PDA

View Full Version : "Stiffler" Cold Electricity videos...


amigo
10-13-2007, 03:45 AM
These seem to be pretty recent, week old, and interesting:

YouTube - Cold Electricity (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVSSmVg5voo)

YouTube - Cold Electricity Part 2 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlEAeqWfq5o)

YouTube - Cold Electricity Part 3 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNQmJLdjFls)

YouTube - Cold Electricity Part 4 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJvFd3pYBnM)

Jetijs
10-13-2007, 11:38 AM
Oh, this is awesome Amigo :)
It's a pity, that we can't get the circuit to investigate, because all the links to Stiffler web pages on peswiki are not working. Seems that he is on to something big and it did not seem to be too complex circuit on the video. This somehow reminds me of that jole thief.

amigo
10-13-2007, 02:30 PM
His site has been under several DDoS attacks lately, for whatever reason, though I was there last night and it worked. Should've mirrored it...duh.

No mention of that cold electricity circuit on them yet, but it was under construction so I'm sure he plans to post the circuit.

I'm going to try and hunt down some barium ferrite cores, hopefully local electronics surplus store has some. Then I'll be set to play with things since what he showed does not look complex, just a matter of figuring out the setup.

elias
10-13-2007, 05:16 PM
Hello Amigo,

I think that this person has found a way to tap this aether (cold electricity) like Tesla did very easily.
I wanted to know the difference between Barium-Ferrite and Ferrite cores. Can one tell from their color? Sorry to ask this, but I really don't know.

Thanks

amigo
10-13-2007, 07:38 PM
Hello Amigo,

I think that this person has found a way to tap this aether (cold electricity) like Tesla did very easily.
I wanted to know the difference between Barium-Ferrite and Ferrite cores. Can one tell from their color? Sorry to ask this, but I really don't know.

Thanks

BaFe is just another substance that ferromagnetic cores are made of. It is also found in permanent magnets as well, as far as I recall.

I think these cores can be found in the old AM portable radios, so salvaging them from there is an easiest way to procure some.

amigo
10-13-2007, 07:50 PM
By the way he has posted his basic circuit now, it's at Stiffler Scientific (http://www.stifflerscientific.com/)

elias
10-13-2007, 09:38 PM
They are badly attacking his site. Pray God for not attacking him self. :notworthy:
Someone is certainly very upset with his disclosure.
His site cannot be accessed right now.
But some information is posted here:
Selfrunning cold electricity circuit from Dr.Stiffler (http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3457.msg54349/topicseen.html#msg54349)

Take care ...

amigo
10-14-2007, 04:01 AM
Someone said on the overunity.com forum in the "Stiffler" thread that this is nothing special, a one wire transmission that's already known and described in some other tests on the same forum.

So why is this guy's site being bombarded then if this is not a "big deal"?!

Jetijs
10-14-2007, 11:14 AM
By the way he has posted his basic circuit now, it's at Stiffler Scientific (http://www.stifflerscientific.com/)
The page works now, but you must be a registered user to access these selections about cold electricity and the registration selection is currently turned off. :(

amigo
10-14-2007, 02:36 PM
The page works now, but you must be a registered user to access these selections about cold electricity and the registration selection is currently turned off. :(

His site registration is back on, but you can also check the link elias posted to the overunity.com forum where the circuit and photos have also been posted.

elias
10-15-2007, 07:16 PM
Well,

It seems that the material offered on his website has different claims than the videos he had on youtube! :thinking:

This is a quote from his website:
"Now for OU or Over Unity, well again in my opinion this idea is in error. If you think you are getting something for nothing then you have not looked back far enough in the chain of events leading up to the specific observational point in time. Simply stated in a Law derived by Newton, 'For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction'. This most certainly applies to potential energies of all forms, current and hypothetical. Conversion of energy into a kinetic form does indeed ripple in effect both forward and backward in time."

He clearly stated in the videos that he was getting overunity results and demonstrated it. But what HAPPENED? Was he threatened or what?

Elias

amigo
10-15-2007, 11:02 PM
Maybe he shouldn't have stated anything in the videos. That way people could've figured out on their own if there was anything there. :)

Then again nobody would have looked at it if there were no fantastic claims. I still have to check other forums to see if anyone has replicated this yet...

Jetijs
10-15-2007, 11:28 PM
As far as I know, John Bedini also does not believe in the term of OU, because OU is when you can put something in and get far more of the same energy out from nothing. But here we are extracting energy from environment or aether that is already there, we are simply converting that energy into usable energy. Like when you put a water turbine into a river and convert the mechanical energy of moving water into usable electricity. Or when you operate a heatpump. In this case we are simply taping the sea of energy that is already there, but is not recognized by most of scientists. You can get more energy out than you put in, but you are not creating any energy, just converting from other forms. That's I believe is why he states that OU is impossible. :rolleyes:

amigo
10-15-2007, 11:57 PM
I have never really been concerned about OU to be honest, and I do not understand all that fuss that people are going through charging and discharging batteries to prove they got something more than they put in.

My concern, or what I care for, is to devise a source of power that is not based on current orthodox methods (solar, water turbine, coal, nuclear, wind) that is portable and without any moving parts (so no spinning rotors and other stuff moving around - except nano-particles, I'll settle for that).

Ultimately it should be a black box with a plug on it that you simply connect to and it's done, you got power. To a common person, and in a big picture, anything but the black box is totally irrelevant.
It only matters to those of us who are investigating these methods because we are willing to try something new regardless of its usefulness and are willing to accept based on experimental evidence that numbers show some kind of gain from charging/dis-charging batteries over and over. :)

amigo
10-16-2007, 11:43 PM
Has anyone replicated this (haven't checked other forums yet). I think I got all the parts, got the barium-ferrite core with the coil wound and have the other parts.

Sadly I don't have a signal generator (shame on me I know, got all the parts here for one with MAX038 but haven't put it together) so I wonder if I can just use a 555 at 1-10KHz for a signal instead?

Jetijs
10-16-2007, 11:53 PM
Amigo, why don't you simply try the 555 out? I think that the 555 should handle the 10kHz range. BTW here's a simple tutorial for 555 circuits:
LM555 Timer Circuits (http://home.cogeco.ca/~rpaisley4/LM555.html)
:cheers:

amigo
10-17-2007, 12:33 AM
Thanks, I already had a 10KHz 555 built but wasn't sure whether that would be an adequate drive or not. Doesn't hurt to try either way, right? :)

Aaron
10-17-2007, 03:55 AM
The distinction is that there is not overunity, which is an oxymoron.
You can't have "more than everything" basically.

The difference is to know the difference between efficiency and COP.

Efficiency is total in vs. total out. It will always be 100% or under in an open or closed system...doesn't matter. BOTH systems contribute to entropy overall.

COP is OPERATOR input vs. total out. Total out CAN be more than operator input, which does NOT include environmental input that the operator didn't pay for so a system CAN have over 1.0 COP.

Ewhaz
10-17-2007, 07:19 AM
Has anyone replicated this (haven't checked other forums yet). I think I got all the parts, got the barium-ferrite core with the coil wound and have the other parts.

Sadly I don't have a signal generator (shame on me I know, got all the parts here for one with MAX038 but haven't put it together) so I wonder if I can just use a 555 at 1-10KHz for a signal instead?


Why not use this program, it has a signal generator through the sound card.

Visual Analyser
http://www.sillanumsoft.com/

amigo
10-18-2007, 12:32 AM
I have tried replicating this circuit and I believe I have everything right but I am getting nothing. I feed a 10KHz signal from a 555 and at the end from a square wave it sort of starts looking like a fully rectified sine wave, but nothing else happens.

I'm starting to wonder what else is there to be done since the circuit is so simple...

amigo
10-18-2007, 12:40 AM
Visual Analyser
http://www.sillanumsoft.com/

Thanks for the link, though I'm always skeptical about using the sound card as a source because the sound is built into my computer - if I fry it I'd have to buy a whole new machine...

Jetijs
10-18-2007, 12:57 AM
amigo, maybe you did not get the resonant frequency. In the video you can see that even touching one of the leads, the light went dimmer, because the impedance changed. Also did Stifler not say something about self resonance? Isn't the circuit supposed to self resonate to achieve the goal? Like in the jole thief circuit?
BTW, I am not an expert, I do not know :embarrassed:
:thinking:

amigo
10-18-2007, 03:13 AM
I'm not an expert either but he did not spill all the beans which is kinda irritating me. If he expects people to take his videos seriously then he does need to dish out all the way and describe exact replication and parameters of his setup that everyone can verify.

amigo
10-19-2007, 01:05 AM
Doc has posted two more videos:

YouTube - Cold Electricity Part 6 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S6shraRAYCw)

YouTube - Cold Electricity Part 7 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdJm9QCVJHY)

Last one is particularly interesting since he's driving the circuit from the ground only...

Karl_Palsness
10-30-2007, 03:43 AM
His 7th Video is really interesting; His webpage is also posting the plans for the circuit. What I found interesting is the way the Diodes are wired up! This defies logic…and I love it.

amigo
10-30-2007, 10:44 PM
I have been partially successful in replicating his experiment. Partially because I do not have a good function generator (yet) and also because I do not have a decent LCR meter. (I know that's two for two, someone slap me behind the neck) :)

Doc has posted video #8 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jn8u8EIJ8Gk) and it's only getting better and better...

There's a long thread on overunity.com about this so that's where I'm partaking in this, and so is the doc.

amigo
10-31-2007, 11:32 PM
Doc has a new video up (#9) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2QjJWn-bzE) this one with a kind of Haiku on the subject, pretty cool :)

Everything else seems to be getting better and better, too bad some people @overunity.com are bombing the thread over there on this subject...

Jetijs
10-31-2007, 11:40 PM
Nice video, that guy has a sense of humor :D
Amigo, how far are you with your experiments?

amigo
10-31-2007, 11:47 PM
I have been able to somewhat replicate the basic circuit but have ran into a snag because I do not have a decent signal generator. I have built one with MAX038 but it is nothing close to what I feel is needed so I get oscillations and stuff all over the place :)

I also do not have a real LCR meter so could not wind my L1 to 1.1uH which is another impediment. Online air coil calculators aren't working for me because I do not get the needed effect after winding the coil in that way.

Never the less, there is definitely something with this claim and couple of other people have been replicating it with more or less success. I think biggest problem is people do not follow the rules set by the claim, they jump into changing things around, for whatever reason, or throw accusations without even attempting to replicate the experiment as stated.

Karl_Palsness
01-29-2008, 05:30 AM
I had not been back to stiffler scientific in some time and was very surprised to find he has done a lot of new work. Have not seen anyone talking about him either so I thought I would let you all know…unless I have messed something…lol

Stiffler Scientific (http://www.stifflerscientific.com/)

Scroll down to Project Video's

And have some fun…

Karl

amigo
01-30-2008, 12:11 AM
I am still with him in the thread on the other forum and indeed he has made interesting developments. I will be trying to replicate the latest findings as well, just that lack of the experience and knowledge he has really bugs me. :)

Solace
02-05-2008, 02:05 AM
Does he have any new video's?

All the other video links are dead now.

Thanks,

S.

amigo
02-06-2008, 02:23 AM
The last one I have is 9.75...