Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

They Need Free Energy Scientists

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • They Need Free Energy Scientists

    Steven M. Greer, M.D. has been successful with the disclosure project and has a plan to protect scientists and bring the technology to the market large scale.

    ( here him speak on it : Steve Greer 2007-08-20 Presentation )


    Technology Criteria

    The following criteria is used in the evaluation by AERO of technologies and devices submitted by inventors.

    Three Categories of Inventions:

    1. Our preference is for a zero point energy (or over unity) device that produces more electrical wattage than it consumes, in the kilowatt range or greater.

    2. A second choice would be a device that reduces consumption fossil fuels by at least 25%. This would be a retrofittable device that works with fuel-injected vehicles.

    3. A third choice would be a device that reduces electrical consumption in a home or small business without reducing
    the work done.

    4. A fourth choice would be a device that reduces gravity and can be configured to produce electrical wattage. (Note: we are interested in antigravity in its own right but cannot focus on it until AERO Phase III.)

    Here are some examples of devices that will not be considered:

    Not retrofittable to existing vehicles or buildings (that is, the device must be installed at the time of manufacture).

    Only works with carburetors, not with fuel injection.

    Produces torque (turning force) output less than 10 times greater than the input energy (The reason is that, although textbooks would lead one to believe that torque converts to electrical wattage through a simple formula, in fact the calculation may be inaccurate by an order of magnitude).

    Has not been built and tested (you must be able to tell us how you measured its performance).

    Further, the only purported zero point energy devices we will consider are those:

    Requiring no input (aka negative resistor), or

    Requiring only a startup input, then runs continuously without additional input, or

    Configured to allow metered measurement of input electrical wattage and metered measurement of output electrical wattage. (The cleanest measurement is DC in and DC out. We can also measure AC, but this is more complex.) Note that we are not interested in voltage or amperage but only in their product; i.e. wattage.

    Requirements. Please read these requirements carefully, as they are not flexible. The party submitting a device should be aware of the following requirements:

    The device is functioning and ready to test. Do not submit plans or partially completed devices.

    The device meets one or more of the following performance conditions:

    - If over unity, it generates at least 100 watts of usable reliable output power in excess of input power;
    - If antigravity, it levitates ten or more US pounds in excess of its own weight;
    - If a more efficient fuel system, it increases the mileage per gallon by not less than 25% for a given amount of fuel input (replacements for gasoline are also acceptable).

    You own the device, or legally control it.

    You are willing to disclose how the device works. We are willing to sign standard non-disclosure (confidentiality) agreements (NDA's) prior to examining devices we ask to test. Click here to see our Standard NDA to protect inventors.

    You are willing to license the device to AERO under a normal business arrangement (note: submission does not oblige you to license to us).

    You are willing to have the device transparently tested by AERO, including an on-site initial test, 3 independent lab off-site tests AND independent reproduction of the device by AERO.

    What can you tell me about AERO? In addition to information elsewhere on this web site, here are some documents you may wish to read:

    Advanced Energy Research Organization - Why AERO? An Overview for Inventors

    Advanced Energy Research Organization - Questions and Answers for Inventors

    Advanced Energy Research Organization, LLC

    Advanced Energy Research Organization - Strategic Overview

    Advanced Energy Research Organization - Technology Evaluation Procedure

    If you have a device that you would like AERO to evaluate, please click Advanced Energy Research Organization - Technical Evaluation Procedure Requirements to begin the evaluation procedure.

    We are sorry, but due to overwhelming demands on our staff time, faxed or mailed submissions will be rejected.
    Keep your mind on the aether www.PathsToSucceed.com

  • #2
    AERO2012 site is hijacked

    AERO claims that they provide "strategic security", yet is unable to prevent the hijacking of their own site, the links for which is indicated in this forum.

    Comment


    • #3
      It seems more like, that the Page does not exist anymore
      Theorizer are like High Voltage. A lot hot Air with no Power behind but they are the dead of applied Work and Ideas.

      Comment


      • #4
        Yeah the Aero site definately seems to have been shut down. Here is another website by steven greer reguarding submitting technology The Orion Project - Technical Evaluation Form

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by future pather View Post

          NOT ACCEPTED:

          Produces torque (turning force) output less than 10 times greater than the input energy (The reason is that, although textbooks would lead one to believe that torque converts to electrical wattage through a simple formula, in fact the calculation may be inaccurate by an order of magnitude).
          I can see the problem with assessing energy inputs and outputs
          particularly if dealing with pulses.

          But if the input is a rechargeable battery and the output
          is water which has been heated, this objection should be
          invalid.

          Comment

          Working...
          X