Energetic Forum  
Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Delicious Digg Reddit WordPress StumbleUpon Tumblr Translate Addthis Aaron Murakami YouTube 2020 ENERGY CONFERENCE - PRE-REGISTER NOW!!!!

2020 Energy Science & Technology Conference
PRE-REGISTER NOW!!!
http://energyscienceconference.com


Go Back   Energetic Forum > > >
   

Eric Dollard Official Forum This forum is dedicated to the work of Eric P. Dollard. His Official homepage is http://ericpdollard.com

* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #2581  
Old 07-01-2016, 12:11 AM
t-rex's Avatar
t-rex t-rex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: In the bushes
Posts: 422
Answers to Questions

1) Coax Steel Wire

This wire is copper clad steel, or "copper weld."

Do not concern yourself with this, it is only the shield outer surface that is active at high frequencies.

2) Thornhill

I know of him but I cannot spread myself out any further, I am in the Transmission subject deep now.

3) E.S. Generator

The input work, output energy relation is still in need of quantification.

Experiment is necessary.

4) Current & Potential

Conduction current is inside the conductor, displacement current is outside the conductor.

Displacement current is a reaction to a chance in potential.

Conduction current is the material aspect of magnetism.

Inductors react with an electro-motive force and charge with conduction current.

Conduction current is magnetic potential.
__________________
SUPPORT ERIC DOLLARD'S WORK AT EPD LABORATORIES, INC.

Purchase Eric Dollard's Books & Videos - 70% of the sale goes to Eric and EPD Laboratories: Eric Dollard Books & Videos
Donate by Paypal: Donate to EPD Laboratories
Reply With Quote

Download SOLAR SECRETS by Peter Lindemann
Free - Get it now: Solar Secrets

  #2582  
Old 07-01-2016, 04:18 AM
Dingus Dingus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 264
Is The Extraluminal Transmission Systems of Tesla & Alexanderson a book or one of those long-winded lecture videos? Please tell me it's a book.
Is wireless power transmission through the earth extraluminal, or are those 2 separate things?
Of all the things you could be inventing or focusing on, why earthquakes?
You claim that the sun is hollow? How did you arrive at that conclusion? Are you sure it's surface isn't mirrored?
__________________
 

Last edited by Dingus; 07-01-2016 at 04:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2583  
Old 07-02-2016, 04:05 AM
David G Dawson David G Dawson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 421
Hello Eric & Aaron,

Guillemin Pulse Theory:
Pulse Generators - PFNs or NET:
I am writing a letter to Eric and in explaining some requirements with respect to pulsing, I find that the Guillemin Theory is using capacitors in the Farad range.
I had mistakenly used uF and now find an impossible situation has risen where the higher you go in capacitance, the lesser becomes the voltage.
The highest I have in stock here is a 24,000uf at 10 volts and hardly applicable to Thyratron use where you are using very high voltages for pulsing.
Most Farad Supercaps are only of a few volts.
So where do you get these capacitors from as they are not readily available commercially?
I had chosen Fig 6-28 on Page 205 of the MIT Chapter V 'Pulse Generators' but find all the other configurations similar with one using 21 Farads.
In Eric's 'Tesla Transformer Pulse Generator' (TTPG) which I have built, uses a 600 volt supply feeding a 2050 thyratron.
In this case your PFN would need to be rated at + 600volts and that voltage is expressed directly across the PFN (Pulse Forming Network or NET).
This is Radar type technology and looks like the needs are very specific and probably priced outside our buying power range and not possible to achieve what is required.
Anybody?

Smokey
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2584  
Old 07-02-2016, 07:38 AM
David G Dawson David G Dawson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 421
Sun Distance

Hello Eric,
Have discovered a means by which one person only is able to make a Sun Distance measurement and this has been ongoing since August 2015 with nearly a year of data.
Have explained in my letter to you how this is achieved and also includes measurement of Sun Diameter and a chart.

Both the Sun's Analemma shape and the area of the Northern Hemisphere compared to the Southern are in the relationship of PI - 3.14.
As is also the height between the two Hemispheres but at 1/2 PI - 4120/2570 = 1.603 (1.57).
This is all explained in my letter.
Also included is a picture of the Japanese Himawari-8 Satellite over Australia and shows the Sun Disc very clearly over the landscape.
Estimates of being 1800 kms 1118 miles in diameter and shows clearly that the Sun is NOT 93 million miles away as does the picture of the Analemma.

Sun diameter is measured at 32 nautical miles (32 minutes of arc) or 36.83 statute miles and have several proofs attached and one from the Sun Disc size itself.
These are the Sun Distance calculations for the past year:

Sun Distance 2nd July 2016:

Location: Taree, NSW, Australia
Lat -31.868S Lon 152.488E
Sunrise 06:51 am - Daylight Saving ended 2:00am Sunday 4th April
Sunset 16:57 pm
Middle of day or Sun Apogee at 11:54 am
Sun Angle = 34.5º
Direction Magnetic 12.5ºM 360ºT
Distance from Source baseline right angle = 1625 + 575 + 1604.4 = 3804.4 miles

Sun Vertical Distance 21st June 2016 = 3804.4 * Tan 0.6873 = 2614.8 miles 4208.1 kms

Series Progression:
18th August - 44.5º - 2015 corrected 3012 miles 4847 km - fast
1st September - 49.5º - 3256 miles 5241 km - 20 days before Equatorial/Spring Equinox - fast
28th September - 59.3º - 3503 miles 5638 km - 7 days after Equatorial/Spring Equinox - fast
10th October - 63.8º - 3628 miles 5839 km - fast
26th October - 70.5º - 3908 miles 6289 km - fast slowing
16th November - 77º - 3898 miles 6273 km - slowing
4th December - 80º - 4450 miles 7162 km - slow
17th December - 81.5º - 4128 miles 6643 km - very slow
21st December - 81.5º - 4068 miles 6547 km - Summer Solstice - very slow
11th January 2016 - 80.2º - 4247 miles 6835 km - slow increasing
21st January - 78º - 3684 miles 5931 km - slow increasing
1st February - 75.2º - 3722 miles 5989 km - fast
9th February - 72.5º - 3755 mile3s 6042 km - fast
23rd February - 68º - 3696 miles 5949 km - fast
7th March - 64º - 3758.2 miles 6048 km - fast
23rd March - 57º - 3472.5 miles 5584.4 km fast - 2 days after Equatorial/Autumn Equinox crossing
6th April - 51º - 3214.4 miles 5173.1 km - fast
10th April - 48.2º - 3146.5 miles 5063.8 kim - fast - Bathurst NSW
20th April - 46.2º - 3072.6 miles 4944.9 km - fast
3rd May 2016 - 42º - 2947.9 miles 4744.1 km - fast
21st May 2016 - 38.5º - 2798.8 miles 4504.3 km - fast slowing
29th May 2016 - 35.8º - 2627.4 miles 4228.4 kms - slowing
10th June 2016 - 34.5º - 2575.6 miles 4145.0 kms - slow
15th June 2016 - 34.2º - 2559.0 miles 4118.3 kms - very slow - corrected
21st June 2016 - 34.2º - 2633.5 miles 4238.1 kms - very slow - Winter Solstice
2nd July 2016 - 34.5º - 2614.8 miles 4208.1 km - very slow increasing

Notes:
Discovered another means by which a calibration can be made and this is without directly using a protractor but simply is the shadow of the Sun onto the top of the Spirit level from a raised square edge with a previously calibrated scale on the surface.
This would make the actual reading much easier and probably a little more accurate.
May do this as an interim to the new and larger 6' model as it is simple to achieve.
This would no longer rely on the flat surface of the measuring block but now just a single edge.

Have added angle to Series Progression to show the change.

Year data shows height or distance to be 4,120 miles 6,630 kms in the Southern Hemisphere and 2,570 miles 4,136 kms in the Northern with a mean of 3,345 miles 5,383 kms.
This is also showing that the Earth is Flat and stationary and does not rotate.
Our Global Earth is nothing but a myth.
If anyone is interested in the detail attached to all of this, please let me know and I will respond here.

Should have the full letter in the Post sometime this week with accompanying material.

Smokey
__________________
 

Last edited by David G Dawson; 07-02-2016 at 01:38 PM. Reason: Hemisphere heights
Reply With Quote
  #2585  
Old 07-02-2016, 01:30 PM
David G Dawson David G Dawson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 421
Alexanderson

For those interested in the Alexanderson annual transmission from Sweden:

REMINDER

OF GRIMETON RADIO/SAQ TRANSMISSION

Received the following message recently from Lars Kalland regarding SAQ 17.2
kHz Alexanderson Day transmission on Sunday 3rd July.

The annual transmission on "Alexanderson Day" with the Alexanderson
alternator on VLF 17.2 kHz with the call SAQ will take place Sunday, July
3rd, 2016 at 09:00 UTC (tuning up from after 08:30 UTC) and will be repeated
at 12:00 UTC (tuning up from after 11:30 UTC).

Amateur Radio Station with the call "SK6SAQ" will be QRV on the following
frequencies:

- 7.035 kHz CW or - 14.035 kHz CW or - 21.035 kHz CW or - 3.755 kHz
SSB

Two stations will be on the air most of the time.

QSL-reports to SAQ and SK6SAQ are kindly received via:

- E-mail to: <mailto:info@alexander.n.se> info@alexander.n.se

- or via: SM bureau

- or direct by mail to:

Alexander - Grimeton Veteranradios Vaenner,

Radiostationen

Grimeton 72

SE-432 98 ROLFSTORP

S W E D E N

Website: Vänföreningen Alexander – Grimeton SAQ veteranradios vänner <http://www.alexander.n.se/>

The station will be open to visitors.

Smokey
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2586  
Old 07-07-2016, 10:12 PM
t-rex's Avatar
t-rex t-rex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: In the bushes
Posts: 422
Networks

Quote:
Originally Posted by David G Dawson View Post
Hello Eric & Aaron,

Guillemin Pulse Theory:
Pulse Generators - PFNs or NET:
I am writing a letter to Eric and in explaining some requirements with respect to pulsing, I find that the Guillemin Theory is using capacitors in the Farad range.
I had mistakenly used uF and now find an impossible situation has risen where the higher you go in capacitance, the lesser becomes the voltage.
The highest I have in stock here is a 24,000uf at 10 volts and hardly applicable to Thyratron use where you are using very high voltages for pulsing.
Most Farad Supercaps are only of a few volts.
So where do you get these capacitors from as they are not readily available commercially?
I had chosen Fig 6-28 on Page 205 of the MIT Chapter V 'Pulse Generators' but find all the other configurations similar with one using 21 Farads.
In Eric's 'Tesla Transformer Pulse Generator' (TTPG) which I have built, uses a 600 volt supply feeding a 2050 thyratron.
In this case your PFN would need to be rated at + 600volts and that voltage is expressed directly across the PFN (Pulse Forming Network or NET).
This is Radar type technology and looks like the needs are very specific and probably priced outside our buying power range and not possible to achieve what is required.
Anybody?

Smokey

Guillemin network condensers most likely pico farads not farads. i am working on presentation now so wait till next week please. N6KPH
__________________
SUPPORT ERIC DOLLARD'S WORK AT EPD LABORATORIES, INC.

Purchase Eric Dollard's Books & Videos - 70% of the sale goes to Eric and EPD Laboratories: Eric Dollard Books & Videos
Donate by Paypal: Donate to EPD Laboratories
Reply With Quote
  #2587  
Old 07-08-2016, 05:27 AM
David G Dawson David G Dawson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 421
Guillemin Theory Plus

Guillemin Theory:
Eric, Thankyou for responding.
Hope the Conference goes well and hoping you get more than just interest.

Unless I am misreading what is before my very eyes or there is an error in the MIT documentation but it is very clear that under every schematic are the words Farad and Henry:



I was most disappointed when I realised this anomaly.
However, when you get into the application side of the theory, the PFN clearly shows something entirely different:



The AD-YU 36 position variable Delay Line is using values in the 500pF and 1 mH area and is connected in a TEM arrangement.
Zero to 30 Henry with a variable coil at rear - extremely fortunate in being able to purchase such an item.

Crystal Set Initiative CSI or CRD Radio:
Don't think I have posted this previously but this is an attempt to see a difference between a telluric (CSI) and atmospheric signal from the local Radio Station which is only 7 km away.



Top is from a transistor radio and bottom is from the CSI from memory.
I could not see anything here that made me think I was identifying a difference.
CSI is still operating even with the secondary coils falling down onto one another but is now to be modified and turned on its side.



This is a picture of the signal received alongside the CSI when I first began pulsing with your 2050/5R4GYB (Tesla Transformer Pulse Generator - TTPG) and am unable to determine exactly what this is telling me.
This is from a coil dangling in mid air near the CSI with a probe from the Oscilloscope attached - I never directly attach to the device under test.
When I build these devices including all your much appreciated Vacuum Tube designs, I ensure that they work and then go onto the next as the line has been rather extensive including many of my own.
I am now at the stage of building and experimenting to my own designs using all of the built material.
This includes getting back to the CSI.
This is where the 'Spherics Tetrahedral Device' (STD) is forthcoming and is using your pulser above.

Spherics Tetrahedral Device (STD):



AD-YU Delay Lines (DL) in the two SS boxes with one calibrated, your 6SN7GT Triode Driver in front, alongside the 2C22 Regenerative Magnifying Receiver - RMR), 2050/5R4GYB TTPG to the right, PFNs on top and x4 6BQ7A amplifiers at rear.
PFNs - 'Pulse Forming Networks' or NET.
Only thing missing in the very middle is the 5 or 6" x 1" air pickup coil and transformer.
Driving is via the DLs with a 120º at each of the 3 lower coils.
When I can get some idea of what L & C are required, will change this all to a LMD arrangement as it will be of interest to determine what the difference is exactly.

My base cause is for the development of a house power plant for every home negating the use of wires and poles.
Everybody that is here looking at your work would also have this as their prime objective and will continue to hold their interest.

Anything you may have to complement this initiative would be greatly appreciated.
All the best to all.

Smokey
__________________
 

Last edited by David G Dawson; 07-08-2016 at 06:30 AM. Reason: Repeat
Reply With Quote
  #2588  
Old 07-08-2016, 06:28 AM
David G Dawson David G Dawson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 421
Guillemin Theory

Guillemin Theory:
With all due respect I think I can answer my own question as the note at the bottom of each schematic uses the word 'seconds'.
What this is telling us is that you degrade by a suitable power of 10 when you talk of mSecs or uSecs.
The AD-YU has a delay of 18uS at 640 ohm and the reason why the Cs are in pFs and the Ls in mH.
As an example when using an Oscilloscope you measure the number of mSecs for a full wave and then use 1/mS and then x by 1,000 and by 1,000,000 for uSecs to obtain your frequency with respect to time.

So, in effect you divide the Farads by 1,000 if you want mSecs and by 1,000,000 if you want uSecs.
This then means that the high 21 Farad becomes 21/1,000 = 0.021 uF or 21,000 pF or 21/1,000,000 = 0.000021 uF or 21 pF.
Hope this is clear as using the words Farad and Second is really confusing to a layperson or a simpleton like me.

Delay Lines are used in TVs where you have two different images to contend with, the fast luminance image (brightness) and the slower chrominance image (colour) and where you need to slow the luminance at each retrace across the screen.

Would now like to ask Eric what values of C & L he was using in his TEM/LMD demonstration and will expect the values of C & L to be the same right through the chain and why did he use these values in particular as they appear to be for an application?
Thanks.

Smokey
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2589  
Old 07-08-2016, 09:11 AM
wheatbelt.radio wheatbelt.radio is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 14
Re - 3D resonator AND transluminal FOR Dollard

David = that is the coolest looking build ive seen in some time, in essence my favorite elements are those which it shares with 50's +/- Vintage UFO's,. Great too see the CRT electron alignment coils being used, - Kapandzee uses those ferrite based coils for his 3 2 1 kapagen home power unit also,. I definitly look forward too hearing about the various tests you perform along the way,
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2590  
Old 07-08-2016, 09:23 AM
wheatbelt.radio wheatbelt.radio is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 14
ERIC : The Matter of multiple co-ordinate systems has been on my mind recently whilst considering the nature of the universe and particularly the nature of dimensions, - Spacial VS "Etheric REALMS"

Clearly the L,W,H spacial dimensions will be one of our "multiple co-ordinate systems", - also shared with my "multiverse maths model"

Another that occurs would be Resonant Transmission - With Potential Ties too an Etheric Realm - Need a little more night time R&D around tesla coils too advance this hypotheses ,

These 2 co-ordinate systems allow you too access a point in the universe from another another point., now a third co-ordinate system would really require a stretch of the imagination - strictly speaking i dont think electron migration via potential, - would be ranked at high as the first 2 options due too practical usability, which also goes for magnetic lines of force - simply due too the quantity of matter in space creating an impedance.

what is your saturday night 6pack favorite manifestation of a co-ordinate system ?
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2591  
Old 07-08-2016, 01:13 PM
Marcus Neuhof Marcus Neuhof is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 81
Mr. Dollard,

I am still trying to understand dielectric parameter variation devices.

Consider your PP-18/AR voltage converter. Schematics are below.

Dollard-PP-18-AR.jpg

Where and how does parameter variation occur in this device?

The condenser C varies its position in the circuit, yes: it goes from being located across the first power supply (V_1) to being located from the positive terminal of the first supply (V_1) to the positive terminal of the second (V_2).

By this transition it adds its stored potential (equal to V_1) to the continuous potential of V_1 in order to produce 2 * V_1 = V_2... or the opposite, reducing V_2 to one-half its potential.

And yet, at nowhere in this process does C ever change its capacity!

To be sure, if we were to add a second condenser, fixed in position across V_1, then a variation in capacity would indeed occur. After all, two condensers of equal capacity in series have half the capacity of either condenser on its own.

Is the parameter variation to which you refer?

The below document would seem to indicate so.

Dollard-Notes_on_PP-18-AR_Military_Volt_Converter.PDF

The difficulty for me is that not even the original military PP-18/AR converter contained such a condenser, at least not one of any significant size. The only other large condenser was used to filter voltage ripple in the output (across V_2)... not the input!

Dollard-PP-18_AR_Power_Converter.jpg

Nevertheless, I attempted to replicate the PP-18 voltage converter with a condenser across the V_1 input power supply to permit parameter variation.

I used 6800 microfarad condensers (across V_1 as well as as the position-varying C -- C-2 in the military schematic) and a split reed type vibrator operating at 116 cycles per second. 20 nanofarad condensers were used to reduce sparking across the vibrator contacts, and a 2200 microfarad condenser was used as an output reservoir (C-1 in the military schematic).

As specified, the device successfully produced twice the input voltage across the output condenser. Run "in reverse," applying power to the output side, resulted in one-half the input voltage, again as specified.

However, I did not observe any anomalous effects due to parameter variation. Once the initial current source (a 9V battery) was removed, the condensers ran down quickly and the device ceased operating.

Removal of the condenser across V_1 did not change this; instead the device simply stopped operating as soon as the battery was disconnected (as there was no longer any current available for the vibrator coil).
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2592  
Old 07-09-2016, 05:37 AM
David G Dawson David G Dawson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 421
Impulse Discharge

Impulse Discharge Generator:
Hello Marcus.
An attempt to explain your observations.

A.V. Chernetskii -- Self-Generating Discharge Plasma

What the Russians are terming a 'Self Generating Discharge' which we and certain others have discovered through various experiments.
This is a quick comparison I did between the two but both work and I have a setup here that is about to be connected to Eric Dollard's 'Tesla Transformer Pulse Generator' (TTPG) which I have built and feeding into a transformer:



Initial tests showed the ability to light a 100 watt lamp from a 7 Watt input but this was through another spark gap which I deemed not practical and will use Eric's TTPG on the output into a transformer:



This is an adapted Don Smith circuit - Capacitors used were 4 x 8uF 4 kV oilfilled in series, Pulser is one from Bruce Perrault via Bob Iannini, 10 line series ceramic caps give about 20 pF, spark gap is using carbon rods from 'D' cells.
Surprise when the spark extinguished but the caps kept charging.
Three areas of interest where an ambient energy could enter were the 10 series ceramic caps, the extinguished spark gap and the use of carbon (a Tesla favourite).
What we had generated was a Plasma exchange at the gap and this is also what I believe Tesla was attempting to do with his Magnets either side of the spark gap in an effort to extinguish the spark asap to gain the ambient energy input.



Ignore the resistors as this was another Don Smith attempt but note the wide gap at the carbons and the meter showing over 1 kV at the capacitors and still rising.

I am suggesting to Eric Dollard that this is exactly what is occurring in his PP-18/AR with the contacts of the multivibrator where a plasma exchange occurs at the gap after the spark is extinguished and travels back to the centre contact.
A cap across the gap is going to kill these effects and a need to fine tune the multivibrator for minmum arc.

Eric suggested my Lester Hendershot replication (another art form) was a deviation/distraction but can only disagree as through an attempt to find a resonator that worked, I substituted a 4 volt multivibrator and through a loose connection which sparked, was able to generate an 11 kV spark within the circuit from a mere 4 volts.
Remember that Tesla was most interested in what happened immediately the power switch was closed and before the current was able to flow - Impulse Discharge.

In all of this is the reason for my previous Post on the 'Spherics Tetrahedral Device' (STD) where we do not have situations that need be adjusted like in a spark gap or where maintenance is often required.
However, both systems are in a competition to see which is the most practical as a source of home energy but there are others here that are also contenders.

Hope this may assist in explaining the phenomena.

Eric may come back with a more technical explanation but this is coming from an actual 'electrical experimenter'.

Smokey
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2593  
Old 07-09-2016, 05:25 PM
Marcus Neuhof Marcus Neuhof is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 81
Smokey,

Thank you for the interesting post.

The concept of the spark plasma as a producer of anomalous energy surplus is not new to me. I have previously read claims that the spark gap in certain forms of Tesla apparatus performed this function.

The Steinmetz chapter in the "Transient" book on the phenomena surrounding lighting arrestors, which Mr. Dollard has posted several times, may also shed light on this concept. However I have not been able to fully comprehend this chapter.

It is therefore quite possible that, as you say, adjustment of the vibrator for maximum sparking is crucial.

Certainly in my case I designed the circuit for minimum sparking, in order to prolong the life of the vibrator. I could not imagine Mr. Dollard doing otherwise, given the scarcity of suitable vibrators and the necessity of functional power conversion in his Corolla.

However, I have reason to be skeptical that sparking at the switching contacts is a crucial element of the circuit.

First, sparking ought to produce no change in any dielectric parameter variation, except possibly in terms of the rate of change of the parameters.

The rotating variable condenser device developed by Chris Carson did not appear to require any kind of spark gap. It is possible that the Carson device was nevertheless able to produce a comparable capacity time rate of change through extremely high-RPM operation, but I doubt it.

Next, an earlier attempt on my part to replicate Mr. Dollard's results with the PP-18 circuit produced a great deal of sparking, but also no anomalous results.

In that case, I used an ordinary electromechanical relay with an operating frequency of approximately 40Hz. There, the result was precisely the same as with the vibrator.

As it was a very brief test, the relay was a modern type with long life contacts, and relays are easy to come by, there I took no measures to minimize contact wear. The result was continuous and visible arcing at the contacts. Yet the circuit still ceased operating upon removal of the external power source -- rather than continuing to operate and producing ca. 100mA surplus.

At the time I assumed that there were one or more critical thresh-holds pertaining to operating frequency and switching delay. The electromechanical vibrator performs considerably better than the relay in both of these respects. However, my most recent test with a vibrator would seem to invalidate this hypothesis.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2594  
Old 07-10-2016, 01:15 AM
David G Dawson David G Dawson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 421
Impulse Discharge

Tesla's Radiant Energy & Imhotep's Radiant Oscillator:

http://www.panaceatech.org/Tesla&#39;s%2...Oscillator.pdf

Did the Imhotep Oscillator and it worked and worked well but only briefly.
What you depend on here is the relay continuing to operate with much arcing at the contacts and eventually the relay fails but it worked.
Also why the Car Radio multivibrators were something of a pain in the neck for that very same reason and required regular contact cleaning and adjustment.
That is why the plasma gap appeared to be an answer as there was simply no longer any maintenance and why Tesla used the Magnets across his gap.

That is now why the 'Impulse Discharge' or 'Self Generating Discharge' is of such interest as it eliminates the main problem of maintenance.

I keep seeing the Kapanadze setup with the four high spark gaps arcing like crazy and ask myself for how long?

In my scratchy note page I mentioned a spark gap Vacuum Tube and that is a 1B22 and there are others similar and this also includes an Ion Valve from Bruce Perrault.

In looking for the Imhotep information I came across a statement that clearly indicated that you need to go negative to be able to invite the ambient energy into your circuits and this is also what I myself have continued to say.
This is why I charge a Joe Cell into the negative that people fail to understand.

In my Weather engineering it becomes a simple fact that a Low pressure system contains considerable energy compared to the High pressure system.
Expansion is hot and dry and calm and Male and positive, Contraction is cold and wet and packed full of energy and Female and negative - Explosion/Implosion.
I use directional resonant negative ion generators (RNIG) at high voltage to produce rain at long range over a Flat Earth.

I will repeat here that I am only interested in a house power plant that is going to be reliable, near maintenance free and not expensive and the reason for my current builds.
I have done all the base work (14 years) and is now a process of putting that research into an application that is available to everyone.
The most difficult part of this long road has been to filter out the real bad information that you find to have been plageurised from others also not being in the know as most had simply failed to verify anything themselves at the bench and were just too busy behind a keyboard.

Eric will probably agree with me here as this is the only way to learn about what we all seek by actually being at the bench where an entirely different world is open to you where a capacitor is no longer used to filter off the noise.
Hope this helps.

Smokey
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2595  
Old 07-10-2016, 06:21 AM
Marcus Neuhof Marcus Neuhof is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 81
Smokey,

I briefly reviewed the PDF you linked to in regards the Imhotep circuit. However I see no evidence that it is producing a surplus of "energy." The description implies that it is merely more efficient and, notably, the schematic diagrams all contain batteries.

Are you able to confirm that the Imhotep circuit was able to operate in a self-sustaining fashion, i.e with no battery?

Your allusions to low pressure, negativity, implosion and such are, as you are no doubt aware, reminiscent of Viktor Schauberger. In the "Ere many generations pass" thread on this forum, there are discussions of a Tesla device along those lines.

Nevertheless I would suspect that any "worship of the female principle" would be considered by Mr. Dollard to be an error.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2596  
Old 07-11-2016, 10:49 AM
Marcus Neuhof Marcus Neuhof is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 81
Here is a transcript of a video where Mr. Dollard discussed the PP-18 and explained why and how it produces anomalous results.

Unfortunately I am still not able to tell why my attempts to replicate his results have not been successful.

TRANSCRIPT FROM VIDEO:
Telluric3.MP4 - "Eric Dollard's Telluric Research 2007, Part 3"
Video available from ericpdollard.com

Interjections from other persons in the video have been omitted from the transcript.

1:04:33 TRANSCRIPT BEGINS

All this stuff is so simple, and so easy, and just little simple algebraic equations, simple little motors and things that have been around all the time, not the laws of conservation of energy...

I've got a little aircraft vibrator box in my car, that was designed to take a 12V aircraft, and turn it into 24 volts for 24 volt radio equipment.

Now the way this device does it is, it was before solid state reality that destroys all power flow relationships in any kind of power system because it's unidirectional!

So what this does is it has a pair of vibrators on a common reed.

Okay.

So like the vibrators in an old car radio except it's a pair on a common reed. So it's got 8 pins instead of 4 or 5.

Now what this does, it's very simple, simple little device that has two electrolytics in it.

Contacts are on the A side.

The two electrolytic capacitors are hooked in parallel and connected to the 12 volt battery in the car.

The series inductance charges the capacitors to 12 or actually 14 or whatever.

The vibrator at that time charge rate, after they're done, it's constant about 100 cycles a second vibrator, goes to contact set B.

Contact set B takes the two electrolytic capacitors and connects them in SERIES, now you have 24 volts, and connects them to the 24 volt battery.

So what you've done with this device is I have a 24 volt battery, and I have a 12 volt battery, hooked in parallel, with out a blast, because it's an exact 2:1 DC transformer, and you can't operate a transformer unless you involve the dimensions of per second.

1:06:19

And it gets the per second okay, by the vibrator.

Now if you take an inductance coil, like in a motor, an induction motor, and you take that inductance coil and you vary the inductance with respect to time...

And that's what an induction motor does, because of the rotation...

An inductance is in the dimensions of length squared divided by time. And that gives you the dimensions of resistance.

Okay.

So if I take an inductance coil, and I make the core hop in and out, I will get the same phase angle, the some phase angle a proper phase angle, same frequency as the AC that's going through the inductance coil but what will happen is, is I will either extract energy from that vibrating coil or I will deliver energy to that vibrating coil in the form of a resistance, you see what I mean?

You know because energy is entering or leaving the field. It's a loss. Resistance is negative. Inductance is a negative, lag. Other side of the equation you have capacitance... Okay now just because all the textbooks took the negatives and erased it, they didn't ... wrath of Steinmetz, I'll use the negatives, positives, oh yeah yeah yeah, change old signs around... okay...

So the other side you capacitance... a varying capacitance with respect to time... gives you the dimensions of conductance, which is one over resistance, ok. That actually turns out to be the energy generating component.

If I have a system of electrical networks, and one of them is an alternator, okay, that's a conductance, that's generating in the system.

1:07:57

The motor is dissipating, it's the resistance in the system. The transmission line is the inductance and, has to have all four elements, I have the energy creation, energy destruction, energy storage, energy return, it's a complete loop.

So what this device in the car is doing, it's varying capacitance with respect to time and creating an energy component synthetically, through its dimensions, a piece at a time.

And what that thing does, okay, is I can take the car and unplug it from the station, turn off the military radios which are a big drain, leave the scanner on, which pulls 100 milliamps.

That vibrator, and that oscillating back and forth battery (???) will keep the scanner running indefinitely with draining the car battery. And sometimes I can't turn the thing off.

That's all there is to free energy. It's that simple.

1:08:53

I built a whole system to be studied in lab at Santa Barbara. I spent months, man, to build these networks to try to duplicate this effect and bring it out, so this could be so faint that you wondered if you might not be fooling yourself ... and of course they all went off to La-La Land and you know, abandoned the whole project, and you know I went back to the dumpsters.

1:09:14 TRANSCRIPT ENDS
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2597  
Old 07-11-2016, 08:35 PM
t-rex's Avatar
t-rex t-rex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: In the bushes
Posts: 422
To David and all - Q & A

David Dawson: Ok, you figured the Farad dilemma out.

Please do NOT use acronyms - I do not get it with them, nor do others. Spell the whole thing out.

The 2C22 circuit is to make a regenerative receiver. Start with a normal tuned circuit and feedback coil, get the "hang of it" here before trying the Tesla Transformer, which will present difficulties.

As for underground vs overground delay, put one signal into scope vertical, other signal into scope horizontal, diagonal line in phase, ellipse out of phase.

Remember, mutual inductance between network coils make things different, usually for the better however.

The network values for the recent video are 0.2 microfarad & 88 millihenry. Be sure to use half values at the ends or distortion will result.

PP-18 aircraft radio power converter. I cannot get it to do what it used to do. Do not know why this is. However, I still do get extended time constants, contact adjustment is critical for this. I suggest for independent mercury reed contacts driven by variable time functions for each.

Chris Carson died before we could finish analysis of his efforts. That unit was very hard to construct!!!

Indeed, sparking was taking place when the PP-18 acted as a "perpetual charged condenser." That means cross phased on time for SPDT contacts.

Remember the 1B22's are very rare and valuable. Do not Foxtrot them up! Keep pulse currents small and short.

I did make a very sophisticated switching unit for Peter Lindemann, Mike Knox and Chris Carson at S.B. but it vanished like a fart in the wind. So what is new?

The ringing Geiger Counter is a sales product. Remember Japan! Steve McGreevey has new box so you can hear the severe U.H.F. digital world you like to live in. It is horrifying how much power is swirling about and pecking away!!

Ron Cole setup is no more than a simple Tesla Impulse Generator, so use Tesla's name, not Ron Cole. A Guillemin Condenser, the name for his networks instead of regular condenser may make for interesting elements.

For the Tesla Transformer Pulse Generator, put a 50 ohm resistor in series with the 0.1 uF input condenser, it will extend tube life.
__________________
SUPPORT ERIC DOLLARD'S WORK AT EPD LABORATORIES, INC.

Purchase Eric Dollard's Books & Videos - 70% of the sale goes to Eric and EPD Laboratories: Eric Dollard Books & Videos
Donate by Paypal: Donate to EPD Laboratories

Last edited by t-rex; 07-11-2016 at 08:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2598  
Old 07-11-2016, 10:48 PM
Marcus Neuhof Marcus Neuhof is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 81
Mr Dollard,

What do you mean by " cross phased on time for SPDT contacts" ?

It is interesting that the PP-18 no longer seems to do what it used to do. Extended time constants are consistent with my own experience.

It is my hypothesis that our projects here operate in a domain where the apparent rules of reality are no longer quite as reliable as one tends to believe they are.

It may well be that a "free energy device" is only possible when its existence is known to very few.

Its existence would, according to this hypothesis, demand too great a shift from the ambient thought framework.

This would also represent an explanation of the mysterious events which have dogged your work.

It is very much a film from the "computer reality" but you may nevertheless find the following to be of interest:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfXtzBRX3sg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOe0sggQfF4

If this hypothesis is correct then the bringing about of "abundance" on a large scale would require a different approach than the design and engineering of a single device.

It would also perhaps explain the secrecy which has always surrounded the deeper aspects of the so-called "occult."
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2599  
Old 07-13-2016, 12:42 AM
David G Dawson David G Dawson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 421
EP Dollard Response

EP Dollard Response:
Thankyou for your responses and will work on those as we proceed.
Hope the Conference went well.



The acronym you are probably referring to is not one at all but the very name of a Chinese Company that was manufacturing Delay Lines at Passiac, New Jersey and called AD-YU.
They eventually went before the courts to explain why they were giving away information to China that was considered to be of a National Security interest.
I am very aware of the acronym problem and you will note that I specifically DO explain anything that is made brief.
I am ex spacetrack NASA Tidbinbilla, Australia and we (the DSN - Deep Space Network) were given the very job by DSN/Intell (4040) who were the very first remote control chip manufacturers involved with this huge task, to keep all the acronyms the same and be meaningful at the same time.
Without the Space Industry we probably would be back with 1990 computers.
We started in a huge room about 50 meters long by 20 wide with 3 full rows of 19" racks with about 12 operators (about 30 subsystems) and in the end, after about 12 years I was the last man standing at the RF front end and all the rest was being handled by two others in the control room - Computers and where it all began.



This is a picture of the opened top of the AD-YU showing the L & C organisation and have done some in circuit measurements with the following results:
3 randomly chosen strings:
500/281/258pF - 913mH
262/976/531pF - 811mH
643/318/933/525pF - 1.429mH

Confirmed an in circuit measurement of my own 5 place PFN (Pulse Forming Network or NET) with the following results:
mH 168/192/193/69/73
Do not know why the two at one end are low as they were made equally but may suggest something out of the ordinary may be occurring here?
uF 0.053/0.029/0.029/0.029/0.052
As you can see the two outside Cs are about double the inside and is in accordance with your suggestion to 1/2 the outers.



The bottom ceramic cap string line is from the Don Smith 'Impulse Discharge' experiments where I also believe a phenomena is occurring due to the caps being in a series string when stressed under an extra high voltage - caps are 20kv 100pF.

Steve McGreevey:

auroralchorus.com - Natural VLF Radio - Sounds of Space Weather - The Music of the Magnetosphere

We already have the Crystal Set/Radio Initiative (CSI/CRI) working and considering now for it to be duplicated into the final TX/RX configuration using my Extra Coil and not yours as we differ on the fundamental reasoning.
Results on this when I can get the time.
Thankyou again for your answers and wish you all the best.

Smokey
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2600  
Old 07-13-2016, 02:18 AM
David G Dawson David G Dawson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 421
TEM & LMD NETworks

TEM & LMD NETworks:

https://youtu.be/bi0wg3UvSSw

Communication Networks - Ernst A Guillemin:

http://www.shamanicengineering.org/w...ume-2-1935.pdf

This is the book Eric is referring to with respect the related organisations.
It is of significant interest to me in building the 'Spherics Tetrahedral Device' (STD) as it means I need to know in which direction to rotate the invisible vortex motor and I also need to know if I should be leading or lagging where phase is concerned.
My direction is indicated by a Weather Low Pressure System in the Southern Hemisphere by rotating CW as that is where the energy is being generated and not in the High.
LMD is significant in its relationship with light where we see something happening before it actually does as related to PI/2 * c where 'c' is the speed of light.
Notice that the TEM Eric calls the Low Pass Filter and the LMD the High and the two together are Wide/Broadband and this is significant in that we will attempt to be opposite to what current/today technology represents in what is termed 'fine' tuning where all the Cosmic noise including the Aether is eliminated.
This is as applied to an ambient energy extraction device which we are currently working on from many angles.

Later - unfortunately the PDF is only to Page 135 at the beginning of Chapter IV with the full version containing 581 pages but gives you an idea of what's ahead.

Smokey
__________________
 

Last edited by David G Dawson; 07-13-2016 at 04:19 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2601  
Old 07-13-2016, 05:50 PM
t-rex's Avatar
t-rex t-rex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: In the bushes
Posts: 422
Neuhof

Cross phase is a power line term where two different phases are connected giving a short circuit condition.

In this case it is when both contacts in a SPDT switch contact the central terminal shorting the normally open to the normally closed contact.
__________________
SUPPORT ERIC DOLLARD'S WORK AT EPD LABORATORIES, INC.

Purchase Eric Dollard's Books & Videos - 70% of the sale goes to Eric and EPD Laboratories: Eric Dollard Books & Videos
Donate by Paypal: Donate to EPD Laboratories
Reply With Quote
  #2602  
Old 07-15-2016, 03:55 AM
David G Dawson David G Dawson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 421
A Time Reversal Capacitor of 1 Farad & Negative Resistance

A Time Reversal Capacitor of 1 Farad & Negative Resistance:
A precursor to understanding the principles involved here would be to review Eric's 'Extraluminal = Tranverse + Longitudinal' video:

https://youtu.be/bi0wg3UvSSw

A brief comparison between the two:
TEM - Low Pass Filter - Time Delay or Lag Network - zero to infinity
LMD - High Pass Filter - Time Advance (PI/2*c) 'counterspace' or time reversal - infinity to zero - an ambient superconductor
TEM+LMD = Broadband or Wideband - Extraluminal

I need to explain this initially in the solid state format but have advanced into Vacuum Tubes later in the article.
What I am going to attempt here is to associate Eric's video with 'negative resistance' (NR) which is called an ambient superconductor and holds the same phenomena as the Longitudinal Magneto Dielectric (LMD) wave string.
Those that know me will understand what I am presenting here as it has been the collective work of many years endeavouring to understand what NR means and after watching the video you should see the same words being used to explain like 'TIME REVERSED'.
Below is the 'Negistor' article from Marcelo Puhl explaining the NR phenomena and uses words as Eric did in his video:

KeelyNet on negative resistance - 04/07/00

On Page 3 at bottom is the Farad capacitor link which is the next two Pages featured at this URL:

American Radio History: Documenting the History of Radio TV and FM broadcasting





This is the reference from the 'Radio-Electronics' of March 1985 under 'Designer's Notebook':

This is a simulated Farad but is of that value never-the-less and you might like now to consider Thomas Henry Moray's device where he was using Farad capacitors but not ones from the shop which are only of a few volts.
Have been searching for this type of information for years and it has now fallen into place and answers many questions.

Vacuum Tubes:
The above information is related to transistors and we now need to apply that same phenomena with Tubes where considerable information is available on negative resistance (NR) with respect to oscillators and dynatrons etc.
For those new to Tubes, have added this URL in an attempt to make it easier to better understand their properties where 'rp' dynamic plate resistance - 'gm' transconductance and 'mu' amplification factor are concerned where:

mu = gm * rp:

The explanation you must read

Eric presented an article on 'very high transconductance' Vacuum Tubes and mentioned the 6AS7G where this Tube has an 'rp' of 280 ohms and you can see from the chart in the URL, the best is from a 12AV7 with 4,800 ohms.
The lower this figure is, the better the bandwidth.
Can you now see why the 6AS7G is 'out of the box'?
This is real 'broadband' (negative resistance) and why the audiophiles use this as the preferred Tube for headphone amplifiers.
As an aside, not all the odd harmonics are beneficial in an audio perspective but requires experiment to obtain the 'sparkle' and 'chime' mentioned in the article BUT I believe that all of those odd harmonics are most welcome where energy is concerned.







Negative Resistance in Tubes was really only first recognised in the Cunningham/RCA C-324-A (24A) which was the very first 'screen grid' Tube which appeared at the end of 1928 - first indications however, dated back to 1918.
This is the Tube I believe Tesla used in his Pierce Arrow (1931) and have already made implications that he was personally involved in its introduction.
Nothing here about amplification magic nor over unity but just a TIME REVERSAL and a very broad bandwidth or working in 'counterspace' but what it does do is PI/2*c - 'c' being the speed of Light.
This is what the Crystal Set/Radio Initiative (CSI/CRI) is all about is a time reversal and working in counterspace where you are able to achieve phenomena which is 'out of the box' and what the Alexanderson antenna system was all about at RCA Bolinas.
Using Tubes that are not amplifiers like the 6AS7G and similar is also working in this area and the 'guitar studio' document, clearly shows the implications where you widen the bandwidth and it is then that you receive the pristine sounds of real life music.
What this is actually doing is increasing the bandwidth and including the higher end odd harmonics and this is where the magic begins and the simple reason why you use Vacuum Tubes and NOT solid state for audio amplification.





I now get back to my Female analogy of energy in that what we currently use is only the positive side, the Male and is now why we need to look at the contractive and Female side.
This is analogous to the Muslim religion where the Male predominates and the Females are supressed and do not have balance in their lives and why we see this so called terrorism in Male explosion/expansion.
No longer look at fine tuning, narrow bandwidth Male but to the broadband Female where energy is concerned.
Male is flat in the horizontal and expansive and has an energy that is dispersed over a wide area and where fine tuning is required to drag in that energy where Female is broad in the vertical and contractive and contains a huge energy resource that is contained in a small area.
TIME FORWARD _ TIME REVERSE - MALE_FEMALE - YIN_YANG - HIGH PRESSURE_LOW PRESSURE.

Hope this is making some of what we talk about being more acceptable to the reader as where we are is entirely new and requires correction from our corrupted education.
No apologies for the long Post as I needed to get this all together and where better than here.
All the best.

Smokey
__________________
 

Last edited by David G Dawson; 07-15-2016 at 04:07 AM. Reason: URL missing
Reply With Quote
  #2603  
Old 07-15-2016, 02:50 PM
wheatbelt.radio wheatbelt.radio is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 14
Dear David Dawson,

Spherics Tetrahedral Device - was of particular interest too one of my flywheel based projects recently, delivering the purpose of generation stability in a single spacial dimension, teemed i might add with various groupings of fellow symmetrical tetrahedral flywheels too offer little more than stability and inertia in the typical fashion, however in my readings i have noted a few anomalous uses that others have experimented with and i understood as being atypical too either traditional function. without getting into the scifi ufo stereotyping of their uses, can you point me towards a page you have used for inspiration in your work
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2604  
Old 07-16-2016, 01:13 AM
David G Dawson David G Dawson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 421
Free Energy Design Criteria

Free Energy Design Criteria:
Hello wheatbelt.radio,

I had made my mind up on day one to remove myself from physical rotation (motors/generators etc) and that a passive vortex device was the base criteria needed and this simply to eliminate the maintenance/noise/fuel costs.
This for a house power plant eliminating poles and wires.
Spherics came along at 'Overunity' whilst I was designing the organisation as I had already considered a 4 pulse coil design and the need to pulse each coil at the 120º offset as I had made a point of buying old TV Neck Ferrites (a dual coil + bifilar wound) and was most fortunate in acquiring the AD-YU delay lines required to do this.

http://www.overunityresearch.com/ind....0;attach=9863

Plus all the vintage GLOM (General List OF Material or BOM - Bill Of Material) I could put my hands on like multivibrators, Tubes, ignition coils and flybacks for high voltage.
Vacuum Tubes were the essential pulse ingredient here as solid state was also eliminated in the original design criteria as bandwidth was required with harmonics present.
Everything today was 'fine tuned' and was considered that the very opposite phenomena was an essential requirement into OU - TEM vs LMD.
Eric's thyratron pulser met these demands as I had already come to this conclusion when experimenting with the Don Smith 'Impulse Discharge' design and why Eric Dollard's input on TEM & LMD is most beneficial to me for ALL free energy designs - that I needed thyratrons to do the down conversion into a useable AC.
Batteries and Inverters were also eliminated in the base criteria - simply a total change in thought as to what we were going to use.

People are here asking Eric for a free energy device to do what I am engineering and it is all contained in the information that he is providing and why I presented the TEM/LMD/Negative Resistance association.
LMD = PI/2*c

I cannot stress more that people need to pull themselves away from keyboards and actually do something at the bench - Eric's 'electrical experimenter'.

A document coming shortly on 'Impulse Discharge' as this is the second experimental road into OU after the 'Spherics Tetrahedral Device' (STD) and a third is Expansion/Implosion in the Fran De Acquino Tower Device and that is also being attended to and a 4th in Bruce Perrault's Radiant Energy collector.
And last but by far not the least of significance is Eric's 'Crystal Set/Radio Initiative' (CSI/CRI) which is also here with intent to modify and be Tube pulsed with a duplicate receive coil arrangement.

All five are on the bench for experiment with adaptations but progress is slow as I also cover other research fields including Rainmaking after TJ Constable and FLAT EARTH and Sun Distance.
Which device has the most potential to fill the house power criteria? - the 'Spherics Tetrahedral Device' (STD).

If anybody would like further information, it is available at Yahoo Groups 'dltorsiondevices' or you can connect at my Email:
smokey9s@bigpond.com.
Only dedicated individuals also at the bench please as my time is limited and wondering how it may be possible to reverse time as in an LMD arrangement.

Further information will be presented here as it is actually using some results of Eric Dollard's information which has been one of the connecting threads for all of free energy but only a very few are awake to that fact.

Summary for an 'Energy Synthesis Device':
No physical rotation.
No Solid State - Vacuum Tubes preferred initially
No Batteries or Inverters
No noise, or use of Fossil Fuels
Low maintenance
No power outages like during storms etc
No poles or wires
No long wire or similar Antenna except for a smart design using LMD principles which I am working on
Safety paramount
Practical size

Smokey
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2605  
Old 07-16-2016, 05:59 PM
Marcus Neuhof Marcus Neuhof is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 81
Mr. Dawson,

Have you been able to produce an 'Energy Synthesis Device' at all, without regard to the design parameters that you specify?
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2606  
Old 07-16-2016, 08:00 PM
Aaron's Avatar
Aaron Aaron is offline
Co-Founder & Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 11,005
Live call - Eric Dollard tomorrow

TOMORROW NOON PACIFIC DAYLIGHT SAVINGS TIME - LIVE CALL WITH ERIC DOLLARD - have questions? Call in and ask him yourself - Conference Call Dial-in: 1-857-232-0155
Conference Code: 582590
__________________
Sincerely,
Aaron Murakami

Reply With Quote
  #2607  
Old 07-17-2016, 06:01 PM
Aaron's Avatar
Aaron Aaron is offline
Co-Founder & Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 11,005
live call in 1 hour

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron View Post
TOMORROW NOON PACIFIC DAYLIGHT SAVINGS TIME - LIVE CALL WITH ERIC DOLLARD - have questions? Call in and ask him yourself - Conference Call Dial-in: 1-857-232-0155
Conference Code: 582590
Live call in 1 hour.
__________________
Sincerely,
Aaron Murakami

Reply With Quote
  #2608  
Old 07-17-2016, 06:39 PM
Marcus Neuhof Marcus Neuhof is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 81
Quote:
Originally Posted by t-rex View Post
Cross phase is a power line term where two different phases are connected giving a short circuit condition.

In this case it is when both contacts in a SPDT switch contact the central terminal shorting the normally open to the normally closed contact.
From a theoretical perspective, why would the simple act of varying capacitance NOT be enough to produce surplus current flow... why would additional current flowing through the condenser, or other conditions, be necessary?

Editing to add:

There are a variety of ways to construct a parametric variation device.

One may optimise for the highest possible number of parameter variations per second.

One may optimise for the most rapid possible parameter variation.

In the case of the PP-18, one may over-charge one or both condensers to above 12V. One may under-charge one or both condensers.

One may even produce parametric excitation or resonance in the PP-18 through careful choice of timing and the input inductance. (This seems unlikely given the design parameter of minimum ripple.)

And yet, I was under the impression that the 'energy surplus' appeared at the moment of parameter variation: when the e.g increase in capacity produced a positive conductance (G = C / time).

The positive conductance in turn resulting in a reduced voltage potential (across the varying capacity) or increased current flow -- V = I / G or, rearranged, G = I / V.

Yet if "cross phased" switching is required to produce any significant effect then it would seem likely this description is not complete:

From my point of view "cross phased" switching ought not to change the time rate of change of capacity (and therefore conductance), except in as much as the breaking of the arc might occur more quickly than a mechanical switch break.

In other words, if "cross phased" switching is required then the appearance of positive conductance would seem to be only part of the picture.

Other phenomena are evidently also required, acting in concert, to produce either or both of an increase in dielectric or magnetic induction.

This increase in either or both dielectric or magnetic induction, in turn, produces the second-order increase in electric induction which produces, according to your theories, Joules.

Indeed since dielectric parameter variation does not change the quantity of dielectric induction, at work would seem to be most likely an increase in magnetic induction, producing Volts.

But I see no clear path to understanding where this might come from in the domain of dielectric parameter variation.

Therefore, is it understood what the precise moment is at which the apparent energy surplus appears?
__________________
 

Last edited by Marcus Neuhof; 07-18-2016 at 01:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2609  
Old 07-20-2016, 07:19 PM
wheatbelt.radio wheatbelt.radio is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 14
in regards too the PP-18 voltage doubler,

its just occured too add too list possible list of working principles, the posssility that it is all common earthd, and the inductance is sucking in electrons from the chassis , ive noticed that such big lumps of iron after often as good as a ground earth for increasing current flow in circuits, personally i find this more likey from personal experience than the plasma being the mediator for this current flow - and if it isnt wired up too allow this possibility, it could be
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2610  
Old 07-29-2016, 07:54 PM
Marcus Neuhof Marcus Neuhof is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 81
I seem to be having trouble posting.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
aether, cosmic induction, energy conference, epd laboratories, eric dollard, eric p dollard, ernst alexanderson, extraluminal, generator, longitudinal, steinmetz, tesla, versor algebra, wireless, dollard, eric

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Please consider supporting Energetic Forum with a voluntary monthly subscription.

Choose your voluntary subscription

For one-time donations, please use the below button.


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v1.4.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
2007-2015 Copyright - Energetic Forum - All Rights Reserved

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

Tesla Chargers