PDA

View Full Version : The Quantum Key, 5th Edition by Aaron Murakami


Aaron
12-14-2007, 12:27 AM
Hi Everyone,

I'm happy to announce that The Quantum Key (http://www.esmhome.org/shop) book is finally available here:
Energetic Science Ministries Online Store (http://www.esmhome.org/shop) It will make a great present for yourself and as a stocking stuffer for your friends and family! :)

This books is 25 pages longer with extra diagrams that were not in the original "Synthesis of Matter" version.

I would call this book a "unified field philosophy" linking the quantum potential world with the macro scale universe. It describes in very simple explanations and diagrams what the virtual photon potential is, mass, intertia, why gravity is a push and not a pull and what causes the push, time and other related topics.

In my opinion the most important chapter is showing the distinction between open and closed systems as it relates to thermodynamics... equilibrium thermodynamics vs. non-equilibrium thermodynamics.

For anyone who is interested in "free energy" technologies, it is a MUST READ. Also for anyone interested in consciousness concepts such as the Law of Attraction, it is a MUST READ as well. Why?

It shows the actual physics that cover systems that can output more than you have to put into them without violating any laws of physics, which LOA and "free energy" over 1.0 COP systems certainly seem to violate...but don't.

Feel free to post any comments or questions here in this forum. It would be much better to read a copy first then post questions or comments.

Grace
12-14-2007, 03:39 AM
Hi Aaron,

I have read Synthesis of Matter (the original title to your book) 5 times now since I bought it in Vegas from you. It most definitely awakened/enlightened me to the power of/and truth of our being. We are consciousness.

I was empowered with the chapter showing the distinction between open and closed systems. I am forever grateful for your effort and deliberate work to consciously awaken others! :thanks: :thumbsup:

elias
12-14-2007, 12:13 PM
Hi Aaron,

I have been to reading some books lately such as "The Field" and "The Intention Experiment" of Lynne Mctaggart and some other similar books, I can't wait till I buy your book, As I am familiar with your posts, I don't doubt the value of your book. I am very grateful to see how much spirituality and free energy are co-related! Free energy = freedom from enslavement and a true awakening for the humankind, and now we see how much the concepts of spirituality and science are embracing each other for a very glorifying future of humankind.

Just eager to hear more about your book. :heartthrob:

Elias

Athena
12-14-2007, 12:42 PM
I'd really love to buy an autographed copy, Aaron. How do I get one? :thinking:

Aaron
12-14-2007, 06:14 PM
Hi Elias,

I saw your post in the other thread about Int'l shipping.

In the shopping page at
Energetic Science Ministries Online Store (http://www.esmhome.org/shop)

There are 3 icons of the book to click. One is for delivery in the United States, one is for delivery in Canada and one is for other international shipping. If you click on the appropriate one for where you are, the shipping fee will be automatically calculated.

Feel free to post any questions here about this.

Aaron
12-14-2007, 06:29 PM
Elias,

I certainly believe the fundamental potentials involved in all of this are not only connected but are the same.

A lot of my understanding in the book comes from my learning and experiences working with some "free energy" technologies but it revealed to me a lot more than that.

The book is really for people on both sides of the equation... free energy "overunity" sciences as well as spiritual minded people and to those who are balanced in both.

There are some powerful distinctions that I point out that really shine some light on some "mysteries" of the universe.

One of the oldest concepts in philosophy/thinking/science, etc... is "Can a machine/system put out more energy that you have to put into it?" The answer is absolutely yes.

Anyone practicing the Laws of Attraction are going to draw to them more than they put out to the universe.

Anyone operating a machine with a COP over 1.0 is causing more work to be done than they had to pay for on the input.

How can this be possible and not violate the laws of physics?

Have more output implies that there is input into the system but it doesn't necessarily have to come from the operator...if it is an open system, it could come from any number of potential sources: consciousness/matrix, time, gravity, light, wind, water, vacuum potential, love, etc...

Equilibrium Thermodynamic vs non-Equilibrium Thermodynamic systems are only 1 distinction in the book written so that hopefully just about everyone can understand the difference and this is only one thing pointed out in the book.

Much of the book is inspired from what I learned by being friends with John Bedini for the last 7 years and Peter Lindemann for about the last few years and intensely studying Tom Bearden's writings in relation to vacuum energy potential... taking all of this and having my own intuition/logic/imagination meld them together into a model that links it all together.

Some is based on hardcore science and known accepted fact, some is hypothesis, some theory and some wild speculation but I think that anyone who reads it and sees how it all comes together will have to admit that it is a very interesting concept. I don't believe there is another book quite like it.

This is the first in a 3 part series that is my original intention. The Quantum Key is the foundation the other two build on. The next is more focused on the mind/thinking/consciousness/the thinking thing and the thinker/intention/synchronicity/a model of divination/etc... The third is more focused on the physical body. Both the second and third directly tie back to the first book as it is the foundation from what everything springs from in my opinion.

Aaron
12-14-2007, 06:32 PM
Hi Athena,

I haven't thought about this but if you email info at esmhome.org with this question, we might be able to come up with something.

I'm honored that you would ask! :notworthy:

Athena
12-14-2007, 06:55 PM
:iloveyou: I'll do that, Aaron! I think I read on another thread that Pamela wants one as well.

Aaron
12-16-2007, 09:36 PM
These 2 posts are in the Renewable Energy forum under the Radiant Energy thread. They're more geared towards the concepts in the book as they apply to "free energy" and "radiant energy" but you mind find them helpful.

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/473-radiant-energy.html#post13931

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/473-radiant-energy.html#post13958

Aaron
12-17-2007, 07:15 AM
Here is a reply to someone in a yahoo group about LOA that I responded to:

--- In SSConnection@yahoogroups.com, "xxxxxxxxxxxx" <xxxxxxxxx@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Aaron,
>
> Your book sounds interesting but how do I know you have anything new
> to say ;-)? I've read a lot on this subject. How is your book
> different from all the rest?

Hi Jen,

That is a fair question. In the files section, there is a folder with my name and a pdf in there with info about the book...a 1 page info sheet.

If you're familiar in laymans terms with open system non-equilibrium thermodynamic systems then you probably already know what I'm going to say in the book. That is only one part of it. Knowing the difference between open and closed systems is one step that I explain. I'm not just some desk jockey theorist writing my ideas, I have a lot of hands on experience building machines and other technologies that do the "impossible."

If you want to see a machine turn tap water into a powerful gas on demand or an electric motor that takes less and less energy to run the faster it goes or the more you take from it, then see some of my youtube vids: YouTube - Broadcast Yourself. (http://www.youtube.com/qiman13)

What does this have to do with LOA? Unless you know the connection, then you may not have ever read what is in my book because the explanation just hasn't been connected and put into simple terms for non physicists. I'm not a physicist but am fortunate to have been mentored by some of the top medical doctors, qigong masters, engineers and others who are the top in the world in their own respective fields so I guess you could say by having a serious obsessive desire for me to learn whats shared with me and maybe a little osmosis, I believe I may just have something interesting and of value to anyone wanting to learn about what the mind is made of and where the potential comes from.

Anyone can write a book telling people what to do to cause things to be drawn to us through the application of various LOA concepts but not everyone can write a book (nor has anyone) explaining what the source of potential of the thought power is without veiling it under some mystical veil of spirituality or other secret knowledge.

What is the potential that you are using when you use a thought? What about a memory? Is it stored in the physical brain or is it in the collective? This book is the primer that will allow anyone to understand just these things and unless these basics are covered, people will be left in mystery.

I can build a machine that outputs more than you put into it. You may use a certain amount of potential to plant seeds in the collective to attract to you what you desire. Do you realize that what you get back is much more than what you put out? Do you realize that it is supposed to be impossible to get more out of a system than you put in but LOA clearly defies this "law" of physics? I can tell you for a fact that it doesn't defy any laws but many of the same people who believe in LOA, apply it and receive benefits may find it impossible to believe a machine can output more work that you have to put into it. That wouldn't be an authentic analysis of the situation by anyone who believes in LOA. What concept in physics freely allows more output than someone has to input? Why is nobody even making the distinction? Why are they not explaining it?

You'll find these answers in simple terms and much more...that is just a brief on a few things that you will find in the book and I'm confident you have never read any of it in any other book ever written on the subject of LOA, positive thinking and so forth.

When you have a thought...where does the potential come from to even give it motion or action? You'll learn what the potential actually is, where it is, and how it is manipulated so that it can move to cause action. And, the concepts are so simple you can share it with a child...especially with the simple analogies and diagrams that are provided.

What about a simple way to explain what gravity is to children with a model of it that is so simple and common sense you'll laugh when you read it...and you'll be wondering...why isn't this taught in school?

Anyway Jen, I hope this helps a bit.

Take care,
Aaron

p.s. I may post excerpts from the book at my own forum at EnergeticForum.com that is an excellent idea!

future pather
12-17-2007, 02:40 PM
Some examples of things I gained a new understanding from in reading Aaron's book:

Open and closed systems and why they matter

What gravity is all about

What aether is

The chapers are short but packed with good explanations.

I took one chapter at a time and it was not overwhelming or too technical. I didn't understand every single explanation 100% but even what I didn't understand 100%, I got a general sense of.

XO Jessica

Aaron
12-17-2007, 05:49 PM
Here is a little more detail about the book:
The Quantum Key (http://www.esmhome.org/library/aaron-murakami/the_quantum_key.pdf)



.

Grace
12-18-2007, 03:44 AM
I wanted to post this picture I discovered today while I happened to be thinking about your book! It was a very cool synchronicity which I could not deny!! It was very interesting, I received an email from an unknown person concerning my martial arts success', which you were asking me about just yesterday! This email and subsequent website led me to this picture! It has meaning for me, and yet I know Aaron it has meaning for you. Your book is going to be a greater success than you could have ever imagined!! I am truly grateful for your good fortune!!

http://i144.photobucket.com/albums/r194/truthpower/Whitedragon.gif

Aaron
12-18-2007, 06:04 AM
Thank you Grace,

I does mean a lot to me!! :)

I'm amazed at how many orders were placed since Friday!!

The first batch shipped today I believe. I'm very excited also to see so many international orders being placed!! I had no idea how global Energetic Forum is until I saw that... I know a lot of our friends here are from many different countries, but the interest in the book from many other places is very exciting for me.

Aaron
12-26-2007, 07:16 PM
Thanks to PESWiki (http://peswiki.com/index.php/Main_Page)(Pure Energy Systems) for listing The Quantum Key (http://www.esmhome.org/shop) in their review website! This is one of the largest if not the largest "Free Energy" site on the internet.

Reviews:Book:The Quantum Key - PESWiki (http://peswiki.com/index.php/Reviews:Book:the_quantum_key)

dannyboybell
12-28-2007, 05:49 PM
Got your book today(and I really like it by the way :) ) and I'm just halfway thru it but I have a question:

Could a mill driven by a horse going in a circle be considered an open system cause the wind can add to the input thru the "wings" on the roof?

This could be an absolutely moronic question for ppl who know stuff about this but I have no clue so I thought I'd fire away with some questions when I was gonna give praise to the book anyway.

Also(and I will re-read that chapter) are we all built from Aether or is that separate from our physical body?

Cheers

:)

Danny

Aaron
12-28-2007, 06:43 PM
Hi Danny,

That is a great question and yes, there can be systems within systems.

If there is a battery powered toy boat on a lake...the battery power part of the system is a closed loop. If the boat has a sail on it, any wind input would be part of an open system. So what is it...an open or closed system? Both. It depends on what part you're looking at or how big of a whole system do you want to see it as.

Even the closed loop battery powered motor 'may' be considered open to some degree...perhaps gravity is different in day and night (which it is)...but the downward push of the aetheric gravity push on the wire may cause the battery circuit to be stronger or weaker. Another system in a system. A closed system in a larger open system.

This concept could be nit-picked to death but it is something to think about.

At least getting the basic concept of the difference is very profound in my opinion and that is why I stressed it so much in the book. I think one of the most powerful things Tom Bearden ever taught besides all the technical details of machines, etc... is the simple concept of open vs closed systems.

I think you might see that from some of the simple analogies of open systems in the book that after reading that explanation that it is practically common sense that any opens system can easily output more than we have to put into the system. It is just that this distinction is not happily pointed out in school or about anywhere else. The closest that these concepts seem to come to the public's awareness is amongst those who are tinkering with "free energy" systems and they learn about it this way.

Anything physical is sustaining itself by its open interaction with aether in its local environment. Are we made by it or just powered by it? At the most fundamental level of what all sub-atomic "particles" are composed of, I would say that we are made of the aether.

dannyboybell
12-28-2007, 06:49 PM
"I think you might see that from some of the simple analogies of open systems in the book that after reading that explanation that it is practically common sense that any opens system can easily output more than we have to put into the system."

Yes to me it seems so obviously logical so I'm thinking it must be something I don't get or is it that simple and if so it seems ridiculous how ppl wouldn't acknowledge this in an instant?

:thinking:

Danny

Kevin
12-28-2007, 06:58 PM
"I think you might see that from some of the simple analogies of open systems in the book that after reading that explanation that it is practically common sense that any opens system can easily output more than we have to put into the system."

Yes to me it seems so obviously logical so I'm thinking it must be something I don't get or is it that simple and if so it seems ridiculous how ppl wouldn't acknowledge this in an instant?

:thinking:

Danny

Danny,

I agree with you that it is so simple once you see it. Understanding open systems was one of the most powerful things that I got from the book.

With age and experience, we learn that common sense is not so common.

Pulling electricity "out of the air" just goes against so many paradigms...it is just easier for people to reject it out of hand.

Have fun!

:)

dannyboybell
12-28-2007, 07:08 PM
"With age and experience, we learn that common sense is not so common."

I totally agree with that even though I might not have reached avatar-age to gimme any bragging rights yet ;)

Yes, "out of the air" if one believes the air is empty or that we've known exactly what's in everything and I know nothing about these things but it seems common sense to me that the "nothing" is filled with something and that that something may be used in some way :)

But it's interesting...

Danny

Aaron
12-28-2007, 07:24 PM
Hi Danny,

Yes, it is that simple....almost ridiculously simple. LOL

dannyboybell
12-28-2007, 07:26 PM
Haha, darn it feels good to be a genius :D

Danny

Athena
12-31-2007, 03:51 PM
Aaron,
:hug: I :heartbeat: the inscription you wrote in my copy! I was out-of-town, visiting relatives for Christmas when my book arrived so that's why I haven't said, "Thank you, Aaron!", until now.

Jetijs
01-07-2008, 01:46 AM
Aaron,
I just got through your book. I must say that this is money well spent. Although I knew a lot of things mentioned in the book, there still was a lot of info I did not know. I especially liked the part about gravity, inertia and propulsion, because that matches everything I read about this stuff from other sources. It is short, but loaded with interesting info, therefor it is not boring :) The book is inspiring and I think that this book is absolutely a must have for everyone who is just beginning his path in free energy field.
Thank you very much!
Jetijs
:cheers: :notworthy:

Aaron
01-07-2008, 05:15 AM
You're welcome Athena!

And Happy New Years!!!

Aaron
01-09-2008, 07:41 PM
Thanks Jetijs!

I'm happy you enjoyed the book! :thanks:

jimmy17
01-10-2008, 06:24 PM
Hi Aaron,
I am an electronic engineer with 37 years of experience in the industry. I have been studying free energy for the past 13 years.

Your book "The Quantum Key" is a great book! It is the best book (and theory) on the subject of the source of free energy that I have seen in my research. It really is a good start at a unified-field theory. I like how you tie in all those little scientific facts. I am going to have to re-read it now several times now so I can blurt out some of these theories and facts to my engineering friends.

It is also the right size and easy to read. I read the whole thing in a little over an hour.

Thanks for writing it! It takes courage to stand up to academia like that. I have lost quite a few engineering friends over my talks about free energy, UFO's, Tesla, etc.

Also, while I was reading it I kept wondering what your background is. Are you a trained physicist?

Aaron
01-12-2008, 10:36 PM
Thank you Jimmy for the comments, I'm deeply grateful!

I am not a trained physicist. My interest in these subjects started at a very young age but in a more passionate way in my early 20's. Through some profound synchronicities, one thing led to another.

I eventually met John Bedini about 7-8 years ago and since he is near my home, I have been to his shops countless times. I obsessed over building his SG type motors and obsessed over Tom Bearden's work to the best of my ability. John insisted I read Secrets of Cold War Technology - chapter 1 and also Peter's Free Energy Secrets of Cold Electricity book. That brought a lot of things together. Not too long after, I met Peter also in my neck of the woods.

I have been involved in various healing technologies before meeting John and even up to now and a lot of it ties together with the "radiant energy." Also, being involved with consciousness technologies such as PATHS, also relates to the "aether" in terms of the collective unconscious mind and how it can be worked with using technologies that relate to the "aether."

Just one thing led to another and at least to my satisfaction, I see one seamless model that ties all of them together and it really seems very simple.

It is my intention with The Quantum Key and 2 books to follow to show all of this in terms that most people can understand even if they don't have a technical background.

Aaron
02-14-2008, 07:34 AM
Hi everyone,

I'm deeply appreciative for all the support with my new book. :notworthy: The sales for the book in February are already way beyond January so word of mouth is absolutely gaining momentum. :thanks::thanks::thanks:

I had a few people ask about the shopping cart being a secure connection. The OScommerce shopping cart at Energetic Science Ministries Online Store (http://www.esmhome.org/shop) is not itself on a secure connection but upon checkout, it is directed to a secure connection with Paypal so it is very trustworthy.

You can sign up on the mailing list at http://www.thequantumkey.com if you want to receive direct updates about The Quantum Key.

As a little tidbit:

42% of the people looking at the book are in the United States
35% are International outside of the US & Canada
23% are from Canada

bmind
05-07-2008, 03:12 PM
Hi Aaron,
I would like to first thank you for the forums you maintain. I have and countinue to learn so much about magnetic fields, energy generation and back emf. I am a mechanical engineer who embraces the ability some people have to look beyond conventional theories/thinking. My goal is to better understand the nature all around us. I have just ordered your book and look forward to reading it. Perhaps one day I will be able to make my contribution to humanity, just as you, Stan, Tom, John, Peter and many others have done and continue to do so. World would be a better place if people tried to better each others life everyday.
:cheers:

Aaron
05-07-2008, 08:00 PM
Thanks Bmind,

I really appreciate you sharing that!

I feel mostly like a messenger just getting the word out about some amazing people who actually helped develop these concepts that have some serious implications.

I'm absolutely thrilled to have so many talented people in these areas contributing to Energetic Forum. All the collaboration is amazing.

Enjoy the book and thank you!

Aaron
12-06-2008, 12:59 AM
For anyone that is starting out learning about the "free energy" concepts...this book has been called a simplified Bearded book with other simple concepts woven together in a very simple model to show what the energy and potential is.

Order now: Energetic Science Ministries Online Store (http://www.esmhome.org/shop/)

http://www.whitedragonpress.com/thequantumkeycover.gif

Read what people are saying about
The Quantum Key

“I have read The Quantum Key 5 times now since I bought it in Vegas from you. It most definitely awakened/enlightened me to the power of/and truth of our being. We are consciousness. I was empowered with the chapter showing the distinction between open and closed systems. I am forever grateful for your effort and deliberate work to consciously awaken others!” - Grace Haeusler, Winner of 3 Gold, 2 Silver and 1 Bronze medals in Karate at The Wide World of Sports 2007

“...it seems you hit the nail square on its head with the The Quantum Key book. Well done, spot on.” - Joel Rault, Director of EcoCircle® Organic Farming Method

“After reading The Quantum Key I finally understand the quantum nature of our universe and our individual lives. Literally a whole new world was opened up to me that affects my understanding and quality of daily living. While the phrase "quantum physics" can be intimidating, and also esoteric in nature, I found this book to be very practical in improving my life. I wholeheartedly recommend reading this book ASAP!" - Kevin Pirolo, Originator of Pre-Paid Phone Cards in the United States

"I just got through your book. I must say that this is money well spent. Although I knew a lot of things mentioned in the book, there still was a lot of info I did not know. I especially liked the part about gravity, inertia and propulsion, because that matches everything I read about this stuff from other sources. It is short, but loaded with interesting info, therefor it is not boring. The book is inspiring and I think that this book is absolutely a must have for everyone who is just beginning his path in free energy field. Thank you very much!" - Jetijs, Engineer

"I am an electronic engineer with 37 years of experience in the industry. I have been studying free energy for the past 13 years. Your book 'The Quantum Key' is a great book! It is the best book (and theory) on the subject of the source of free energy that I have seen in my research. It really is a good start at a unified-field theory. I like how you tie in all those little scientific facts. I am going to have to re-read it now several times now so I can blurt out some of these theories and facts to my engineering friends. It is also the right size and easy to read. I read the whole thing in a little over an hour. Thanks for writing it! It takes courage to stand up to academia like that." - Jimmy Moore, Rowland Heights, CA, CEO/Explore Electronics Inc.

"Some examples of things I gained a new understanding from in reading Aaron's book: Open and closed systems and why they matter, What gravity is all about, What aether is. The chapers are short but packed with good explanations. I took one chapter at a time and it was not overwhelming or too technical. I didn't understand every single explanation 100% but even what I didn't understand 100%, I got a general sense of." - Jessica Miller, Sales & Marketing

"...to me it seems so obviously logical so I'm thinking it must be something I don't get or is it that simple and if so it seems ridiculous how people wouldn't acknowledge this in an instant?" - Danny, Musician


Order now: Energetic Science Ministries Online Store (http://www.esmhome.org/shop/)

Kingman
12-06-2008, 01:38 AM
I have the book and it is a great read with amazing insight into the free energy field! It helps to open your mind to many possibilities!

Thanks Aaron for the great effort,
Stephen

Aaron
12-06-2008, 09:08 AM
Thank you Stephen, that is greatly appreciated!! :notworthy:

Aaron
12-08-2008, 08:53 AM
I posted this in the Imhotep thread...this is a bit of what is in The Quantum Key

-----

I like the thinking Bodkins on the time differences.

The time is slower at the ground than air because the aetheric density is higher. Light moves slower there that it does away from mass.

Any mass displaces the aether from center outwards just like putting a bowling ball in a bathtub will displace the water outwards.

The aether rebounds back towards the center pushing down on anything holding it to the ground. A ball in the water has water pushing back towards where the ball is from all sides, not just from the top.

If you have a piece of wood and a piece of lead, you lift the wood, it is lighter. If both are 1 cubic foot in size..same size different weight.

The "matrix" or innerspace of the wood has more "open space" than the lead...the lead has less "open space."

If you take a net with 1 square inch mesh and swoosh it through the water, there isn't much resistance. (wood)

If you take a net with 1 square mm mesh and swoosh it through the water, there is a lot of resistance. (lead)

As the aether is rebounding back to the center of the Earth, it moves through the wood with less resistance and the lead with more resistance (more to push on). That is why the lead is heavier..lifting up against more resistance to the downward aether and the wood is lighter.

What happens to the aether when it hits the middle of the earth? You get something that looks like Lighty's avatar. I believe creation of sub atomic particles that rise to the surface...otherwise, it would just hit an equilibrium and gravity wouldn't exist since it is an active push constantly moving.

With the earth rods and batteries, there are two immediate sources of potential to add to circuits...the first one here is like what John Bedini shows on one of his Stubblefield pages:

Stubblefield (http://www.icehouse.net/john34/stubblefield.html)
http://www.icehouse.net/john34/earmagcur1.jpg
"Nathan Stubblefield used earth magnetic currents. this is not current as we know it. Electricity is a wasted product of this magnetic current."


The second is the aetheric potential that is pushing down on a material and has it's own relevant interaction with the atomic/matrix of any particular material inducing a radiant potential (gravity power).

This seems to be a bit different from creating a simple dipole, it is conducting the already existing moving potentials.

Now with time, the more dense the aether at ground, the slower time, the less dense, the faster the time.


If you wound up a rubber band powered propeller and put it in a bowl of water, it would unwind pretty quick. The ability for LIGHT to propagate in a low density aether is faster.

If you wound up a rubber band powered propeller and put it in a bowl of gelatin slightly hardening, it would unwind very very slow if at all. The ability for LIGHT to propagate in a high density aether is slower.


If you're in the low density aether area perceiving time, it would look normal to you because your perceptual apparatus (visual apparatus based on photon energy and not virtual photon energy) would be subject to the speed of light in that area...so of course would look normal.

If you're in a high density aether area perceiving time, it would look normal to you because your perceptual apparatus would be subject to the speed of light in that area...so of course would look normal.

Now with mass moving in aether, a spherical ball displaces it symmetrically and pushes down towards the center of displacement equally. There is no movement. If you took a bar of soap and squeezed down equally around it, it would just stay there.

Now squeeze it slightly offset and it will move in the direction where there is the LEAST amount of push.

Two pieces of matter can't occupy the same space..I don't believe that but that belief suits this purpose... BUT Two pieces of matter can influence the same aether between them.

If you have a gigantic ball and super small ball next to each other in outers pace...big and small enough to have real gravitation effects that can be witnesed... The small ball will move to the big one and the big might be slightly moved to the small.

What is happening is that the bigger mass dominates the space around it and has the strongest aetheric rebounding effect to it...meaning...it is REDUCING the amount of aether rebounding to THAT SIDE of the small mass. That means that small mass has ASYMMETRICAL push on it now and it will move to the direction of the LEAST push...towards the larger mass.


Anyway, all these things are perfectly predictable by a fluid aetheric model like what I put in my book for example. I don't think I have encountered anything that can't be predicted by it.


Based on this model, I was able to walk straight up to Imhotep's original oscillator, put a plug on it instead of a light and start charging caps with one wire...the model let me see how the batteries on front and back had to be just right to maintain the intake and exhaust pressures.


This all PERFECTLY applies to all these light experiments.


If anyone read this far, thanks :notworthy:

There are negative "pushes" as well.

Aaron
02-12-2009, 02:50 AM
The Quantum Key

New E-book release!


The Quantum Key has been revised and is
almost double the size of the paperback.
Also added an extra chapter dedicated to
"Aetheric Energy Machines!"

I have also created 9 video tutorials that are
over an hour and a half long combined, which
walk you through all the fundamentals that
are proposed in The Quantum Key.

Go here for details: The Quantum Key (http://www.thequantumkey.com)



.

Aaron
02-12-2009, 02:52 AM
The Quantum Key

New E-book release!


The Quantum Key has been revised and is
almost double the size of the paperback.
Also added an extra chapter dedicated to
"Aetheric Energy Machines!"

I have also created 9 video tutorials that are
over an hour and a half long combined, which
walk you through all the fundamentals that
are proposed in The Quantum Key.

Go here for details: The Quantum Key (http://www.thequantumkey.com/)

David Barclay
04-16-2009, 09:16 AM
Hi Aaron, I haven't read your book but it certainly sounds interesting.:cheers:

The most commonly accepted ideas about physics seem to be out of step with the real world...such as the idea of energy being proportional to mass regardless of the material in question.

In a very general sense energy is proportional to mass, but when you get right down to it each and every material has a different ratio of energy per unit of mass with hydrogen taking the number one spot.

So is it any wonder that water is so important to life and good health.

And in my opinion this is critical to anyone considering free energy concepts.

blackchisel97
09-30-2009, 04:02 AM
Hi Aaron,

We never met in person but since I have joined this forum, I read and learn more every time. I don't respect people according to their rank, status or position but for who they are, in terms of true human being, open minded and concerned about others. I truly believe that you're one of them, together with Peter Lindemann, John Bedini and other great minds I've never met and probably never will.
I just got your book and I look forward to begin exploring. :dance:

Thank you

:cheers:
V

Aaron
07-27-2010, 07:33 PM
Here are some teaser vids about my model...

YouTube - How Does Gravity Work? (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XG6yoEX_ZdY)
YouTube - How Does Gravity Work? Part 2 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_EhYRdE5K-Q)

And on other video sites:
how does gravity work - Google Search (http://www.google.com/search?q=how+does+gravity+work&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbs=vid%3A1&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wv)

Aaron
07-27-2010, 07:34 PM
Here are some teaser vids about my model...

YouTube - How Does Gravity Work? (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XG6yoEX_ZdY)
YouTube - How Does Gravity Work? Part 2 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_EhYRdE5K-Q)

And on other video sites:
how does gravity work - Google Search (http://www.google.com/search?q=how+does+gravity+work&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbs=vid%3A1&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wv)

ibpointless2
09-22-2010, 10:48 PM
So can I get the ebook?

Aaron
11-17-2010, 09:09 AM
I never saw this until now, but yes. You can click the link in my signature
or click the book cover in the right column of the forum.

paul_wood
11-30-2010, 11:53 AM
thanks for sharing really great work done .keep it up

rexsmith09
12-17-2010, 12:10 PM
Is this book related to spiritual quest through science? It's interesting to read the excerpts..

Aaron
12-20-2010, 05:52 PM
Rex,

It is more of a simplified unified field model based on the aether with
no math and common sense analogies. Was written more for the
metahpysical minded person that doesn't have a technical background.

A Course in Mind Power goes more into the spiritual side of things including
showing how the mind is a non-equilibrium thermodynamic system and how
it is another reflection of natural systems that operate just like the
real free energy systems.

Thanks for asking!

Littleremnant
02-24-2011, 02:37 PM
Hey Aaron,

If you had a round, flat, piece of heavy lattice material, such as lead
laying on the ground, would you have aether energy PROJECTING from
around it upwards?

Thanks

Aaron
02-24-2011, 05:50 PM
From the positive potential of the flux, I believe it would be pushing
down on the lead with a certain amount being deflected over the edge
and down instead of upwards. The positive potential is imparting a push
on the mass of the lead.

I have been told, but cannot confirm, but seems there may be some
'gravity wells' which are like an upside down bowl made of dense materials
with interesting properties that "shield" gravity - or more accurately,
deflect the downward pushing potential around it so that inside of the well,
gravity is negated or at least reduced.

Littleremnant
02-25-2011, 05:20 PM
Thanks for the reply Aaron,

I wonder then, if we could set up these gravity wells or get in close proximity
to the potential differences in the aether (flux?) created by the wells or heavy
lattice material to capture it better in the Bedini circuit or something else not
yet known? If what you say is true, then why not just put a piece of lead or
one of these bowl shapes above a Bedini machine to create an aether vortex
or GATE to collect from???? Maybe this could be proven by using a Gray tube
to see if there would be more VISABLE radiant energy available??

Thanks

Aaron
02-25-2011, 11:52 PM
I don't know if that kind of gravity well even exists. That was told
to me by someone I trust but I haven't seen it. It is more than
just having a dense element - there was a mixture supposedly.

But you can put a magnet on one side of the coil to offset the
magnetic symmetry of the coil when it pulses off and on. I showed
this long time ago but thought it was doing something else.
I think Bedini described how a magnet can maybe offset the bloch
wall for a more non linear field.

antigraviticsystems1
03-20-2011, 03:18 AM
Hi Aaron, I think that in order to rule the etheric flow of polarizing must advance to the field in order to make it work in unison, which makes next experiment is to generate a rotating electromagnetic vortex...thanks:beamup:

antigraviticsystems1
03-20-2011, 03:26 AM
Hi Aaron, I think that in order to rule the etheric flow of polarizing must advance to the field in order to make it work in unison, which makes next experiment is to generate a rotating electromagnetic vortex...thanks:beamup:

http://img197.imageshack.us/img197/6221/esquemacamporotatorio.jpg (http://img197.imageshack.us/i/esquemacamporotatorio.jpg/)

Uploaded with ImageShack.us (http://imageshack.us) http://img825.imageshack.us/img825/276/45y6bobinas.jpg (http://img825.imageshack.us/i/45y6bobinas.jpg/)

Uploaded with ImageShack.us (http://imageshack.us)

antigraviticsystems1
03-20-2011, 03:36 AM
http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/7321/cimg1662p.jpg (http://img22.imageshack.us/i/cimg1662p.jpg/)

Uploaded with ImageShack.us (http://imageshack.us)

Aaron
04-27-2011, 10:02 PM
http://www.pathstosales.com/ignitionsecrets/images/ignitionsecrets728x90.jpg (http://ignitionsecrets.com)

Aaron
12-22-2012, 09:00 PM
Yesterday, 12/21/12, the 5th Edition of The Quantum Key launched.

http://www.thequantumkey.com/images/the_quantum_key.jpg (http://thequantumkey.com)

Two new chapters added. One elaborates on the difference between
energy and potential since all the classical textbooks on this give
erroneous definitions. The other new chapter highlights a simple experiment
that demonstrates clear and simple violations of the 1st and 2nd "Laws"
of Thermodynamics. There are also violations of the 3rd Law of Motion
and the Law of Conservation of Momentum. There is no such thing as
conservation of momentum in a cyclic system that regauges itself.

The chapter on practical applications is revised with some of the
technologies removed and some added to reflect some of the more
recent developments.

The Quantum Key (http://thequantumkey.com)

Raphael37
04-14-2013, 01:30 PM
Hi Everyone,

It describes in very simple explanations and diagrams what the virtual photon potential is, mass, intertia, why gravity is a push and not a pull and what causes the push, time and other related topics.



First Aaron thank you for your efforts regarding this forum, in helping to bring the 'fringe into the fold' :thumbsup:

Secondly do you have a 'reader's digest' version of why gravity is a PUSH and not a PULL?

http://matttimms.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/pushmipullyu.jpg

It is a topic I have discussed on another forum here:
Science-Based Discussion Is Gravity still a mystery? Do you support this proof of the Millennium? - Page 6 (http://www.toequest.com/forum/general-physics/6712-gravity-still-mystery-do-you-support-proof-the-millennium-6.html#post174724)
Unified Discussion The OX TOE - Page 8 (http://www.toequest.com/forum/your-toe-theory/6578-the-ox-toe-8.html#post177052)

cheers,

Raphael37
04-14-2013, 01:39 PM
http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/7321/cimg1662p.jpg (http://img22.imageshack.us/i/cimg1662p.jpg/)

Uploaded with ImageShack.us (http://imageshack.us)

Your prototype looks similar to the one in the images I am offering below.
What I am putting on the table is a nearly perpetual motion machine,

i.e. a model of the 4.6+ billion year old SUN...

note that your model is 'symmetrical' but in the images we see below, there is clearly an asymmetry.

http://i.imgur.com/Qbe85QP.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/xYcYb.jpg

Very interesting book.
The Terracotta Warriors by Maurice Cotterell.

selah V

Aaron
04-14-2013, 07:57 PM
First Aaron thank you for your efforts regarding this forum, in helping to bring the 'fringe into the fold' :thumbsup:

Secondly do you have a 'reader's digest' version of why gravity is a PUSH and not a PULL?

http://matttimms.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/pushmipullyu.jpg

It is a topic I have discussed on another forum here:
Science-Based Discussion Is Gravity still a mystery? Do you support this proof of the Millennium? - Page 6 (http://www.toequest.com/forum/general-physics/6712-gravity-still-mystery-do-you-support-proof-the-millennium-6.html#post174724)
Unified Discussion The OX TOE - Page 8 (http://www.toequest.com/forum/your-toe-theory/6578-the-ox-toe-8.html#post177052)

cheers,

Thanks, actually yes in several places throughout this forum over the years. Just search for my username and the right keywords - something will come up.

aaksimms
09-27-2014, 12:49 AM
Elias,

I certainly believe the fundamental potentials involved in all of this are not only connected but are the same.

A lot of my understanding in the book comes from my learning and experiences working with some "free energy" technologies but it revealed to me a lot more than that.

The book is really for people on both sides of the equation... free energy "overunity" sciences as well as spiritual minded people and to those who are balanced in both.

There are some powerful distinctions that I point out that really shine some light on some "mysteries" of the universe.

One of the oldest concepts in philosophy/thinking/science, etc... is "Can a machine/system put out more energy that you have to put into it?" The answer is absolutely yes.

Anyone practicing the Laws of Attraction are going to draw to them more than they put out to the universe.

Anyone operating a machine with a COP over 1.0 is causing more work to be done than they had to pay for on the input.

How can this be possible and not violate the laws of physics?

Have more output implies that there is input into the system but it doesn't necessarily have to come from the operator...if it is an open system, it could come from any number of potential sources: consciousness/matrix, time, gravity, light, wind, water, vacuum potential, love, etc...

Equilibrium Thermodynamic vs non-Equilibrium Thermodynamic systems are only 1 distinction in the book written so that hopefully just about everyone can understand the difference and this is only one thing pointed out in the book.

Much of the book is inspired from what I learned by being friends with John Bedini for the last 7 years and Peter Lindemann for about the last few years and intensely studying Tom Bearden's writings in relation to vacuum energy potential... taking all of this and having my own intuition/logic/imagination meld them together into a model that links it all together.

Some is based on hardcore science and known accepted fact, some is hypothesis, some theory and some wild speculation but I think that anyone who reads it and sees how it all comes together will have to admit that it is a very interesting concept. I don't believe there is another book quite like it.

This is the first in a 3 part series that is my original intention. The Quantum Key is the foundation the other two build on. The next is more focused on the mind/thinking/consciousness/the thinking thing and the thinker/intention/synchronicity/a model of divination/etc... The third is more focused on the physical body. Both the second and third directly tie back to the first book as it is the foundation from what everything springs from in my opinion.
hi Aaron, nice meeting you here. i have my bedini sg replica well made and assembled but it seem not to work. the transistors get hot as i connect both terminals of the input battery(primary battery), my NE-2 bulb does not light-up but there is an induce current in the magnetic wires and the core materials(the iron welding rods). do help me out if there is something i did not do to get it started.
thanks

Aaron
09-27-2014, 02:38 AM
hi Aaron, nice meeting you here. i have my bedini sg replica well made and assembled but it seem not to work. the transistors get hot as i connect both terminals of the input battery(primary battery), my NE-2 bulb does not light-up but there is an induce current in the magnetic wires and the core materials(the iron welding rods). do help me out if there is something i did not do to get it started.
thanks

Hi, there are other threads for that but if you can post some pictures of your build with specs of your parts, how they're hooked together, etc... I'll see if I can find anything obvious.