Tweet
“There is no energy in matter other than that received from its environment [as meant Ether / fields].” – Nikola Tesla
“The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena [fields, Aether], it will make more progress in one century than in all the previous centuries of its existence.” – Nikola Tesla
I did not mean by the title that there IS NO "instantaneous action at a distance (within fields)" Of course there is, within fields 'instant action at a distance' without propagation speeds
(as proved by Tesla and Dollard and others regarding longitudinal field propagation).
But that the entire PREMISE is 100% flawed, regarding the statement of: "instantaneous action at a distance"
Field pressure gradients are not IN space nor therefore a modality of time.
So what is going on "instantly" is merely field inductions, pressures occurring "under" and preceding space which is merely a modality of any field.
So, taking the common phrase regarding fields (mag, grav, dielectric): " "instantaneous action at a distance"
we have removed the "INSTANTANEOUS" part as merely a human perceptual flaw of immanent fields within which there is space (but never a field IN space, rather space as attributional to or of a field).
"ACTION" can be removed, since we are only talking about field pressure gradients, inductions, charges and discharges. There are no "moment actions", since actions are comparators over 2 points in time. However the case is is that what something is in Principle it is in Attribute, likewise therefore deductively we can speak of X as both a THING/PRINCIPLE, and an ACTION/ATTRIBUTE, ........such as light-illumination, or will-willing. The very co-eternal principles, also, of and to any field.
"DISTANCE" can likewise therefore be eliminated, since we are talking about the attribute and EFFECT WITHIN any field(s). There are no "distances" , since this is a conceptual abstraction of fields which are impinging/interacting within / to/ against etc. each other.
ANY retardations of field action-propagation are logically only merely resistances encountered from intervening field-modality inductions/capacitance; or field voidance or counter-voidance pressures
So, having eliminated all 3 main words within "instantaneous action at a distance", whats left? Only fields logically. .... Well, we are left with "AT"
Field pressure AT another field
Electricity terminating AT X as magnetism
Magnetic moving its attribute (space) AT a dielectric ( which = dielectric inertial plane torque = electrification)
Your body AT a location in space AT which another body's centripetal convergent gravitational field is acting AT yours.
By the way, for the GREEKS, space IS an attribute of a field (χώρα). "Look at the wide open space here (IN THE FIELD IM STANDING IN)" !
again, space is a field-effect-attribute.
Space as a principle, cannot , shall not , may not, never will definitionally be anything other than a concept when speaking about merely "space (ltself)".
There is a WHOLE book dedicated to this one greek words (χώρα) (FIELD) importance.
Chorology:
Chorology
All fields are definitionally Ether modalities, either convergent/divergent, spatial, counterspatial, circular, radial, inertial, centripetal, centrifugal.
As for any "polarized (=SPATIAL)" field, it isn't IN space, rather contains space, and therefore is definitionally "polarized", .......when all this time we have considered "polarized = IN space", rather than "space = attributional construct of a polarized field".
And as we know, there is no "N or S pole", NO clockwise or counterclockwise spins.
the same rope turning CW on one end is turning (apparently so) CCW on the other end, but we also of course, know that the entire rope (or ball, etc) is spinning in one single direction as pertains itself, but "has space" (inverse spin) as attributional to it being "polarized" and therefore "creating a space" as definitional to its polarization, i.e. Ether modality.
We are then merely left with an ocean of fields overlapping fields in which there are atomic magneto-dielectric and gravitational fields which prop up the volumes of atoms and their covalent joining.
Weight is not only location specific, but also MEDIUM (Ether, water etc etc) specific. Obviously an obese person doesn't 'weight much' floating in the water and even a 10 year old can "carry" a 400 pound person in that medium.
There needs to be a whole NEW SCIENCE for the future regarding Field Incommensurabilty or F.I. (as I coined it, pardon if that is hubristic).
I have 3 books I uploaded you should own:
Instantaneous Action at Distance Pro & Contra
Forces and Fields Action at a Distance in Metaphysics Philosophy
Action at a Distance
If scribd says you have to "PAY" to download, ignore that nonsense, just JOIN scribd and UPLOAD ANYTHING, just ANYTHING
You uploaded 3 things, you can DOWNLOAD 3 things
What of the disappearing SUN thought experiment? Only 2 objects in the universe, Sun and Earth, poof, Sun is gone, earth instantly flies off into nowhere.
Hows that possible? nothing propagates faster than light? If the sun is gone, shouldn't it take 8 mins for that missing Suns gravity to effect Earth? well Nope. There are no more "2 fields" interacting anymore...Sun is gone, so is the Earths movement around a now-non-existent place where the Sun was.
We can of course give definition TO space, but only as is meant an attribute WITHIN a field, AS a product of a field.
A field containing space is moving at a rate of change of the field as measured BY its attribute, space.
To speak otherwise is like saying There is light (field) expanding into/within illumination (nonsensical). Rather illumination is an attribute co-principle to and as light.
Light,/EM , like magnetism itself being a radiation is expanding with its attributional 'field of illumination (space)'. We say we are 'in an illuminated space', when the proper causation would be that we are 'standing within the space of illumination (field)'
How did I 'discover' that there are no fields in space? ....I came across countless discoveries along the road, and they all pointed at one unknown point, all of them pointing at a place I had never looked, I wasn't even looking for!,..... finally so many pointing fingers could not be ignored. There is no space outside of a field. It is impossible. Likewise therefore no time. Likewise therefore no inductions. Space is a property of a field, an attribute, but there are none, and never has there ever appeared ‘a field within ‘existing space’ ', because space is the effect, not the "medium" into which there is field expansion.
As is typical of GR and QM, they have been looking at the horses ass, rather than the in the horses mouth. When a field is present, then so too space, but not "a field expanding, contracting, interacting IN SPACE".
GR and QM have it backwards (as usual), they have reified SPACE as a 'thing' that 'does things'. Space has done nothing, never has done anything (as a principle or autonomous entity, since definitionally it has no such existence).
.....likewise GR and QM dismiss 'fields' as a principle of space (rather than a modality of the Ether/Aether).
To reify space is like saying "love attracts a rock".
There IS instant action at a distance regarding fields, because space-time does NOT exist outside of a field, space is effect WITHIN a field.
A field CANNOT,NEVER HAS terminated in space. Space is IN a field, but not the inverse.
Counter-voidance is spatial compression, or what the commoner calls "magnetic repulsion" is spatial compression. Of course these are polarized Ether-fields, but what is being compressed is space itself, as given definition by polarized field gradients at maximum counter-voidance ('repulsion').
Feel free to tell me I'm "full of taurus excreta "
“The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena [fields, Aether], it will make more progress in one century than in all the previous centuries of its existence.” – Nikola Tesla
I did not mean by the title that there IS NO "instantaneous action at a distance (within fields)" Of course there is, within fields 'instant action at a distance' without propagation speeds
(as proved by Tesla and Dollard and others regarding longitudinal field propagation).
But that the entire PREMISE is 100% flawed, regarding the statement of: "instantaneous action at a distance"
Field pressure gradients are not IN space nor therefore a modality of time.
So what is going on "instantly" is merely field inductions, pressures occurring "under" and preceding space which is merely a modality of any field.
So, taking the common phrase regarding fields (mag, grav, dielectric): " "instantaneous action at a distance"
we have removed the "INSTANTANEOUS" part as merely a human perceptual flaw of immanent fields within which there is space (but never a field IN space, rather space as attributional to or of a field).
"ACTION" can be removed, since we are only talking about field pressure gradients, inductions, charges and discharges. There are no "moment actions", since actions are comparators over 2 points in time. However the case is is that what something is in Principle it is in Attribute, likewise therefore deductively we can speak of X as both a THING/PRINCIPLE, and an ACTION/ATTRIBUTE, ........such as light-illumination, or will-willing. The very co-eternal principles, also, of and to any field.
"DISTANCE" can likewise therefore be eliminated, since we are talking about the attribute and EFFECT WITHIN any field(s). There are no "distances" , since this is a conceptual abstraction of fields which are impinging/interacting within / to/ against etc. each other.
ANY retardations of field action-propagation are logically only merely resistances encountered from intervening field-modality inductions/capacitance; or field voidance or counter-voidance pressures
So, having eliminated all 3 main words within "instantaneous action at a distance", whats left? Only fields logically. .... Well, we are left with "AT"
Field pressure AT another field
Electricity terminating AT X as magnetism
Magnetic moving its attribute (space) AT a dielectric ( which = dielectric inertial plane torque = electrification)
Your body AT a location in space AT which another body's centripetal convergent gravitational field is acting AT yours.
By the way, for the GREEKS, space IS an attribute of a field (χώρα). "Look at the wide open space here (IN THE FIELD IM STANDING IN)" !
again, space is a field-effect-attribute.
Space as a principle, cannot , shall not , may not, never will definitionally be anything other than a concept when speaking about merely "space (ltself)".
There is a WHOLE book dedicated to this one greek words (χώρα) (FIELD) importance.
Chorology:
Chorology
All fields are definitionally Ether modalities, either convergent/divergent, spatial, counterspatial, circular, radial, inertial, centripetal, centrifugal.
As for any "polarized (=SPATIAL)" field, it isn't IN space, rather contains space, and therefore is definitionally "polarized", .......when all this time we have considered "polarized = IN space", rather than "space = attributional construct of a polarized field".
And as we know, there is no "N or S pole", NO clockwise or counterclockwise spins.
the same rope turning CW on one end is turning (apparently so) CCW on the other end, but we also of course, know that the entire rope (or ball, etc) is spinning in one single direction as pertains itself, but "has space" (inverse spin) as attributional to it being "polarized" and therefore "creating a space" as definitional to its polarization, i.e. Ether modality.
We are then merely left with an ocean of fields overlapping fields in which there are atomic magneto-dielectric and gravitational fields which prop up the volumes of atoms and their covalent joining.
Weight is not only location specific, but also MEDIUM (Ether, water etc etc) specific. Obviously an obese person doesn't 'weight much' floating in the water and even a 10 year old can "carry" a 400 pound person in that medium.
There needs to be a whole NEW SCIENCE for the future regarding Field Incommensurabilty or F.I. (as I coined it, pardon if that is hubristic).
I have 3 books I uploaded you should own:
Instantaneous Action at Distance Pro & Contra
Forces and Fields Action at a Distance in Metaphysics Philosophy
Action at a Distance
If scribd says you have to "PAY" to download, ignore that nonsense, just JOIN scribd and UPLOAD ANYTHING, just ANYTHING
You uploaded 3 things, you can DOWNLOAD 3 things
What of the disappearing SUN thought experiment? Only 2 objects in the universe, Sun and Earth, poof, Sun is gone, earth instantly flies off into nowhere.
Hows that possible? nothing propagates faster than light? If the sun is gone, shouldn't it take 8 mins for that missing Suns gravity to effect Earth? well Nope. There are no more "2 fields" interacting anymore...Sun is gone, so is the Earths movement around a now-non-existent place where the Sun was.
We can of course give definition TO space, but only as is meant an attribute WITHIN a field, AS a product of a field.
A field containing space is moving at a rate of change of the field as measured BY its attribute, space.
To speak otherwise is like saying There is light (field) expanding into/within illumination (nonsensical). Rather illumination is an attribute co-principle to and as light.
Light,/EM , like magnetism itself being a radiation is expanding with its attributional 'field of illumination (space)'. We say we are 'in an illuminated space', when the proper causation would be that we are 'standing within the space of illumination (field)'
How did I 'discover' that there are no fields in space? ....I came across countless discoveries along the road, and they all pointed at one unknown point, all of them pointing at a place I had never looked, I wasn't even looking for!,..... finally so many pointing fingers could not be ignored. There is no space outside of a field. It is impossible. Likewise therefore no time. Likewise therefore no inductions. Space is a property of a field, an attribute, but there are none, and never has there ever appeared ‘a field within ‘existing space’ ', because space is the effect, not the "medium" into which there is field expansion.
As is typical of GR and QM, they have been looking at the horses ass, rather than the in the horses mouth. When a field is present, then so too space, but not "a field expanding, contracting, interacting IN SPACE".
GR and QM have it backwards (as usual), they have reified SPACE as a 'thing' that 'does things'. Space has done nothing, never has done anything (as a principle or autonomous entity, since definitionally it has no such existence).
.....likewise GR and QM dismiss 'fields' as a principle of space (rather than a modality of the Ether/Aether).
To reify space is like saying "love attracts a rock".
There IS instant action at a distance regarding fields, because space-time does NOT exist outside of a field, space is effect WITHIN a field.
A field CANNOT,NEVER HAS terminated in space. Space is IN a field, but not the inverse.
Counter-voidance is spatial compression, or what the commoner calls "magnetic repulsion" is spatial compression. Of course these are polarized Ether-fields, but what is being compressed is space itself, as given definition by polarized field gradients at maximum counter-voidance ('repulsion').
Feel free to tell me I'm "full of taurus excreta "
Comment