Energetic Forum  
Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Delicious Digg Reddit WordPress StumbleUpon Tumblr Translate Addthis Aaron Murakami YouTube 2019 ENERGY CONFERENCE - ONLY 150 118 99 SEATS AVAILABLE!

2019 Energy Science & Technology Conference
ONLY 150 118 99 SEATS AVAILABLE - LIMITED SEATING
Get your tickets now: http://energyscienceconference.com


Go Back   Energetic Forum > > >
   

Eric Dollard Official Forum This forum is dedicated to the work of Eric P. Dollard. His Official homepage is http://ericpdollard.com

* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 06-23-2014, 03:29 AM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 955
Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages, using tips from E. Dollards

Based upon 10 years of research and finding a few of the last remaining LINKS in the puzzle from Eric P Dollard, I will be done in less than a week.

When I upload the 92+ PAGE article (with many original diagrams) to the website,


*EDIT. DONE 99 pages


Done, BOOK uploaded, 99 pages


2 sizes, small and large (one reduced in image optimization)


www.kathodos.com/magnetism1.pdf 67.9 MB PDF

www.kathodos.com/magnetismsmall.pdf 13.4 MB PDF


Page 30 begins the description of magnetism.


Yes, there is much repetition at times, but this full work is meant as a prequel to a 250+ page book.


Enjoy

I will give everyone here a link to the book, IT IS FREE

Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism

Exploring the nature of Magnetism, with regards to the true model of atomic geometry and field mechanics by means of rational physics & logic

ISBN 0-9712541-8-4





I have been killing myself to finish the work, all the original diagrams, and digital validations, and experiments with pyrol. graphite, and my own special creation of ferrofluid, and checking and rechecking.


Owning every book ever published on earth on Magnetism and having 100% FREE time for the past 14 years, and having a lifetime devotion to uncovering magnetism, ....


I dont say casually that I am certain you will be stunned with the results / information.
__________________
 

Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 06-25-2014 at 06:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Download SOLAR SECRETS by Peter Lindemann
Free - Get it now: Solar Secrets

  #2  
Old 06-23-2014, 07:10 AM
Dingus Dingus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 264
Do any of the formulas in the book include the golden ratio? It seems to pop-up everywhere yet I never actually see it in any practical math.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-23-2014, 07:32 AM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dingus View Post
Do any of the formulas in the book include the golden ratio? It seems to pop-up everywhere yet I never actually see it in any practical math.

You just asked if you can find animals in the zoo, as an analogy. Yes is the answer.

I, years ago, was not looking to find incommensurability (golden ratio) within magnetic geometry, but I found it, then more and more and .....I will let the article speak for itself on this matter. However I did expect to find it, but not at the levels that were found.

Further more, I have inside the article all the specific angles of reciprocation, and several levels of information about golden ratio conjugate interlacing.

But I wont give too much away until done within the next few days.



If ANYONE is going to the 2014 Energy Science & Technology Conference

please give out the link to this free book, (when posted) Kind regards.

Lux et Veritas
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-24-2014, 06:38 AM
Dingus Dingus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 264
Now you've got my interest!
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-24-2014, 07:31 AM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dingus View Post
Now you've got my interest!

article is 3 or 5 days from being done. Total is 94+ pages.



If the contents don't make your head unscrew from your shoulders and drop on the floor, ....I would be surprised.


Ive already had a (name withheld) rather famous person with a business who did nothing but sell magnets for years and years (one of largest in the country) and made numerous trips to China to arrange MASS importation of neodymium magnets for sale.

Also he is an extremely rich person of which any 'magnet person' would know.

He has seen the rough draft and said it made him keel over in glee to finally see lucid clear logical explanation of magnetism with charts, angles, and specifics.


Lux et Veritas


This 94+ page article (more of a book) is a prequel to a much larger book with a lot more math formulas and information.

however, it is complete at 94 pages, but requires expansion into all the finer details.



bit of humor:-----


This article attacks GR and QM quite harshly by the way (however so does Dollard,.....but i was doing that long before I ran across Dollards work!)



__________________
 

Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 06-24-2014 at 08:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-25-2014, 06:28 PM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 955
Done, BOOK uploaded, 99 pages


2 sizes, small and large (one reduced in image optimization)


www.kathodos.com/magnetism1.pdf 67.9 MB PDF

www.kathodos.com/magnetismsmall.pdf 13.4 MB PDF


Page 30 begins the description of magnetism.


Yes, there is much repetition at times, but this full work is meant as a prequel to a 250+ page book.


Enjoy
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-29-2014, 01:32 AM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dingus View Post
Now you've got my interest!

Pardon, but after much coaxing from friends that I include the magnetic precession ratios, and angles in the first edition, I cranked out 10 more pages.


They implored me that understanding magneto-dielectric geometry utterly NECESSITATES elaboration on magnetic precession.

In hindsight, they're correct. However I had planned on including that much later, I had to triple check my math , and made 5 more diagrams and detailed descriptions about same,


110 PAGES, and the same links as above, but including the 10 page section:


Magnetic precession rates of the gyromagnetic-ratio at 42.4923 Mhz/T in creating the magnetic vortex
Precessional (vortex) Geometry is also Phi-Phi-1Precession



__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-29-2014, 04:53 PM
JasonVerbelli JasonVerbelli is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 42
THANK You!
Sharing on my Facebook page and will be going through the material in detail.
Can use all the insight I can get.

-- Jason Verbelli
Searl Magnetics
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-29-2014, 05:13 PM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonVerbelli View Post
THANK You!
Sharing on my Facebook page and will be going through the material in detail.
Can use all the insight I can get.

-- Jason Verbelli
Searl Magnetics


Searl Magnetics, ahhhh. Good! ...... You must know my close lifelong friend's buddy, George Mizzell

He was the first guy to demand a copy.



My entire life I have been horribly offended at the insane, irrational, illogical pseudo-mystical explanations for , of, and about magnetism.

Using the works of JC Maxwell, Tesla, Eric P Dollard (into dielectricity especially), O. Heaviside, CP Steinmetz,.......the 'entire picture' became clear.

....that and a lot of the use of Platonic retroduction methodology (in discerning things).

On the first page I write....

Of all the types of people who have ever lived, there are only four types of gatekeepers of the mind. 1. The gatekeeper of the mind
which lets in everything, this is the most common type in the world. 2. The gatekeeper of the mind which lets in nothing, this is the
second most common type; of those that are sure they are right, and all others are wrong. 3. The gatekeeper of the mind which lets in
those things it likes or agrees with and not those things it does not like or agree with, even if those things are true and wise. This is the
third most common type. 4. The gatekeeper of the mind which judges things as wise and logical, and lets those things in, and judges
things as unwise and irrational and bars them from entry into the mind. This type of gatekeeper of the mind is the most sublime and
rare. Open minds are only good up to a point at which nonsense, lies, and irrational chaos is allowed to enter. Closed minds are only
good up to a point where things wise and true are barred entry. At this point we must agree that wholly open minds are bad, and
wholly closed minds are equally as bad.





bit of unrelated humor: (not in the book)------

__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-30-2014, 03:51 AM
Turion's Avatar
Turion Turion is online now
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,676
I have to admit that I am still reading, rereading, and digesting, so the question I am about to pose my be answered by the time I reach the end of your manuscript, yet I cannot help but ask it here simply because I believe it to be the crux of why things SHOULD be posted on this forum.

With this new knowledge of how magnets work, what will the average guy be able to do with them that hasn't already been done?
__________________
"I aim to misbehave" Malcolm Reynolds
"Try Not! Do or do not. There is no 'Try' ". Yoda
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-30-2014, 04:09 AM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turion View Post
I have to admit that I am still reading, rereading, and digesting, so the question I am about to pose my be answered by the time I reach the end of your manuscript, yet I cannot help but ask it here simply because I believe it to be the crux of why things SHOULD be posted on this forum.

With this new knowledge of how magnets work, what will the average guy be able to do with them that hasn't already been done?


Some people wonder how they can USE something, ....others are fulfilled in pure comprehension of something.

If you have comprehension, ...then your spectrum of USE (invention, etc.) is expanded 100 fold.
I care about the former, the comprehension, ...I let others worry themselves about the "USE" in the later.


Download the book again if you have the 1st edition, friends coaxed me into adding the important section of Gyromagnetic precession EARLY, ........so verify you have the second edition.
To do? There are countless possibilities.........To UNDERSTAND, .....was my only goal for many years. Pure understanding for its own sake and ends.


Foremost, the book wasn't written to the "free energy" people, or the "UFO crowd" or the "conspiracy .......(X)" crowd.
The basis for the WORD magic is where the word MAGNET comes from. Socrates uses magnets as analogy for invisible action at a distance.
at one times magnets (as loadstones) sold for their weight in GOLD. Human desire to understand this concept, this principle is as deeply ingrained as blood in the veins.


Pure understanding is its own reward. Some people only see profit, fame, etc. I dont.


As far as invention goes.......
.......however its ultimate end-result can and will be the same on several levels.

as I mentioned in the book:

In understanding this dielectric inertial plane I have already written 20 bits of data to a magnetized subject and reproduced the results,
by means I will not explain here. However the implications of this means writing data on another plane rather than merely along the
XY spinning surface of a magnetic hard drive platter. Additionally I am 100% certain that data can be written between two ferromagnetic
surface planes where dual platter disks can, conjugately, create data fields in the vacuum spaces between the two ferrous
platters at which the data exists in a free space vacuum to be read by induction readers of conjugate magneto-dielectric field gradients.
Incommensurate compounding and self-similarity likewise has implication with near-100% certainty, that data storage devices can be
increased to the 100+ terabyte range in a likewise 9.5mm hard drive currently with a max capacity of 1.5 terabytes.


I HAVE written (several times) 20 bits of data (24 one time) to a magnetized subject. I have demonstrated this fact to several peoples already.
However I will withhold the details of this process.....holding back due to (obviously) patent seeking potential.
The ramifications are that one can (have proven same) write data on another plane entirely from the traditional 2D XY plane of a conventional hard drive platter. That is one example. I have thought of several others, but not proven them .....yet.


I dont care about money, I retired when I was 32. I am 42 now. Im a loner who literally eats, sleeps and lives for discovery, understanding.
MOST monks have more human contact than I do. My 2 homes I live in are half LAB, half library.


I did not make this book (or any of the several others I have made) to make money, etc.
I have already sold many copies and already made a 1st installment payment to Dollard, .....I promised him 30% of whatever I get from the book.
But generally I am giving it out to anyone and everyone. 10 hours ago the book exploded on 2 TORRENT sites reaching 400 leachers and up to 300+ seeders.


There is an 'insanely' deep and firm ingrained premise within mankind to understand magnets / magnetism.....and as yet, nobody HAS delivered.
Pure understanding,......pure discovery with all sake of name and money etc in the rear view mirror. Pure understanding as GOAL and REWARD.


I don't have a 8 Terabyte PDF book collection for nothing.
I spent $6000 on a rare book 12 years ago just so I could scan it in and PDF it so I could give it out to the world for free, because the work was so important (a book Andrew Baxter, 1700s Scotland printing).
I issued the book a new ISBN number, and could have SOLD copies of it, but I wanted the world to have it, so I gave it away.


I love giving things away.


I have another, at least, 80+ pages to add to this book, but the rest of it rather dry, a few formulas, elaboration of force VS. tension, and most importantly (to me) Field Incommensurability

Lux et Veritas
__________________
 

Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 06-30-2014 at 10:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #12  
Old 07-01-2014, 04:11 PM
JasonVerbelli JasonVerbelli is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 42
I read through it all and am VERY impressed!!
I feel that it's nearly a flawless document.
The only criticism I have is from page 98 to 110. The last portion where you show the Newtonian model of the prism.
And giving examples from The Primer Fields by David LaPoint.

Are you familiar with the brilliant work of Johann Goethe?
Goethe's work and models of prisms would make that document untouchable.
The current understanding of light through prisms is erroneous.
Here are 3 links detailing how and why:

Newton's theory on Prisms and Color verses Goethe's Models:
True Nature of Light & Electricity

Newton vs Goethe:
THE TAO OF COLOURS byÂ*Doug Marsh | Aether Force

Light, Dark & Color:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ID0BSlfZyHU


I've been in a similar situation as you in that I've had the last 8 years of solitude to fully pursue exactly what you have detailed in your PDF.
Walter Russell, Nikola Tesla, Eric Dollard, Ed Leedskalnin, Viktor Schauberger, Pier Luigi, Ighina, John Keely, etc etc etc.

I'm well on my way, but have a long journey still. Can use all the insight and guidance I can get!
I seriously need some help with my pdf. Attempting to do Professor John Searl's explanations of the SEG justice.
But John is partial to Einstein's models, electrons, bosons, etc. And he also thinks in terms of negative inertia, negative mass and a lot of other concepts that need to be translated to Russellian terminology, Tesla's terminology, More Aether and less electrons, etc.

I've put together a 224 page pdf so far. But from the mainstream perspectives using "electrons" and all that nonsense.
It's the only way to speak the language of the people who are "destined to oblivion."
I want to get their attention using explanations and terminology they already understand. And then hit them with an alternate version of the document using completely different terminology and more reality.

Understanding the SEG - Reality of Costs/ "Blueprints" - Mock Up vs Prototype - Coherence vs Chaos - History of John Searl - Current Status of Project & Context:
Understanding John Searl's SEG

I know I've found the man to help me out!
I've made it my life to pursue these perspectives, do them justice and apply them so people can benefit.
But there's A LOT for me to learn and understand first so that I can be Able to do the information justice.
Because it's genuine.

Again, thank you for the YEARS of work and research (and logic) it took to put that document together.
It's so good, I want to do a youtube video preview for it to let others know it's available.
Much respect my friend!

--Jason Verbelli
Verbz@comcast.net
Skype: SineWave0
Facebook.com/Verbelli
Youtube.com/TheRealVerbz2
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-01-2014, 05:21 PM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonVerbelli View Post
The only criticism I have is from page 98 to 110. The last portion where you show the Newtonian model of the prism.
And giving examples from The Primer Fields by David LaPoint.

Are you familiar with the brilliant work of Johann Goethe?
Goethe's work and models of prisms would make that document untouchable.
The current understanding of light through prisms is erroneous.
Here are 3 links detailing how and why:

More Aether and less electrons, etc.

I've put together a 224 page pdf so far. But from the mainstream perspectives using "electrons" and all that nonsense.

You must have misread something. In reference to diffraction and the 'afterthought' section on TEM and light....., I made NO reference to electrons in any way shape or form.

The shorter the wavelength, the higher the dielectric capacitance, and likewise the greater the dispersion thru any prism, and likewise Einsteins explanation for the "photoelectric effect" is wrong and senseless.

As for Ed Leedskalnin, his work on magnetism, which I have been thru has utterly no worth. It is riddled with countless contradictions, and absurdities, and looks as if it was written as a 2 day afterthought.
The paper on magnetism seems to be a 2 day afterthought of random musings on the matter, Leedskalnin's that is.

I will have to have a look into Goethe's work.

As for Walter Russell, he dropped out of school very young. He was an acquaintance of Tesla, and while I am not one for conspiracy's at all, I dont believe Russell wrote his 3 main works. However he might have. It seems someone else may have written them. But that is very unclear.


Nikola Tesla wrote back to Walter Russell in 1927 after receiving and reviewing a copy of his first major treatise on Universal Cosmology, "The Universal One," urging him to bury this work in a sepulchre for a thousand years, for it would take humanity that long to develop sufficient awareness to even begin to comprehend Russell's theories and philosophies of the Universe.


Walter Russell made countless errors, but countless discoveries.
However Russell was clueless about dielectricity, and did not understand a great many things.



Kind and warm regards to you for your lovely thoughts and comments and to Mr. Searl and those at Searl Magnetics


Lux et Veritas
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-01-2014, 09:32 PM
JasonVerbelli JasonVerbelli is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 42
Oh, I didn't mean that You referenced electrons.
I just meant that the world itself needs more Aether, less electrons.

In regards to Leedskalnin, I personally think there's quite a bit there. The work of Jon Depew, Jerry Smith, Scott Lang and Matt Emery show some pretty amazing things. (They are very into experimenting and speaking on what they observe from the results)
It's a different perspective for sure.

Goethe is definitely applicable to your paper!

Russell seemed to be more into intuitive mind-knowing rather than modern education. I've read a great many of his works and believe he truly did have a profound understanding.
I agree about the dielectric part being left out. As a few other things.

I'll be continually reading through your stuff and sharing it.
Gold mine.

MUCH respect.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-01-2014, 10:05 PM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonVerbelli View Post
Oh, I didn't mean that You referenced electrons.
I just meant that the world itself needs more Aether, less electrons.

You are correct that the final 3 sections are very "scant".
I debated on including them at all, since they weren't specifically directed at or parcel to magnetism.


As I mention in 2 of those sections "this section will undergo further expansion over time".


I translate ancient Greek. Plato, Plotinus, and Aristotle had MUCH to say about the Ether that mirrors Tesla, etc. far more specifically than anyone dare imagine.

See this link posted yesterday for further details:

Aristotle in support of E. Dollard on 4 Ether-types, INCLUDING counterspace!



I will look into details of your links, and Goethe this late evening.

Kind regards.


Lux et Veritas
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-08-2014, 05:53 AM
Dingus Dingus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 264
You may understand magnetism, but you need a lot of work understanding drawing, writing & teaching. I only read half of the small version because it was a slog. I swear, you could have made it 1/2 as long if you just cut out all the stuff about how dumb you think Einstein & relativity is. It contributes nothing to the document.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-08-2014, 06:06 AM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dingus View Post
You may understand magnetism, but you need a lot of work understanding drawing, writing & teaching. I only read half of the small version because it was a slog. I swear, you could have made it 1/2 as long if you just cut out all the stuff about how dumb you think Einstein & relativity is. It contributes nothing to the document.
Considering the content you mention is extremely little (less than 5 pages out of 110), the comment of "1/2 as long" doesn't add up.

"there are those that do, and those that talk about those that do"


New sections including formulas,
and a section on field incommensurability
section on divergent and convergent gradients etc.
And a section on 'fields vs. space'
Something amounting to 40+ more pages.


If you write too little, someone complains, if you write too much, someone complains.

There is always something to complain about in any work.


Eric Dollards works LONE PINE WRITINGS II (which obviously you never read) contains 28 PAGES (pages 6 thru 34) against Einstein and Relativity
I have 5 (roughly) pages on same.

Make sure you give equal opportunity to that work for, what you consider, the "offense of attacking" the 'Cult of Quantum' (or as E Dollard calls it "Quantum Mysticism")
Your distribution on said topic is disproportionate

"Never try to be all things to all peoples ......and do this in all things"


Ill mail you a refund check and.........oh wait, that's right.
__________________
 

Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 07-08-2014 at 06:25 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-09-2014, 01:48 AM
Dingus Dingus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheoriaApophasis View Post
Considering the content you mention is extremely little (less than 5 pages out of 110), the comment of "1/2 as long" doesn't add up.
I only read the first half & that was hyperbole. You do seem to retread the same points numerous times with little added to it. You also seem to repeat things in what I assume is meant to be explanatory but falls flat with me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheoriaApophasis View Post
If you write too little, someone complains, if you write too much, someone complains.

There is always something to complain about in any work.
All I'm saying is that you wrote a paragraph on reductionism but your writing would have benefited from actually applying it. If someone complains that it's too short, then what they really mean is it doesn't explain things well enough for them to understand & want a better explanation. That does not always mean it actually needs to be longer, but that the existing example does not do it's job well enough, so it might benefit from being replaced. Some parts can be made both shorter & better.

On the other hand you'd do well to lengthen things you make claims about but fail to support. For example; you claim that quantum mechanics is wrong & I don't doubt that, but I think it would really help if you explained how the double-slit experiment works without QM.

I also wish you'd cut the "there's only one dimension of space and that's space" crap that Dollard keeps spewing. The 3 dimensions (from the latin dimensionem, meaning "to meaure") are still perfectly necessary to engineer things physically, which is very important when engineering electrically. If anything the dimension of "space" should be volume, diameter, surface area or something.
__________________
 

Last edited by Dingus; 07-09-2014 at 01:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-09-2014, 02:18 AM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dingus View Post
On the other hand you'd do well to lengthen things you make claims about but fail to support. For example; you claim that quantum mechanics is wrong & I don't doubt that, but I think it would really help if you explained how the double-slit experiment works without QM.

Since you never actually "read" (as in A to Z) the book, you missed the parts (not specifically related to magnetism), to which you refer; IN WHICH it is stated in the work - "these sections will be added and expanded in future additions"


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dingus View Post
I also wish you'd cut the "there's only one dimension of space and that's space" crap that Dollard keeps spewing. The 3 dimensions (from the latin dimensionem, meaning "to meaure") are still perfectly necessary to engineer things physically, which is very important when engineering electrically. If anything the dimension of "space" should be volume, diameter, surface area or something.

Actually I was saying that space has only 1 dimension LONG before I ever encountered Dollards works.

However you have both NO "cred" nor the logic to back up such an extreme position.

(you spelled measure wrong).


You are not measuring space, son, you are measuring a collection of atoms , trillions of magneto-dielectric FIELDS.


Again, Space has 1 dimension, ....not 2, 3, 4 etc .


Plato said the same thing regarding SPACE being merely "a single plane.......of the chora (field)" Parmenides

Plotinus goes into GREAT DETAIL on this fact in the 6th Ennead ( I translate ancient Greek by the way).

There is NO space as separate from a FIELD(s). There is space within a field, but no fields "expanding in space"


Space does nothing, is nothing, acts on NOTHING, and influences nothing. You're committing the 'inverse fallacy of principle attribution'.


LATIN?????????????????

Let me educate (just a very little bit at least). The GREEK precedes the Latin.

The term χάος , is the "dimension (SINGULAR) of the field (chora/ χώρα))" Plotinus Ennead 6.4




There is an entire book on this ONE word, the χώρα:

Amazon.com: Chorology: On Beginning in Plato's Timaeus (Studies in Continental Thought) (9780253213082): John Sallis: Books



.............Which however goes back to ANOTHER meaning in the Greek (regarding space) AORISTOS DYAD, of which I wrote this work a few years ago:
https://archive.org/details/Indefini...ysicsMysticism

A translation of ALL Greek occurrences in Plotinus of the Aoristos Dyad.

The Greek term ἀοριστ (ἀ+ ὁρίζω Orizos), or the late Latin & Greek; is also the Latin aoristos, or undefined, from a + horistos definable, from horizein to define. Literally INcoordinate, or metaphysically is meant illumination itself, from the ancient Egyptian akhet (horizon, see above hieroglyph). We also get from Greek horizont-, horizōn, from present participle of horizein to bound, define, from horos boundary (boundary of Horus); perhaps akin to Latin urvum curved part of a plow.


I didn't graduate from college 3 years early and retire at the age of 32 by believing in or falling for nonsense.

Your false reification of SPACE as a "thing" that "does things" is merely a brain flatus from GR and QM.


If you THINK for a second that Dollard came up with "SPACE HAS ONE DIMENSION" ..... then you know nothing about the Greeks, the Platonists, Numenius, Proclus, Syrianus, Plotinus, Damascius, Socrates, Parmenides, Theon Smyrna....etc etc.

They ALL said this. If you think you are smarter than any of them, let me know so I can prepare the correct laugh--------------




Kha, cf. Greek Xaos, is generally "cavity"; and in the Rg Veda, particularly "the hole in the nave of a wheel through which the axle runs" (Monier Williams). A. N. Singh has shown conclusively that in Indian mathematical usage, current during the earlier centuries of the Christian era, kha means "zero";(1) Suryadeva, commenting on Aryabhata, says that "the khas refer to voids (khaini sunya upa lakptani) . . . thus khadvinake means the eighteen places denoted by zeros." Among other words denoting zero are sunya, akasa, vyoma, antariksa, nabha, ananta, and purna.(2) We are immediately struck by the fact that the words sunya, "void," and purna, "plenum," should have a common reference; the implication being that all numbers are virtually or potentially present in that which is without number; expressing this as an equation, o=x-x, it is apparent that zero is to number as possibility is to actuality. ,.gain, employment of the term ananta with the same reference implies an identification of zero with infinity; the beginning of all series being thus the same as their end. This last idea, we may observe, is met with already in the earlier metaphysical literature, for example RV IV.I.II, where Agni is described as "hiding both his ends (guhamano anta) "; AB 111.43, "the Agnistoma is like a chariot wheel, endless (ananta)"; JUB 1.35, "the Year is endless (ananta), its two ends (anta) are Winter and Spring . . . so is the endless chant (anantam saman)." These citations suggest that it may be possible to account for the later mathematicians selection of technical terms by reference to an earlier usage of the same or like terms in a purely metaphysical context.

Our intention being to demonstrate the native connection of the mathematical terms kha, etc., with the same terms as employed in purely metaphysical contexts, it will be necessary to prepare the diagram of a circle or cosmic wheel (cakra, mandala) and to point out the significance of the relationships of the parts of such a diagram according to universal tradition and more particularly in accordance with the formulation of the Rg Veda. Take a piece of blank paper of any dimensions, mark a point anywhere upon it, and With this point as center draw two concentric circles of any radii, but one much less than the other; draw any radius from the center to the outer circumference. With exception of the center, which as a point is necessarily without dimension, note that every part of our diagram is merely representative; that is, the number of circles may be indefinitely increased, and the number of radii likewise, each circle thus filled up becoming at last a plane continuum, the extended ground of any given world or state of being; for our purpose we are considering only two such worlds mythologically speaking, Heaven and Earth, or psychologically, the worlds of subject and object as forming together the world or cosmos, typical of any particularized world which may be thought of as partial within it. Finally, our diagram may be thought of either as consisting of two concentric circles with their common radii and one common center, or as the diagram of a wheel, with its felly, nave, spokes, and axle point.

In order to understand the use of terms for "space" (kha, ukasa, antarik~a, sunya, etc.)(10) as verbal symbols of zero (which represents privation of number, and is yet a matrix of number in the sense o=x-x),(11) it must be realized that akasa, etc., represent primarily a concept not of physical space, but of a purely principal space without dimension, though the matrix of dimension." For example, "all these beings arise out of the space (akasad samapadyanta) and return into the space (akasam pratyastam yanti). For the space is older than they, prior to them, and is their last resort (parayanam)," CU I.9.I; "space is the name of the permissive cause of individual integration (akaso vai nama namarupayor nirvahita)," CU VIII.I4; and just as India "opens the closed spaces (apihitj khani)," RV IV.2H.I, so the Self "awakens this rational [cosmos] from chat space (akasat esa khalu idam cetamatram dobhayati)," MU VI.I7, in other words, ex nihilo fit. Furthermore, the locus of this "space" is "within you": "what i's the intrinsic aspect of expansion is the supernal fiery energy in the vacance of the inner man (tat svarupam nabhasah khe antarbhutasya yat param tejah)," MU VII.II;(13) and this same "space in the heart" (antarhrdaya akasa) is the locus (dyatana, vesma, nada, kosla, etc.) where are deposited in secret (guha nihitam) all that is ours already or may be ours on any plane (loka) of experience (CU VIII.I.I 3). At the same time, in BU v.i, this "ancient space" (kha) is identified with Brahman and with the Spirit (kham brahma, kham puranam, vayuram kham iti), and this Brahman is at the same time a plenum or pleroma (purna) such chat "when plenum is taken from plenum, plenum yet remains (14)
__________________
 

Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 07-09-2014 at 02:50 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-09-2014, 04:16 PM
dR-Green's Avatar
dR-Green dR-Green is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 1,557
Dimensions of space??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dingus View Post
I also wish you'd cut the "there's only one dimension of space and that's space" crap that Dollard keeps spewing. The 3 dimensions (from the latin dimensionem, meaning "to meaure") are still perfectly necessary to engineer things physically, which is very important when engineering electrically. If anything the dimension of "space" should be volume, diameter, surface area or something.
Space exhibits 3, or really 6, directions. But there is only one space. If you think there is more than one measurable space then you are deluded. In which case I would suggest that you go see a doctor, except that the doctor would agree with you. Oh dear.

It is unit^3, not space*3.
__________________
http://www.teslascientific.com/

"Knowledge is cosmic. It does not evolve or unfold in man. Man unfolds to an awareness of it. He gradually discovers it." - Walter Russell

"Once men died for Truth, but now Truth dies at the hands of men." - Manly P. Hall
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 07-09-2014, 06:34 PM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by dR-Green View Post
Dimensions of space??



Space exhibits 3, or really 6, directions. But there is only one space. If you think there is more than one measurable space then you are deluded. In which case I would suggest that you go see a doctor, except that the doctor would agree with you. Oh dear.

It is unit^3, not space*3.
Oh great wisdom "poureth from the fountain of knowledge"


Yes, likewise stooopid human critters think magnetism has "2 POLES" or spatial vectors.

well, no it does'nt, you spin a rod, sphere etc, its going in the same direction, but CW from one end and CCW from another.


I would say (rather crudely, forgive me), that:
"Space is the great MIND SKR3W and illusion, resultant of being inside a field"



Yes, his Doctor would agree with him.

A famous local Doctor I know practicing for 40 years, he told me "Hell, you dont have to be smart at ALL to be a doctor!!!!! You just have to be good at memorization in med school!"
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #22  
Old 07-09-2014, 08:01 PM
dR-Green's Avatar
dR-Green dR-Green is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 1,557
The latest scientific opinion is that "reality" is actually an illusion. But this doesn't seem to have any impact on anyone's activities, I'm not really sure why. In the words of Walter Russell, they continue to mistake the effect for the cause, despite the fact that they now acknowledge that what they observe is an illusion.

Your spinning rod analogy explains it perfectly well in a couple of words!

Yes it's unfortunate that the "education" system mostly mistakes memory for intelligence. As long as you remember what you were told and repeat it back onto the exam paper then you'll get good grades, you don't have to actually understand any of it.
__________________
http://www.teslascientific.com/

"Knowledge is cosmic. It does not evolve or unfold in man. Man unfolds to an awareness of it. He gradually discovers it." - Walter Russell

"Once men died for Truth, but now Truth dies at the hands of men." - Manly P. Hall
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-09-2014, 10:09 PM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by dR-Green View Post
In the words of Walter Russell, they continue to mistake the effect for the cause
Ive been writing about that FOR YEARS on other topics I lecture on (I wont go into it)


Its the "inverse attribute" fallacy

Or on my other topics and writings (not related to electricity) its the "inverse fallacy of identification".

Also "attribute/concept reification"

Its the same as the common dufus reifying illumination (attribute) as light (Principle)

I wrote a small book about this from the premise of the ancient greeks, with ALL TRANSLATIONS of the term:

https://archive.org/details/Indefini...ysicsMysticism




I was up to 7AM this morning, I invented a wholly new magnetic "item" , a 'device' that will revolutionize and make OBSOLETE FOREVER AND ALL TIME the use of iron filings for viewing "fields" and magnetic viewing film, and ferrofluid.



Ive sent the video of the new invention some top people, Ive been in constant contact. Im so happy, Im going out and get a deluxe pizza and other stuff to celebrate!!!!!!!!!!

Ive been trying to invent this "item" now for 2 years.


wonderful day , wonderful !!!!!!!!!!!


(and I'm a rather pessimistic SOB that isn't impressed by hardly anything)
__________________
 

Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 07-09-2014 at 10:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-10-2014, 04:31 AM
Sputins's Avatar
Sputins Sputins is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 530
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheoriaApophasis View Post


I was up to 7AM this morning, I invented a wholly new magnetic "item" , a 'device' that will revolutionize and make OBSOLETE FOREVER AND ALL TIME the use of iron filings for viewing "fields" and magnetic viewing film, and ferrofluid.



Ive sent the video of the new invention some top people, Ive been in constant contact. Im so happy, Im going out and get a deluxe pizza and other stuff to celebrate!!!!!!!!!!
I hope that you might share some further details with us soon! (Don’t be a tease)! What is it? - I suppose you’ll want to perfect the “item / device” first?

Open source it or copyright / patient?
With or without Anchovies?

?
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-10-2014, 05:05 AM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sputins View Post
I hope that you might share some further details with us soon! (Don’t be a tease)! What is it? - I suppose you’ll want to perfect the “item / device” first?

Open source it or copyright / patient?
With or without Anchovies?

?

Already have my lifelong buddy (hes 65) setting up appt. with his patent lawyer.

My buddy has 9 patents and more experience on same than myself. Hes fronting all the fees for a 30% cut.


I "got" it yesterday eve., then took 9 more tries to get it perfect till 7+AM. Now it is perfect.


I had a giant pizza from JETS in celebration.


The 2 year search of creating BOTH a vortex 3D demonstration device that operates slowly, showing the magnetic vortex movements is over.


I had 2 agendas in this invention:


1. show the vortex MOVING pattern in a magnet, which is just almost impossible, you cant use normal ferrous materials (iron dust), because they become magnetized themselves and "LOCK" into place in the pressure gradient zones ('field lines') like magnets themselves, and show a 2D false representation of a magnetic field (as mentioned in the book).


Diamagnetic materials dont work, they basically operate (when powdered) like iron filling do, but in reverse..... I had to grind up pyrolytic graphite to test that theory.

2. Show the magnetic vortex SLOW ENOUGH that it doesn't vanish in a fraction of a second that you have to freeze a video to see. I already created an "item" some time ago to show a 3D magnetic vortex, but is happens completely within about 1+ second or less.


This "item" give you a 15 -22+ second 3D viewing time of the magnetic vortex.

I can increase that time by changing the size of the 'item' however.

__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-10-2014, 05:19 PM
Dingus Dingus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 264
You're a real self-aggrandizing ******* who likes to talk way, way too much.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-10-2014, 06:38 PM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dingus View Post
You're a real self-aggrandizing ******* who likes to talk way, way too much.
I wasn't expecting a rational or logical rebuttal, ..and I predicted the resultant with perfect clarity.


Ignorance is like anti-freeze, both are sweet, both are deadly.

All hatred is an intellectual currency
of ignorance nobody wants, cant be spent, and always burns the person who stockpiles it.


Lux et Veritas
__________________
 

Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 07-11-2014 at 06:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-11-2014, 05:41 AM
Dingus Dingus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 264
It would seem I'm not the only one who hates you, and with good reason.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-11-2014, 06:53 AM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 955
Im a Platonist.


That link you post to is about (as it states) A.E. Hollingsworth, who is a 65 year old short man who lives in a Atlanta I used to be close to in writing a few books.
I am 42 years old and living in Ft. Myers Florida.
So your link is twaddle and nonsense from a crazy person.


Ad hominem has nothing to do with discussing magnetism intelligently.

I wont stoop into the gutter with you.



As for being "hated" Plato said that is a good thing


...."the wise love him for the same reason the fools hate him" - Proclus

"To please or amuse fools is the slander of divine wisdom" - Damascius



No intelligent person has tried to "be all things to all people" in so doing you are "nothing to nobody".


Here ended the lesson.

If you cannot or are incapable of engaging the dialectic (that's dialectic by the way, not dielectric )......., you should seek life elsewhere.
__________________
 

Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 07-11-2014 at 07:01 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-13-2014, 05:35 AM
TheoriaApophasis's Avatar
TheoriaApophasis TheoriaApophasis is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida, Europe, and NY
Posts: 955
Quote:
Originally Posted by dR-Green View Post
Dimensions

.

PROOF that ON EVERY SIDE (I already proved it many other ways however!!!!!) of the magnet, you have a center situated CENTRIPETAL moving OPPOSITE to the SAME SIDED centrifugal !!!!!!!!!!

[/B]

AHHHHHHH~~~~~~!!!!!! I had a stroke of genuis a little while ago today!!!!!

Uploading the video now, but heres some SNAPS:

, PROJECT a spiral FROM a camcorder to the SCREEN of the TV, and PROVE what is going on!!!!!


This is the image ON the WALL taken from the camcorder to the TV set:

which is a printed CLOCKWISE vortex



If the outside centrifugal is ALSO clockwise LIKE the printed vortex, THEN IT MUST move the vortex in the SAME CW direction

BUT!!!!!! IT MUST CREATE A CENTRIPETAL CENTER THAT IS MOVING OPPOSITE, COUNTERCLOCKWISE!!!!

TAAA-DAAAA



Since the printed vortex is CW, then a CCW centrifugal MUST distort the printed and projected vortex

Yup:-------





CCW centrifugal DISTORTING the printed CW ring, AND showing a CW centripetal



CW centrifugal spinning the printed CW ring, AND showing a CCW centripetal



also.......CCW centrifugal DISTORTING the printed CW ring, AND showing a CW centripetal



__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Please consider supporting Energetic Forum with a voluntary monthly subscription.

Choose your voluntary subscription

For one-time donations, please use the below button.


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v1.4.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
2007-2015 Copyright - Energetic Forum - All Rights Reserved

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

Tesla Chargers