It appears that your believes have a foundation of stone and not sand. However, weather you are correct or not in your deciphering, It will not be you who receives the glory. Because if it is as you say and your motive is so pure you would not make claim to gift something that doesn't belong to you in the first place. Despite all this, I'll trust that your intent is honorable and thank you for your service. I wish more service members understood the meaning and importance of the oath they made. It is scary to think that such a powerfully group of people don't know what master they swore to serve. A few things that lend credibility to your claim.

1) Volume dose not determine energy yield.
This has been shown by many and I have measured it first hand over the years.

2) Water can be made to "burn" with a little help.
This has been shown by many. I'm sure of this after reproducing the "Water Sparkplug" Your theory could be similar to what is seen in that thread. As it has been suggested that Ionized air is playing a role in that effect.

3) You are saying exactly what Stan said in his patents on other docs.


A few questions if you have the time.

Is it the Ionized Oxygen (GP), the VIC that could be used to Ionize Oxygen (VIC running GP) or the gas moving through a specific shape of the surface area of the injector or alternate fuel distribution system (How can voltage preform work? How can a magnet preform work? How can an atom preform work?) that is the "Magic" behind your theory?

Oxygen, and water for that mater reflect blue light so I would surmise that a red LED would be a good place to start. What do you think? White is almost certainly what Stan used. Wouldn't using white be a safe way to go? It would rule out the LEDs as the source for the entire system failing.


Gauss
Regardless of who is correct. You are the one who looks like the MIB by going into someones thread and tirelessly trying to kill the idea. Put that effort into creating results to prove your theory.