Energetic Forum  
Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Delicious Digg Reddit WordPress StumbleUpon Tumblr Translate Addthis Aaron Murakami YouTube 2020 ENERGY CONFERENCE - PRE-REGISTER NOW!!!!

2020 Energy Science & Technology Conference
PRE-REGISTER NOW!!!
http://energyscienceconference.com


Go Back   Energetic Forum > > >
   

Eric Dollard Official Forum This forum is dedicated to the work of Eric P. Dollard. His Official homepage is http://ericpdollard.com

* NEW * BEDINI RPX BOOK & DVD SET: BEDINI RPX

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1171  
Old 08-03-2013, 07:06 PM
Aaron's Avatar
Aaron Aaron is offline
Co-Founder & Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 11,005
Dr Green

DR GREEN - please check skype.
__________________
Sincerely,
Aaron Murakami

Reply With Quote

Download SOLAR SECRETS by Peter Lindemann
Free - Get it now: Solar Secrets

  #1172  
Old 08-03-2013, 08:58 PM
mahakal mahakal is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 12
Goethe color system

Quote:
Originally Posted by T-rex View Post
Wow this is a fantastic video. I have never seen Goethe's color system explained so well, and visually as it must be.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #1173  
Old 08-03-2013, 08:59 PM
madhatter's Avatar
madhatter madhatter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 457
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-rex View Post
Too bad we lost Mad Hatter aka the Purple Multipactor. I gave the Colorado page numbers and these should be posted to see plainly.
Not lost, just took a step back to let the dust settle. Racing season is here and that's my busy time.

working on a couple different things, electrostatic disassociation of the H2 bond and electron fields- this relates to the plasma work I'm doing and also falls into the development of the multipactor which has led to some interesting theories that I have to explore as time permits. not many Co's still making VT's and the one that can do custom stuff has recent patents for classified stuff very similar to what I'm working on, conflict of interest and possible trouble there. proto-type will most likely be a vacuum chamber, that introduces issues all it's own on out gassing and contamination.

had a transformer go 'missing' (yeah like 200lbs go's missing!)in shipment set back the PS build above 100kv.

Lot's of papers to still sort thru, an interesting one by August Hund sent over recently by Garrett, busy and smart gent. Thanks.

I have some free time coming up, will sit and read then share.

Magenta, the color that does not exist....
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #1174  
Old 08-03-2013, 10:17 PM
orgonaut314 orgonaut314 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-rex View Post
The coils shown were designed for equal areas. Bronze was chosen for the primary to have maximum depth of penetration. Skin effect high for silver, a reflector. The primary is laminated to reduce eddy losses.
Thank you!

I used that design to get some understanding but I will try to build a crystalradio coil. In that case I should go for the equal mass or surface?

While reading the posts I could find very little information on the primary coil but perhaps I missed it?

Thanks!
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #1175  
Old 08-04-2013, 12:25 AM
dR-Green's Avatar
dR-Green dR-Green is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 1,558
Thanks Aaron.
__________________
http://www.teslascientific.com/

"Knowledge is cosmic. It does not evolve or unfold in man. Man unfolds to an awareness of it. He gradually discovers it." - Walter Russell

"Once men died for Truth, but now Truth dies at the hands of men." - Manly P. Hall
Reply With Quote
  #1176  
Old 08-04-2013, 01:12 AM
Aaron's Avatar
Aaron Aaron is offline
Co-Founder & Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 11,005
@ Dr Green

Quote:
Originally Posted by dR-Green View Post
Thanks Aaron.
My pleasure!
__________________
Sincerely,
Aaron Murakami

Reply With Quote
  #1177  
Old 08-04-2013, 01:13 AM
Aaron's Avatar
Aaron Aaron is offline
Co-Founder & Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 11,005
Arrow Eric Dollard Live again

Gary Hendershot interviews Eric Dollard LIVE night before last on the Smart Scarecrow show - watch it here on youtube: August 1, 2013 - Eric Dollard interviewed by Gary Hendershot Smart Scarecrow show - YouTube
Eric's interview starts at about 27 minutes into the video.
__________________
Sincerely,
Aaron Murakami


Last edited by Aaron; 08-04-2013 at 01:16 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #1178  
Old 08-04-2013, 01:15 AM
dR-Green's Avatar
dR-Green dR-Green is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 1,558




























__________________
http://www.teslascientific.com/

"Knowledge is cosmic. It does not evolve or unfold in man. Man unfolds to an awareness of it. He gradually discovers it." - Walter Russell

"Once men died for Truth, but now Truth dies at the hands of men." - Manly P. Hall
Reply With Quote
  #1179  
Old 08-04-2013, 01:15 AM
dR-Green's Avatar
dR-Green dR-Green is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 1,558
















The final diagram is calculated from the given dimensions and secondary frame description. From the given groove spacing and Tesla's description the secondary is technically 16 turns, the 17th turn being on the top insulators.

Also I've just spent an hour if not more looking through the same few pages in CS Notes but I can't find it, but somewhere towards the end Tesla reverts back to 20 (or 19) turns and as far as I know that's the final adjustment. I think this is mentioned when he's describing some of the pictures at the end.
__________________
http://www.teslascientific.com/

"Knowledge is cosmic. It does not evolve or unfold in man. Man unfolds to an awareness of it. He gradually discovers it." - Walter Russell

"Once men died for Truth, but now Truth dies at the hands of men." - Manly P. Hall
Reply With Quote
  #1180  
Old 08-04-2013, 02:15 AM
madhatter's Avatar
madhatter madhatter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 457
page 345, latest type of 20 turns two wires #10.... ratio of conversion 1:20
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #1181  
Old 08-04-2013, 02:45 AM
dR-Green's Avatar
dR-Green dR-Green is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 1,558
That's it, thanks madhatter. I must have passed that page about 50 times.

__________________
http://www.teslascientific.com/

"Knowledge is cosmic. It does not evolve or unfold in man. Man unfolds to an awareness of it. He gradually discovers it." - Walter Russell

"Once men died for Truth, but now Truth dies at the hands of men." - Manly P. Hall
Reply With Quote
  #1182  
Old 08-04-2013, 05:40 AM
dR-Green's Avatar
dR-Green dR-Green is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 1,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-rex View Post
It is not important that the number of turns be equal to Colorado. Wire length is best to be the EXACT fraction of wavelength that existed in Colorado, same with Z.

Equal reactance in ohms & suceptance in Siemens for both scaled and Colorado. Frequency in proportion to the square root of inductance, inductance in proportion to the square of the turns and radius, both divided by a factor.

L equal radius squared, turns squared this over 9 radius plus 10 length.
From your "The Telegraph Equation, Part One:"

"Energy Defined" by E. P. Dollard | Gestalt Reality

Quote:
(a) Dielectric Energy Storage,
Suceptance, B, in Farad per Second

(b) Magnetic Energy Storage,
Reactance, X, in Henry per Second
Reactance = L multiplied by the radians per second? And I assume the same for susceptance? I'm reading through those notes now but it's 6:40am so I'm going to have to give it up for now and continue tomorrow.

Also what do you mean by "Frequency in proportion to the square root of inductance, inductance in proportion to the square of the turns and radius, both divided by a factor."?

The ratio of F to the square root of L should be equal on all scales?

Thanks for your help, I wish you luck with getting everything sorted out and have a good journey back into the bushes if you're already gone tomorrow, I'll be in touch one way or another if you're not back on here for a while.
__________________
http://www.teslascientific.com/

"Knowledge is cosmic. It does not evolve or unfold in man. Man unfolds to an awareness of it. He gradually discovers it." - Walter Russell

"Once men died for Truth, but now Truth dies at the hands of men." - Manly P. Hall
Reply With Quote
  #1183  
Old 08-04-2013, 06:52 AM
Sputins's Avatar
Sputins Sputins is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 540
100 Watt Transmitter & Power-Supply Stage1, Pt1

Power supply & Transmitter front panels (unfinished) need mA meters, paint job and other finishing touches:


100 Watt Transmitter schematic partly based on this. VFO & CIG Network not shown here (working on this to show later).


Transmitter build, the connecting wires are a dogs breakfast at the moment. I can now see why a common grounded chassis is normally used, much easier. Await a few other parts as yet unfinished but I expect to power up for the first time in about a week or so.


RCA 807 Tube close up: (Nerd eye-candy).


Power supply Schematic:

Power supply, Transformer, rectifier (silicon diodes) and a battery of capacitors to provide the B+750, B+250, 6.3V filaments and has 5V supply for tube rectifiers, when I take that path later on.


Large plate transformers & 304TL Tubes: Lucky to score these transformers for free, extracted out of ICP/ Mass Spectrometers. The large one would cost $8000 new! A collection of 304TL tubes, one is dead however. Matching capacitors, rectifiers and chokes not shown.



304TL close up. (More eye candy).


Primary Coil / capacitor arrangement for TMT / CIG is the next step, once the transmitter & PS is complete and all tests okay. Along with the secondary and extra coils. More on all of this later.

Sputins.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #1184  
Old 08-04-2013, 05:20 PM
t-rex's Avatar
t-rex t-rex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: In the bushes
Posts: 422
Dr Green 1125

Reactance in Ohms is Henry per second. The per second is two Pi times the frequency, this is called radians per second.

Frequency, or radians per second is one over the square root of L time C, so if L varies, the frequency varies as an inverse square root, example, four times L gives one half the frequency.

Inductance L varies with the square of the number of turns, example, twice the turns, four times the inductance. Its the same with the diameter.

So, F varies with square root of L, L varies with square of the turns, so F varies directly with length by combination of square & square root. All scales must conform to basic law.

A model must equal its original in two things.

Network analysis seeks two things:

1. Propagation, or the fraction of one wavelength.

2. Impedance, the ratio of magnetism to dielectric.

This is called the Transfer Function.

All networks have this pair of functions. Thus, to make a model (scale) network, it must have the same function results, one fourth wave, and 1000 ohms let's say, this result at the frequency of the model, which would be a fourth wave and 1k Ohm at the original frequency. In general L time C is propagation, L over C is Impedance.

If the original coil has a reactance of X ohms at its frequency, the model coil must have the SAME reactance at its frequency.
__________________
SUPPORT ERIC DOLLARD'S WORK AT EPD LABORATORIES, INC.

Purchase Eric Dollard's Books & Videos - 70% of the sale goes to Eric and EPD Laboratories: Eric Dollard Books & Videos
Donate by Paypal: Donate to EPD Laboratories

Last edited by t-rex; 08-04-2013 at 05:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #1185  
Old 08-04-2013, 05:27 PM
t-rex's Avatar
t-rex t-rex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: In the bushes
Posts: 422
da da dit dit dit dit dit dit da da

I'm heading back to the bushes and don't know when I'll be back on a computer again.

In the meantime, for entertainment purposes, see what the phony Eric Dollard is saying: https://www.facebook.com/TheAetherForce

Most importantly, keep building and experimenting! Try to get more people involved in showing their results and that makes me more interested.

QRT DE N6KPH SK
__________________
SUPPORT ERIC DOLLARD'S WORK AT EPD LABORATORIES, INC.

Purchase Eric Dollard's Books & Videos - 70% of the sale goes to Eric and EPD Laboratories: Eric Dollard Books & Videos
Donate by Paypal: Donate to EPD Laboratories
Reply With Quote
  #1186  
Old 08-04-2013, 05:43 PM
dR-Green's Avatar
dR-Green dR-Green is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 1,558
Thank you Eric, have a good journey back into the bushes and hope to see you back soon, with any luck with some experimental results on this. Time to get to work!

Take care.
__________________
http://www.teslascientific.com/

"Knowledge is cosmic. It does not evolve or unfold in man. Man unfolds to an awareness of it. He gradually discovers it." - Walter Russell

"Once men died for Truth, but now Truth dies at the hands of men." - Manly P. Hall
Reply With Quote
  #1187  
Old 08-04-2013, 06:42 PM
dR-Green's Avatar
dR-Green dR-Green is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 1,558
I believe the reactance of the Colorado extra coil is 10411.7401 ohms if my calculations are correct. Susceptance = 254333288 Siemens. But I'm not sure if I've even calculated that right.

[edit] Either way, it's definitely not right because I calculated from pF instead of Farad! New result is 0.00024414 Siemens.
__________________
http://www.teslascientific.com/

"Knowledge is cosmic. It does not evolve or unfold in man. Man unfolds to an awareness of it. He gradually discovers it." - Walter Russell

"Once men died for Truth, but now Truth dies at the hands of men." - Manly P. Hall

Last edited by dR-Green; 08-04-2013 at 07:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #1188  
Old 08-04-2013, 07:01 PM
dR-Green's Avatar
dR-Green dR-Green is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 1,558
__________________
http://www.teslascientific.com/

"Knowledge is cosmic. It does not evolve or unfold in man. Man unfolds to an awareness of it. He gradually discovers it." - Walter Russell

"Once men died for Truth, but now Truth dies at the hands of men." - Manly P. Hall

Last edited by dR-Green; 08-04-2013 at 07:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #1189  
Old 08-05-2013, 05:23 AM
thedude's Avatar
thedude thedude is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 384
Quote:
Originally Posted by T-rex View Post
I'm heading back to the bushes and don't know when I'll be back on a computer again.

In the meantime, for entertainment purposes, see what the phony Eric Dollard is saying: https://www.facebook.com/TheAetherForce

Most importantly, keep building and experimenting! Try to get more people involved in showing their results and that makes me more interested.

QRT DE N6KPH SK
Crap! Just missed you Eric. Just wanted to say thanks for all your inspiration. I just purchased your Four Quadrant Representation of Electricity and watched it last night.

Your rotational model really illustrates the relationship between sine and cosine in their separate planes. Has me thinking a lot lately while reading Steinmetz's "Electric Discharges, Waves & Impulses" but still really looking forward to your book.

Stay safe in the bushes Eric! Hope your not too discouraged with the public at large and are back soon.



PS- Just had a look there at Ray's rendition of Eric on Facebook to discover that he is promoting a link to a torrent file with latest lecture there. I'd get on top of that Aaron if i were you. What a jackass that Ray is turning out to be.

Last edited by thedude; 08-05-2013 at 05:40 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #1190  
Old 08-05-2013, 07:35 AM
Aaron's Avatar
Aaron Aaron is offline
Co-Founder & Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 11,005
Eric Dollard

Quote:
Originally Posted by thedude View Post
What a jackass that Ray is turning out to be.
Thanks - got your email!

I have something special saved up for the troublemaker and it will be revealed in the near future.

@All, Eric did another interview this morning with someone, will post a link after it is released.
__________________
Sincerely,
Aaron Murakami

Reply With Quote
  #1191  
Old 08-05-2013, 05:43 PM
jwpotts's Avatar
jwpotts jwpotts is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 5
Question Somethings Rotten In Denmark!!

Post removed by jwpotts to: Eric Dollard - False Allegations by Techzombie Ray Savant "Muhamed"
__________________
 

Last edited by jwpotts; 08-05-2013 at 10:37 PM. Reason: Moved to Relavant Thread
Reply With Quote
  #1192  
Old 08-05-2013, 07:41 PM
Tenaus Tenaus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 44
I have a question for Eric. I don't have the opportunity to go to those QA phone calls, so if someone could ask him this if they have the chance I would appreciate it.

Why are you calling the math "Versor" algebra? Versors are the algebraic form of quanternion math, which was the type originally used by Maxwell. Heaviside improved upon Maxwell's equations, but he did so using vectors. Steinmetz did develop this entire new system of mathematics, but they are not versors. They are called phasors by the contemporary engineering/physics community, and are used all the time. So, with the math being called phasors, why not call them phasors yourself? The term versor is a misnomer and it then allows people to assume that you don't know much of anything because they believe erroneously that you work on a form of math which is completely different than what you actually do work with.

And another question, which also bothers me:

Why the use of the term dielectric as what contemporary physics calls the electric? It makes sense to me, however, it is consensus from Maxwell, to Faraday, to Tesla and others to call the dielectric field the electric field, and the combined dielectric and magnetic fields, the electromagnetic. Only Steinmetez has insisted on calling the field "dielectric". So why do you, when almost all, save Steinmetz, call it the dielectric, when people know it as the electric? It only serves to confuse people and this results in them disbelieving in your work.
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #1193  
Old 08-05-2013, 09:34 PM
Aaron's Avatar
Aaron Aaron is offline
Co-Founder & Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Washington State
Posts: 11,005
recent false allegations

JWPotts & other new readers:

This thread is to focus on the word Eric Dollard has shared. We want to keep this thread positive with replication attempts, etc.

To look at the false allegations with documented facts, please look at this: http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...t-muhamed.html all references are given.

You can post in there about those issues but this thread is to focus on Eric's work. That is a NEW thread and is different from the Ray Savant Techzombie exposed thread.
__________________
Sincerely,
Aaron Murakami

Reply With Quote
  #1194  
Old 08-05-2013, 10:02 PM
jwpotts's Avatar
jwpotts jwpotts is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron View Post
JWPotts & other new readers:

This thread is to focus on the word Eric Dollard has shared. We want to keep this thread positive with replication attempts, etc.

To look at the false allegations with documented facts, please look at this: http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...t-muhamed.html all references are given.

You can post in there about those issues but this thread is to focus on Eric's work. That is a NEW thread and is different from the Ray Savant Techzombie exposed thread.
Thanks for the heads up Aaron, not an avid poster.....
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #1195  
Old 08-06-2013, 12:54 PM
chazza chazza is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 7
Old posts reinstated?

Quote:
Originally Posted by T-rex View Post
I'm heading back to the bushes and don't know when I'll be back on a computer again. [edit]

QRT DE N6KPH SK
Good luck Mr Dollard

I also went away an hour or so later, and have come back to find that the above post, which was #1129 on page 38 has turned into # 1185 on page 40. Does anyone know what's been added, and where?

thanks, Chazza
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #1196  
Old 08-06-2013, 05:11 PM
orgonaut314 orgonaut314 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 222
Primary coil

Guys I still have some questions on the primary coil.

Eric gave these instructions:
Quote:
The primary coil is the same diameter as the secondary coil. The ratio of conductor width to coil diameter is 18%.
If I make a secondary coil 76 cm wide this means the primary is 0,18*76=14cm sheet copper.

Now my question is if I make two turns should I spiral them on top of each other with a thin insulator in between? So the total surface remains 14cm. Or should I wind them above each other like the secundary wire making the total surface 2*14=28cm? This seems a bit to much

Thanx!
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #1197  
Old 08-06-2013, 06:00 PM
dR-Green's Avatar
dR-Green dR-Green is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 1,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by orgonaut314 View Post
spiral them on top of each other with a thin insulator in between? So the total surface remains 14cm.
Like that.
__________________
http://www.teslascientific.com/

"Knowledge is cosmic. It does not evolve or unfold in man. Man unfolds to an awareness of it. He gradually discovers it." - Walter Russell

"Once men died for Truth, but now Truth dies at the hands of men." - Manly P. Hall
Reply With Quote
  #1198  
Old 08-06-2013, 06:10 PM
orgonaut314 orgonaut314 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by dR-Green View Post
Like that.
Thanks!

Is it also necessary to shift the primary with respect to the secondary to experiment with the coupling? I believe Tesla said something about loose coupling?
__________________
 
Reply With Quote
  #1199  
Old 08-06-2013, 08:04 PM
dR-Green's Avatar
dR-Green dR-Green is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 1,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by orgonaut314 View Post
Thanks!

Is it also necessary to shift the primary with respect to the secondary to experiment with the coupling? I believe Tesla said something about loose coupling?
Yes, see ARRL Radio Amateur's Handbook section on coupled circuits. If the coupling is too tight then you won't get a resonant "peak" with high selectivity (magnification factor) but a diminished output at the resonant frequency, with peaks above and below the resonant frequency. At optimum coupling the selectivity is lower. But with higher selectivity the output is less etc. You will have to find what works best.
__________________
http://www.teslascientific.com/

"Knowledge is cosmic. It does not evolve or unfold in man. Man unfolds to an awareness of it. He gradually discovers it." - Walter Russell

"Once men died for Truth, but now Truth dies at the hands of men." - Manly P. Hall

Last edited by dR-Green; 08-06-2013 at 08:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #1200  
Old 08-06-2013, 08:24 PM
thedude's Avatar
thedude thedude is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 384
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tenaus View Post
I have a question for Eric. I don't have the opportunity to go to those QA phone calls, so if someone could ask him this if they have the chance I would appreciate it.

Why are you calling the math "Versor" algebra? Versors are the algebraic form of quanternion math, which was the type originally used by Maxwell. Heaviside improved upon Maxwell's equations, but he did so using vectors. Steinmetz did develop this entire new system of mathematics, but they are not versors. They are called phasors by the contemporary engineering/physics community, and are used all the time. So, with the math being called phasors, why not call them phasors yourself? The term versor is a misnomer and it then allows people to assume that you don't know much of anything because they believe erroneously that you work on a form of math which is completely different than what you actually do work with.

And another question, which also bothers me:

Why the use of the term dielectric as what contemporary physics calls the electric? It makes sense to me, however, it is consensus from Maxwell, to Faraday, to Tesla and others to call the dielectric field the electric field, and the combined dielectric and magnetic fields, the electromagnetic. Only Steinmetez has insisted on calling the field "dielectric". So why do you, when almost all, save Steinmetz, call it the dielectric, when people know it as the electric? It only serves to confuse people and this results in them disbelieving in your work.
I don't know if Eric will be around to answer your question Tenaus. As far as Versors vs Phasors, I don't know what he would say there. However you can't really call the dielectric field the electromagnetic field as it absolutely is defined as only one part of the electromagnetic field and propagates in a completely different way than than its counter part, the magnetic field.

Why refer to electric field as dielectric field? I don't think anyone (especially a physicist) should confuse those two terms in the way your mentioning. Dielectric field is really referring to the electrostatic field lines that emanate from with in the conductor, with outside pressure, under longitudinal wave force(the most interesting part of the electrical phenomenon IMO!). The magnetic field is utilizing radial patterned operational lines of force, outside the conductor and moves under transverse propagation of energy (far more typical and understandable). The two together make up electromagnetic energy, not one or the other alone. So breaking down the distinction of the dielectric force within the electromagnetic field would be ignoring half of the equation in my opinion.

I think the fact that contemporary physicists simply wish to just refer to dielectric field AS the electric field altogether, might serve as an explanation for why so few discoveries are actually made within that contemporary realm as well as their inability to consider utilizing the BEMF component of electricity (generally speaking). I'm pretty sure if Eric is referring to the dielectric, he means the dielectric implicitly and not a pseudonym for electricity in general.

Last edited by thedude; 08-06-2013 at 09:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
aether, cosmic induction, energy conference, epd laboratories, eric dollard, eric p dollard, ernst alexanderson, extraluminal, generator, longitudinal, steinmetz, tesla, versor algebra, wireless, dollard, eric

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Please consider supporting Energetic Forum with a voluntary monthly subscription.

Choose your voluntary subscription

For one-time donations, please use the below button.


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v1.4.0 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
2007-2015 Copyright - Energetic Forum - All Rights Reserved

Bedini RPX Sideband Generator

Tesla Chargers