Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Diabetes Super Module is here...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Diabetes Super Module is here...

    PATHS Diabetes Super Module has been released.

    A short description and a synopsis of over a years worth of testing will be posted here later tonight.

    Happiness & Health,

    PATHS, S.A. Staff

    PATHS

  • #2
    PATHS Diabetes Super Module

    WARNING~~~~DISCLAIMER~~~~WARNING


    PATHS S.A. module software is not intended to prevent or cure any disease. Whilst it may contain certain technologies, which have the intention to help maintain or elevate biological function, you understand that this technology is offered educationally as a complimentary benefit to your overall wellness, and are not intended to replace the advice or recommendations given by a qualified physician or medical doctor. If you suffer from any condition, physical or otherwise, which you feel may be affected by increased energy levels or additional stimulation of your brain functioning, you should consult your doctor/physician prior to using this software. Whilst we believe this software to be safe - you should consult a qualified GP/medical doctor/physician if you have any concerns. The staff of PATHS, S.A. will not be able to advise you on such matters.


    PATHS products are based on an entirely new paradigm in Consciousness Science, utilizing largely undocumented quantum principles.

    Portions of the Mission Statement at Energetic Science Ministries accurately reflect our Mission at PATHS, S.A.

    Many have called what we do a spiritual "technology".

    Whatever name one puts to it, we will let the results that people experience speak to the efficacy of the PATHS products.



    The following information is NOT a scientific study, nor is it to be interpreted as any medical claim. It was not controlled, the participants may have made mistakes or misinformed us.

    It is simply a report of the information we received from individuals viewing the PATHS Diabetes Module Theater Presentation.

    PATHS, S.A. specifically disclaims giving any medical or healthcare related advice or claims.

    The following information should be viewed as anecdotal, and nothing more.




    PATHS DIABETES MODULE (version 4.3)
    REPORTED RESULTS


    Reports Collected: February 9 through February 23, 2007

    Subjects:

    #1 Male age 48 type 2 diabetic for 6 years controlled by diet & exercise

    #2 Male age 68 type 2 diabetic for 1 year controlled by diet, exercise and 3
    insulin shots daily

    #3 Male age 55 type 2 diabetic for 8 years controlled by diet, exercise and 2
    insulin shots daily

    #4 Female age 51 type 2 diabetic for 14 years controlled by diet, minimal to no
    exercise, 4-7 insulin shots daily

    #5 Female age 4 type 1 diabetic for 1 year controlled by diet, exercise and 4
    insulin shots daily

    #6 Female age 69 type 2 diabetic for 18 years controlled by diet, exercise and 3
    insulin shots daily


    General Notes:

    All subjects established a minimum 2 week average of their blood sugar levels prior to beginning use of the PATHS Diabetes Module.

    All subjects measured their blood sugar levels 4x a day, both before and during the use of the PATHS Diabetes Module. (exception-#2 measured their blood sugar only 2x a day before and during the test)

    All subjects kept their carb intake at the same level (10%+-) during entire test period.

    Insulin intake was the same or less during entire test period.

    Ideally blood sugar levels should never exceed 110 and not drop below 70. However, many doctors advise their diabetic patients that their goal should be to try and keep their blood sugar level below 150 and above 70 because it can be so difficult to keep it below the ideal of 110.

    For this reason we use the 150 level and the 110 level as key points in the report below.

    * Three of these subjects had been using PATHS Diabetes test modules for as long as 2 months prior to this test. Subject #1 had been on various PATHS Diabetes modules for 11 months.



    Subject #1

    This subject was the only one that conducted a Glucose Tolerance test.

    February 2007
    80 grams glucose
    2 hour result 130 blood sugar (this is high normal for a non-diabetic)

    Year 2005 result of the same test as above was 225 blood sugar

    Year 2002 result of the same test as above was 218 blood sugar

    Year 2000 result of the same test as above was 242 blood sugar

    Pre-test period

    % of time below150 level 100%

    % of time below 110 level 60% (range between 90 and 135) (average of 108)

    During usage of PATHS Diabetes module

    % of time below150 level 100%

    % of time below 110 level 100% (range between 62 and 108) (average of 84)

    Improvement 65%

    Note: This subject actually had to eat more carbs during use of the module to keep blood sugar from falling too low. This subject had also participated in previous PATHS Diabetes tests and it is believed that they did experience a cumulative positive effect.


    Subject #2


    Pre-test period

    % of time below150 level 100%

    % of time below 110 level 18% (range between 98 and 138) (average of 130)

    During usage of PATHS Diabetes module

    % of time below150 level 100%

    % of time below 110 level 100% (range between 88 and 102) (average of 90)

    Improvement 555%



    Subject #3

    Pre-test period

    % of time below150 level 100%

    % of time below 110 level 3.5% (range between 109 and 139) (average of 126)

    During usage of PATHS Diabetes module

    % of time below150 level 100%

    % of time below 110 level 100% (range between 98 and 110) (average of 103)

    Improvement 2850%



    Subject #4


    Subject was excluded after it was learned that they used blood thinners. Spirulina was a needed supplement for this PATHS Theater Presentation viewing and a person on blood thinners should not take spirulina.



    Subject #5


    Pre-test period

    % of time below150 level 21%

    % of time below 110 level 10.7% (range between 88 and 384) (average of 205)

    During usage of PATHS Diabetes module

    % of time below150 level 45.5%

    % of time below 110 level 29.5% (range between 62 and 314) (average of 150)

    Improvement 275%



    Subject #6

    Pre-test period

    % of time below150 level 73%

    % of time below 110 level 29% (range between 93 and 192) (average of 162)

    During usage of PATHS Diabetes module

    % of time below150 level 91%

    % of time below 110 level 48.5% (range between 82 and 174) (average of 131)

    Improvement 67%




    WARNING~~~~DISCLAIMER~~~~WARNING

    PATHS, S.A. specifically disclaims giving any medical or healthcare related advice or claims.

    It is simply a report of the information we received from individuals viewing the PATHS Diabetes Module Theater Presentation.

    THE COPYRIGHT TO THIS POST IS OWNED BY PATHS, S.A., AND COPYING ALL OR ANY PORTION OF THIS POST INTO ANY OTHER FORUM, OR ANY OTHER MEDIA, WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM PATHS, S.A. IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN.

    Happiness & Health,

    PATHS, S.A. Staff

    PATHS

    Comment


    • #3
      PATHS diabetic results summary

      The results of this most recent test may be confusing for some. Here is a simplified list of the results:

      Subject / Increased time below 110 in safe range / Drop in average blood sugar level

      1 / 65% increase / 22.22% drop
      2 / 555% increase / 30.8% drop
      3 / 2850% increase / 18.25% drop
      4 -
      5 / 275% increase / 26.83% drop
      6 / 67% increase / 19.14% drop
      Sincerely,
      Aaron Murakami

      Books & Videos https://emediapress.com
      Conference http://energyscienceconference.com
      RPX & MWO http://vril.io

      Comment


      • #4
        This is of interest to me as I have Type 1 Diabetes
        But you guys have publsihed the BG(Blood Glucose) levels in mg/dl = milligrams/deciliter where as in the UK more and more people are tending to use mmol/l = millimoles/liter.

        So before these stats made sense to me I had to sit there and convert them LOL

        I have changed the values below to help other people who may measure their BG levels in mmol/l .

        Hope this is okay, if not feel free to delete post.

        Regards

        Sean.

        **************************************
        General Notes:

        All subjects established a minimum 2 week average of their blood sugar levels prior to beginning use of the PATHS Diabetes Module.

        All subjects measured their blood sugar levels 4x a day, both before and during the use of the PATHS Diabetes Module. (exception-#2 measured their blood sugar only 2x a day before and during the test)

        All subjects kept their carb intake at the same level (10%+-) during entire test period.

        Insulin intake was the same or less during entire test period.

        Ideally blood sugar levels should never exceed 6.11 and not drop below 3.88. However, many doctors advise their diabetic patients that their goal should be to try and keep their blood sugar level below 8.33 and above 3.88 because it can be so difficult to keep it below the ideal of 6.11.

        For this reason we use the 8.33 level and the 6.11 level as key points in the report below.

        * Three of these subjects had been using PATHS Diabetes test modules for as long as 2 months prior to this test. Subject #1 had been on various PATHS Diabetes modules for 11 months.


        Subject #1

        This subject was the only one that conducted a Glucose Tolerance test.

        February 2007
        80 grams glucose
        2 hour result 7.22 blood sugar (this is high normal for a non-diabetic)

        Year 2005 result of the same test as above was 12.50 blood sugar

        Year 2002 result of the same test as above was 12.11 blood sugar

        Year 2000 result of the same test as above was 13.44 blood sugar

        Pre-test period

        % of time below 8.33 level 100%

        % of time below 6.11 level 60% (range between 5.00 and 7.50) (average of 6.00)

        During usage of PATHS Diabetes module

        % of time below 8.33 level 100%

        % of time below 6.11 level 100% (range between 3.44 and 6.00) (average of 4.66)

        Improvement 65%

        Note: This subject actually had to eat more carbs during use of the module to keep blood sugar from falling too low. This subject had also participated in previous PATHS Diabetes tests and it is believed that they did experience a cumulative positive effect.


        Subject #2

        Pre-test period

        % of time below 8.33 level 100%

        % of time below 6.11 level 18% (range between 5.44 and 7.66) (average of 7.22)

        During usage of PATHS Diabetes module

        % of time below 8.33 level 100%

        % of time below 6.11 level 100% (range between 4.88 and 5.66) (average of 5.00)

        Improvement 555%


        Subject #3

        Pre-test period

        % of time below 8.33 level 100%

        % of time below 6.11 level 3.5% (range between 6.05 and 7.72) (average of 7.00)

        During usage of PATHS Diabetes module

        % of time below 8.33 level 100%

        % of time below 6.11 level 100% (range between 5.44 and 6.11) (average of 5.72)

        Improvement 2850%


        Subject #4

        Subject was excluded after it was learned that they used blood thinners. Spirulina was a needed supplement for this PATHS Theater Presentation viewing and a person on blood thinners should not take spirulina.


        Subject #5

        Pre-test period

        % of time below 8.33 level 21%

        % of time below 6.11 level 10.7% (range between 4.88 and 21.33) (average of 11.38)

        During usage of PATHS Diabetes module

        % of time below 8.33 level 45.5%

        % of time below 6.11 level 29.5% (range between 3.44 and 17.44) (average of 8.33)

        Improvement 275%


        Subject #6

        Pre-test period

        % of time below 8.33 level 73%

        % of time below 6.11 level 29% (range between 5.16 and 10.66) (average of 9.00)

        During usage of PATHS Diabetes module

        % of time below 8.33 level 91%

        % of time below 6.11 level 48.5% (range between 4.55 and 9.66) (average of 7.27)

        Improvement 67%
        **********************
        http://www.overunity.org.uk
        **********************

        Comment

        Working...
        X