Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Motor Generators

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Rakarskiy
    replied
    [VIDEO]watch?v=04SfNQL9P-E[/VIDEO]

    Leave a comment:


  • Rakarskiy
    replied
    In General, the winding system is seen in the generator Nikola Tesla, though in the patent available, it does not focus on the design. But visually it was at the dawn of electricity. Modern developments are more effective.



    http://lipo.ece.wisc.edu/2014pubs/2014-10.pdf

    https://www.researchgate.net/publica...n_and_analysis
    Attached Files
    Last edited by Rakarskiy; 09-08-2019, 07:08 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Bedini S.E.T.D. Self Excited Transformer Device

    [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfbNXjkmWns[/VIDEO]

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    It is wound like a cyclotron or collider/accelerator rings. Anymore data
    on this guy? Does the generator have a name? Cool idea.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rakarskiy
    replied
    Originally posted by BroMikey View Post
    Oh thats right I see it now. Thx again. How in the world does it get
    more out than in? Any ideas?
    Development of the generator in Zhitomir (Ukraine), we do the same in Kiev (Ukraine) completely independ. Even with this winding, there are excitation options in which the braking is weak.

    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Oh thats right I see it now. Thx again. How in the world does it get
    more out than in? Any ideas?

    Leave a comment:


  • Rakarskiy
    replied
    Originally posted by BroMikey View Post
    This is a motor in the back that turns the block of steel then
    the four windings in the front are a generator? Yes?
    It's a generator. It is widely known as the Quantum Еlectric Generator. But there is still a whole line of switch-type generators (or magnetic flux switching).

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    This is a motor in the back that turns the block of steel then
    the four windings in the front are a generator? Yes?

    Leave a comment:


  • Rakarskiy
    replied
    QEG!? I think more effective to make the excitation of direct current (DC electro-magnet). For resonance, this winding will not give the active current in full.

    [VIDEO]watch?v=rXK7QEduwAE[/VIDEO]

    Leave a comment:


  • lotec
    replied
    Thanks for the reply, I will think on that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rakarskiy
    replied
    Originally posted by lotec View Post
    It sounds like intersting results can be seen from using different generator swithching stratergies.

    Your translator might not be that bad. Were you meaning that the challange is to match the output from the Faraday induction with the self induction, so they can be collected together, while having the best effect on the rotor, or something different?
    It's hard to explain, but with one field you can **** induction and self-induction. Only self-induction in a very short period of time that's it and try to stretch the induction from the pole of the magnet.About this plan, which is now being implemented. Mathematics opens eyes, as in fairy tale.

    Induction and self-induction is essentially the same for EMF, the difference in the source of the field.
    Last edited by Rakarskiy; 08-30-2019, 01:27 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • lotec
    replied
    Originally posted by Rakarskiy View Post
    I don't think the latest SAV model uses a reactive component, for basic current generation. Reactive power? (actually self-induction) can be used for recovery purposes. The problem is that the parameters of the induction pulse and self-induction differ not only in characteristics, but also in the time interval. The main source is Faraday induction. Bifilar I use, for better maintenance of the induction process. I highly recommend not to generalize terms and concepts, we are interested in the potentials and strength. The designer needs accurate settings, not medium to build the device. The planned system generation in my design is a cross between pulse Converter, savingaccount retention with increasing induction. I plan to obtain a smooth hysteresis of the magnetic field and, accordingly, the current component.

    My English is worse. In order to translate I need to change the philosophy.
    It sounds like intersting results can be seen from using different generator swithching stratergies.

    Your translator might not be that bad. Were you meaning that the challange is to match the output from the Faraday induction with the self induction, so they can be collected together, while having the best effect on the rotor, or something different?

    Leave a comment:


  • Rakarskiy
    replied
    Originally posted by BroMikey View Post
    So what i think you are saying in the past 5-10 posts is that the Sav
    generator uses reactive power and your generator also uses reactive
    power, so in this regard the SAV generator and your generator are the
    same????? My Russian/English is terrible
    I don't think the latest SAV model uses a reactive component, for basic current generation. Reactive power? (actually self-induction) can be used for recovery purposes. The problem is that the parameters of the induction pulse and self-induction differ not only in characteristics, but also in the time interval. The main source is Faraday induction. Bifilar I use, for better maintenance of the induction process. I highly recommend not to generalize terms and concepts, we are interested in the potentials and strength. The designer needs accurate settings, not medium to build the device. The planned system generation in my design is a cross between pulse Converter, savingaccount retention with increasing induction. I plan to obtain a smooth hysteresis of the magnetic field and, accordingly, the current component.

    My English is worse. In order to translate I need to change the philosophy.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by Rakarskiy View Post
    You had better ask the author of this information "seraphis," but last time he came to the forum where posted information in December 2018. Why I paid attention to it. I had my own design similar to that of Carl Lutter. Why I paid attention to what is not on the charts, I developer and saw the solution.
    So what i think you are saying in the past 5-10 posts is that the Sav
    generator uses reactive power and your generator also uses reactive
    power, so in this regard the SAV generator and your generator are the
    same????? My Russian/English is terrible
    Last edited by BroMikey; 08-30-2019, 07:51 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rakarskiy
    replied
    Originally posted by alexelectric View Post
    OK thanks
    I have searched for information on the patent of AU53890 / 86 Carl J LUTTMER
    if anyone has information and the data of this patent please share it
    You had better ask the author of this information "seraphis," but last time he came to the forum where posted information in December 2018. Why I paid attention to it. I had my own design similar to that of Carl Lutter. Why I paid attention to what is not on the charts, I developer and saw the solution.
    Last edited by Rakarskiy; 08-30-2019, 06:18 AM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X