about the Ferrocell (ferrolens)

[mikrovolt]

smaller short sentences.

This misunderstanding is simply a translation problem.
The (author) has a website. He is a swiss guy named Pascal.
He posts pictures of magnetic analysis.
He likes dynamic toroid conversion in biological systems.
His field is immunology pharmaceutical research.

Because nano ferro fluid is used in a variety of medical science (squid, spion, hall quantum)
Also like drug delivery and imaging ect His platform comes from
application specific to Imunology however he also has interest in
astrophysics, chemistry, geometry and a few other sciences.

The image models hinted possibly Magnetic Immunoassays Technology.
Nature of Organic Chemistry being very complex well respected, A matcher
for nerve research. Guess that the other magneto optical guy's priority level is too high.
Thanks good try

[Iamnuts]

img006.jpg

Come on somebody have a go at describing this in terms of what a ferro lens would
"see"
Or, what would the Earth look like in a ferro lens view?
What will the modern description help us to do?

[Iamnuts]

I’m an old grandpa and I work away nearly all day every day but it’s mostly
physical labour so I have spare brain capacity. I just love thinking of these
sort of problems.
I’ve come to the conclusion that there must be a relationship between
grandpa fields and ferri lens fields.
I think that the single light source and lens gives the best feel for what’s going
on. Timm’s photo of the sideways magnet showing something happening in the
middle (Bloch wall?) is quite convincing.

[mikrovolt]

Mr. Nutz

Magnetism plays a fundamental role and is not completely understood.
There are thousands of theories, you can assign value to them, this is why I am here to collect. The emotional content is distractive unfortunately
it is the only motivation for some.

The magnetic force lines have been credited for bringing forward the era of dynamos of the electrical power system. The energetic forum has other alternative theories. One popular theory is where power comes from an open system.

( my opinion about what is being seen )
Since the paramagnetic realm does coexist you can assign value to it.
It seems logical and dignified to call it the paramagnetic field and leave the magnetic field alone. Even better to use the paramagnetic field as well as the Faraday magnetic force lines are doing. They cannot instead they disrupt ( strong assertions ) premature claims quotations and borrowed mimicry.

There are extremist that say that the prior art is completely wrong. Erase your minds, follow the narrative berate the founders
they try to explain and make claims based on new observations as absolute proof in the process as mental giants they attack you,
ignore you, make noise and reconfigure the bells and whistles, stealing good work along the way.

Here is the truth.
A field is shown by the ferrolens.
The same field is not visable with iron powder.
Both fields are valid with respect to the type of indicator used.
We travel around space on a planet that uses both.

[Iamnuts]

http://www.energeticforum.com/attach...1&d=1526985865

To me this thing resembles a jigsaw puzzle. I have a choice of two pictures and
they both could be correct. People scattered around the world have some pieces
which may or may not fit one of the pictures. My task is to collect pieces and
decide where they go,if anywhere.
In a ferrilens the particles are ordering themselves to make a light pipe so I
need to know how these clumps arrange themselves in a grandpa field.
The clumps obviously respond to a grandpa field in an orderly way otherwise
nothing would happen.
In these two pictures it’s interesting to see the clumping effect which the
surfactant imparts.

[Iamnuts]

http://www.energeticforum.com/attach...1&d=1526992562

I feel I’m learning bit by bit.

[dyetalon]

http://www.energeticforum.com/attach...05f01ba09f-jpg

I feel I’m learning bit by bit.

The nanoparticles fall into the Rayleigh Scattering category without a magnetic field (nm length) That's the orange-ish color the cell naturally is.

When a field is applied, the particles form chains (um length) in the regions where the lowest potential is. Now we see Geometric scattering as 'flux bands' within the Rayleigh.

Kinda like the trail a jet makes high up in the atmosphere on a cold day.
Read about it here:
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/acmp/2017/2583717/

Yep, you nailed it, Iamnuts

[bistander]

Coincidence

Guys,

I just accidentally have found that the ferrocell has his own Wikipedia page!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrolens
...
EM

Looks like it was written by Markoulw on 14 March 2018.

[dyetalon]

img006.jpg

Come on somebody have a go at describing this in terms of what a ferro lens would
"see"
Or, what would the Earth look like in a ferro lens view?
What will the modern description help us to do?

I couldn't post this link until today, when he released it to public view.
Look familiar?



Dr. Tufaile will be presenting this paper at the Chaos Conference 2018 in Rome next month:
https://pt.slideshare.net/albertotuf...ce=ssslideview

[Iamnuts]

Thank you.
I had a look at some of those things and maybe your cell is working
like a rainbow.
People who have made big cells do get complete circles,which after all
a rainbow would be if you could see it all.

[Iamnuts]

http://www.energeticforum.com/attach...1&d=1527026281

Sorry,the rainbow was a bit of a wind-up.
This image is quite convincing,I think.

[Markoul]

Message to you all by Mike

Message to you all by Mike

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZrHRa1SpDg[/VIDEO]

[dyetalon]

[QUOTE=Markoul;310506]Message to you all by Mike

WOW

What a great way to separate the larger particles from the smaller ones!
It beats the hell out of what I've been trying to do. Buying 5nm particles and mixing my own is a lot of work, plus EVERYTHING has to be PERFECT.
I still haven't got it right.

So cool. What an experimenter extraordinaire !
Hail Mike

[mikrovolt]

Thanks Markoul,
practical, beneficial for optical performance.

The chip magnetophoresis very graceful movement
https://youtu.be/JJ8D-aR_JOw

[Iamnuts]

I keep trying to get a bit further.
What I seem to have found is that there are no photons (virtual?) until
you move your magnet about.
This starts to make sense as photons are packets of energy and a magnet
does no work. Therefore you are suppling energy via movement to make
the photons.