Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ufopolitics
    replied
    Figuera Non Related Testing 1

    Originally posted by seaad View Post
    I used +8 volt to pull the input AC above the ground level.
    And the performance was outstanding! About 0.1%
    Seaad,


    That test proves absolutely nothing, NADA, in the world of the Figuera Device.

    Figuera uses DC throughout the whole Generator exciting system, and not one single AC input.

    IT IS CLEARLY SHOWN ON HIS ORIGINAL SPANISH PATENT!!

    By doing all this non related test, all you achieve is to piss off MM, allowing the stalkers like Citfta to walk in and start their known BS, based on your nonsense test!!

    So, please may I ask you to MAINTAIN EXACTLY BY THE FIGUERA'S DEVICE CONFIGURATION, and Not trying to "IMPROVE" absolutely NADA??!!


    Is that too much to ask from You?

    EDIT: By the way, could you show Us all here...at least one picture of your real device tests?...And I am not relating to any "Simulation Testing BS" or poorly hand written diagrams...but the Real Mc Coy Build??


    Ufopolitics
    Last edited by Ufopolitics; 10-21-2016, 12:42 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • marathonman
    replied
    Un worthy

    I regret to inform everyone that not only am i offended by your rude comments but appalled by your stupidity toward the Figuera device. i am withdrawing my support from this day forward for the Figuera device as i refuse to support stupidity and ignorance of real science.
    i have enjoyed trying to teach real science but the burden of opposition is to overwhelming and has risen beyond my level of comfort and thus i must say good by.

    a few of you i will surely miss and others i will not thus the game of life continues.

    to my 450 followers i do regret as i am deleting all my research and in the next few days will delete all my posts from this web site. i am sorry but i feel as of this time you are not worthy of this wonderful gift and have no understanding of it's nature or implications.

    God bless you all just not this day.
    to admin, go sell another BS book, i'm not the one and Eric knows that.

    Your past friend,

    MM
    Last edited by marathonman; 10-21-2016, 05:59 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • admin
    replied
    warning

    Originally posted by marathonman
    Go F your selves ignorant bastards. your not worthy of Figuera.
    KISS MY BULLS EYE.

    By
    These images and text in your signature line need to be changed or removed. Please disagree with others without name calling and insults - this applies to everyone. Will check back tomorrow to see if any posts need to be deleted or if anyone needs to be banned.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ufopolitics
    replied
    Originally posted by marathonman
    UFOP;

    I really don't know what you are doing wrong as this is simple induction.
    speed of fluctuation, currant flow, type of timing, verification of flux field are many factors to consider.
    if one simple magnet can make a galvanometer move then there is no reason for an electromagnet to not do the same
    all you can do is go through the system and find the problem as i know your quite capable of.

    MM
    Thanks MM,

    It is not quite simple induction as we are not moving physically the "Magnetic Field Carriers" (whether magnet or electromagnets) but just the virtual field...

    The problem I had was the PSU I was using to feed primary...it was not rendering the constant Amps rate after certain run time. Plus they decay too fast.

    Since we are all dealing here with a "Spatial Virtual Field" to induce on secondaries, we need a constant amp and volts rate to generate always the same High Field.

    This Spatial Field requires to have specific strength derived from its input...generating it with lower values will render lower induced output at secondaries...I have tested 36V @ 2 Amps to reach Hi Field...not good!!

    We need higher values in the range starting at 48V and 3-4 Amps minimum.

    So I need to get a stronger PSU...so I am trying to get a 60V/10A delivered in a single output (not dual and connected in series) ...even though I would be using only like 50V and 4 Amps as High (Max) Field...I wanna have some extra room that way won't be driving PSU at Max at all time...which I consider is not good for the equipment.

    Let's all keep the calm here...is the only way to do better work.


    Regards to All


    Ufopolitics

    Leave a comment:


  • seaad
    replied
    No one would be happier than me if the Figuera concept could work! But it seems like there are some small obstacles we must overcome first.

    From patent:""To fix ideas is convenient to refer to the attached drawing which is no more
    than a sketch to understand the operation of the machine built using the
    principle outlined before.
    ""
    Look at Hannon's collage of pictures above with so many different rectangles around the "y"-cores!! Y-core inserted, y-core with a gap...........
    MM and all let's work as a team.
    Arne

    ps. when experimenting why are you (all) aiming for a contraption in the kW class?
    Last edited by seaad; 10-20-2016, 09:58 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by marathonman
    Go F your selves ignorant bastards. your not worthy of Figuera.
    KISS MY BULLS EYE.

    By

    That is all you got, anyone who attacks our leaders is dog pucky.
    The rest of you kissing his butt are no better.Marmalade Muffet
    Just a straight up low class, know nothing.
    Last edited by BroMikey; 10-21-2016, 07:26 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • citfta
    replied
    Originally posted by marathonman
    NO, i am not over reacting, you people are ignorant and foolish to the third degree. i'm done f-in with you ignorant fools, trying to convince a bunch of non intelligent people about the Figuera device is like trying to F a snake.

    go f your selves in the ars. fools.
    I LAUGH AND SPIT IN YOUR DUMB FACE.

    MM
    Instead of ranting and acting like a 2 year old tell us what about my post you disagreed with. I clearly explained that seaad's signal was DC and not AC. Why do you not agree with that?

    Leave a comment:


  • bistander
    replied
    Originally posted by marathonman
    NO, i am not over reacting, you people are ignorant and foolish to the third degree. i'm done f-in with you ignorant fools, trying to convince a bunch of non intelligent people about the Figuera device is like trying to F a snake.

    go f your selves in the ars. fools.
    I LAUGH AND SPIT IN YOUR DUMB FACE.

    MM
    Nice guy. NOT

    Leave a comment:


  • bistander
    replied
    Luck

    Originally posted by marathonman
    And you would benefit reading about inductors.

    there is no luck involved, i did my research and you did not.

    you will need the luck trying to hit a target with your mind and brain closed.

    have a nice day.

    MM
    Yes MM, I do benefit from reading about inductors. Here is a recent read: http://web.mit.edu/viz/EM/visualizat...es/guide11.pdf Notice equation (11.2.3). It says Inductance = Flux * Number of Turns / Current. Easy to see zero flux means zero inductance. Next page or two is Example 11.3, Inductance of a Toroid.

    Ampere's Law is to the Magnetic Circuit as Ohm's Law is to the Electric Circuit. This article has a good section showing how to apply algebraic sum of magnetic potential around a closed magnetic circuit. Opposites Attract: A Review of Basic Magnetic Theories

    The luck might come about when something works but not in the expected manner.

    bi

    Leave a comment:


  • citfta
    replied
    Originally posted by marathonman
    Well i am glad your working on something but it sure is not the Figuera device.

    because,

    THE FIGUERA DEVICE IS DC OPERATED!


    OU ALL OVER AGAIN.


    MM
    Marathonman,

    You are overreacting because of your paranoia about how you are so sure this device works. Look again at the schematic posted by seaad. If the sine wave of the signal is less than the 8 volt offset then he is powering the coils with DC not AC. As long as the bottom of the sine wave never goes below the zero line the the signal is a varying DC signal not AC. And that is what your part G is supposed to be supplying, a varying DC signal just like seaad shows in his schematic. Why he is getting such poor results could be a whole other problem but his signal is a varying DC signal not AC.

    Respectfully,
    Carroll

    Leave a comment:


  • seaad
    replied
    Don't scream to me! Be aware that I am a very brittle old man.... You know AC* is good DC is bad. Have a beer
    * AC: air conditioning

    Leave a comment:


  • seaad
    replied
    Quick Test

    I used +8 volt to pull the input AC above the ground level.
    And the performance was outstanding! About 0.1%
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • bistander
    replied
    Ampere's Law

    Hi MM,

    You would benefit from learning Ampere's Law.

    Good luck,

    bi

    Leave a comment:


  • bistander
    replied
    Spikes

    Originally posted by seaad View Post
    Watch out for the most middle G-points they produces kV spikes!! even w. brake before make!
    That's what I've been trying to tell them. At midpoints windings are equal and opposite so cancel mmf and result in no flux in toroid core. Zero flux means zero inductance in the windings around the toroid. Hence spikes at midpoints. Also, it is make before break.

    bi

    Leave a comment:


  • Elcheapo
    replied
    MM,
    "sorry you are having problems."

    Thanks for your input.
    The problem is when the hi & the lo get switched at the end of each cycle.
    So who ever made that wave form at post 1345 will be having the same problem I have.

    Good luck in solving your own problems.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X