Energetic Forum  
Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Delicious Digg Reddit WordPress StumbleUpon Tumblr Translate Addthis Aaron Murakami YouTube 2019 ENERGY CONFERENCE - ONLY 150 118 99 71 63 SEATS AVAILABLE!

2019 Energy Science & Technology Conference
ONLY 150 118 99 71 63 SEATS AVAILABLE - LIMITED SEATING
Get your tickets now: http://energyscienceconference.com


Go Back   Energetic Forum > > >
   

Eric Dollard Official Forum This forum is dedicated to the work of Eric P. Dollard. His Official homepage is http://ericpdollard.com

* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #2041  
Old 10-18-2014, 04:41 PM
Aaron's Avatar
Aaron Aaron is offline
Co-Founder & Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,932
Eric's forum

Quote:
Originally Posted by David G Dawson View Post
If this is Mr Eric P Dollard's Official Forum then it would be really nice if he were to turn up here at least monthly with some kind of report that let's us know what he is doing.
Or at least give it to Aaron or John just to Post here so we can all keep in touch - Thank you!

Aaron, thankyou for posting all of Eric's Math but the interest there would be for about 1% of the participants.
In reality, the Math should really follow something working at the bench and we have put the cart before the horse.
Lack of interest is shown by lack of progressive reports coming from all of his earlier followers.
The only way for Eric to read the forum is if he is with someone that has a computer, since he does not own one himself.

It will probably be months before I see Eric but John Polakowski may see him in the near future and may be able to have Eric read the forum and post something.
__________________
Sincerely,
Aaron Murakami

Reply With Quote

Download SOLAR SECRETS by Peter Lindemann
Free - Get it now: Solar Secrets

  #2042  
Old 10-21-2014, 03:47 PM
7redorbs 7redorbs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 58
good show

Nice builds there David. Good to see that you and a few others are still dedicated to the work. I'm looking at a crystal radio replication myself at the moment and looking forward to getting onto it. I have finished building my other transformer and electric magnet that I have been working on for some time now. Hope all goes well with you all,

Hope to hear more from you and Eric,

My best wishes,
Adam
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2043  
Old 10-26-2014, 11:42 AM
orgonaut314 orgonaut314 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 222
Now and than I am thinking further on the Dollard/Tesla stuff and I remember I have read somewhere that it all comes down to what is happening inside a capacitor.

Now I am trying to get this more clear and your opinion on this. Is Eric saying that essential the energy transport from one plate to the other goes through counterspace and is not transversal electromagnetic?

The traditional view is that the Poynting vector fills the space between the plates but the Poynting vector is a transversal electromagnetic wave.

Eric said somewhere that we would have to do a measurement in the cap to know. I know that a lot of people tried that and they did find a circular magnetic field in a cap but the value was much smaller than calculated. No one has ever measured the predicted magnetic field. Only the shape is correct.

My opinion is that this magnetic field might be a small transversal component and that indeed the energy transports as a pulse through the electric fieldlines. Counterspace.

This article says the magnetic field is never measured inside a capacitor in 140 years. Other articles that measured with superconductive elements can only measure the dependence or shape of the field but not the real value, that value is always much lower than predicted.
http://www.antennex.com/shack/Apr07/dc_factfan.pdf

Is there some critic that can point me to an article where they did measure the magnetic field in accordance with Maxwells predictions? Also its value?

This overlooked detail of the magnetic field inside a cap might hold the falsification of traditional electromagnetics. How long will we ignore it as a measuring error?
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2044  
Old 10-27-2014, 04:36 AM
Geometric_Algebra's Avatar
Geometric_Algebra Geometric_Algebra is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 82
Dollard Letters, 6SN7/6080/etc exciters

Here's a dropbox folder of letters from Eric.

The more recent ones have 6SN7/6080/etc tube exciter information.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2045  
Old 10-27-2014, 07:56 AM
Marcus Neuhof Marcus Neuhof is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 77
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geometric_Algebra View Post
Here's a dropbox folder of letters from Eric.

The more recent ones have 6SN7/6080/etc tube exciter information.
Thanks for posting those.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2046  
Old 10-27-2014, 04:50 PM
orgonaut314 orgonaut314 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geometric_Algebra View Post
Here's a dropbox folder of letters from Eric.

The more recent ones have 6SN7/6080/etc tube exciter information.
Thanks that last letter has instructions on making an impedance matching transformer.

I was working on my pi filter and ended with a shunt coil and series condensator. That works good too.

Here you can calculate the vallues:
LC Impedance Matching Network Designer | SiversIMA
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2047  
Old 10-27-2014, 06:22 PM
Aaron's Avatar
Aaron Aaron is offline
Co-Founder & Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,932
another call with Eric

After this weekend, Eric is up to a conference call. Is anyone here interested in getting on a live call with him?

Let me know time frames (in Pacific time zone) and days of the week that work best for you all and I'll see what I can do.
__________________
Sincerely,
Aaron Murakami

Reply With Quote
  #2048  
Old 10-29-2014, 09:12 PM
7redorbs 7redorbs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 58
Always a privilege and a pleasure to talk to Eric and get his work out there

Aaron

Yeah of course! It's always a pleasure and a privilege to talk to Eric if he wants to talk, that would be cool. I always like to prepare some good questions, I think I might have quite a few more good ones!

Best Wishes,
Adam
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2049  
Old 10-29-2014, 11:58 PM
David G Dawson David G Dawson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 418
Vacuum Tubes

Geometric,
Thankyou for the information on the Vacuum Tubes from Eric on the 6SN7/6080/6BL7/6BX7.
I should mention that both the 6BL7 and 6BX7 are TV vertical deflection oscillators and amplifiers and where I am working with the Steven Mark TPU with respect the RCA colour TV implosion.
A TV vertical deflection circuit operates at 60 hertz and is seperately generated and has nothing to do with the Mains 60 hertz and is also not synched to it.
The horizontal deflection is much higher in frequency at 15734 hertz for NTSC and 15625 hertz for PAL.
The 6080 was such a fine illustration of an unusually designed Tube that Yaesu used it as a PA in one of their transceivers and is also capable of pulse work:

6080 @ The National Valve Museum

Eric is very good at hinting at specific phenomena like 'out of the box' and similar but the only way to know the why is to build the systems he presents and will be following this one up.
I would like him to go into greater detail as to the what and why these schematics are so good like he does with the Math which is alien to most of us but guess we need to build to see for ourselves.
The 6AS7 I feel has an ability to either enhance/amplify harmonics or even to introduce their presence into the circuit.
One look at the specs tells you that the Plate current is really high in comparison to similar Tubes and the reason for this is the very low ohmic value like 280 ohms compared to others in the Megohms.
This hints at 'a something different' phenomena will occur in such a Tube and is not really an amplifier but the audiophiles have latched onto this one as being an excellent Tube for headphone use as I guess the sound would be pristine in nature.
The 6AS7 and 6080 are both 'cathode followers' which also hint at their abilities.
Eric mentions an aluminium chassis and will be doing so but using my rail idea.

Smokey
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2050  
Old 11-03-2014, 04:08 AM
Geometric_Algebra's Avatar
Geometric_Algebra Geometric_Algebra is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by orgonaut314 View Post
Thanks that last letter has instructions on making an impedance matching transformer.

I was working on my pi filter and ended with a shunt coil and series condensator. That works good too.

Here you can calculate the vallues:
LC Impedance Matching Network Designer | SiversIMA
Yes. There's other goodies in there besides tube amps. You can tell Eric put a lot of time into those notes.

The PI and T match networks will give you more degrees of freedom in terms of matching input to output impedance, but the L net that you mention is less hassle to build.

Assuming you're treating the primary alone as your load impedance, what values of L and C did you calculate for your matching network? What is your primary impedance (calculated and measured)? What is your source impedance?
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2051  
Old 11-03-2014, 10:40 PM
orgonaut314 orgonaut314 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 222
I did some guestimates on the base of an internal resistance of 6k for a 6sn7 and having two parallel that was 3k source impedance.

My load is the varicap and the primary parallel. I once measured that to be some 500 ohm when tuned.

That way I knew what kind of varicap and varicoil to use. I made the L and tuned the coil and both caps. After that I measured the varicoil and substituted a permanent smaller coil. 500 pF varicap and I think 200 uH coil but I don't remember will look it up. It as close to my guestimates

In the end I had a nice secondary radiator as the radiation was the thing to optimise.

But progress is slow as usual when will I ever make an extra coil?
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2052  
Old 11-04-2014, 12:12 AM
Geometric_Algebra's Avatar
Geometric_Algebra Geometric_Algebra is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by orgonaut314 View Post
My load is the varicap and the primary parallel. I once measured that to be some 500 ohm hen tuned.
Sounds good to me, but let's check. For your setup, what is the primary coil geometry and operating frequency you've designed for? From that we can compute the inductive reactance, and then the load impedance, and then play with the matching net.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2053  
Old 11-04-2014, 07:33 PM
Geometric_Algebra's Avatar
Geometric_Algebra Geometric_Algebra is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by David G Dawson View Post
Geometric,

6080 @ The National Valve Museum
...
One look at the specs tells you that the Plate current is really high in comparison to similar Tubes and the reason for this is the very low ohmic value like 280 ohms compared to others in the Megohms.
This hints at 'a something different' phenomena will occur in such a Tube and is not really an amplifier but the audiophiles have latched onto this one as being an excellent Tube for headphone use as I guess the sound would be pristine in nature.
...
Smokey
Yeah. I'll have to think about that and play around with the numbers for these tubes again. I don't know what is going on with the internal structures of the 6SN7/6080 style tubes, but I think the basic idea is to maximize the transconductance term and minimize the output resistive term, so not necessarily high gain but plenty of i/v.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2054  
Old 11-05-2014, 12:11 AM
Sputins's Avatar
Sputins Sputins is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 530
Quote:
Originally Posted by orgonaut314 View Post
Now and than I am thinking further on the Dollard/Tesla stuff and I remember I have read somewhere that it all comes down to what is happening inside a capacitor.

Now I am trying to get this more clear and your opinion on this. Is Eric saying that essential the energy transport from one plate to the other goes through counterspace and is not transversal electromagnetic?

The traditional view is that the Poynting vector fills the space between the plates but the Poynting vector is a transversal electromagnetic wave.

Eric said somewhere that we would have to do a measurement in the cap to know. I know that a lot of people tried that and they did find a circular magnetic field in a cap but the value was much smaller than calculated. No one has ever measured the predicted magnetic field. Only the shape is correct.

My opinion is that this magnetic field might be a small transversal component and that indeed the energy transports as a pulse through the electric fieldlines. Counterspace.

This article says the magnetic field is never measured inside a capacitor in 140 years. Other articles that measured with superconductive elements can only measure the dependence or shape of the field but not the real value, that value is always much lower than predicted.
http://www.antennex.com/shack/Apr07/dc_factfan.pdf

Is there some critic that can point me to an article where they did measure the magnetic field in accordance with Maxwells predictions? Also its value?

This overlooked detail of the magnetic field inside a cap might hold the falsification of traditional electromagnetics. How long will we ignore it as a measuring error?
Bill Miller, KT4YE: Displacement Current: Fact or Myth?
“Unfortunately, the misinterpretation of Maxwell’s equations is not just an academic error of consequence only to scholars. This error has led to at least two failed antenna designs: the CFA and the EH. And those projects have cost millions of wasted dollars, countless wasted hours, and the destruction of many professional reputations. - It is time for instructors everywhere to stop teaching an erroneous concept”.


Ted Hart, W5QJR: On E-H Antennas
“For more than 120 years all antennas have been Hertz antennas, except the Crossed Field Antenna. In the future all antennas will be EH Antennas.”

So one can find many internet links that discuss the Cross Field and EH antennas with many discussions for and against these types of antennas and proposed theory on their mode of operation etc.

http://ehant.qrz.ru/book.pdf


As I don’t really know about these antennas much and with conflicting arguments as to whether they even work or not, I wonder what Eric would say about these types of antennas? [NFG]?
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2055  
Old 11-06-2014, 04:27 AM
upgradd upgradd is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 23
Eh = Nfg

Sputins,

I've looked into this topic. And for what it's worth, from examining the available (published) literature on EH antennae, the basic theory behind its operation is that the E and H fields of *separate* circuits can interact to produce divergence of S (the Poyntine vector) at their crossing. This action is called PVS or Poytine Vector Synthesis. Ultimately this cannot work as it would violate conservation of energy due there being no divergence at either the E-field or H-field sources used to synthesize the hypothetical Poyntine vector that transmits RF energy into space. That is, each source remains reactive, while active energy, theoretically, leaves the transmitter due to PVS. Obviously this results in FE, since no load is seen by the signal source while energy is leaving the system.

Furthermore, any EH antenna that "functions" does so by antennae currents on the feed cables. When the antenna is properly isolated from the transmission line, i.e. by a balun, the antenna stops working. Thus the "structure" that you believe is radiating does nothing, and the part that shouldn't radiate is what actually does all the work.

Also, the debate against displacement current is a very complex one, that the article in question doesn't adequately address. You have polarization of material substances (dipole moment), you have plasmon resonances on the surface of metallic objects and you have the age old question of how charge moves in capacitor. Plasmons (the wave nature of charge, de Broglie matter waves) are what allow metals the ability to reflect light, by interacting with the E-field of the photon. Do they also function for the mysterious inner workins of a capacitor? Also the forest hidden by the trees is the Poyntine vector--the carrier of EM energy. The general equation is E * H = S, so if there isn't a magnetic field, due to charge movement, you shouldn't have any energy being moved. Finally, examine how a vacuum tube or particle beam works: Electrons or ionized particles are accelerated through x distance of vacuum. The particles produce a magnetic field proportional to their velocity and charge. However, when a vacuum capacitor passes the same amount of current, what travels through the vacuum between the two plates? A "displacement current," which approximates the space current of the tube example. Or some form of wave? If you place both a vacuum capacitor and a thermionic tube in a black box you couldn't tell the difference, insofar as far as getting an AC current to pass through. But one of them doesn't actually move those charges from one side to the other directly. So it could be that displacement current is real but simply doesn't have a magnetic field associated with it because no charges move through the distance of separation. Which means displacement currents are more like waves than any sort of "current". It's likely that the charge movements on each plate is due to surface plasmons reacting to the applied E-field.

Depending on how you analyze this, you can say that D is really just E after all, or alternately, define D as the charge oscillation of isolated conducting objects when an E-field is impressed, thus having no effect on vacuum and no currents or H-fields in areas that don't contain conductors. Simply put, no magnetic field should be associated with displacement currents in the space between conductors as no current filaments exist between these isolated conductors. The applied E-field induces surface charges to move which makes it "look" like a current passed between the plates.

Now, if you throw a slab of insulating material in between the vacuum capacitor's plates, you will then cause movement of bound charges (as lattice strain) in response to an applied E-field. In this case a magnetic field should exist as charges are in relative motion, though not necessarily in the direction of the resultant current. So in practice there are four phenomena associated with "currents": "Space currents," emitted charges (ions or electrons) that are accelerated across a distance of vacuum (as in thermionic tubes or particle accelerators). "Conduction currents" where "free" charges are easily able to move (through a lattice) in response to an applied E-field (as seen in metals). "Polarization currents" where "bound" charges cause slight movements and rotations (of a lattice) in response to an applied E-field (as seen in insulators and ionic compounds). And finally, true "displacement currents" where free charges on conductors separated by vacuum act in response to an applied E-field. The last two cases involve no conduction or space currents between the distance separating the conductors and only the polarization current produces a magnetic field in this space (due to the insulator's bound charges).
__________________
 

Last edited by upgradd; 11-06-2014 at 05:12 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2056  
Old 11-06-2014, 02:45 PM
orgonaut314 orgonaut314 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 222
I think the discussion on the displacement current becomes very simple if we just as Maxwell did assume there is an aether that behave like a bounded charge in an insulator a dipole electric and magnetic.

If you look at Lenz law of magnetic induction you can see that the magnetic field induces a magnetic current in the aether and these magnetic dipoles that displace cause a circular electric force around the field that is the EMF.

In the capacitor the aether particles are the electric dipoles that displace causing a circular magnetic field in the capacitor.

So only particles are the origin of the field or the ends of the field lines and these particles are either aether particles or electrons protons etc.

It is not necessary to say that fields can be the origin of fields but it is ok if the field has a material reality. The electrons are than the endpoints of marterial fieldlines of aether particles.

I know the problem is that this Maxwell aether is supposed not to be there but that is Einstein crap. Miller has measured it again and again high up in the mountains not deep in concrete buildings. Clearly the aether is affected by heavy matter like concrete but when Miller measured high enough with canvas around the instruments in stead of concrete he measured an aether flow again and again. Even Einstein said that Miller was a problem. After Millers dead his results where wiped of the table by some commission saying that the statistics where not strong enough. Of cause everyone wanted to believe that Einstein was right than but Einstein himself was much less convinced.

Dayton Miller - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I hope we will witness the rectification of the biggest scientific error ever.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2057  
Old 11-07-2014, 10:20 AM
orgonaut314 orgonaut314 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 222
Now Eric seems to say that this displacement current is in fact a longitudional compression in the electric fieldlines with no accompanying magnetic field?

So this means that Eric does not believe in Maxwells law of dielectric induction???

But he does say there is a transversal electromagnetic wave along the wires and that requires Maxwell dielectric induction? What does Eric say on electromagnetic waves?

I still don't get it after all this time.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2058  
Old 11-07-2014, 11:28 AM
lamare's Avatar
lamare lamare is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,224
Quote:
Originally Posted by orgonaut314 View Post
Now Eric seems to say that this displacement current is in fact a longitudional compression in the electric fieldlines with no accompanying magnetic field?

So this means that Eric does not believe in Maxwells law of dielectric induction???

But he does say there is a transversal electromagnetic wave along the wires and that requires Maxwell dielectric induction? What does Eric say on electromagnetic waves?

I still don't get it after all this time.

Of course, I don't know for sure what Eric thinks, but it is correct that longitudinal waves do not have an accompanying magnetic field. The magnetic field actually is a rotational movement of the aether. So, whenever you have a magnetic field, you have some kind of vortex and/or rotation.

A very interesting phenomena is the so-called "near" and "far fields" around an antenna, which are not properly understood by main stream science:

Near and far field - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Quote:
In the quantum view of electromagnetic interactions, far-field effects are manifestations of real photons, whereas near-field effects are due to a mixture of real and virtual photons. Virtual photons composing near-field fluctuations and signals, have effects that are of far shorter range than those of real photons.
They have to invent virtual photons, which by definition do not exist, in order to straighten things out!

What I think really is going on is that the "near field" is a real, transverse surface wave, while the far field consists out of "particles" or "photons" which show that strange wave-particle duality phenomenon:

Wave–particle duality - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Quote:
Wave–particle duality is the concept that every elementary particle or quantic entity exhibits the properties of not only particles, but also waves. It addresses the inability of the classical concepts "particle" or "wave" to fully describe the behavior of quantum-scale objects.
However, since we know these "photons" are electro-magnetic in nature and thus *must* contain some kind of vortex, we can attempt to visualise how these things actually look like, which may be something like this:





Now there is one problem with the current understanding of the electromagnetic fields, as described in the Maxwell equations in their currently accepted form.

For any kind of wave to propagate, one needs both inertia (modelled by the magnetic induction, or a coil) and elasticity (modelled by dielectrity, or a capacitor). So, for describing electromagnetic waves, we have a model for both components. However, the description of the inertia *only* contains the rotational form of the inherent inertia of the aether. And that is why it seems there cannot be longitudinal waves. No wave without inertia!

In other words: if we accept the existence of the aether as a real, gas/fluid like medium, we have a basis for describing longitudinal waves, BUT we don't have a proper model for describing the inertia needed for sustaining longitudinal waves, because our models *only* account for *one* kind of inertia, namely the magnetic field, which describes *only* the rotational component of the real inertia present in the aether.

As an analogy, the current theory is akin to allowing *only* gyroscopic mechanical oscillations, because of ignoring the possibility of translational movements, which are perfectly possible.

It is beyond me why such an obvious mistake has not been corrected, but the fact of the matter is that it isn't, which is why "science" has come up with the crazy ideas incorporated in "quantum mechanics", as I wrote about in this article:

Tuks Unsorted KieknWatTWordt Stuff - Questioning Quantum Mechanics
Reply With Quote
  #2059  
Old 11-08-2014, 01:07 PM
orgonaut314 orgonaut314 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 222
In this article the displacement current is also criticised.
http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/displacement-current.pdf

Transmission lines where only understood with transversal electromagnetic waves so Maxwell was a genius it says. His displacement current led to the correct understanding of transmission lines and EM radiation.

But there is a problem with this as the electromagnetic wave along a cable has a front where the field changes very rapid. If there would be a magnetic field at this front created by the rapid changing field that is a displacement current than the wave would be ahead of itself. So it is very problematic to say changing fields cause fields.

The solution seems to be that the field causes the currents and charges. Than in fact Maxwell should have said. There are electromagnetic waves explaining transmission lines and giving Heaviside the tools to construct working transmission lines. These electromagnetic waves have boundaries on charges and currents. The wave itself is simple a dual thing with electric and magnetic parts.

Now what happens inside a capacitor is answered as it is just another transmission line. Read the article he explains better.

So no there is no extra magnetic field in a capacitor but for the field caused by the transversal electromagnetic wave.

So we do give Eric credit for opening our eyes that charges and currents ar no sources but boundaries as Maxwell did not get that yet.

Still noone sees the longitudional energy in a cap and when we look at the Tesla coil I think there are two transmission lines. One going vertical between the loops and one along the line. But Eric says the vertical transmission line carries a longitudional wave and not a transversal. That makes all the difference.

But electromagnetic theory is not as simple as they teach us. Even today we discover Maxwell to have build a fictional mathematical current because he got it the wrong way around. Lot of confusion everywhere.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2060  
Old 11-08-2014, 02:20 PM
orgonaut314 orgonaut314 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 222
What I wanted to say too is that nobody understands the near field but it gets clearer when you realise that the electromagnetic radiation is freed from its boundaries in currents and charges when it is transmitted.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2061  
Old 11-10-2014, 02:29 AM
Sputins's Avatar
Sputins Sputins is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 530
Displacement Current : - “ Is the result of a capacitor either accumulating the charge or getting rid of its charge”. “Charge = displacement current multiplied by the time in which it acts”.

It is still yet to be determined if there is a magnetic field associated with it or not, experiments yet to be fully carried out. There may be a situation where there is no magnetic field.

This was all explained with the most recent conference call. With Aaron and Eric - Really good content here, (thanks Aaron)!

@ upgradd,
Thanks for the detailed reply.

I’ve briefly looked at the EH-antenna circuits, [not too deeply as to avoid confusion and mind contamination], while they are likely NFG in normal radio TEM transmission and receivers, the active line from the transmitter goes through a tuning coil, then the P coil, with a capacitive cylinder attached the end. So there will be some reflective-wave component from the terminal capacitance. With who-knows-what if any coupling going on to the other grounded cylinder.. So it’s not a normal transmission mode, neither completely Tesla (telluric) like, nor transverse like. It’s kind of a failure of both! If a similar EH [receiver] was constructed, it may pick up something, but the efficiency would be low.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2062  
Old 11-10-2014, 03:37 AM
Aaron's Avatar
Aaron Aaron is offline
Co-Founder & Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,932
Sputins, please check your pm.
__________________
Sincerely,
Aaron Murakami

Reply With Quote
  #2063  
Old 11-10-2014, 12:44 PM
orgonaut314 orgonaut314 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sputins View Post
Displacement Current : - “ Is the result of a capacitor either accumulating the charge or getting rid of its charge”. “Charge = displacement current multiplied by the time in which it acts”.

It is still yet to be determined if there is a magnetic field associated with it or not, experiments yet to be fully carried out. There may be a situation where there is no magnetic field.

This was all explained with the most recent conference call. With Aaron and Eric - Really good content here, (thanks Aaron)!
Well I have enough information from Eric without the conference call and I have no idea how to get that info too. What is measured inside a cap can be explained by the transversal wave entering the cap. The displacement current that Maxwell introduced turned out to be fiction (that field is not there so Maxwell used the wrong picture for a cap). These measurements where done with superconductors and will probable not get better.
My understanding is that Eric says we have an ether and that acts like a superfluid. The transversal energy is close to the plates but there is also a longitudional strong component. When you look at the sun the transversal component soon dies out and the longitudional component makes it through dark space. There are more people saying this. Eric used the example of the ocean where transversal waves are on the surface only.

So it all comes with the universe as a super ether fluid or not.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2064  
Old 11-10-2014, 07:46 PM
Aaron's Avatar
Aaron Aaron is offline
Co-Founder & Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 10,932
Tomorrow's Surprise Release

TOMORROW'S RELEASE - ERIC DOLLARD'S SECRET VIDEO


Tomorrow at 1pm Pacific Time Zone, we're releasing a 4 Hour video by Eric Dollard that nobody has seen yet.

This video will blow your mind when you see the scope and magnitude of a project he was involved with and is in the process of replicating again.


By purchasing a copy, you'll be supporting Eric and EPD Laboratories, Inc. They need the funds for gas money so Steve, the Director of the lab, can drive to a few locations to pick up a massive amount of glom that has already been donated to the lab. It's already theirs - they just need to get the stuff back to the lab.
__________________
Sincerely,
Aaron Murakami

Reply With Quote
  #2065  
Old 11-11-2014, 11:05 PM
David G Dawson David G Dawson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 418
AVEC & Patrick Flanagan on Scalar

AVEC - The 'Aether Vortex Energy Converter':

Still working on the Steven Mark TPU and the AVEC is a similar styled device but improved and modified from the SM original.
Once again this information is dated back in 2010 and I don't see anybody jumping up and down in having a working replication that is powering their everday energy desires including their house.

Directory contents of /pdf/Aether%20Vortex%20Energy%20Converter/

Why no working replications?
Firstly we don't know if the design is bogus or not and secondly most go into a build and make it all so neat and pretty like a picture they have seen without attempting any of the prerequisite experiments to gain some idea if they think it is going to work or not.
One of the requirements in the AVEC is as much resistance as possible in the coil windings and I have here Manganin wire (60% Copper) which I will be experimenting with including the plain Copper and Aluminium as well as Silver coated Copper after the work of Otto & Roberto who had a working TPU replication.
And this is only one aspect of many to attempt including feeding TV Neck Ferrites in various organisations.

And they went and spoilt the entire device by adding batteries at the end and when are we going to learn that this technology alone is real vintage and very badly technically downgraded in the current commercial world and just like education
It's like buying prescription spectacles from your local Optometrist who proudly display the cost of the frames at only on special at $99.99 when their actual cost is a mere $5.

This is the Patrick Flanagan document on Scalar, dated but relevant:

http://www.overunityresearch.com/ind....0;attach=4969

On Page 5 he talks of making opposite calculations to an EM antenna and he is saying the 'hydronic' antenna is out of resonance and once again we see the requirement for voltage and not current that gives the signal the punch required.
Longitudinal as against EM and why it is not used is questioned and good to see another angle on what Eric continually refers to.
Much talk here of how to do the Math and hope this may help others with the Crystal Set/Radio Initiative (CSI) and need to apply to my own calculations which still go unheeded.

Eric P Dollard described Scalar back in the very first Energetic Forum but I still don't quite understand and I feel I am not alone:

Peter, whatever happened with Eric P. Dollard?

Anybody feel that you are on the border of just understanding or not and would have serious problems explaining the theory to someone else?
I am still hearing people here say they are still very unsure of 'electricity' even after all of Eric's work and I am one that will also agree with that statement and sentiment.
The Math doesn't help me in the slightest but reading his many other documents does to a degree.
It may be just that it is going to take time and experiment at the bench before it begins to fully sink in.

5U4G Power Supply now working well and adding a 50 Watt 1.5 ohm Rheostat with switch and meter for the filaments so that it becomes a variable power supply when used with a Variac.
Had to dispense with the Tek 585 transformer as I had misread its abilities and was fortunate in having a Kelvin & Hughes Flaw Detector (the very first device used to monitor the baby in Mum's womb using ultrasound) and this had the required filament current at 10 amps (needed 6) and the reason for the Rheostat - 6.3 to 5 volts.
HT was 270 volts CT and this gives me about 405 volts DC with an AC component on top.
AC and DC reside together on this power supply as the main feed is from the Cathodes to the pi filter and this is one thing that both Steven Mark and Tesla alluded to in their own experiments.
This also has a bonus HT winding of 1050 volts which I will probably also tap out onto the chassis for use and also 2 other 6.3 volt Tube windings (also has a thyratron and cathode ray tube and 23 Tubes).
This type of GLOM is Gold and have had it for about 4 years with a question on whether to refurbish or use as parts and the parts bit finally won - NO schematics or manuals available.
This is by far the most difficult aspect of Vacuum Tube work in obtaining the correct power supplies and has taken me about the same 4 years to get several together as the requirements are very broad with all the types of Tubes to work with.

Eric unfortunately is not responding here and cannot hold that against him and will be snail mailing for some answers with respect to the work I am doing with the TPU, both expansive and contractive and also Vacuum Tubes.

All the best with your own experiments.

Smokey
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2066  
Old 11-11-2014, 11:56 PM
orgonaut314 orgonaut314 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 222
The most important thing I understand is that my Tesla coil makes an astral wave or a longitudional wave. The wave is interacting with my consciousness and is interesting enough to work further on.

My plans are to make a longitudional wave the analogue way. So the same road Eric took to Alexanderson. I think that if I can make astral waves with a smaller line of caps and coils I can make one device with a tube amp that can be carried with me.

Now I need to know what docs where explaining how to chose the values for the caps and coils. Anyone has an idea? Do I have to but the last book on Alexanderson networks? There are so many notes and books that is is very difficult to find the right stuff back again. Or does it work with any coil and cap? Or was there a relation between the caps and coils???

Thanks for any help.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2067  
Old 11-12-2014, 12:21 AM
David G Dawson David G Dawson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 418
Theory Of Wireless Power

Orgonaut314,
Eric's 'Theory Of Wireless Power' and at the end 'The Oscillating Transformer' would be a good start in your endeavours.
Eric says his 'Coil Capacitance Factor' chart is incorrect but doesn't go into detail as to why and is probably meant as a guide and still relevant to a degree.
Also there are the 'Propogation Factor' and 'Sheet Impedance' charts.

What impressed me were the large Coil stacks for the Alexanderson antenna field and where a man is standing looking as a reference.
Two coil stacks there, one shunt, the other series.

Why not build an EH or CFA antenna which removes EM from the equations?
I don't quite grasp what you want to do.

Smokey
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2068  
Old 11-12-2014, 06:47 AM
orgonaut314 orgonaut314 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 222
Thanks. What I am trying to do is use the wave as a means to transmit stuff into my stereo and crt projector to make the image and sound more like real.
We have discovered long ago that if you apply Your own orgon to an electrical device it becomes more transparant to the reality of the recording. Noise levels are getting lower. The spacial information becomes clerarer and most of all emotions come through much better. This research has produced information that carbon is a good conductor for emotions and orgon in the recording zo are tubes. Now we did know that and we found ways to make carbon even much better. I discovered that using a Tesla coil through carbon with a tube osciallator boosts the orgon in my devices so I would like to miniature the device to better build it in.
I can asure you that a statistical relevant research was carried out by former scientists where people listened for a long time to a modified set and experiences where noted. 9 out of 10 people start to get emotional when they first hear what orgon can do to audio and they have an unbelievable experience. So did I. 1 hears not much only a good stereo. They are not sensitive at all.
__________________
 

Last edited by orgonaut314; 11-12-2014 at 06:52 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2069  
Old 11-12-2014, 09:51 AM
David G Dawson David G Dawson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 418
The Camp David Antenna

Orgonaut314,
Understand and just hit me what your name here also reflects.

'The Camp David Antenna' I found to be most enlightening as I could understand the Math there and made me more comfortable.
This is where the picture of the man with coat over his arm inspecting the Series Coil came from.
Eric goes into some good calculations here and his 1:100 Scale Model of the Alexanderson Antenna should give you some ideas.

Have some work to do with alloyed wires but may build the 6AS7/6080 first as I already have the 6SN7s railed.
Got to find out what the connection is with this Tube, the Aether, Counterspace or a Longitudinal signal like in the CSI.

Did you read the Patrick Flanagan pdf where he tells you a means of detecting the LMD signal and just like my dual 1N34 with high impedance headphones.

Smokey
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #2070  
Old 11-12-2014, 12:26 PM
orgonaut314 orgonaut314 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 222
Ok this is a good starting point
The Camp David Antenna | Gestalt Reality

But there is an obvious mistake in the mathematics, more than one. This one I will pick out:

T2 is defined as a sum of 2 terms a0 + a1 = 1 + a

Now Eric says T = sqrt(1+a) but T1 is defined as the sum with 1 term a0

so a0 is not sqrt(1 + a)

The index N from TN is used in two different meanings first as a summing index and than as a power index.

With all respect I don't think the mathematics was critical reviewed.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
aether, cosmic induction, energy conference, epd laboratories, eric dollard, eric p dollard, ernst alexanderson, extraluminal, generator, longitudinal, steinmetz, tesla, versor algebra, wireless, dollard, eric

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Please consider supporting Energetic Forum with a voluntary monthly subscription.

Choose your voluntary subscription

For one-time donations, please use the below button.


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v1.4.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
2007-2015 Copyright - Energetic Forum - All Rights Reserved

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

Tesla Chargers