I've started this thread to discuss the issue of the spam threads which keep popping up.
Examples, ask I type this post - are:
What all these threads have in common is as follows:
Their goal is the link, because they believe that the more links they get to a site, the greater SEO effect it will have on their search engine rankings.
When the fact is that google (who is the main search engine they target) has moved on to more sophisticated means of determining who should be where in the search engine results. Basically the search engines have moved on, while the people who are manually doing the spam posting - are still doing it as if they were still back in 2004.
Anyway...
The solution is to remove their ability to gain the link.
So all new users should have the ability to create posts with active links removed, until they have actually contributed to the forum - in the form of a minimum number of posts.
Another option would also be to remove the ability of new users, from creating new threads until they have a minimum post count as well, but the minimum post count for thread creation should be higher than that for links.
The software running this forum should have that ability.
As it stands, this thread is an easy target. Only worsened by the Copyright bit at the bottom of the page (which should not be in HTML, but should be in image form).
Examples, ask I type this post - are:
"Scooters for sale" thread: http://www.energeticforum.com/announ...ters-sale.html
"Recognized Golf Drivers By Taylormade" thread: http://www.energeticforum.com/announ...aylormade.html
"Actively playing golf Instructions Information to get Out of Golfing Enthusiasts" thread: http://www.energeticforum.com/announ...thusiasts.html
"Basic Suggestions to the Newcomers of Golfing" thread: http://www.energeticforum.com/announ...s-golfing.html
"More of Marc Jacobs Handbags" thread: http://www.energeticforum.com/paths/...-handbags.html
"Myths about piles" thread: http://www.energeticforum.com/health...out-piles.html
"Recognized Golf Drivers By Taylormade" thread: http://www.energeticforum.com/announ...aylormade.html
"Actively playing golf Instructions Information to get Out of Golfing Enthusiasts" thread: http://www.energeticforum.com/announ...thusiasts.html
"Basic Suggestions to the Newcomers of Golfing" thread: http://www.energeticforum.com/announ...s-golfing.html
"More of Marc Jacobs Handbags" thread: http://www.energeticforum.com/paths/...-handbags.html
"Myths about piles" thread: http://www.energeticforum.com/health...out-piles.html
What all these threads have in common is as follows:
New user
Very low post count - their posts only consist of spam threads, that they have created - for the single purpose of gaining a link back to their target site.
Very low post count - their posts only consist of spam threads, that they have created - for the single purpose of gaining a link back to their target site.
Their goal is the link, because they believe that the more links they get to a site, the greater SEO effect it will have on their search engine rankings.
When the fact is that google (who is the main search engine they target) has moved on to more sophisticated means of determining who should be where in the search engine results. Basically the search engines have moved on, while the people who are manually doing the spam posting - are still doing it as if they were still back in 2004.
Anyway...
The solution is to remove their ability to gain the link.
So all new users should have the ability to create posts with active links removed, until they have actually contributed to the forum - in the form of a minimum number of posts.
Another option would also be to remove the ability of new users, from creating new threads until they have a minimum post count as well, but the minimum post count for thread creation should be higher than that for links.
The software running this forum should have that ability.
As it stands, this thread is an easy target. Only worsened by the Copyright bit at the bottom of the page (which should not be in HTML, but should be in image form).
Comment