Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Capitalism Myth

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by DavidE View Post

    In your way of thinking, even the Pope has a dark side.
    You are kidding right? The Pope's Miter is the image and symbol

    of the ancient gOd DAGON, Dagon the Fish gOd. Good Friday and so forth?

    Feasting on those yummy fish patties. Hail Dagon. The POPE is a scaling

    unholy man. Anyone who follows the POPE into world gov. will drink

    of the wine of the wrath of THE ALMIGHTY. The Pope in Italy is controlled

    by the ancient Jesuit Mafia who have no problem eating the people.

    Eat the people? How? Eat up their profits, political robbers.

    The Pope's have always killed entire populations who would not

    come under their umbrella. This is common historical fact. To think that

    things have changes in our century is a sign of the propaganda brain

    warping. Child trafficking and molestation or the sale of baby tissue and

    organs has always been linked to the Justice department. It is estimated

    in the billions that the controlling body of our world through the legal

    system bring in every year.

    The people who run our current system are at each others throats

    constantly trying to out do one another, killing and genocide has always

    been their open interrogate boast on the inter-circle. Proving who is

    the better killer is a way to prove who is the biggest. You don't think

    that all of that money the POPE controls came from Sunday

    offerings, Do you? All of the worlds figure heads have been cloned,

    they all have doubles. THEY hate Christians. The POPE pushes Madonna

    worship. Mean while the majority of the world sees the POPE protecting

    Bishop's who are caught on a regular basis year after year for decades

    and the masses are disgusted. However the people soon forget and

    easily lead to the slaughter and before you know it, one by one become

    the meat on Satan's table.

    The POPE is the false spokes person for the GOD OF HEAVEN also

    known as the False Prophet. He will be cast into the lake of fire and

    no one will shed a tear.

    Leave a comment:


  • DavidE
    replied
    Aaron

    In your way of thinking, even the Pope has a dark side. Is that what fills your head as you walk around being Aaron?



    You need some Taylor Swift in your life. Here, I will get you started. Happy day.

    [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRzpPppFOFk[/VIDEO]

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    Wikipedia the FRAUD reference

    Originally posted by DavidE View Post
    Aaron

    Only you would take on an institution like Wikipedia. And at the same time impugn all of the contributions as being non-authoritative in nature.

    In mid-2015, Wikipedia was the world's sixth-most-popular website according to Alexa Internet,[6] and is the largest general-knowledge encyclopedia online, with a combined total of over 36 million mainspace articles across all 291 language editions.[1] On average, Wikipedia receives a total of 10 billion global pageviews from around 495 million unique visitors every month,[7][113] including 85 million visitors from the United States alone,[8] where it is the sixth-most-popular site.

    Why not stop while you are ahead friend.
    You can't be serious. McDonald's sells the most popular hamburger in the world and it is the worst quality imaginable. Popularity has absolutely nothing to do with quality and it never will. That in itself demonstrates your inability and unwillingness to utilize and accept functional basic logic.

    10 shocking facts you never knew about Wikipedia and Jimmy Wales - NaturalNews.com

    These are just a few of the many sleazebag practices of Wikipedia and it's founders - all documented irrefutable documented facts - and that is what you are defending - a phony "authoritative" source with phony volunteer editors - you're the one who needs to give up while you're ahead because you are trolling with disinformation and refuse to accept historically accurate origins of the English language - no surprise, Wikipedia is your your guide - :

    1) Wikipedia claims to be run by "volunteers" but is actually edited by corporate-paid trolls on many topics such as GMOs, vaccines, chemotherapy and pharmaceuticals.

    5) Jimmy Wales is a key operator of the "Hillary Clinton protection network" that cleanses the Clinton entry of all facts about Hillary's crimes and acts of treason against America

    6) Wikipedia also distributed child porn. "The parent company of Wikipedia is knowingly distributing child pornography..." said Larry Sanger, co-founder of Wikipedia

    7) Jimmy Wales openly despises natural medicine and the healing arts, deliberately allowing corporate-funded Wikipedia editors to disparage authors, naturopaths, doctors and practitioners who help people heal

    10) The Wikipedia extortion racket is a reflection of the total lack of ethics practiced by Jimmy Wales himself

    Leave a comment:


  • DavidE
    replied
    Aaron

    Only you would take on an institution like Wikipedia. And at the same time impugn all of the contributions as being non-authoritative in nature.

    In mid-2015, Wikipedia was the world's sixth-most-popular website according to Alexa Internet,[6] and is the largest general-knowledge encyclopedia online, with a combined total of over 36 million mainspace articles across all 291 language editions.[1] On average, Wikipedia receives a total of 10 billion global pageviews from around 495 million unique visitors every month,[7][113] including 85 million visitors from the United States alone,[8] where it is the sixth-most-popular site.

    Why not stop while you are ahead friend.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    Wikipedia - fake reference

    Originally posted by DavidE View Post
    Aaron

    I am developing this new sense about you... if I called you a peanut butter and jelly sandwich, you would argue peanut butter and honey. When this turns into a debate - I am out because its not worth the energy to prove one point or another. They are both sticky sandwiches.

    As to your diatribe about Capitalism? You need to argue with Wikipedia
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism


    When you said this:
    "Only a couple people know about this and it will stay that way until I have time to scale it up a bit and do more tests."

    Stating it this way can be observed as a taunt to what you know, versus what is otherwise commonly known. So I reacted to your expression or attitude about the phenomena. Words mean things bub.
    Using Wikipedia as your reference is all telling. Wikipedia is the biggest joke of an "authoritative" source that has ever plagued the Internet. If you want to know what a word means, you study it's etymology - NOT Wikipedia the fake encyclopedia run by a encyclopedic wannabes that are too scared to think.

    When I use Wikipedia as a reference, I usually disclaim that it is a joke, but for the point that I'm using, its accurate and agrees with other real authoritative sources.

    Leave a comment:


  • DavidE
    replied
    Aaron

    I am developing this new sense about you... if I called you a peanut butter and jelly sandwich, you would argue peanut butter and honey. When this turns into a debate - I am out because its not worth the energy to prove one point or another. They are both sticky sandwiches.

    As to your diatribe about Capitalism? You need to argue with Wikipedia
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism


    When you said this:
    "Only a couple people know about this and it will stay that way until I have time to scale it up a bit and do more tests."

    Stating it this way can be observed as a taunt to what you know, versus what is otherwise commonly known. So I reacted to your expression or attitude about the phenomena. Words mean things bub.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    started a topic Capitalism Myth

    Capitalism Myth

    Originally posted by DavidE View Post
    Aaron

    cap·i·tal·ism
    ˈkapədlˌizəm/
    noun
    an economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state.

    Private Owners for profit.

    There is this prevailing attitude than many in this field freely collaborate, when in reality its far more about facilitating a low cost way to catalyze their own thinking, bringing gain for themselves. Forums can be like that. You take the chances by underwriting the cost, so its your privilege.

    "Only a couple people know about this and it will stay that way until I have time to scale it up a bit and do more tests."
    "What I am actually saying is that I'm not going to waste anyone's time with this circuit that has been tested at flea power levels and will offer it up when I know it is actually worth pursuing."


    I am doing my best to get your meaning - because you do really have great explanations in this challenging field - but these two statements are miles apart.

    Sooner or later if we want this field to progress in a larger sense, everyone will need to be more about freely sharing experimental observations and less about guarding existing beliefs, deity inventors, or capitalistic interest. How many people need to die with their secrets before we all learn?

    And based on your last note about value of pursuing? Why not just release your observation to the world?

    Not sarcasm here, just a truth. I am one of your customers, and your attitude in your post, will not help you sell books. I would hope that you work in your field out of love of the subject matter and the meaning it produces for you - otherwise make a new choice.

    I only came to this thread to learn how others oriented around Cold Electricity. I apologize to wayne.ct that my presence has produced some non-Cold Electricity clutter.
    We can only use the original meaning or we're engaging in Orwellian Newspeak as you quoted. You're using modernized definitions revised by multinational corporations, which hides the real meaning.

    The original meaning is...

    capitalism (n.) 1854, "condition of having capital;" from capital (n.1)

    "The Oxford English Dictionary, considered an authority on the English language, credits William Makepeace Thackeray for the first published use of the word ‘capitalism’ in his novel, The Newcomes (1853-55), though it is clear from its context that this refers to finance capital, rather than as a ‘system’."

    "Private owners for profit" as you highlight has nothing to do with the meaning of the word capitalism.

    Like I said, a capitalist is one who uses finance capital to make more money, which has absolutely nothing to do with someone selling their goods or services and making a profit. Selling products or services is free enterprise and is not and never has been capitalism and any claim to the contrary has always been socialistic/communistic propaganda.

    That false and deceptive argument goes way back before any of us were born and is intended to help put the laborers against business owners and lump them together with the real capitalists. This is how laborers are used to do the bidding of the ruling elite in order to pass "worker rights" bills, etc... so that the state can take more and more control of many aspects of smaller privately owned businesses. It is a step towards socialism and then ultimately communism. The bottom line is that your claim is subversion created by the communists but it doesn't seem that you are aware that you have been used in that manner to propagate such a mythological belief but it's a historical fact.

    You also completely ignore the fact that most of what I have ever published has already been posted for free online at one time or another but most people do not want to take the time to search for it and would rather have it compiled in one place to save time. You also ignore the point that I made that this isn't a hobby for me but it seems that it is for you.

    What do you do to earn your income and why don't you just volunteer your time for free and ask for donations?

    I address each of your points, but you conveniently skim past mine and simply repeat what you already said. Just because your primary source of income might not have anything to do with this field doesn't mean that the same standards shouldn't apply to you. Suddenly someone does something in the "free energy" field and they're not allowed to earn their income from it and they're a capitalist? That's completely made up and is a double standard.

    I have also contributed many gigabytes of open source work that I was involved in online for 15 years that is free for the taking. Some of that has value and some doesn't, but I shared it without asking anyone in return for anything - that is usually ignored by those criticizing me as you are doing right here.

    dR_Green is absolutely right. My two statements are not miles apart - they are completely congruent and I can't state it any better than he already did.

    I also don't appreciate the underhanded insults about "deity inventors" - I worship no man and neither does anyone I know. These people are my friends and I associate with people that not only have their ideas but build things that work that I can see with my eyes and measure with my hands. The reason many of them have some kind of "celebrity" status in this field is because they're time tested and proven so to speak. The very people that you are insulting are the very ones you wish would hand their life's work over to you on a silver platter.

    And how many people need to die? That's beyond disingenuous. By publishing books of people's works, they obviously don't go do the grave and I spelled that out in my last post. You have ignored basically everything I said, which was pointed out to you and then come back to state something that continues on the same path of deception.

    I said, "you are lucky to even know what it is at any price but you obviously are not able to appreciate the fact that its not taken to the grave."

    And your comeback is about how many people have to die. That is all complete BS David and you know it. Why can't you just accept what is being said for what is being said instead of twisting or ignoring it?

    I do honestly appreciate the fact that you have purchased some of the books and videos, but money is not my priority and if something is blatantly false, I'm going to say something. I'm not going to fake being agreeable to something that I don't agree with in order to make more sales. My integrity comes before money and it always will. I'm involved with all of this because it is a calling and I'm passionate about it.

    If I was interested in just making money, this is the LAST field that I would try to do that in for countless obvious reasons.
    Last edited by Aaron; 09-27-2015, 04:21 AM.
Working...
X