Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Barbosa and Leal Devices - Info and Replication Details

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MadMack
    replied
    You are still advising people to use the mains after it has been explained many times that the power comes from the mains via a ground loop when doing so in this type of arrangement with the hot wire connected directly to one side of the load. Please stop trying to deceive people with such nonsense.
    Hello level,

    Please reread my previous post, and please point out how Clarence's measurements are invalid and how his extra power comes from the mains via a ground loop, in regards to the way he has his actual physical setup.

    I don't want a heated argument here, just a rational explanation that makes sense when applied to Clarence's setup.

    Best regards
    Mack

    Leave a comment:


  • level
    replied
    Originally posted by wantomake View Post
    I've been a little successful using the captor setup, but using car coils instead of toroids. Only lights a 13 watt cfl and powers the charger to the battery bank.
    I'm only able to do a small setup with 5 copper grounding rods. Therefore I'm certain, as it did happen, that energy can be pulled from the earth.

    Hope to add to the setup as I can,
    wantomake
    Hello wantomake. If you are using car ignition coils to step up the voltage, then that doesn't sound exactly like a Barbosa and Leal arrangement, but if you can post a drawing here showing how you have everything connected, I think people here would be interested in seeing it. Are you just powering your setup from a battery and inverter, with no mains connection at all?

    Leave a comment:


  • level
    replied
    Hello MadMAck. What I have explained is very straight forward. Some people seem to interpret what I have said as indicating that I think a Barbosa and Leal device can't possibly work, but I have said nothing of the kind. I have pointed out where you can potentially be fooled however, and what steps you should take to avoid those potential problems. Use only battery power and measure the voltage and current on the battery and you should be good as long as you know how to do basic measurements.

    Leave a comment:


  • MadMack
    replied
    Common sense

    It has been pointed out to you on a few occasions already that when there is a ground loop when using the mains, that it is possible that a power meter at the input of the device may not correctly detect the actual power being used. If the ground loop bypasses the power meter, then the meter may possibly not properly measure the power drawn in the loop that is bypassing it, depending on the type of power meter being used.
    Sorry, it doesn't make sense to me. Rather than just take it for granted that you are right or Clarence is right I have done a little research and compared it to Clarence's circuit and his ground rod arrangement.

    http://web.mit.edu/~jhawk/tmp/p/EST0...ps_handout.pdf

    In particular pages 3 to 6. Clarence measured the current as it entered his circuit and measured the current at the load in his circuit. Why would that be invalid? The house meter has nothing to do with it. To think that his ground center rods are getting current from a single house ground rod 20 times farther away than the multitude of rods surrounding his center rods is a bit of a stretch, don't you think?

    If that were the case then my house has ground loops with my neighbors electric service on all sides.

    Mack

    Leave a comment:


  • wantomake
    replied
    Did succeed

    Clarence,
    Thanks for this replication, it's good to see something that can harvest energy from the planet without polluting it in return. I've been a little successful using the captor setup, but using car coils instead of toroids. Only lights a 13 watt cfl and powers the charger to the battery bank.

    I'm only able to do a small setup with 5 copper grounding rods. Therefore I'm certain, as it did happen, that energy can be pulled from the earth.

    Hope to add to the setup as I can,
    wantomake

    Leave a comment:


  • level
    replied


    **************

    Leave a comment:


  • clarence
    replied
    Originally posted by level View Post
    Hello Clarence. It has been pointed out to you on a few occasions already that when there is a ground loop when using the mains, that it is possible that a power meter at the input of the device may not correctly detect the actual power being used. If the ground loop bypasses the power meter, then the meter may possibly not properly measure the power drawn in the loop that is bypassing it, depending on the type of power meter being used. This is another reason why anyone serious about testing this type of device arrangement should only test with a battery and inverter. You could possibly get incorrect readings from a power meter, especially the little cheap consumer plug in types, but measuring the battery terminal voltage while it is under load and the battery DC current being drawn from the battery into an inverter, should be a pretty reliable measurement of the true power being drawn from the battery, as long as these battery measurements are done properly with a decent meter.

    It is interesting that Barbosa and Leal had all their equipment confiscated because they were found to have one or more proprietary utility power company meters in their possession. It seems at least possible they were testing with the utility company power meters to try to find ways to fool the meters. I am not saying that is necessarily what they were doing, but that is certainly a possibility.

    The bottom line is if someone is using the mains to power a Barbosa and Leal device, you just can't draw any conclusions about how that setup is really performing and where the power is really coming from. A battery and inverter eliminate all the ambiguity around using the mains as a power source with this sort of setup, and so that is really the only reasonable way to test this type of setup. You should also only rely on a measurement of the battery voltage and battery current drawn as a reliable measurement of battery load when powering loads with this setup, as the cheapo plug in power meters that plug into a socket on your inverter could possibly give you misleading results. The battery voltage and current draw measurements while under load should be a good reliable check to determine actual battery power draw.

    Another very simple quick reality check is if the Barbosa and Leal setup 'works' when plugged into the mains, but does not work the same at all when powered from a battery and inverter, then very obviously the extra power seen when powering from the mains is coming from the mains.

    I am pointing these things out for people who are truly interested in trying to determine how things really are working when testing a Barbosa and Leal setup. Those who are only looking to deceive themself or others are free to ignore these points.

    YOUR WISH IS GRANTED!
    you are ignored!

    Clarence

    Leave a comment:


  • level
    replied
    Originally posted by clarence View Post
    Every single one of them are TOTALLY SELF OBLIVIOUS to the FACT that B&L
    designed their units TO BE POWERED FROM THE MAINS of CEMAR UTILITY POWER COMPANY. KNOWING AHEAD OF TIME ONLY A SMALL AMOUNT OF WATTS WOULD BE DRAWN TO BE THE "ELECTROMAGNETIC EXCITER"
    FOR THEIR UNITS AND POSSIBLE PHASE NEEDS. THEY ALSO USED THE UTILITY SYSTEM GROUND ROD ITSELF AND PLACED IT IN THE CENTER OF THEIR LOOPED SERIES OF EARTH RETURN GROUND RODS. HA! HA!
    Hello Clarence. It has been pointed out to you on a few occasions already that when there is a ground loop when using the mains, that it is possible that a power meter at the input of the device may not correctly detect the actual power being used. If the ground loop bypasses the power meter, then the meter may possibly not properly measure the power drawn in the loop that is bypassing it, depending on the type of power meter being used. This is another reason why anyone serious about testing this type of device arrangement should only test with a battery and inverter. You could possibly get incorrect readings from a power meter, especially the little cheap consumer plug in types, but measuring the battery terminal voltage while it is under load and the battery DC current being drawn from the battery into an inverter, should be a pretty reliable measurement of the true power being drawn from the battery, as long as these battery measurements are done properly with a decent meter.

    It is interesting that Barbosa and Leal had all their equipment confiscated because they were found to have one or more proprietary utility power company meters in their possession. It seems at least possible they were testing with the utility company power meters to try to find ways to fool the meters. I am not saying that is necessarily what they were doing, but that is certainly a possibility.

    The bottom line is if someone is using the mains to power a Barbosa and Leal device, you just can't draw any conclusions about how that setup is really performing and where the power is really coming from. A battery and inverter eliminate all the ambiguity around using the mains as a power source with this sort of setup, and so that is really the only reasonable way to test this type of setup. You should also only rely on a measurement of the battery voltage and battery current drawn as a reliable measurement of battery load when powering loads with this setup, as the cheapo plug in power meters that plug into a socket on your inverter could possibly give you misleading results. The battery voltage and current draw measurements while under load should be a good reliable check to determine actual battery power draw.

    Another very simple quick reality check is if the Barbosa and Leal setup 'works' when plugged into the mains, but does not work the same at all when powered from a battery and inverter, then very obviously the extra power seen when powering from the mains is coming from the mains.

    I am pointing these things out for people who are truly interested in trying to determine how things really are working when testing a Barbosa and Leal setup. Those who are only looking to deceive themself or others are free to ignore these points.

    Leave a comment:


  • clarence
    replied
    Originally posted by CANGAS View Post
    Clarence, I discovered your good work over on that other thread, and followed your trail to here when the lunatics overcame the asylum over there.

    I just want to say, thanks, thanks, thanks for your good work and your report of it. for many years I have been optimistically looking for free energy in the field of mechanical systems, also including the use of magnets or electrostatic components. My work has NOT been completely fruitless, though it is not yet exactly the right circumstances for me to make any announcements.

    Your work is immensely reassuring. What would really get the party started is if it could be scaled way down so that even a poor boy like me could buy $1.98 worth of parts and prove the principle for himself on a small scale before spending big money (for a poor boy) to build the real thing.

    My practical electrical and electronic expertise is very small. I am urgently hoping that somebody who knows their volt from their amp will design a LITTLE demonstration device that might only make 10 watts, or 1, but will do it reliably and undeniably.


    Best regards and God bless you!
    CANGAS
    Hello CANGAS,

    Just a reminder not to fear the lunatics on this thread.
    that's exactly what I meant when I said they would be lurking in the shadows
    itching for the chance to run out and make their "bear in the woods usual crap pile" .

    Every single one of them are TOTALLY SELF OBLIVIOUS to the FACT that B&L
    designed their units TO BE POWERED FROM THE MAINS of CEMAR UTILITY POWER COMPANY. KNOWING AHEAD OF TIME ONLY A SMALL AMOUNT OF WATTS WOULD BE DRAWN TO BE THE "ELECTROMAGNETIC EXCITER"
    FOR THEIR UNITS AND POSSIBLE PHASE NEEDS. THEY ALSO USED THE UTILITY SYSTEM GROUND ROD ITSELF AND PLACED IT IN THE CENTER OF THEIR LOOPED SERIES OF EARTH RETURN GROUND RODS. HA! HA!

    ITS AMAZING how FACTS like that just blow right past their knuckleheads!
    but just consider the source and ignore the hell out of the BULL CRAP.
    you can discern the handles of those who possess such self induced
    ignorance by the previous group of posts that were made by them. put them on your ignore list and move forward. they never even knew they were being drawn out purposely so you could spot them when the time came! HA! HA!

    as I said before when the time comes I will arrange what you were after.

    THANKS ,
    and respects

    Clarence
    Last edited by clarence; 06-04-2015, 11:15 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • clarence
    replied
    Originally posted by level View Post
    I actually spend many hours of my free time experimenting with all sorts of free energy ideas and circuits. Have done so for years. It is you who said you have a working device that you wanted to share here. So if you want anyone to take you seriously you can either provide some details on how it performs or continue as you have been doing here by deflecting and making excuses. Enough silliness already. If you had a working setup you would have done the simple tests and provided the performance results a long time ago. Period.
    Keep waiting on your SILLINESS TEST/ICLES!
    they will NEVER come!

    Clarence

    Leave a comment:


  • level
    replied
    Originally posted by clarence View Post
    STILL same old song and dance - you want OTHERS to do the work and THEN have the unmitigated GALL to want them to submit to you the results of THEIR WORK! all while you sit back on a do-nothing butt.
    don't ever wait on anything from me - it's for sure you'll pass without it!
    Clarence
    I actually spend many hours of my free time experimenting with all sorts of free energy ideas and circuits. Have done so for years. It is you who said you have a working device that you wanted to share here. So if you want anyone to take you seriously you can either provide some details on how it performs or continue as you have been doing here by deflecting and making excuses. Enough silliness already. If you had a working setup you would have done the simple tests and provided the performance results a long time ago. Period.

    Leave a comment:


  • clarence
    replied
    Originally posted by level View Post
    Unfortunately just more deflection when asked to provide some details of how your claimed 'working' setup actually performs. You can't reasonably expect people to spend big money to replicate your setup when you won't provide a single detail on how your setup actually performs in a long term test using the battery. Again, your tests using the mains are meaningless. If you have a working setup, please provide some long term performance results using the battery and inverter, otherwise it is just more pixie dust.

    Clarence, imagine if I said to you that I have a working free energy device that will cost you two thousand dollars to replicate, but I won't provide any details of how it actually performs. Would you just want to blindly believe me before shelling out two thousand dollars, or would you want to have details first of how my device actually performs in some proper long term tests? I think we both know the answer to this question. You don't really know me at all , so of course you have have no way of judging if what I am saying is true without further details. Please stop and think. It is of course not in any way against you for people to ask for long term performance test details. It is just basic common sense. Without such details you are just another guy amongst many claiming they have a working free energy device, but, so far at least, not willing to demonstrate or share even some basic performance test results.
    STILL same old song and dance - you want OTHERS to do the work and THEN have the unmitigated GALL to want them to submit to you the results of THEIR WORK! all while you sit back on a do-nothing butt.

    don't ever wait on anything from me - it's for sure you'll pass without it!

    Clarence

    Leave a comment:


  • level
    replied
    Originally posted by shylo View Post
    If you have to use mains supply whats the point , It's what I'm trying to get away from.
    artv
    Hello shylo. Also, if it only 'works' when powered from the mains, but not when powered from a battery and inverter, then the power is obviously coming from the mains itself.

    Leave a comment:


  • level
    replied
    Originally posted by clarence View Post
    The only SUCH NONSENSE comes from your self centered deceiving self and all of its BULL CRAP contained there in so put the brakes on yourself!
    Clarence
    Unfortunately just more deflection when asked to provide some details of how your claimed 'working' setup actually performs. You can't reasonably expect people to spend big money to replicate your setup when you won't provide a single detail on how your setup actually performs in a long term test using the battery. Again, your tests using the mains are meaningless. If you have a working setup, please provide some long term performance results using the battery and inverter, otherwise it is just more pixie dust.

    Clarence, imagine if I said to you that I have a working free energy device that will cost you two thousand dollars to replicate, but I won't provide any details of how it actually performs. Would you just want to blindly believe me before shelling out two thousand dollars, or would you want to have details first of how my device actually performs in some proper long term tests? I think we both know the answer to this question. You don't really know me at all , so of course you have have no way of judging if what I am saying is true without further details. Please stop and think. It is of course not in any way against you for people to ask for long term performance test details. It is just basic common sense. Without such details you are just another guy amongst many claiming they have a working free energy device, but, so far at least, not willing to demonstrate or share even some basic performance test results.

    Leave a comment:


  • shylo
    replied
    If you have to use mains supply whats the point , It's what I'm trying to get away from.
    artv

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X