Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Resonance Energy Device Explained

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • med.3012
    replied
    Just an idea to share about Tesla wireless power transmission and the strange relation between inductance and capacitance which indicate the presence of parallel /serial interaction both at the same time :






    from the receiver sphere into the transmitter sphere both the capacitance and the inductance are related in serial while the two spheres are connected in parallel in the open air !

    the following text is quoted from :

    http://www.k-meyl.de/go/Primaerliter...alar-Waves.pdf


    If I put the transmitter into the aluminium case and close the door, then nothing should arrive at the receiver. Expert laboratories for electromagnetic compatibility in this case indeed cannot detect anything and that, although in spite of that the receiver lamps glow! By turning of the receiver coil it can be verified that an electric and not a magnetic coupling is present although the Faraday cage should shield electric fields. The scalar wave obviously overcomes the cage with a speed faster than light, by tunnelling!

    in order to benefit from electrostatic induction we have to understand the parallel/serial interaction mechanism!

    Leave a comment:


  • med.3012
    replied
    The reader of this thread are welcome to give a comments, suggestions, or questions, with this further ideas may be explored !

    Leave a comment:


  • med.3012
    replied
    Serial / parallel at the same time !

    i think it's very important to review the geometry of the E-TBC in order to make the idea very clear and easy to understand especially the serial/ parallel behaviours , let's see the following drawing :



    if CD connection is open you have AC the first coil and DB the second coil between the two coil you have a capacitor this connection is serial where it start from A and finish at B.

    parallel connection will be secured when CD connection is closed, both geometry parallel or serial has the same resonance frequency .
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • med.3012
    replied
    Ramadan month

    This is the month of Ramadan, fasting month in Muslims countries and all Muslims wherever they are ... Wish the best for All !


    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • med.3012
    replied
    who is in serial ? who is in parallel ?

    as the headline describe it's really difficult to assume what is happening! what i suppose is this : the best way to produce radiant energy is to use the E-TBC , this device give the opportunity to amplify the electro radiant effect due to the rotational energetic symmetry provided.

    in negative side it's easy ( only when understood ) to manage radiant energy due to its smoothness... we don't have a real current that need a specific wired paths.

    when SG2 fire what is the cause of increased radiant voltage? is it because the low resistance so the R-voltage increase or due to the suppression of normal voltage induced from the electromagnetic flux !!??

    when SG2 fire why radiant voltage don't stay there in the excitation coil ? i suppose R-voltage has the ability to change it's paths according the pulse from serial inside the coil ( this is outside parallel interaction with the virtual E-TBC since the coil form something similar to cylinder --- spacial interaction--- remember the low distance the more power! ) into parallel outside the excitation coil through the earth, here we have two plates with different pressure ( something similar to normal capacitor)

    R-current is stimulated in parallel spacial mode when R-voltage are in serial after that R-current change its parallel behaviour show toward the excitation coil in this spacial mode toward serial mode providing the motive force for the accumulated R-voltage.

    the beauty in this design is that we are treating both radiant energetic sides at the same time giving each side what it need .


    this design can enhanced further more using etched foils ( increased treated surface ), a good earth connections can increase the gained power more and more, but as any source of energy it's not suitable to use a very high coil number as excitation coil , be aware of the extremely high radiated power !

    Leave a comment:


  • med.3012
    replied

    completing the previous post


    the trick used in the proposed circuit is introducing a relatively large number coil to allow serial/parallel interaction using another spark gap arrangement :


    any time normal voltage cease radiant voltage start flowing but SG2 is already provide a low resistance area, it's not good to short circuit SG2 firmly! this is a pulsation technique meaning that the radiant voltage increase in interaction with radiant current , the less distance between the E-TBC and the excitation coil ( receiver) the more power will be drawn from the vacuum, radiant energy present in the vacuum providing serial parallel exchange, we have to have both mode in order to harvest this power, the proposed circuit will solve this problem providing voltage and current at the same time.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • med.3012
    replied
    i just want to add some drawing to explain the geometry make the proposed circuit a favoured idea.

    first let's reviews the past/future light cone :



    this cone explain how is it possible for a coil to be a capacitor in negative energy side the same apply to capacitor in positive energy side where it transform into coil in the hidden energetic ocean, in negative side the E-TBC is an energetic elements that can interact with each other using a special vortex mechanism, this was discussed in my document as a rotational energetic symmetry where the X capacitor divide magnetism and electricity in two identical portions, in electromagnetic flux the two portion are related using what called electron spin mechanism, this mechanism is essential to explain the ability of magnetic filed to charge a short circuited one dimensional capacitor.

    in the past light cone nothing is visible, here we don't have a static charges, the capacitor in negative E-TBC resemble the scalar electrostatic field, because there no real E-TBC only energetic elements vortex exchange take action in this side creating electrostatic planes with different pressures, the following drawing describe how voltage and current are situated :





    radiant voltage in red flowing perpendicular compared with radiant current in blue, radiant energy is rich in geometry compared electromagnetic flux, in radiant energy mutual induction is possible because it's a pure energy, no mass elements, everything is energetic...

    the important of mutual induction appear in the geometry of the E-TBC itself, because the coil form the capacitor itself, the electromagnetic feedback increase the power but it's limited in geometry if we take into consideration the presence of electrostatic field inside the E-TBC which disconnect the ability of serial resonance to take action when CD junction is open, in negative side this problem can't exist because we don't have electrostatic charge here, everything is energetic, if we could increase radiant voltage we could increase the overall power, in other hand we could easily create two different pressure plans where radiant voltage is able to flow....

    in the same light cone we know already that radiant voltage resemble the normal current , it flow in serial regarding the flying electrostatic plans ( previous drawing), the current is the pressure of the projection of these electrostatic plans, the next drawing will explain more :

    Attached Files
    Last edited by med.3012; 06-15-2015, 08:51 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • med.3012
    replied
    serial - parallel at the same time!

    this post is an attempt to analyse the previously proposed circuit, still not fully tested , the only tested behaviour is radiant power amplification where SG2 fire, this impose the production of Ozone gas with large quantity ( caution have to be taken .... be in a well ventilated place).

    the E-TBC form a good balanced device but regarding the electromagnetic flux the gained power seem to be dormant, the reactive power being produced is the proof of this sleepy state, using standing waves in electromagnetic flux can't change the timing but this will change only the position, this mean you have points where max voltage exist as standing location the same about current but they still in reactive manner where time shift prevent you to extract the power, if we analyse the geometry the electrostatic charge gained from the rotating induced electric field is there represent the dormant state ...

    The E-TBC in negative side will oscillate the same as in positive side but because it form a kind of energetic device it can bypass the dormant electrostatic state shown in electromagnetic flux, the vacuum is forced to push these electrostatic charge in all direction, these radiant electrostatic flux form the radiant current itself, Tesla call it radiant matter.

    the past/future light cone give a good information about that where the radiant current take the behaviour of normal voltage and radiant voltage take the place of normal current, this comparison will not solve the puzzle still something missing ...!

    if radiant current is the voltage, if radiant voltage is the current what is the best way to harvest such power? radiant energy has a special spacial geometry where serial/parallel interaction exist together at the same time, so the optimal condition where we could conserve this power appear when we treat this serial/parallel interaction together at the same time ...

    the proposed circuit play this role, we have two coil :

    1- the excitation coil is a large number coil where serial interaction exist, this coil have to be wound over the E-TBC to attract the most possible radiant energy stream, this mechanism appear when SG2 fire providing a low resistance toward this radiant voltage, the E-TBC form a good surface regarding the excitation coil, if radiant voltage increase more radiant stream have to be present, radiant voltage is the pressure of spacial electrostatic charge being moving from the virtual E-TBC that work in negative energy side, this pressure can be amplified from radiant current itself because both flow vertical to each other in this spacial mode , so the interaction between radiant energy and radiant voltage is spacial, the E-TBC plus the excitation coil form something similar to dynamic capacitor where there is interaction between radiant current and radiant voltage but due to the unique character of radiant energy ( where no static charge ), it's possible to amplify this phenomena, imagine a plane surfaces that can be squeezed to the desired amount...


    2- the parallel interaction ( transfer ) coil is nothing than a simple radiant current receiver, a conducting foil have to be inserted between the E-TBC and the excitation coil ( or receiving coil ), the radiant voltage being amplified and present in the two coils, transfer coil ( this one ) and the previously discussed, the less the distance between the excitation coil and the E-TBC the more radiant energy be present, in reality we have two different zone of pressure that have to be connected together using another medium ( the earth for example ) in order to let the radiant voltage push the equivalent electrons to the capacitor banks using the different pressure plans that exist .

    Leave a comment:


  • med.3012
    replied
    Originally posted by boguslaw View Post
    Nice thread. Check please Edison "Etheric force" - it's the same as radiant energy.I don't know if Edison realized that when he hired Tesla to fix the issue of DC generators. Then he had broken agreement with Tesla to pay him 50000 $ and some time later patented solution.
    Thank you , i had a look at this link :

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etheric_force

    wonderful information that can help us a lots, at the moment i am writing a post to explain the circuit proposed, not fully tested at the moment only radiant energy excitation coil have being tested, thanks once again

    Leave a comment:


  • boguslaw
    replied
    Nice thread. Check please Edison "Etheric force" - it's the same as radiant energy.I don't know if Edison realized that when he hired Tesla to fix the issue of DC generators. Then he had broken agreement with Tesla to pay him 50000 $ and some time later patented solution.

    Leave a comment:


  • med.3012
    replied
    Hello everyone,

    in this post i will try to explain the last discussed idea about using two coil to receive the power from the E-TBC, this is necessary due to the complicated habit of radiant energy, the next photo show it :



    Radiant energy have a complicated behaviours according the future/past light cone, this model is very important in fact and may give the solution for extracting the power without problems, let's start by analysing a very strange behaviour in the E-TBC , this special capacitor coil involve serial parallel connection at the same time, this is visible when the spark gap is open, you have a capacitor inside with two coil ( a friend gave this remark ) the resonance frequency of this serial connection equal the frequency of parallel connection when CD is closed !!

    meaning this geometry is very important but it involve some difficulty especially in oscillating state where the serial connection disconnect so only parallel connection appear to be the visible character, physically the induced rotating electric field is the reason, this field jump upon oscillation to avoid serial connection by charging the capacitor instead of the induced current that appear in normal parallel L/C circuit , the rotating field is very fast compared to the induced current so it's able to charge the capacitor before the current can do it.

    the problem now is the static electric field gained inside the E-TBC upon oscillation, even it's a gain in power but it seem to be not extractable regarding the electromagnetic flux being amplified, since it's the gain it appear to have a scalar direction...

    in other hand when analysing the light cone; negative energy seem to be a little bit different compared the positive light cone, these two cone are mixed together and very complicated at the same time, the E-TBC in negative energy side is energetic element... something virtual but real ... , static charge don't exist in this energetic ocean, if we imagine the E-TBC in this side how the static charge can exist ?! now i think you have the reply!! it will be radiant active energy, an active static field has a scalar characters, without any complicated mathematical description we are able to prove the scalar propriety of radiant energy, another important information is the active situation of negative energy where no static charge do exist ..!

    this will give another important fact about the behaviour of the E-TBC in the negative side where two kind of oscillation have to exist together at the same time, parallel with serial connection have to exist in this side and the vacuum is forced to push the power in all direction, this fact will allow us to amplify the power and make a good connection between radiant voltage and radiant current, this is important because we are forced to connect the high pressure with the low pressure in order to conserve it : the next drawing is a proposal circuit, more explanation will come soon.


    Attached Files
    Last edited by med.3012; 06-11-2015, 06:48 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • med.3012
    replied
    @ Magnethos

    sorry for not completing my idea yesterday, i was in a hurry , the following drawing will show the idea :




    forget about the primary coil at the moment and see only the emitter coil with the receiver coil, if the receiver coil replicate the power from the emitter coil where is the amplification process ? meaning how we could amplify the power gain ? according his statement the only way is to put a lots of receiver coil.

    the question now what is the induction system he used between his primary and secondary in the emitter coil ? using his logic the receiver will duplicate the same power available in the primary coil, the result is the primary have to be the source of power amplification.

    in my opinion the inventor show only a signs for his device, direct conclusions may lead to mistakes.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • med.3012
    replied
    Originally posted by Magnethos View Post
    med.3012
    There is not a video about that device. Don Smith explained it somewhere, I don't remember exactly where.

    The device is based on a emitter coil (the center one that contains a primary coil and a secondary coil) and three receiving coils in this setup (it's possible to add more). The emitter coil emits some kind of energy and the receivers copy it, so there is a copy of the power source, without affecting it. The power is not taken from the emitter coil, the power is taken from the ambient background. It's one of the most simple examples Don Smith talked about.

    this will lead to another question, if these coils duplicate the power from the emitter coil, what is the kind of induction used between the primary and the secondary coil in the emitter device ??
    in other words the secondary will duplicate the primary power, if electromagnetic induction used ... the inventor gave a very tiny amount of information, this is why we have to be careful when dealing with his device as shown to the public , in my opinion we have to see the most faraway area ...

    Leave a comment:


  • Magnethos
    replied
    med.3012
    There is not a video about that device. Don Smith explained it somewhere, I don't remember exactly where.

    The device is based on a emitter coil (the center one that contains a primary coil and a secondary coil) and three receiving coils in this setup (it's possible to add more). The emitter coil emits some kind of energy and the receivers copy it, so there is a copy of the power source, without affecting it. The power is not taken from the emitter coil, the power is taken from the ambient background. It's one of the most simple examples Don Smith talked about.

    Leave a comment:


  • med.3012
    replied
    Originally posted by Magnethos View Post
    Have you studied this device from Don Smith?
    Hello everyone;

    are there a link for something that explain this special arrangement by Donald Smith ? do really these device work as the inventor show them ? the only device shown when it work was in black box...

    in the same photo from where he take the power in the receivers coils ? what i understand from this photo is that ; the resonance can't produce power , that all my mind can give me!
    i appreciate your explanation.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X