No announcement yet.

Inertia and Spin.(maybe a philosophical thought)

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Inertia and Spin.(maybe a philosophical thought)

    Inertia and Spin.(maybe a philosophical thought)
    1. Aristotle.
    Every object needs force/power/energy for its moving.
    No force - no movement.
    2. Newton.
    Of course the great Aristotle is right saying that there is
    no movement without forces. I respect him very much and
    I won’t make a fool myself quarreling with him.
    However I can say more and explain Aristotle’s opinion
    by the formula F = ma.
    It means,
    the force of moving object depends on acceleration of mass.
    But here I have two opportunities / possibilities:
    a) The acceleration appears as a result of outside influence.
    One moving body interacts with another body (moving or resting).
    b) But if I have only one, single body moving in the straight line
    and it doesn’t interact with another body it means that this body
    also must have an acceleration.
    In this situation I don’t know how the acceleration appears,
    I don’t know if it is inner acceleration of body,
    I know nothing about this acceleration.
    But this kind of acceleration must exist and I will name it “inertia”.
    3. Mach.
    Newton doesn’t know the reason of inertia, but maybe inertia
    depends on all stars, on all the matter in the Universe.
    4. Planck.
    Newton’s inertia is very strange, and Mach’s idea is strange too.
    But if I will take that our Universe looks like a “black body “ then
    I can suggest that must be some very small particle (quant)
    which can move “inertial body'' with constant speed c = 1
    over a period of time.
    I will write this “inertial” moving of quanta by formula: h = Et.
    But really, it is hard for me to believe that I am right.
    5. Einstein.
    Of course Planck is right.
    But I don’t like the way he reached the result.
    He says nothing concrete about the particle and the reason
    of this acceleration’s beginning.
    I will take another road.
    If I use the Boltzmann resting particle (R/N = k) and give him
    Wien’s displacement constant (b), as an acceleration,
    then the particle will have the Planck’s impulse
    but now the formula of impulse will be: h = kb.
    Planck’s formulas and my own are equal, as they explain
    behavior of quant (light quanta) from different point of view.
    6. Goudsmit – Uhlenbeck.
    It is all well.
    But we can see different kinds of movements in the real Nature
    And look at Planck’s formula h = Et. It includes time (t).
    And time, by its nature, is a limited - relative parameter.
    It means that this particle cannot go straight at all time
    with constant speed c = 1.
    This kind of moving must be temporary and can change.
    So, another possibility is that the particle can ''spin'' around itself
    and we will write this kind of moving by formula h = h/2π.
    7. L. de Broglie and W.Heisenberg.
    These two spins of particle are very important parameters,
    and we will try to explain all phenomena in the Nature using
    only these parameters. (h and h = h/2π)
    But, unfortunately, neither had success.
    Why did they fail?
    Because to use only ''spin'' parameters (h and h = h/2π) are not enough.
    The spin parameters belong to the particle what has also another parameters:
    speed (c) and volume (a) and all together they can create particle which
    we call electron: e^2 = αh*c. ( Sommerfeld's fine-structure constant formula)
    Now using electron (E=h*f) and Boltzmann particle (R/N = k) it is possible
    to explain the beginning of star formation (gravitation) and later all another
    phenomena of Nature.
    Attached Files

  • #2
    For the movement we must pay energy-money.
    Your car wouldn't move even one inch without energy.
    The same is about an ''inertia'' movement.
    There isn't inertia without energy.
    But Newtonian conception of ''inertia'' says nothing
    about the forces/ energy of inertia.
    The idea of energy for '' Inertia'' was discovered by Einstein.
    In 1905 Einstein wrote paper :
    “ Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy content?”
    As he realized the answer was:
    “ Yes, the inertia depends on its energy E= Mc^2.”
    How can E=Mc^2 be responsible for inertial movement of quantum particle?
    Nobody explains the details of such possibility of inertia movement.
    Somebody wrote:
    “An old professor of mine used to say
    that anyone who can answer that question
    what inertia is, would win a Nobel Prize. “