My Asymmetric Electrodynamic Machines

[JC4me]

Thanks Ward,

Below is the only "UFO KIT" available...that I could find...
...(Edited images out)
Just kidding...


The Info is at page 97 and you could see direct link post below:

LINK TO UFO KIT

Now, the "already wound" Rotor is NOT Asymmetrical...so, make sure rotor is NOT wound, however, Dyann knows exactly what this is all about.

Thanks for your interest in Asymmetrical Machines


Regards


Ufopolitics

Hello All,

I am tapping out after learning this from Imperial Electrics new distributor

From: nwarsheski@goferparts.com
Date: Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:41 AM

Hey Ward,

Thanks for taking the time to talk this morning. Please see the pricing you requested below:


1.) Price on P56MD003 - Brand new motor will be $527.26. This motor has an 8 week lead time with Imperial.

2. The kit part # is 054021. As we spoke about last week, your price is $450.46 and this kit has a 10 week lead time. I will send the confirmation shortly. Gofer part # IMPP56MD3

3.) New itemized kit line-item prices, please see the breakdown below:

0510052 rotor core assembly - $70.00
0502029 stator core assembly - $98.30
0566001 bearing -$8.00
0566000 bearing - $8.00
0567028c comms 2@$48.00 - $96.00
0515032 brush assembly - $68.00
0596081 1/4"x 1" key - $4.00
0596093 long bolt 2@$4.00 - $8.00
0514120 com bracket assembly - $116.30
0541008 driver end bracket assembly - $49.70
0582036 com bracket cover - $8.00

Total is $534.30

If you need anything else, please let me know

Thanks!

Nikki

What made me cancel my order request was it took 2 weeks between Imperial and GoferParts.com to get all this. As of this AM the order was still not placed. Yesterday i asked for individual parts Nikki was still waiting for the Kit PN to be set-up in their system. Lucky i asked this.

I know it is still the best per easiest, but i am out of my league. I cannot afford this much at moment, and could i wait any longer for an order to be placed. It should not be so hard to spend money.

What irks me is that the parts we need were jacked up the most. No deal.

-Ward

[Ufopolitics]

[QUOTE=Midaztouch;275230]#4

Raul,

Please tell everyone when and were to find the post when YOU made the three pole first... It looks like another member made the 3pole motor first. Then, as usual, you only made the CAD and put you name all over it.

Just checking. Things need to be factual around here.

Midaz


Admin, everything was relevent to Asymertic Motors and factual.

Just like the last time.

Go ahead, bring that proof...am waiting...

[Midaztouch]

UFO/Raul

I called you on the phone and told you/sharing openly about everything that's on my thread now!...

But it was too late by then, I had already started down loading MY thoughts on your thread about Singular Coils!

You where FUMING!!! On the phone.

After you called me every bad word you could think of and said I was trying to discredit you, you hung the phone up in my face!

After an hour in dismay, I removed all of my thoughts and started my thread.

The worst part about it, you're here TODAY, to fight me for it!

You can have it! It means nothing to me, if its not shared!





Just do the A1MoGen correctly or I will kick your butt, Everytime!
YOU work for US... Not the other way around!

Sincerely,

CEO Midaz

[Ufopolitics]

This guy keeps "double posting",filling this thread with disruptive and repetitive posts!
He posts here, then duplicate MY POSTS in his thread.

All this generates is CONFUSION, which it has been his main task on this Forum.

Admin, just. Check this out in order to verify what am writing.


UP

[Midaztouch]

#4[QUOTE]

Raul,

Please tell everyone when and were to find the post when YOU made the three pole first... It looks like another member made the 3pole motor first. Then, as usual, you only made the CAD and put you name all over it.

I can't find anything on this thread or vid on YouTube or you personal sites. You claimed you made the 3pole!?
Two years of searching... Nothing to be found so far.

Just checking. Things need to be factual around here.

Midaz


Your angry because you want to claim the singular coils of the A1MoGen


[VIDEO]https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=EYUuM9T23fc[/VIDEO]

[Midaztouch]

#3[QUOTE]
This is open Forum. Anyone can post and build

[IMG][/IMG]

Nice CAD Raul/Ufo but...

Can you ADD extra brushes to either designs to collect the collapsing field? I don't want to reduce the performance of the machine/magnetic drag.

In your opinion, is it possible to do what I'm saying? Because anything besides that would be a waste of time. Don't you agree!?

Midaz

As soon as P2 and P16 gets fully disconnected from Input, this coils would be in a kind of "limbo", where their previously oriented domains with North direction would get somehow in a 'loose status' just for nano seconds, then easily influenced by both South Stators Magnetic Fields...this would cause a Counter Orientation of the ferromagnetic comprehended core, which would be completely "compatible" with the natural collapsing field and Voltage polarity reversal.

We must realize that every time a ferromagnetic core approaches a magnetic field Pole, the field will "expand" and that specific Pole will take over that portion of the core under the inflluence.

IMO, at this early, primitive stage is too soon and too close to start collecting energy (by setting extra brushes), since it may create "Influence Conflicts" with the Coils being energized by direct input, since they are too close.

I recommend to set the Generator Brushes further away as possible from this 'conversion' stage, and as closer as possible before entering the next Input Cycle, this way we will 'suck out' all the reversed plus the induced energies, leaving a "Blank" clean Coil to receive next input, resulting in much less sparking.

However, all this are just assumptions based on magnetism and electrical behavior 'theories' as well as "not theories but reality", however, complex interactions requires that all of this must be tested/checked at different angles in order to determine which setting will deliver better performance and output.

Just my opinion.


Ufopolitics

It seems like the A1MoGen meets the requirements.

With the Singular Coils = A1MoGen, I believe that you can add extra brushes to collect the collapsing field... There is plenty of room to add the extra brush with no interface.

Look at the CAD. They fit and with with room to find that "Sweet Spot". Don't you think so!?

UFO

The only Chance we have to get maximum performance and extra brushes, is with the singular coils = A1MoGen.

It's seem to me that pair winds and group winds there is NO possibility of adding extra brushes to collect the collapsing field without hindering asymetric motors.

Not to waste anyone's time... shouldn't checking the extra brush and Singular Coils be the main/top priority!? Wouldn't you agree?


Midaz

Mark's half a motor, 1 commutator design, proves that you can add extra brushes. But when you add extra brushes to the Singular Coils = A1MoGen there is room to adjust them for Sweet Spot and maybe acceleration underload.

Mark, with your pair & group winds, I'm sure it created magnetic drag when you collect energy from the collapsing field to power a load with your design. Is that correct?... If you want to try for acceleration unload. Frist you shoud try 4poles Singular Coils = A1MoGen adjusting your gen brushes towards the repultion bisector. Then try the 5poles Singular Coils = A1MoGen... 5pole is a tight squeeze


Keep it Clean and Green
Midaz

Don't forget to use thinner wire... More turns = more Torque

[Midaztouch]

#2[QUOTE]

Hello my friend Midaz, Hello to All,


Ok,Midaz, after we exchange some mails, I think I've got your idea and points.

This concept will work, no doubt about that, and I believe you are right about concentrating the magnetic field within a single coil will 'compact' (let me say it this way) the strength in lesser poles and will not split coils in two. This splitting deviates the bisector angle,or it becomes two bisectors...either one, and yes, it will weaken it somehow. I was going by flux transfer at common shared coils from one to the other...

I like to try this in a Radio Shack first...and see what it does.

If I got it right, the CAD Diagram should look like below:

The only thing that must be done for it to be timed properly, would be to move for a short angle the brushes towards the rotation sense...like 5 to 10 degrees in order to avoid bisector engagement between stators and coil being fired.

Either move the brushes...or rotate both commutators to proper angle (counter to rotation) when assembling rotor, then have brushes at exact alignment to stators center.

So, yeah, let's give it a try friend...we never know, we are all experimenting here....and this is a 'Democracy' here in the Open Source spirit...

I like the simplicity of this configuration...and like I said...You are right, it makes sense...You may have seen what I have missed prior when dissecting the three poles and starting to walk into the All North concept.

For comparison purposes I will wind the RS Motor this way with the same number of turns and gauge, as I did when I made the video where N-S Pairs versus All North Pairs was made, differentiating from the all N Pairs that I would try to fit the two coils total turns into just one coil and two poles.

I will try to "squeeze" this new project in front of my BIG pile of pending work...


Regards Friend


Ufopolitics

"This concept will work, no doubt about that, and I believe you are right about concentrating the magnetic field within a single coil will 'compact' (let me say it this way) the strength in lesser poles and will not split coils in two. This splitting deviates the bisector angle,or it becomes two bisectors...either one, and yes, it will weaken it somehow. I was going by flux transfer at common shared coils from one to the other..."


Midaz

Not only did UFO agree with me, ALL the original "TEAM" members that I spoke to agreed also.

[Midaztouch]

#1

Hey Sam

The width of your brushes is very important for the critical angles! Are your brushes the same size as a commutator segment?



Follow me... If I were you, I would wind your motor with 3poles Singular Coils = A1MoGen!
Remember, I set the guideline for the A1MoGen = "Singular Coils are the same size as the magnet."

Keep it Clean and Green
Midaz

UFO

You have a serious mistake!

Don't push 4pole Singular Coils wind on Sam. Nooooooo!!!

* The image does not show the moment when coils disconnect. The bisector of the coils are past the bisector of the magnets.

FACTS:
1.) That will cause the amps to spike! = heat.
2.) the magnetic fields repel eachother = lower RPMs
3.) lower efficiency


Midaz

Fix the critical angles. Then show the IMPORTANT frames; connect & then disconnected... Halfway is misleading!

[onewsun]

ufo presentation

sir, i have been following this thread for several years and find it quite enlightening--your deep understanding of the magnetic fields has been very helpful in teaching me to understanding the way to harness the ether--with that said i will tell you that when you get close to breaking through the matrix of disinformation the trolls come out! midaz is probably paid to come here and disrupt this thread. if admin will do nothing to defend you from the same forces that closed down tesla and many others then i must wonder why they are here. are we looking to free humanity from enslavement to bad science and big oil or are we just pretending to be for freedom--kinda of like the republican and democratic parties which in reality are just two arms of the same head/body--i vote for freedom not enslavement get rid of midaz on this thread and redirect his posts to his own thread so his "brilliance" will not be lost to history. sorry to go on so long but ufo is very close to breaking us out IMO and i want to continue the journey with him. have a great day--one with the sun- virginia

[HuntingRoss]

...just because his derived creation from my Original Idea was not better than my original related replication...then, no one did absolutely nada about this...And I am not talking about administrators this time, but referring to ALL Members actively participating here.

I too have suffered from a tongue lashing or two and found the exact same response from ALL.

Fact is, I need no one to defend my position. Standing alone is not uncomfortable so long as the ground you stand on is truth.

Garry acquitted himself with restraint and dignity and made Midaz look all the more foolish...in my eyes anyway.

Good Hunting

mark

[Iotayodi]

Your video just lowered your credibility. Your grasp of the English language is atrocious. Spelling is one thing but referring to a winding as if it were the "wind" blowing is mind boggling! As far as I can tell your just here for a pissing contest which lowers your credibility even more. The real test is to put a motor in service for a period of time anyway. There would have to be a significant rise in efficiency to be of any real use on a mass scale.

[GChilders]

eject Midaz

@All
I find Midaz to be extremely disruptive to the point of bullying those who oppose any of his positions. He has an agenda to discredit any and all who would interfere with the future sales of his a1mogen. This is his agenda in staying here. I have grown tired of his disruptive influence and although I believe in freedom of speech he is free to post his opinions on his own thread. He wants maximum exposure and so continues to visit this thread so he can hopefully cash in on the exposure he gets here. He has stated over and over again how knowledgeable he is, and how helpful he has been. I have watched his behavior since he started posting. He has been neither. He attacks any approach that demonstrates his a1mogen is inferior. He bullies even those who question his motives. Recently he has started a campaign to discredit my findings in the "Battle of the Windings" primarily because it demonstrates that although a viable option the an2 winding is still inferior to the an1. When I asked him what excuse he would come up with if the an2 proved to be inferior in the load test, he attacked me directly with comments about my methods. Insinuating that I have created science fiction in my findings. Then when I contracted the stomach flu he brought up the question of my mental stability. Enough is enough. We should be able to post our findings in a peaceful manner. He is a narcissistic ego maniac and has never added one valid test result to prove his points. He demands videos of side by side tests and has not provided a single shred of video evidence of side by side testing to prove his claims that the an2 is superior or inferior to the an1. I believe that all of the attacks come from his own insecure position which he has not proven to himself the superiority of the winding he has proposed. He is what I call a blowhard, someone who believes in his own line of bull**** and thinks that repeating the same line of bull**** over and over again will somehow make it true. But alas it is still as false as the first time he spoke it. Really quite sad to see someone so deluded.

Cheers

Garry

[Ufopolitics]

@ All,

Ever since this person started his 'innovative' and creative idea about single coils, it was an automatic requirement on his end to start criticizing and minimizing all my work.

Ever since he opened his own thread, he has been using my own Diagrams, text, posts, comments to set in ridicule all my work, bad mouthing me personally to extreme situations.

However, I have not posted in that thread not even one single time.

Now he is accusing me that the Original Three Pole Motor was not my own design...and threatening me to "keep my mouth shot"...

I still have the original testing films and original model from that specific motor, since it was the first one that started showing me all the Radiant Energy effects that I have mentioned on my very first thread on this Forum.

What I really find unacceptable is that this guy could harass as he pleases around this forum,....and no administrator restricts his big mouth and small brain.

Whenever Member Garry Childers uploaded his video about testing results from all asymmetrical small motors versus OEM...this guy jumped over Garry Childers like a resort...accusing him of fake results, and this and that...just because his derived creation from my Original Idea was not better than my original related replication...then, no one did absolutely nada about this...And I am not talking about administrators this time, but referring to ALL Members actively participating here.

It is really disappointing and sad to see how this thread has deteriorated just because of an individual behavior. This should never happen in such a Scientific Forum like this.


I have a very useful "resolution" that I take every time I see my self or my work closer to the darkness because of the actions from others...it is simple...and I will write it in my Native Language where it really sounds as it means:

YO, CONVIERTO EL REVÉS EN VICTORIA

I would translate it in the best of my ability...

I, REVERT FAILURES INTO VICTORY

I have always used this "personal law"...and it has served me very well.

I have learn a lot while being part of this Forum for over two years...good and bad experiences...but all experiences after all.


Regards to All


Ufopolitics

[HuntingRoss]

Integrity

It's not for anyone of us here to talk about banning a member from the forum as UFO suggests.

But I do agree that the conduct of Midaz on this thread is disruptive. The last two pages are just hostile remarks between UFO and Midaz. Sam has probably lost the track of his last post where I asked a question relating to his motor.

The more basic point for me is this. The last time there was a huge blow up, Midaz stated in most emphatic terms that he would not come back on this thread. For a short time that lasted and then he returned.

So, Midaz. If you are a man of principles, a man of honour, then withdraw from this thread and pursue your motor on your own thread. There is nothing to be gained from hounding UFO or anyone else for that matter.

UFO. It is your right to do all the things that you said, closing down open access links, but is that what you really want. I suspect not. I would be pissed not to have access but ultimately the decision is yours.

It's been fun

Good Hunting

mark

[admin]

under review

We are currently reviewing this thread due to complaints. Thank you for your patience.