as MANY as you want, limited only by the size of your rotor. I could be mistaken, but I believe the major difference is that Matt WANTS the CEMF because instead of allowing it to fight the incoming current and voltage, he figured out a way to channel it OUT of the circuit and use it to supply the load. So there is NO bogging down when it is put under load. (no Lenz) One of the ways he found to DO this involves sending the output through a spark gap, which is where the POINTS I showed come in. His setup outputs considerably more power because you get the spike from collapse that Lindemann and Cole are using from TWO coils instead of one, PLUS the addition of the generated CEMF as electrical output. A version of this motor was actually my very first build of anything mechanical that had to do with free energy. I contacted Matt after I read his pdf, and he walked me step by step through the construction of this motor. I saw that it could charge one battery faster than it discharged another, and by switching batteries back and forth, I saw gains in BOTH. Matt also developed a circuit for it that you use to run one battery to charge another, and then flips to run off the charged battery and charge the discharged battery. It could be connected to an Arduino and do it automatically. Depending on the size of your rotors, you could have 2, 4, 6 or 8 coils, which would definitely ADD to the torque of the motor and the power output. He figured 4 coils for 1/2 hp if I remember correctly. Bob French and I are currently in the process of building a LARGE version of this motor. I also have a couple 6" rotors I am working on putting together a small version with, and Bob already HAS a small version with two coils between the rotors for the motor, and then Lenz free generator coils on the OUTSIDE of the rotors to generate power. If he will take a video of it, I will post it.

SImple Motor plāns attached

[BroMikey]

3D printed motor rotors

[BroMikey]

https://www.belmontmetals.com/produc...wdered-metals/


Cast iron powder for 3D printers have silicon right in the mix



https://www.ebay.com/itm/13199961863...r=431346058913

Silicon steels are ferritic alloys of iron and silicon that have magnetic properties which make them useful in motors and transformers. The silicon additions improve magnetic softness and increase the electrical resistivity.

[BroMikey]

This analysis of energy produced is NOT the electrical energy that comes out of the device

How about YOU learn to analyze the data before you make claims.

Yes that is true but my goal is to come up with a motor to drive the generator head with better than COP>1

Let's dispense with the theater. I was thinking up ways to make 2 "S" rotors when I thought of bee bee's and magnetite pressed together by resin. I have these "C" shapes for the coils so my question is would the bee bee's and magnetic sand hold together at high speeds and would that get hot? probably should add some micro fibers to the mix.

https://www.hanessupply.com/loctite-235618

8 COP motor could raise the over all eff. and from what Peter said these motors have huge torque so that might over come a ton of cogging losses. COP 8 for the motor that generated power to boot. Not bad. So you finally watched the video?

See what you put me thru to get you to watch this 17 year old video? Maybe the generated output won't run your house instead say all the electronics with generator lighting?

What do you think about the "S" rotor? I don't have a stamping plant for stacking laminates and I need a solution.

Also having an 8 COP motor means you can connect a conventional scooter motor to it to generate 8X the power you put in. With generator losses 6X. IT'S A GOOD GIFT LIKE THE ZERO FORCE MOTOR.

The Murray ellipse could be cut with chop saw, maybe it's the same thing?

The modified motor didn't even come close to this.

[Turion]

This analysis of energy produced is NOT the electrical energy that comes out of the device that can be used to charge a battery or run your home, as you CLAIMED. It is a COMBINATION of the energy gained from the collapsed spike PLUS the mechanical energy supplied by the shaft. So VERY LITTLE of it is actual ELECTRICAL energy and MOST of it is MECHANICAL energy. How about YOU learn to analyze the data before you make claims.

[BroMikey]

Here is your math paper for the day stoney

[BroMikey]

So you admit you lied about the output of the Lindemann Attraction Motor. Glad you finally fessed up.

hey dave go to minute 2:10min to 2:20min you will see the math breakdown cop 8.6 so I lied when I said cop 8. The video lags poorly

Do you agree? or is this all a fake equation? I guess Dr Lindemann lied also? So everybody is suddenly a liar cause dave can't do the math. Maybe we should build one first before all the name calling startsYou got to get rid of the brain farts.

[BroMikey]

So you admit you lied about the output of the Lindemann Attraction Motor. Glad you finally fessed up.

yup i'm a liar, happy now? Dave you are a mess dude

[Turion]

So you admit you lied about the output of the Lindemann Attraction Motor. Glad you finally fessed up.

[BroMikey]

Here is your pep talk for today, nevermind the scary wizard behind the curtain. I am the great and powerful.

[BroMikey]

YOU are a liar.
YOU claim the Lindemann ONE COIL attraction MOTOR will output 8 times its 8 watt input, or 64 watts Dream on. You know less than nothing about this stuff.

Yes

But you claim to know much much more, right? So where is the data that shows that you do? After all these years just stozzy style intimating. Or big talk. So let's see the evidence that you are far above most. After 15 years of failure to deliver, it ain't gonna happen. But you sound real tough, I'll give you that. You have bye shaking in his boots, at least.

You need to apologize for not delivering. No more blabber. Just tell everyone why you disappeared last conference, tell them you got scared. We will see who forgives you.

[Turion]

I knew that was a quote from John Bedini. But YOU posted it without the quotation marks and without them, it appears the words are YOURS. We BOTH knew they were not, but would other people who read your post?

I have freely acknowledged that EVERYTHING I have ever worked on was something discovered by someone else. I have even shown the patents I get my stuff from for speed up under load and Magnetic neutralization. Thane is the one who claims the speed up under load ideas are "his" when the original idea (so far as I have been able to determine) came from the Tesla paten, which has since expired and is in the public domain. And Thane had the huevos to patent "bifilar coil connected in series" which is EXACTLY what the Tesla patent is. Good luck with THAT. I stated that the Superpole motor was BASED on the Zero Force Motor. Show me an instance where I claimed ANYTHING was mine or "stole" a patent. YOU are a liar.

Oh, and by the way, look at your post 2890. Cole (who was a genuine genius) claims his TWO COIL closed magnetic loop (no Lenz) GENERATOR will output 2.5 watts, while YOU claim the Lindemann ONE COIL attraction MOTOR will output 8 times its 8 watt input, or 64 watts Dream on. You know less than nothing about this stuff.

Yes

[BroMikey]

WOW! So now you are claiming credit for stuff we absolutely KNOW was built by others? Shame on you, bro. Shame, shame, shame. You know postings circuits and YouTube videos of others does not compensate for your lack of actual contributions to ANYTHING. LOL

here is a cool link, hey dave I'll do my best. BTW this link is part of my original post. go back and look closer. Most of the stuff is JB work but you wouldn't know anything about that, right. I mean you are so busy gloating. John warned us about those who stole working principles and put their own name on it. You been copying patents dave, it's okay no need to be scared, it's our secret. You are a funny guy tho, we had fun. You need to go to the conference and shake Thane's hand, maybe even invest some money.

Maybe you should apologize to everyone and come clean for once. Just tell them that you are scared.

https://www.freeenergyplanet.biz/ada.../circuits.html

https://www.freeenergyplanet.biz/ove...ty-device.html