Tweet
http://www.energeticforum.com/223320-post13.html
In the above mentioned response by me on another thread I took a shot at Neale Donald Walsch who claims to have had an uncommon dialogue with God.
How do I know Neale is full of himself and what he had was probably a conversation with himself that had been developed over his lifetime ....?
Please do recall a fact - Neale D. Walsch was raised a Catholic - therefore he had an Issue with Iesus/Jesus.
So how did this man approaching 50 finally reconcile catholic teachings with the world at large that promotes evolution and creation?
It appears that the flaky Neale has been exposed by the ASYMMETRICAL SNOWFLAKE.
Megadunes and Hoar Frost: 6 Facts About Snow : Discovery News
Yes Mr. Walsch has been exposed by the same obvious flaws that exposes Jesus as a man who has not kept pace with the teachings of the day and the forces of 'nature'?
Jesus was great at telling us how to behave, dispensing a moral code...but Jesus' science/math lessons sucked, they appear to have been non-existent??
Unless we use Marko Rodin's VBM (vortex based math based on the Great Name of God) to help explain the 2 fish and 5 loaves of bread miracle!
Marko vs. Jesus >>>
How to feed 5000 people using 5 loaves of bread and 2 fish | Reconciliation of Science and Religion
I have read book 1 of the Conversations with God trilogy.
I own book 2.
I am not sure if I care to bother looking for a used book 3.
And in addition to the ire, I feel like writing a book 4 that helps to reconcile science with religion using real science proofs, not the drivel that Neale and other New Age wackos peddle as divine gospel emanating from their self serving 'this is it' yaps.
The bible is great at waking 'we the sheeple' up from their slumber, but rarely can these new age profits/prophets use their divinely inspired insights to give us scientific remedies to solve the problems that have plagued humanity since genesis of man's primary nemesis.
i.e. man vs. nature.
Why are New Age prophets FAILURES as delivering us from evil and energy depletion?
The trilogy called Conversations with God is a monumental ruse because God would know that a snowflake is in fact ASYMMETRICAL not SYMMETRICAL as commonly believed and as Neale, err I mean God mentions as analogy on pages 43, 46, 49, and 54.
And on page 106 Neale, err I mean God does an end run around the science laws that govern our world.
Why would God not commit himself, go out on a limb regarding the science laws/constants that rule/govern our roost?
Is it because Neale err I mean God does not have a clue about the laws of nature that Neale never discusses at any great length in books 1 and 2?
Why is there so little science/nature in his drivel and just more dogma about the kind of human I should be?
selah V
Raphael
In the above mentioned response by me on another thread I took a shot at Neale Donald Walsch who claims to have had an uncommon dialogue with God.
How do I know Neale is full of himself and what he had was probably a conversation with himself that had been developed over his lifetime ....?
Please do recall a fact - Neale D. Walsch was raised a Catholic - therefore he had an Issue with Iesus/Jesus.
So how did this man approaching 50 finally reconcile catholic teachings with the world at large that promotes evolution and creation?
It appears that the flaky Neale has been exposed by the ASYMMETRICAL SNOWFLAKE.
Megadunes and Hoar Frost: 6 Facts About Snow : Discovery News
Yes Mr. Walsch has been exposed by the same obvious flaws that exposes Jesus as a man who has not kept pace with the teachings of the day and the forces of 'nature'?
Jesus was great at telling us how to behave, dispensing a moral code...but Jesus' science/math lessons sucked, they appear to have been non-existent??
Unless we use Marko Rodin's VBM (vortex based math based on the Great Name of God) to help explain the 2 fish and 5 loaves of bread miracle!
Marko vs. Jesus >>>
How to feed 5000 people using 5 loaves of bread and 2 fish | Reconciliation of Science and Religion
I have read book 1 of the Conversations with God trilogy.
I own book 2.
I am not sure if I care to bother looking for a used book 3.
And in addition to the ire, I feel like writing a book 4 that helps to reconcile science with religion using real science proofs, not the drivel that Neale and other New Age wackos peddle as divine gospel emanating from their self serving 'this is it' yaps.
The bible is great at waking 'we the sheeple' up from their slumber, but rarely can these new age profits/prophets use their divinely inspired insights to give us scientific remedies to solve the problems that have plagued humanity since genesis of man's primary nemesis.
i.e. man vs. nature.
Why are New Age prophets FAILURES as delivering us from evil and energy depletion?
The trilogy called Conversations with God is a monumental ruse because God would know that a snowflake is in fact ASYMMETRICAL not SYMMETRICAL as commonly believed and as Neale, err I mean God mentions as analogy on pages 43, 46, 49, and 54.
And on page 106 Neale, err I mean God does an end run around the science laws that govern our world.
Why would God not commit himself, go out on a limb regarding the science laws/constants that rule/govern our roost?
Is it because Neale err I mean God does not have a clue about the laws of nature that Neale never discusses at any great length in books 1 and 2?
Why is there so little science/nature in his drivel and just more dogma about the kind of human I should be?
selah V
Raphael