View Single Post
 
Old 02-04-2010, 05:52 PM
witsend witsend is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,881
In conclusion.

Therefore there is no material difference between the results that Glen has obtained and my own. It is varied - but that is due to the resistor. All this time arguing would have been better spent finding out how much inductance is required to actually improve the results.

I have already argued that if Glen is anxious to disclaim a replication he would not be well served to produce COP> 17. His argument would fail. But in the light of this, then his impartiality as an experimenter also fails. He would no longer be well served to find that value.

My final point is this. My negative wave form relates not to the voltage across the resistor. I only referenced that my negative waveform across the shunt was greater. Obviously. It explains the improved performance of my results.
__________________